Bob Magaw
Footballguy
... taken from a question i posted in the top 10 dynasty rookies thread that i thought deserved a separate thread... i have a question for the naysayers... how does bush, in any of his physical traits & attributes or skill set... differ from marshall faulk, in any substantive & important respects?they have similar size...faulk 5'10" 210bush 5'11" 205 (could presumably add 5 lbs without catastrophic loss of speed)faulk was EXTREMELY fast... new orleans prep legend & one of fastest skill position players in nation at SDSUbush was one of fastest sprinters in state of CAfaulk had probably the best hands for a RB i have ever seen in the NFL... its possible he could have been a pro bowl WR if rams had asked/needed him to be.bush has the best & most developed hands for a RB i have ever seen at the college level... he has been splitting out wide, running downfield routes (& excelling at it) since he was a freshman.both have (or had in faulks case for some attributes) superior vision, instincts, cutting ability, burst, explosiveness, elusiveness, ability & creativity to string moves together.both flash deceptive power, routinely run through arm tackles & break tackles.so again, for the doubters, if bush ISN'T faulk... WHY? where & how do they differ?and if he IS faulk... than of course he can be a franchise RB... faulk has already proven that... not only could somebody with his constellation of physical attributes & skill set PLAY... but played well enough to be a first ballot HOFer.