I think this is the most persuasive argument IMO. There was very sketchy evidence against Shoeless Joe and based on his performance in the 1919 WS, even if he did take money he wasn't throwing games. Considering the time, the fact that owners really owned the men then and what they made to play...I don't even blame those guys for taking the money. Pete Rose had money, fame, made a great living off the game adn was gonna make money off the game the rest of his life. Betting on baseball while he was in the game was selfish, was the opposite of honorable and leaves a bad taste in anyone's mouth who ever loved the game. I have no sympathy for him, I hope he dies on the outside of Cooperstown.