What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

It's Time - Who Finishes #1 at Each Position? (1 Viewer)

Soulfly3

Footballguy
Let's see who knows what's going on. Let's assume PPR and 4pt passing TDs for QBs.

Plant your flag and let your pants sag.

QB - Goff
RB - Saquon
WR - ARSB
TE - Pitts


Going out on a limb w Pitts, but I feel like he explodes this szn w new coaching staff and a competent QB.
 
Last edited:
QB Mahomes. Boring I know. He actually has a few weapons this year.

RB Robinson. Adding Cousins is big. About to catch 80 plus footballs with 1300 yards rushing.

WR. Tyreek. There is only one answer here.

TE. Dalton. Over 200 targets available. Opens up his route tree downfield a bit. Red zone targets coming.
 
I kind of feel bad not taking CMC because it almost means I’m predicting him to miss time. Hard to see anyone being RB1 if he plays 17.
 
Let's see who knows what's going on. Let's assume PPR and 4pt passing TDs for QBs.

Plant your flag and let your pants sag.

QB - Goff
RB - Saquon
WR - ARSB
TE - Pitts


Going out on a limb w Pitts, but I feel like he explodes this szn w new coaching staff and a competent QB.
Going out on a limb with a TE going around TE6 but not a QB that's going QB13? Goff is the more wild call.
 
I feel like this is turning into a "bold prediction" thread. If this many people actually have Kincaid #1, Bijan #1, etc... would you really take those guys over Laporta and CMC in your own drafts? Doubtful.

Sure Laporta would never be there still, but if you're sitting in Round 5 and Laporta, Kelce, and Kincaid are on the board, and you need TE, are you really grabbing Kincaid there? Cmon now.
 
Let's see who knows what's going on. Let's assume PPR and 4pt passing TDs for QBs.

Plant your flag and let your pants sag.

QB - Goff
RB - Saquon
WR - ARSB
TE - Pitts


Going out on a limb w Pitts, but I feel like he explodes this szn w new coaching staff and a competent QB.
Going out on a limb with a TE going around TE6 but not a QB that's going QB13? Goff is the more wild call.

True, but goff finished #7 last season, and theyve only gotten better + a fully healthy Jamo... could be insane
 
Let's see who knows what's going on. Let's assume PPR and 4pt passing TDs for QBs.

Plant your flag and let your pants sag.

QB - Goff
RB - Saquon
WR - ARSB
TE - Pitts


Going out on a limb w Pitts, but I feel like he explodes this szn w new coaching staff and a competent QB.
Going out on a limb with a TE going around TE6 but not a QB that's going QB13? Goff is the more wild call.

True, but goff finished #7 last season, and theyve only gotten better + a fully healthy Jamo... could be insane
So you won't be drafting any QB's over Goff in fantasy this year in any league?
 
I feel like this is turning into a "bold prediction" thread. If this many people actually have Kincaid #1, Bijan #1, etc... would you really take those guys over Laporta and CMC in your own drafts? Doubtful.

Sure Laporta would never be there still, but if you're sitting in Round 5 and Laporta, Kelce, and Kincaid are on the board, and you need TE, are you really grabbing Kincaid there? Cmon now.
A big Part of the reason you take CMC, Laporta, Kelce, etc is relative safety.
This thread isn’t “who do you draft first”.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone if Bijan or Kincaid finish 1. They could also finish 10. CMC is virtually guaranteed top 3 (5 at the worst) if healthy.
 
I feel like this is turning into a "bold prediction" thread. If this many people actually have Kincaid #1, Bijan #1, etc... would you really take those guys over Laporta and CMC in your own drafts? Doubtful.

Sure Laporta would never be there still, but if you're sitting in Round 5 and Laporta, Kelce, and Kincaid are on the board, and you need TE, are you really grabbing Kincaid there? Cmon now.
A big Part of the reason you take CMC, Laporta, Kelce, etc is relative safety.
This thread isn’t “who do you draft first”.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone if Bijan or Kincaid finish 1. They could also finish 10. CMC is virtually guaranteed top 3 (5 at the worst) if healthy.
I'm not saying it shouldn't surprise if they do. But if you actually fully believe that Bijan will outscore CMC this year, you don't take CMC over him in a draft.

If it's a "bold predictions" where you want to go off the map and call someone who isn't seen as the #1 guy then sure. It just shows how much people value "being right" or "making an upset call" than actually using logic.
 
Favorites
QB: Hurts, having an OC that actually takes advantage of matchups should work wonders.
RB: CMC, injury is the only way this doesn't happen.
WR: Lamb, 200 targets are on the table.
TE: LaPorta, YPR and targets could both go up. TD's are more unlikely, but not impossible. Lions could get PA heavy in redzone.

Darkhorses
QB: Stroud, Diggs addition could make him a 5000-40 guy. Possible Diggs just adds and doesn't take away from Nico/Dell.
RB: Achane, size isn't a limiting factor in this offense. He takes on much of Mostert's TDs, and he's right at the top.
WR: Puka, Rams increase pass TD % and Puka pulls ahead of Kupp in redzone and we're there.
TE: Njoku, the last month of last season just stays all year.

Longshots
QB: Tua, TD pendulum swings back to pass TDs, and Tua leads league in yards and TDs.
RB: R. White, CMC level workload, with more rush TDs/YPC than last season.
WR: Waddle, goes along with Tua. Hill gets doubled, Waddle takes advantage. Merges high catch rookie year, with high efficiency 2nd year.
TE: Freiermuth, finally stays healthy, and is main target of offense, with Pickens staying in a lower % big play role.
 
I feel like this is turning into a "bold prediction" thread. If this many people actually have Kincaid #1, Bijan #1, etc... would you really take those guys over Laporta and CMC in your own drafts? Doubtful.

Sure Laporta would never be there still, but if you're sitting in Round 5 and Laporta, Kelce, and Kincaid are on the board, and you need TE, are you really grabbing Kincaid there? Cmon now.
A big Part of the reason you take CMC, Laporta, Kelce, etc is relative safety.
This thread isn’t “who do you draft first”.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone if Bijan or Kincaid finish 1. They could also finish 10. CMC is virtually guaranteed top 3 (5 at the worst) if healthy.
I'm not saying it shouldn't surprise if they do. But if you actually fully believe that Bijan will outscore CMC this year, you don't take CMC over him in a draft.

If it's a "bold predictions" where you want to go off the map and call someone who isn't seen as the #1 guy then sure. It just shows how much people value "being right" or "making an upset call" than actually using logic.
You really don’t see why you’d take the guy with 90% likelihood of being top 3 over the guy you think finishes 1 but has maybe 50% chance of being top 3?
It doesn’t really matter from my drafts as I have yet to be in position to take CMC, but I have a few shares of Bijan.
 
RB: Achane, size isn't a limiting factor in this offense. He takes on much of Mostert's TDs, and he's right at the top.
Short of injuries to other backs (which is always on the table), there are things about Achane that I think aren't sustainable . . . a 7.8 ypc and a TD every 11 touches seem like huge outliers. I think he could end up with more touches, but his per touch numbers are going to come back to earth.
 
I feel like this is turning into a "bold prediction" thread. If this many people actually have Kincaid #1, Bijan #1, etc... would you really take those guys over Laporta and CMC in your own drafts? Doubtful.

Sure Laporta would never be there still, but if you're sitting in Round 5 and Laporta, Kelce, and Kincaid are on the board, and you need TE, are you really grabbing Kincaid there? Cmon now.
A big Part of the reason you take CMC, Laporta, Kelce, etc is relative safety.
This thread isn’t “who do you draft first”.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone if Bijan or Kincaid finish 1. They could also finish 10. CMC is virtually guaranteed top 3 (5 at the worst) if healthy.
I'm not saying it shouldn't surprise if they do. But if you actually fully believe that Bijan will outscore CMC this year, you don't take CMC over him in a draft.

If it's a "bold predictions" where you want to go off the map and call someone who isn't seen as the #1 guy then sure. It just shows how much people value "being right" or "making an upset call" than actually using logic.
You really don’t see why you’d take the guy with 90% likelihood of being top 3 over the guy you think finishes 1 but has maybe 50% chance of being top 3?
It doesn’t really matter from my drafts as I have yet to be in position to take CMC, but I have a few shares of Bijan.
No, I think if you ACTUALLY believe that Kincaid will outscore Laporta, than you take Kincaid over laporta (if the draft capital spent was the exact same... as in, it's the final pick of the draft and you need a tight end and both are sitting there). I think many of the "Kincaid I think will be the top te this year" people would take laporta.
 
I feel like this is turning into a "bold prediction" thread. If this many people actually have Kincaid #1, Bijan #1, etc... would you really take those guys over Laporta and CMC in your own drafts? Doubtful.

Sure Laporta would never be there still, but if you're sitting in Round 5 and Laporta, Kelce, and Kincaid are on the board, and you need TE, are you really grabbing Kincaid there? Cmon now.
A big Part of the reason you take CMC, Laporta, Kelce, etc is relative safety.
This thread isn’t “who do you draft first”.
It shouldn’t surprise anyone if Bijan or Kincaid finish 1. They could also finish 10. CMC is virtually guaranteed top 3 (5 at the worst) if healthy.
I'm not saying it shouldn't surprise if they do. But if you actually fully believe that Bijan will outscore CMC this year, you don't take CMC over him in a draft.

If it's a "bold predictions" where you want to go off the map and call someone who isn't seen as the #1 guy then sure. It just shows how much people value "being right" or "making an upset call" than actually using logic.
You really don’t see why you’d take the guy with 90% likelihood of being top 3 over the guy you think finishes 1 but has maybe 50% chance of being top 3?
It doesn’t really matter from my drafts as I have yet to be in position to take CMC, but I have a few shares of Bijan.
No, I think if you ACTUALLY believe that Kincaid will outscore Laporta, than you take Kincaid over laporta (if the draft capital spent was the exact same... as in, it's the final pick of the draft and you need a tight end and both are sitting there). I think many of the "Kincaid I think will be the top te this year" people would take laporta.
I ACTUALLY believe that I don’t know how the year plays out and often take a blend of safety and risk. With my first few picks I’m usually taking the guy I think has a better chance of being a top 3 player over the guy I think scores the most.
 
Let's see who knows what's going on. Let's assume PPR and 4pt passing TDs for QBs.

Plant your flag and let your pants sag.

QB - Goff
RB - Saquon
WR - ARSB
TE - Pitts


Going out on a limb w Pitts, but I feel like he explodes this szn w new coaching staff and a competent QB.
Going out on a limb with a TE going around TE6 but not a QB that's going QB13? Goff is the more wild call.

True, but goff finished #7 last season, and theyve only gotten better + a fully healthy Jamo... could be insane
So you won't be drafting any QB's over Goff in fantasy this year in any league?

I don't belong to a single redraft league, so....

In my keep 3, im hoping he's there for mw at the 6 pick, and ill absolutely take him there. I assume guys like lamar, pat, stroud, allen will be held
 
Favorites
QB: Hurts, having an OC that actually takes advantage of matchups should work wonders.
RB: CMC, injury is the only way this doesn't happen.
WR: Lamb, 200 targets are on the table.
TE: LaPorta, YPR and targets could both go up. TD's are more unlikely, but not impossible. Lions could get PA heavy in redzone.

Darkhorses
QB: Stroud, Diggs addition could make him a 5000-40 guy. Possible Diggs just adds and doesn't take away from Nico/Dell.
RB: Achane, size isn't a limiting factor in this offense. He takes on much of Mostert's TDs, and he's right at the top.
WR: Puka, Rams increase pass TD % and Puka pulls ahead of Kupp in redzone and we're there.
TE: Njoku, the last month of last season just stays all year.

Longshots
QB: Tua, TD pendulum swings back to pass TDs, and Tua leads league in yards and TDs.
RB: R. White, CMC level workload, with more rush TDs/YPC than last season.
WR: Waddle, goes along with Tua. Hill gets doubled, Waddle takes advantage. Merges high catch rookie year, with high efficiency 2nd year.
TE: Freiermuth, finally stays healthy, and is main target of offense, with Pickens staying in a lower % big play role.
now THIS i can get behind.
 
I don't belong to a single redraft league, so....

In my keep 3, im hoping he's there for mw at the 6 pick, and ill absolutely take him there. I assume guys like lamar, pat, stroud, allen will be held
lol he will be there for you at pick 6. Even in a keep 3, that means you're HOPING Goff is there at pick 42 in redraft, and he's averaging going at pick 118. Why the HELL would you take a guy that's going 118th, at pick 42 when you can have him easily way way way later?
 
I don't belong to a single redraft league, so....

In my keep 3, im hoping he's there for mw at the 6 pick, and ill absolutely take him there. I assume guys like lamar, pat, stroud, allen will be held
lol he will be there for you at pick 6. Even in a keep 3, that means you're HOPING Goff is there at pick 42 in redraft, and he's averaging going at pick 118. Why the HELL would you take a guy that's going 118th, at pick 42 when you can have him easily way way way later?

Because i live and die by the philosophy of value. Is. Dead.

I take the guys I think will score the most points, even if consensus says I'm reaching. And also because we have 6pt TDs for qbs, which makes them a touch more valuable too
 
I don't belong to a single redraft league, so....

In my keep 3, im hoping he's there for mw at the 6 pick, and ill absolutely take him there. I assume guys like lamar, pat, stroud, allen will be held
lol he will be there for you at pick 6. Even in a keep 3, that means you're HOPING Goff is there at pick 42 in redraft, and he's averaging going at pick 118. Why the HELL would you take a guy that's going 118th, at pick 42 when you can have him easily way way way later?

Because i live and die by the philosophy of value. Is. Dead.

I take the guys I think will score the most points, even if consensus says I'm reaching. And also because we have 6pt TDs for qbs, which makes them a touch more valuable too
But why pay $10 when you can have it for $5?

I know we went through this before, but this just seems like you're likely trolling if you're jumping on a guy like 10 rounds too early. Take some studs in the first couple rounds and snag him round 3.

In 6 points per passing TD, Goff's going on average at position 110. Over thousands and thousands of underdog drafts, it's 125. Sure ignore value, but I can't see any way you're being serious or doing well in a league when you're taking a guy 8-10 rounds earlier than he will go.
 
I don't belong to a single redraft league, so....

In my keep 3, im hoping he's there for mw at the 6 pick, and ill absolutely take him there. I assume guys like lamar, pat, stroud, allen will be held
lol he will be there for you at pick 6. Even in a keep 3, that means you're HOPING Goff is there at pick 42 in redraft, and he's averaging going at pick 118. Why the HELL would you take a guy that's going 118th, at pick 42 when you can have him easily way way way later?

Because i live and die by the philosophy of value. Is. Dead.

I take the guys I think will score the most points, even if consensus says I'm reaching. And also because we have 6pt TDs for qbs, which makes them a touch more valuable too
But why pay $10 when you can have it for $5?

I know we went through this before, but this just seems like you're likely trolling if you're jumping on a guy like 10 rounds too early. Take some studs in the first couple rounds and snag him round 3.

In 6 points per passing TD, Goff's going on average at position 110. Over thousands and thousands of underdog drafts, it's 125. Sure ignore value, but I can't see any way you're being serious or doing well in a league when you're taking a guy 8-10 rounds earlier than he will go.

Because a guy like Goff won't go that late in my league. Stud QBs (and I consider him one now) are snapped up very early.

This league is 20+yrs deep, all buddies. I know the tendency and I have Goff as high or higher than all the QBs that'll be kept for fantasy purposes
 
I don't belong to a single redraft league, so....

In my keep 3, im hoping he's there for mw at the 6 pick, and ill absolutely take him there. I assume guys like lamar, pat, stroud, allen will be held
lol he will be there for you at pick 6. Even in a keep 3, that means you're HOPING Goff is there at pick 42 in redraft, and he's averaging going at pick 118. Why the HELL would you take a guy that's going 118th, at pick 42 when you can have him easily way way way later?

Because i live and die by the philosophy of value. Is. Dead.

I take the guys I think will score the most points, even if consensus says I'm reaching. And also because we have 6pt TDs for qbs, which makes them a touch more valuable too
But why pay $10 when you can have it for $5?

I know we went through this before, but this just seems like you're likely trolling if you're jumping on a guy like 10 rounds too early. Take some studs in the first couple rounds and snag him round 3.

In 6 points per passing TD, Goff's going on average at position 110. Over thousands and thousands of underdog drafts, it's 125. Sure ignore value, but I can't see any way you're being serious or doing well in a league when you're taking a guy 8-10 rounds earlier than he will go.

Because a guy like Goff won't go that late in my league. Stud QBs (and I consider him one now) are snapped up very early.

This league is 20+yrs deep, all buddies. I know the tendency and I have Goff as high or higher than all the QBs that'll be kept for fantasy purposes
Can any of them still see or walk? lol. If you think there's a chance won't be there at pick 50, then you should be winning a league like that every year.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top