What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Is it better to go 18-1.. (1 Viewer)

18-1 by a very very wide margin
As large as the gap between 18-1 and 19-0?
you can go 18-1 and win the Super Bowl.
But in this case, no. So, I suggest that the gap between 1-15 and 18-1 (where the patriots are) is not as big as the gap between the Pats 18-1 and what 19-0 would have been.Basically, from the worst team in the league to league runner up. Or league runner up compared to utterly immortal talked about as greatest team ever and biggest single season accomplishment ever.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
18 and 1 ouch!!!!!! Sorry Pat fans, that has got to sting. :shrug: The only NFL team that I can think of with a more painful story is the Buffalo Bills who went to the Bowl 4 times in a row and came away with 4 big L's. That (the Bills) was a long contracted chronic scar tissue buildup. This (the Pats 2008) is a more acute blow to the crotch. Hats off to the Giants. That was an incredible football performance. Among the best superbowls ever.

 
18-1 this way sucks, BAD! It hurts and will continue to hurt for a while. But, once the disappointment begins to wear off, you still have a very good team that should be back in the hunt next year.

1-15, and you have very little hope of being good anytime soon. The #1 pick isn't really that much of a consolation.

I'll deal with the short term hurt and disappointment, because coming out the other side will be another chance.

 
also, having the #1 overall pick is highly overrated considering the money it costs to sign them and the fact that many fail to become superstars.

 
I'd much rather be 18-1 with an AFC East and AFC conference title as well as knocking off Indy in Indy, beating the Steelers pretty easily and ending San Diego's season for a second year in a row than sucking. Any legit Patriot fan knows what it's like to root for a horrible team that no one cares about that ends up with the #1 pick. We've been there...more than once. While yesterday lose is beyond painful I'd much rather be in that situation than being irrelevant and hoping Kenneth Sims is the savior.

 
18-1 by a very very wide margin
As large as the gap between 18-1 and 19-0?
you can go 18-1 and win the Super Bowl.
But in this case, no. So, I suggest that the gap between 1-15 and 18-1 (where the patriots are) is not as big as the gap between the Pats 18-1 and what 19-0 would have been.Basically, from the worst team in the league to league runner up. Or league runner up compared to utterly immortal talked about as greatest team ever and biggest single season accomplishment ever.
Spoken like someone who has never had season tickets to a team who ended up with the first pick in the draft.
 
Is it better to cheat your way to 18-1? Or to lose 15 games and not cheat?Maybe you should include ethics into the answer
i dont know...cowboys won 3 superbowls cheatingbilicheat cheated when he was the cordinator for the giant superbowlso all those super bowls should go to the other team
 
or to go 1-15....and have the #1 pick in th draft? :thumbup:
Well to go 18-1 and lost by 3 in the SB and getting the #6 or #7 pick is far better from my view. If you're 1-15 and getting the #1, you have far more issues than a #1 pick is going to solve. You do get better players each round, but coming up from 1-15 is a process, not a one year deal. That said, the ordering of the draft is what makes the Pats and Colts run all that more impressive. They've been picking late for years, and yet are two of the best teams in the league, year after year. Nobody else comes close in the FA era. I guess what I'm saying, the draft order helps bad teams get better, but doesn't necessarilly make the best managed teams worse.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top