What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Is David Patten putting anybody on the bench for you? (1 Viewer)

Unless you're in a dyno and weak at WR, are in a very deep league, own Steve Smith, or have a WR injured Patten should not be in your starting lineup.

 
Unless you're in a dyno and weak at WR, are in a very deep league, own Steve Smith, or have a WR injured Patten should not be in your starting lineup.
Yes, because who wants the #1 target for the NFL's #1 passing offense in their lineup?
I wouldn't be so sure they'll pass as much without Colston, Springs being active or inactive may dictate how much NO passes this week.
 
Unless you're in a dyno and weak at WR, are in a very deep league, own Steve Smith, or have a WR injured Patten should not be in your starting lineup.
Yes, because who wants the #1 target for the NFL's #1 passing offense in their lineup?
I wouldn't be so sure they'll pass as much without Colston, Springs being active or inactive may dictate how much NO passes this week.
Yes, I'm sure that instead they'll rely on their oh-so-potent running game.
 
Unless you're in a dyno and weak at WR, are in a very deep league, own Steve Smith, or have a WR injured Patten should not be in your starting lineup.
Yes, because who wants the #1 target for the NFL's #1 passing offense in their lineup?
I wouldn't be so sure they'll pass as much without Colston, Springs being active or inactive may dictate how much NO passes this week.
Springs is active and is at/near 100%. He practiced all week.
 
Unless you're in a dyno and weak at WR, are in a very deep league, own Steve Smith, or have a WR injured Patten should not be in your starting lineup.
Right, with Colston out he's a terrible play in an offense that anemic. :rolleyes:
Did I say he was a terrible play? I'm just saying benching one of your studs for him is a bad move imho.
 
Unless you're in a dyno and weak at WR, are in a very deep league, own Steve Smith, or have a WR injured Patten should not be in your starting lineup.
Yes, because who wants the #1 target for the NFL's #1 passing offense in their lineup?
I wouldn't be so sure they'll pass as much without Colston, Springs being active or inactive may dictate how much NO passes this week.
Yes, I'm sure that instead they'll rely on their oh-so-potent running game.
Excuse me for thinking a bit outside of the box, I'll revert back to 'groupthink' just to make you happy. K?
 
Unless you're in a dyno and weak at WR, are in a very deep league, own Steve Smith, or have a WR injured Patten should not be in your starting lineup.
Yes, because who wants the #1 target for the NFL's #1 passing offense in their lineup?
I wouldn't be so sure they'll pass as much without Colston, Springs being active or inactive may dictate how much NO passes this week.
Yes, I'm sure that instead they'll rely on their oh-so-potent running game.
Excuse me for thinking a bit outside of the box, I'll revert back to 'groupthink' just to make you happy. K?
In my 12-tem league that starts 3 WR's, I have Patten in over Berrian and Derrick Mason (bye week). I had him over Mason even before Ike forced a bye.
 
With Steve Smith still on suspension, I was gonna use Ray Rice as flex, but picked up Patton and planned to start him over Rice, even before the rescheduled game.

 
Unless you're in a dyno and weak at WR, are in a very deep league, own Steve Smith, or have a WR injured Patten should not be in your starting lineup.
Yes, because who wants the #1 target for the NFL's #1 passing offense in their lineup?
I wouldn't be so sure they'll pass as much without Colston, Springs being active or inactive may dictate how much NO passes this week.
Yes, I'm sure that instead they'll rely on their oh-so-potent running game.
Excuse me for thinking a bit outside of the box, I'll revert back to 'groupthink' just to make you happy. K?
Look, it's not a matter of "don't think outside the box" but to come into the thread and say, categorically, that most people should not have Patten in their lineup when he's the #1 receiver today on the Saints seems shortsighted an silly, especially when you give no reasons for that in the post.And then to say they'll pass less, well.... I don't know how much Saints football you've watched the past few years, but the offense goes through Brees. Period. Frankly, I hope they do run more, because I think they need to to win. But I find it highly unlikely that they'll run so much more as to affect the passing game heavily.
 
Unless you're in a dyno and weak at WR, are in a very deep league, own Steve Smith, or have a WR injured Patten should not be in your starting lineup.
Yes, because who wants the #1 target for the NFL's #1 passing offense in their lineup?
I wouldn't be so sure they'll pass as much without Colston, Springs being active or inactive may dictate how much NO passes this week.
Yes, I'm sure that instead they'll rely on their oh-so-potent running game.
Excuse me for thinking a bit outside of the box, I'll revert back to 'groupthink' just to make you happy. K?
Look, it's not a matter of "don't think outside the box" but to come into the thread and say, categorically, that most people should not have Patten in their lineup when he's the #1 receiver today on the Saints seems shortsighted an silly, especially when you give no reasons for that in the post.
I think Bush, Shockey, and Pierre will see an increased workload. Patten may be the #1 WR but I think he's option #4 in that offense today, and Springs is a much better CB than Patten is WR.Benching a Santonio Holmes, Dwayne Bowe, or Braylon Edwards for the #1 Saints WR that's not Colston seems short sighted to me.
 
I thought I would be starting Holt and Andre Johnson this week and a couple of weeks ago I would be confident in this stud WR lineup.

As of now have two waiver wire WRs in Matt Jones and David Patten going today.

I think I'm going to be sick. :D

 
shortsighted in normal weather conditions but with rain and 30 mph winds it will be hard to pass/catch. Braylon has a hard time catching in normal weather

 
shortsighted in normal weather conditions but with rain and 30 mph winds it will be hard to pass/catch. Braylon has a hard time catching in normal weather
He has a hard time catching normal passes, the circus ones he's $$$ on. Yea, I know, doesn't make any sense. Any other WR may be negatively impacted by the inclement weather but it wouldn't surprise me if Braylon's fine. :D :lmao:
 
Manage your own team how you see fit, but I wouldn't bench Bowe, Holt Holmes, or Edwards to start Patten. Those all seem like overreactions to one week or over-thinking the weather situation. I don't think I'd bench R. White either.

Patten makes an intriguing sleeper if you have guys like Colston, Smith, A. Johnson. I'm forced to start him in one league and I'd be happy with 5/50...anything after that is gravy.

 
I thought I would be starting Holt and Andre Johnson this week and a couple of weeks ago I would be confident in this stud WR lineup.

As of now have two waiver wire WRs in Matt Jones and David Patten going today.

I think I'm going to be sick. :X
Haha. I'm in same boat. I drafted Colston, A. Johnson and Roy Williams. If someone told me on a few days ago that M. Jones and Patten were starting for me this week I would have been blown away.
 
I was debating over starting Chambers, VJax or Patten as my 3rd receiver. I think that I am going to roll the dice with Patten. I already have Gates at TE... and I don't think that I want two SD receivers going in against Denver.

 
starting him over kevin smith in a ppr league. sometimes I like to gamble with the flex..

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Benched Lav Coles for David Patten.

I think the NE defense will have something up their sleeves (what sleeves?) today for the Jets. The Hoodie will want to let the NFL world know that the Pats are still the team to beat. That and I don't want to risk a 0 and Lav plays the late game.

 
What the heck happened to Patten yesterday? I didn't watch the whole game, but I flicked over to it and I didn't even see him on the field. Skimmed thru the game and injury thread and didn't see his name. Anyone who watched have any input?

 
What the heck happened to Patten yesterday? I didn't watch the whole game, but I flicked over to it and I didn't even see him on the field. Skimmed thru the game and injury thread and didn't see his name. Anyone who watched have any input?
Champ Bailey was on him and Patten's not that good.
 
For much of the second half, he didn't even look to be in the game.
That's what I noticed to. He wasn't hurt or anything. When I did see him on a few snaps in the game Bailey was not on him.
Played him, and it was fugly. One NFLN clip showed coach Payton yelling @ Patten, so maybe he screwed something up and earned some bench time. Also seemed like L Moore was targeted early and often - catching about everything thrown in his direction.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top