switz
Footballguy
Didnt the Colts have another running back that was pretty good as well? What was his name, Cliff or something?Manning only had Faulk and Addai (starting) for one yearBrady only had Moss for one year

Didnt the Colts have another running back that was pretty good as well? What was his name, Cliff or something?Manning only had Faulk and Addai (starting) for one yearBrady only had Moss for one year
Manning still outperformed Brady's "early years" this year.BTW, Troy Brown made the Pro Bowl, right? Corey Dillon did too, right? Woody?So Brady's best season prior to now came with a Pro Bowl WR, RB, and C.Funny, Manning this year had a Pro Bowl WR, RB, and C, and outperformed Brady's previously best season.I honestly hate this talent argument. The difference in talent between NFL players is miniscule. We are talking about the best of the best football players in the world, no matter what team (except maybe the RaidersThis idea that you can compare the talent of this years Colts with Brady's early years is absurd. I dont care who you are- Wayne/Addai doesnt compare with David Patton/Antowain Smith. Anybody who can throw 28 touchdowns to Troy Brown, Deon Branch, and David Patton is pretty damned amazing. Those guys are underrated, yes, but in the sense that they arent respected for what they did with a moderate level of talent. But there isnt a GM in the league that would think twice about choosing between Reggie Wayne over any WR Brady ever completed a pass to before this season. Thats not even worth arguing over. Manning loses ONE of his pro-bowl WRs and his defenders are acting like he's QBing the Dolphins all the sudden. Please.
Elway & Montana probably would have won more games. Marino would not have.by the time his career is over, he may have 5+ Super Bowl wins and it would be tough to argue that he isn't the best ever.but, at this point, I think he just had his first All Pro season. too early to anoint him as the best of all time given all the great QBs we've seen in recent years. if you put guys like Montana, Elway, Marino, etc. in New England during the Brady era, how do you think they would have done?
He should. He's a 10 year veteran with Reggie Wayne and Joseph Addai on his team. If he DIDNT outperform a 2nd year Brady with the cast he had it would be astonishing.Manning still outperformed Brady's "early years" this year.BTW, Troy Brown made the Pro Bowl, right? Corey Dillon did too, right? Woody?
What?! To say its not is what is ridiculous. Is there some reason the Dolphins were 1-15 this year? I mean, according to Switz Cleo Lemon had just as much talent as Tom Brady to work with...Again- nobody is going to mistake Troy Brown in his prime for Reggie Wayne in his prime. I love Troy Brown, classic overachiever. Heart as big as a lion. But Reggie Wayne is simply a much more gifted WR, and I have a distinct feeling that in the late hours of the night after a couple of bourbons and some honesty, Switz wouldnt pick Brown over Wayne either if he was building a team. No shame there- nobody in their right mind would.To say one player was on a team with less talent is really ridiculous.
Except I'm not talking about his 2nd seasonHe should. He's a 10 year veteran with Reggie Wayne and Joseph Addai on his team. If he DIDNT outperform a 2nd year Brady with the cast he had it would be astonishing.Manning still outperformed Brady's "early years" this year.BTW, Troy Brown made the Pro Bowl, right? Corey Dillon did too, right? Woody?
Again, your reading comprehension is down. The talent difference in the NFL really is miniscule. When averaged out, most teams have about equal talent.Coaching makes a huge difference.As for Wayne/Brown. They are totally different types of WRs. Brown is a slot style WR, where Wayne is an outside WR. So depending on your team needs, your choice may differ. Brown also could play STs, where Wayne doesn't. Brown has far better hands than Wayne. There are many areas where Brown is a better WR than Wayne. It's a shame you can't appreciate that.Most people would probably argue that Dillon was a better RB than Addai is as well.What?! To say its not is what is ridiculous. Is there some reason the Dolphins were 1-15 this year? I mean, according to Switz Cleo Lemon had just as much talent as Tom Brady to work with...Again- nobody is going to mistake Troy Brown in his prime for Reggie Wayne in his prime. I love Troy Brown, classic overachiever. Heart as big as a lion. But Reggie Wayne is simply a much more gifted WR, and I have a distinct feeling that in the late hours of the night after a couple of bourbons and some honesty, Switz wouldnt pick Brown over Wayne either if he was building a team. No shame there- nobody in their right mind would.To say one player was on a team with less talent is really ridiculous.
You're making irrelevant arguments again. Special teams numbers don't count towards the QB's passing numbers. A slot receiver's numbers will not contribute as much towards the QB's yards or TDs as an outside WR. Wayne this year is simply a better option than Brown ever was when it comes to the numbers that they will help their QB put up. Similarly, Dillon's receiving numbers were always low. Addai's, James', and Faulks' have all been much higher. Saying that Dillon is a better RB than Addai is only relevant if you feel that Dillon helped open up the passing game for Brady as much as Addai/James/Faulk, Clark/Pollard, Harrison/Wayne/Stokley/Gonzalez, and Glenn/Saturday/etc. have over the years. I don't understand your unwillingness to concede that Manning clearly had a massive advantage in surrounding offensive talent . It's almost like you know that there are very few arguments left for saying that Manning is the better QB, so you're hanging on to even the most absurd of them.As for Wayne/Brown. They are totally different types of WRs. Brown is a slot style WR, where Wayne is an outside WR. So depending on your team needs, your choice may differ. Brown also could play STs, where Wayne doesn't. Brown has far better hands than Wayne. There are many areas where Brown is a better WR than Wayne. It's a shame you can't appreciate that.Most people would probably argue that Dillon was a better RB than Addai is as well.
Right. As soon as Brady had anything resembling the offensive talent Manning had, he put up better numbers than Manning ever did. Even if you assume that Moss and co. are better than Harrison and co., which I know you do, the fact that this is their first year together, as opposed to Manning's offensive teammates who have stayed together for their entire careers, makes this accomplishment even more impressive. If you're talking about Manning's accomplishments this year, with only the pro bowl running back, TE and WR1, but without the hall of fame WR and pro bowl LT that he usually has, then you still have to concede that the offensive talent surrounding Manning this year is better than anything Brady had in prior years.And yet there is this year...The thing is, Brady put up impressive numbers without anyone to throw to. Manning's never had anything short of a Pro Bowler and/or Hall of Famer at WR, a Pro Bowl TE, and a Pro Bowl running back. Prior to this season, Troy Brown is the only receiver who has ever had 1000 yards for Brady - or on any other team, for that matter.
why would a win this year put him so clearly ahead of Montana?If the Pats win this year...the argument is over. OVER. Every single argument for somebody other than Brady will have to start with some sort of hypothetical. "Well...IF QB X had this..." or "IF Brady didn't..." or something like that. Brady has 1 thing left to do to put himself on the top. That's it.
You're making irrelevant arguments again.As for Wayne/Brown. They are totally different types of WRs. Brown is a slot style WR, where Wayne is an outside WR. So depending on your team needs, your choice may differ. Brown also could play STs, where Wayne doesn't. Brown has far better hands than Wayne. There are many areas where Brown is a better WR than Wayne. It's a shame you can't appreciate that.Most people would probably argue that Dillon was a better RB than Addai is as well.
Really? Tell that to Wes Welker.Special teams numbers don't count towards the QB's passing numbers. A slot receiver's numbers will not contribute as much towards the QB's yards or TDs as an outside WR. Wayne this year is simply a better option than Brown ever was when it comes to the numbers that they will help their QB put up.
And you say my argument is irrelevant? You want to compare Dillon to what 11 players? How about comparing Dillon to his counterpart on the Colts, which this year was Addai. Or did Dillon play in a vacuum, and Woody and Brown weren't on the team?In '04 Brady had Dillon/KFaulk/Branch/Patton/Brown/Graham/Fauria/Woody which is pretty comparable to what Peyton had this year. Now the argument is that Manning has always had better talent, yet this year he still outperformed Brady's '04 season.My point is if you are going to use the "talent argument" then you also have to say after this year, when Manning had talent comparable to some other years of Brady, that he was better. And that the talent argument can't hold water anymore.Similarly, Dillon's receiving numbers were always low. Addai's, James', and Faulks' have all been much higher. Saying that Dillon is a better RB than Addai is only relevant if you feel that Dillon helped open up the passing game for Brady as much as Addai/James/Faulk, Clark/Pollard, Harrison/Wayne/Stokley/Gonzalez, and Glenn/Saturday/etc. have over the years.
Really? I think there are quite a few arguments for Manning being a better QB.I don't understand your unwillingness to concede that Manning clearly had a massive advantage in surrounding offensive talent . It's almost like you know that there are very few arguments left for saying that Manning is the better QB, so you're hanging on to even the most absurd of them.
You act like it's a question whether Brady's cast at WR this year is better than anything Manning ever had. Yes it is impressive that Brady could do this their first year together, but one of the things Brady's always been good at is using interchangeable components, to his credit.Still, Manning threw 49 TDs in 13.5 games with his cast, and Brady threw 48 in 15 with arguable the best WR to play the game ever. And Manning by attempt was on pace for 57, compared to Brady's 50. I guess one would never know, since Manning wasn't chasing the record, he was just playing.Right. As soon as Brady had anything resembling the offensive talent Manning had, he put up better numbers than Manning ever did. Even if you assume that Moss and co. are better than Harrison and co., which I know you do, the fact that this is their first year together, as opposed to Manning's offensive teammates who have stayed together for their entire careers, makes this accomplishment even more impressive.And yet there is this year...The thing is, Brady put up impressive numbers without anyone to throw to. Manning's never had anything short of a Pro Bowler and/or Hall of Famer at WR, a Pro Bowl TE, and a Pro Bowl running back. Prior to this season, Troy Brown is the only receiver who has ever had 1000 yards for Brady - or on any other team, for that matter.
But my point is I don't think that's so. In 2004, Brady had a very very comparable cast to what Manning had this season, especially considering Manning was playing with a rookie LT, an injured RB, and a rookie #2 WR. The fact Manning could do what he did this year with his cast has to be a testament to what kind of QB he is. And yes, his season this year WAS better than Brady's '04.If you're talking about Manning's accomplishments this year, with only the pro bowl running back, TE and WR1, but without the hall of fame WR and pro bowl LT that he usually has, then you still have to concede that the offensive talent surrounding Manning this year is better than anything Brady had in prior years.
How many of Wes Welker's return yards are part of Tom Brady's passing yards this year? Is it:A) 0B) You don't understand what return yards are?You're making irrelevant arguments again.As for Wayne/Brown. They are totally different types of WRs. Brown is a slot style WR, where Wayne is an outside WR. So depending on your team needs, your choice may differ. Brown also could play STs, where Wayne doesn't. Brown has far better hands than Wayne. There are many areas where Brown is a better WR than Wayne. It's a shame you can't appreciate that.Most people would probably argue that Dillon was a better RB than Addai is as well.How so? The argument is that Brady didn't have talent on his offenses, yet when you look historically and compare who he had then with who Manning had this year, that argument fails.
Really? Tell that to Wes Welker.Special teams numbers don't count towards the QB's passing numbers. A slot receiver's numbers will not contribute as much towards the QB's yards or TDs as an outside WR. Wayne this year is simply a better option than Brown ever was when it comes to the numbers that they will help their QB put up.
I'm looking forward to the explanation for this one.Still, Manning threw 49 TDs in 13.5 games with his cast, and Brady threw 48 in 16 with arguable the best WR to play the game ever. And Manning by attempt was on pace for 57, compared to Brady's 50. I guess one would never know, since Manning wasn't chasing the record, he was just playing.
Still refusing to see the point.How many of Wes Welker's return yards are part of Tom Brady's passing yards this year? Is it:A) 0You're making irrelevant arguments again.As for Wayne/Brown. They are totally different types of WRs. Brown is a slot style WR, where Wayne is an outside WR. So depending on your team needs, your choice may differ. Brown also could play STs, where Wayne doesn't. Brown has far better hands than Wayne. There are many areas where Brown is a better WR than Wayne. It's a shame you can't appreciate that.
Most people would probably argue that Dillon was a better RB than Addai is as well.How so? The argument is that Brady didn't have talent on his offenses, yet when you look historically and compare who he had then with who Manning had this year, that argument fails.
Really? Tell that to Wes Welker.Special teams numbers don't count towards the QB's passing numbers. A slot receiver's numbers will not contribute as much towards the QB's yards or TDs as an outside WR. Wayne this year is simply a better option than Brown ever was when it comes to the numbers that they will help their QB put up.
B) You don't understand what return yards are?
Typo - 16 was supposed to be 15.I'm looking forward to the explanation for this one.Still, Manning threw 49 TDs in 13.5 games with his cast, and Brady threw 48 in 16 with arguable the best WR to play the game ever. And Manning by attempt was on pace for 57, compared to Brady's 50. I guess one would never know, since Manning wasn't chasing the record, he was just playing.
I made two points, and you refuted neither. 1) Return yards don't count towards passing statistics. This is the part of your argument I said was irrelevant. When you made the argument that Troy Brown was as valuable to the Pats as Wayne was to the Colts because he was also a returner, you are making a comment that is irrelevant to the conversation about how Brown and Wayne impacted their respective QBs' numbers.Still refusing to see the point.How many of Wes Welker's return yards are part of Tom Brady's passing yards this year? Is it:A) 0You're making irrelevant arguments again.As for Wayne/Brown. They are totally different types of WRs. Brown is a slot style WR, where Wayne is an outside WR. So depending on your team needs, your choice may differ. Brown also could play STs, where Wayne doesn't. Brown has far better hands than Wayne. There are many areas where Brown is a better WR than Wayne. It's a shame you can't appreciate that.
Most people would probably argue that Dillon was a better RB than Addai is as well.How so? The argument is that Brady didn't have talent on his offenses, yet when you look historically and compare who he had then with who Manning had this year, that argument fails.
Really? Tell that to Wes Welker.Special teams numbers don't count towards the QB's passing numbers. A slot receiver's numbers will not contribute as much towards the QB's yards or TDs as an outside WR. Wayne this year is simply a better option than Brown ever was when it comes to the numbers that they will help their QB put up.
B) You don't understand what return yards are?I would think 1,175 receiving yards had something to do with Tom's passing yards. But wait, slot WRs don't help out a QB...
![]()
And 13.5 isn't a typo? It says 16 GS for 2004 on every site I've seen. You and pizzatyme have argued for 15 in the past. But now you've manufactured a new number that's even lower. And that's before we delve into the claim that Manning wasn't trying for the record.Typo - 16 was supposed to be 15.I'm looking forward to the explanation for this one.Still, Manning threw 49 TDs in 13.5 games with his cast, and Brady threw 48 in 16 with arguable the best WR to play the game ever. And Manning by attempt was on pace for 57, compared to Brady's 50. I guess one would never know, since Manning wasn't chasing the record, he was just playing.
Did Stokley's 68-1077-10 help out Manning that season?Still refusing to see the point.How many of Wes Welker's return yards are part of Tom Brady's passing yards this year? Is it:A) 0You're making irrelevant arguments again.As for Wayne/Brown. They are totally different types of WRs. Brown is a slot style WR, where Wayne is an outside WR. So depending on your team needs, your choice may differ. Brown also could play STs, where Wayne doesn't. Brown has far better hands than Wayne. There are many areas where Brown is a better WR than Wayne. It's a shame you can't appreciate that.
Most people would probably argue that Dillon was a better RB than Addai is as well.How so? The argument is that Brady didn't have talent on his offenses, yet when you look historically and compare who he had then with who Manning had this year, that argument fails.
Really? Tell that to Wes Welker.Special teams numbers don't count towards the QB's passing numbers. A slot receiver's numbers will not contribute as much towards the QB's yards or TDs as an outside WR. Wayne this year is simply a better option than Brown ever was when it comes to the numbers that they will help their QB put up.
B) You don't understand what return yards are?I would think 1,175 receiving yards had something to do with Tom's passing yards. But wait, slot WRs don't help out a QB...
![]()
You seem to hate the talent argument because it doesn't work for your position. You state that Mannings receivers are great because of Manning.Manning still outperformed Brady's "early years" this year.BTW, Troy Brown made the Pro Bowl, right? Corey Dillon did too, right? Woody?This idea that you can compare the talent of this years Colts with Brady's early years is absurd. I dont care who you are- Wayne/Addai doesnt compare with David Patton/Antowain Smith. Anybody who can throw 28 touchdowns to Troy Brown, Deon Branch, and David Patton is pretty damned amazing. Those guys are underrated, yes, but in the sense that they arent respected for what they did with a moderate level of talent. But there isnt a GM in the league that would think twice about choosing between Reggie Wayne over any WR Brady ever completed a pass to before this season. Thats not even worth arguing over. Manning loses ONE of his pro-bowl WRs and his defenders are acting like he's QBing the Dolphins all the sudden. Please.
So Brady's best season prior to now came with a Pro Bowl WR, RB, and C.
Funny, Manning this year had a Pro Bowl WR, RB, and C, and outperformed Brady's previously best season.
I honestly hate this talent argument. The difference in talent between NFL players is miniscule. We are talking about the best of the best football players in the world, no matter what team (except maybe the Raiders)
To say one player was on a team with less talent is really ridiculous.
Interesting to note that you also neglect to mention the fact that these were not Pro Bowl performances during the same season. Brown in 2001, Woody in 2002, Dillon in 2004. The 2003 SB champs had 0 probowl offensive players.In the year he had a Pro Bowl WR, his only one, BTW, Brady was a 1st year starter primarily given the responsibility to protect the football, as his 2800/18/12 season would indicate. This year, that you want to say is "comparable" skillwise, Manning is a 10 year vet playing with the leading receiver ( yardage ) in the game and a Pro Bowl running back, playing in a pass heavy offense. I'd expect his numbers to be good.Manning still outperformed Brady's "early years" this year.BTW, Troy Brown made the Pro Bowl, right? Corey Dillon did too, right? Woody?This idea that you can compare the talent of this years Colts with Brady's early years is absurd. I dont care who you are- Wayne/Addai doesnt compare with David Patton/Antowain Smith. Anybody who can throw 28 touchdowns to Troy Brown, Deon Branch, and David Patton is pretty damned amazing. Those guys are underrated, yes, but in the sense that they arent respected for what they did with a moderate level of talent. But there isnt a GM in the league that would think twice about choosing between Reggie Wayne over any WR Brady ever completed a pass to before this season. Thats not even worth arguing over. Manning loses ONE of his pro-bowl WRs and his defenders are acting like he's QBing the Dolphins all the sudden. Please.
So Brady's best season prior to now came with a Pro Bowl WR, RB, and C.
Funny, Manning this year had a Pro Bowl WR, RB, and C, and outperformed Brady's previously best season.
I honestly hate this talent argument. The difference in talent between NFL players is miniscule. We are talking about the best of the best football players in the world, no matter what team (except maybe the Raiders)
To say one player was on a team with less talent is really ridiculous.
Not comparing them defies logic. Yes Tom Brady has the superbowl rings, but for many years Indy's defense was definitely not the caliber of NE's defense during this dynasty.twitch said:I just cant for the life of me understand how anyone in their right mind wants to compare Tom Brady to Peyton Manning at this very moment in any reasonable conversation as greatest ever. It completely defies logic. There are a few others that come to mind. Manning just isnt one of them. Ive been watching football far too long to think otherwise.
That is patently ridiculous.Again, your reading comprehension is down. The talent difference in the NFL really is miniscule. When averaged out, most teams have about equal talent
I wouldn't say that Trent Dilfer is better than Dan Marino...Troy Brown did not make the pro bowl as a WR. He made it as the alternate Kick Returner. Hardly what I would call receiving support. Dillon was the first offensive Probowler that Brady played with and he had already won 2 Super bowls prior to this.There are really only 2 QBs in the GOAT discussion: Brady and Montana.They played in the modern era of football and won Superbowls with little surrounding talent. Brady and Montana are also the only QBs with multiple rings that have a better than 2:1 TD to int ratio in the playoffs. QB is the only position where rings should be taken into account and if Brady gets his 4th he is the GOAT.
I wouldn't say that Trent Dilfer is better than Dan Marino...Troy Brown did not make the pro bowl as a WR. He made it as the alternate Kick Returner. Hardly what I would call receiving support. Dillon was the first offensive Probowler that Brady played with and he had already won 2 Super bowls prior to this.There are really only 2 QBs in the GOAT discussion: Brady and Montana.They played in the modern era of football and won Superbowls with little surrounding talent. Brady and Montana are also the only QBs with multiple rings that have a better than 2:1 TD to int ratio in the playoffs. QB is the only position where rings should be taken into account and if Brady gets his 4th he is the GOAT.
Darth Cheney said:Not yet...Do he deserve to be mentioned in the same breath as your contemporary "Elway-Montana-Favre-Marino" greats? Absolutely...
He hasn't won yet...so you can't say these things. But IF he wins...he'll have accomplished everything in his career that Montana did. PLUS...he'll have the greatest single season ever. And he'll be the leader of the greatest team ever. Unless you are going to pull the Otto Graham's and other pre-Super Bowl guys out...nobody will have the accomplishments of Brady.The stat that nobody is going to touch? His +42 TD to turnover margin from this past year (or whatever it is). It doesn't matter who your surrounding cast is or how many Pro Bowlers you have...that is completely off the charts.Aaron Rudnicki said:why would a win this year put him so clearly ahead of Montana?Tough As Nails said:If the Pats win this year...the argument is over. OVER. Every single argument for somebody other than Brady will have to start with some sort of hypothetical. "Well...IF QB X had this..." or "IF Brady didn't..." or something like that. Brady has 1 thing left to do to put himself on the top. That's it.
I agree, I didn't say that rings should be the only measuring stick only that rings should be taken into account when discussing QBs. If it was just rings the conversation would be pretty quick Bradshaw & Montana > Brady & Aikman > Elway & Starr etc. etc.I wouldn't say that Trent Dilfer is better than Dan Marino...Troy Brown did not make the pro bowl as a WR. He made it as the alternate Kick Returner. Hardly what I would call receiving support. Dillon was the first offensive Probowler that Brady played with and he had already won 2 Super bowls prior to this.There are really only 2 QBs in the GOAT discussion: Brady and Montana.They played in the modern era of football and won Superbowls with little surrounding talent. Brady and Montana are also the only QBs with multiple rings that have a better than 2:1 TD to int ratio in the playoffs. QB is the only position where rings should be taken into account and if Brady gets his 4th he is the GOAT.
I think defenses were so confused that Montana's greatness was helped quite a bit by Walsh's innovative offense...Steve Young had everything Montana had but more mobility. I was very young when Montana was in his prime though, so I have a bias viewpoint.BTW Hucks, I thought you were old enough to have seen Montana. There was a reason Young was benched for so long in S.F., it's called being 2nd best.
Parcell's is a blowhard. He also called Terry Glenn "she." Does that make Glenn a girl?Bill Parcells has said that he's the best player he has seen at any position, not just QB.That's saying something considering it was Parcells who said it.
Montana has only done it once also.....Do people realize that Brady has gone over 30 TD passes exactly once (this year) in his career?
Montana probably could have won 5 or 6 if injuries and Steve Young didn't derail his career.Ignoring stats, if I had to pick one QB to win one game, I'd take Montana over everyone else. I would definitely take Brady over Peyton though. Elway is probably in the conversation as well.He hasn't won yet...so you can't say these things. But IF he wins...he'll have accomplished everything in his career that Montana did. PLUS...he'll have the greatest single season ever. And he'll be the leader of the greatest team ever. Unless you are going to pull the Otto Graham's and other pre-Super Bowl guys out...nobody will have the accomplishments of Brady.The stat that nobody is going to touch? His +42 TD to turnover margin from this past year (or whatever it is). It doesn't matter who your surrounding cast is or how many Pro Bowlers you have...that is completely off the charts.Aaron Rudnicki said:why would a win this year put him so clearly ahead of Montana?Tough As Nails said:If the Pats win this year...the argument is over. OVER. Every single argument for somebody other than Brady will have to start with some sort of hypothetical. "Well...IF QB X had this..." or "IF Brady didn't..." or something like that. Brady has 1 thing left to do to put himself on the top. That's it.
So what does that tell you?Montana has only done it once also.....Do people realize that Brady has gone over 30 TD passes exactly once (this year) in his career?
It tells me that the number of 30 TD seasons isn't a good measuring stick of a QB's "greatness".So what does that tell you?Montana has only done it once also.....Do people realize that Brady has gone over 30 TD passes exactly once (this year) in his career?
That when judging QBs playoff performance >>> regular season.So what does that tell you?Montana has only done it once also.....Do people realize that Brady has gone over 30 TD passes exactly once (this year) in his career?
Like I said...you'd have to start an argument with "If" statements. If Montana didn't have injuries or Young. Tough to convince anybody with hypotheticals.Montana probably could have won 5 or 6 if injuries and Steve Young didn't derail his career.Ignoring stats, if I had to pick one QB to win one game, I'd take Montana over everyone else. I would definitely take Brady over Peyton though. Elway is probably in the conversation as well.He hasn't won yet...so you can't say these things. But IF he wins...he'll have accomplished everything in his career that Montana did. PLUS...he'll have the greatest single season ever. And he'll be the leader of the greatest team ever. Unless you are going to pull the Otto Graham's and other pre-Super Bowl guys out...nobody will have the accomplishments of Brady.The stat that nobody is going to touch? His +42 TD to turnover margin from this past year (or whatever it is). It doesn't matter who your surrounding cast is or how many Pro Bowlers you have...that is completely off the charts.Aaron Rudnicki said:why would a win this year put him so clearly ahead of Montana?Tough As Nails said:If the Pats win this year...the argument is over. OVER. Every single argument for somebody other than Brady will have to start with some sort of hypothetical. "Well...IF QB X had this..." or "IF Brady didn't..." or something like that. Brady has 1 thing left to do to put himself on the top. That's it.
That the Super Bowl means much, much more than the regular season.So what does that tell you?Montana has only done it once also.....Do people realize that Brady has gone over 30 TD passes exactly once (this year) in his career?