Statcruncher
Footballguy
Evidence links cholesterol-reducing interventions with increased risk of dying from accidents, suicide and violence by Dr. John Briffa. Here's a snippet:
Statins generated roughly $26 billion dollars in sales last year.Studies have linked low levels of cholesterol with worse outcomes in certain, specific aspects of health. There has been, for instance, previous evidence linking cholesterol-reducing interventions with deaths due to accidents, suicide and violence (e.g. murder).
Recently, I came across a British Medical Journal study dating from 1990 that made for interesting reading [1]. This study aggregated the results of 6 cholesterol-lowering trials in people without a prior history of cardiovascular disease (e.g. heart attack or stroke).
The individual interventions were either a drug or dietary change. Each trial was well-conducted, and had a comparison group which was not exposed to the intervention. Overall, the intervention groups in whom cholesterol levels were reduced were:
The increased risk of death due to cancer seemed to be due to the findings of one specific trial, in which individuals were treated with the fibrate drug clofibrate. If this trial was removed from the analysis, the risk of death from cancer was not significantly raised.
- At no reduced risk of death overall
- At no reduced risk of death due to heart disease
- At a significantly increased risk (43 per cent) of death due to cancer
- At a significantly increased risk (76 per cent) of death due to accidents, suicide and violence
However, the increased risk of death from accidents, suicide and violence was a consistent finding, and it held true even when the researchers split their analysis into studies of diet-alone or drug therapy-alone interventions. In other words, dietary intervention to lower cholesterol increased the risk accidents, suicide and violence, and so did medication.
Last edited by a moderator: