<Assuming Cleveland is not targeting Calvin Johnson>If I'm in the Browns front office, I'm slobbering all over myself telling EVERYONE who will listen that Johnson is a remarkable athlete and he'll be the best WR since Jerry Rice. Then they can trade to #4 with Tampa or down a bit further, and still likely wind up with Quinn and some other parting gifts.I think it's very tough to say what the Browns are going to do, they are throwing out all kinds of different smoke signals. They seem to be playing a lot of games: a month ago they were raving about Russell and Quinn, two weeks ago they were raving about Peterson, now they suddenly sign Jamal out of seemingly nowhere. I still think Quinn is the way they go, but we may not know who these guys are going to take until they announce their pick at the podium.
Yep... except for that "getting Carr" part.He can't play. Bad O-line or no bad O-line, he's Kyle Boller with a hotter wife.The Browns trading down and getting Carr and an extra 2nd rounder is looking really good right now!
the latest i heard was bentley has had complications... due to a ubiquitous CLE staph infection, i think (i'm serious), he had to have another operation (MCL?)... because they had to wait to perform it, & it has a long recovery time, he won't be avail at all during 07 season...some reports alluded to his career maybe being in jeapordy (never good to miss two seasons in a row), but i have no idea if that was based on a medically informed position or was pure speculation...Anyone know how Bentley's injury is coming along???
This is from rotoworld:LeCharles Bentley-C- Browns Feb. 21 - 10:32 am etthe latest i heard was bentley has had complications... due to a ubiquitous CLE staph infection, i think (i'm serious), he had to have another operation (MCL?)... because they had to wait to perform it, & it has a long recovery time, he won't be avail at all during 07 season...some reports alluded to his career maybe being in jeapordy (never good to miss two seasons in a row), but i have no idea if that was based on a medically informed position or was pure speculation...Anyone know how Bentley's injury is coming along???
that's a pretty good description. the career over thing is more of a football description than a medical one, but I think we'll get a medical opinion in the next couple of months.the latest i heard was bentley has had complications... due to a ubiquitous CLE staph infection, i think (i'm serious), he had to have another operation (MCL?)... because they had to wait to perform it, & it has a long recovery time, he won't be avail at all during 07 season...some reports alluded to his career maybe being in jeapordy (never good to miss two seasons in a row), but i have no idea if that was based on a medically informed position or was pure speculation...Anyone know how Bentley's injury is coming along???
Also, I do not know what to make of the Lewis deal being only a one year deal. I think there is ample room to speculate that Cleveland still drafts Peterson in the 1st or another RB in 2nd or 3rd .... even with Droughns on the team.
I'm absolutely with you J -- I think you and I were two of the main anti-Lewis people back in the summer of '05.I ran the numbers on numbers of RBs to meet three requirements: 1) Did not rank in the top 15 for three straight years.2) Averaged under 4.00 YPC in Year N-2 and Year N-1.3) Ranked in the top 15 in Year N.Results: 11 RBs.Antowain Smith is probably the best fit. He stunk for three years in Buffalo, played a lot, but wasn't any good. Like Jamal. Then he went to New England and had a huge year.Lamar Smith, Tyrone Wheatley and Harvey Williams all had three unimpressive years while splitting time, before finding a new team and exploding.Reuben Droughns, Derek Loville, Ottis Anderson all barely carried the ball in Years N-3 through N-1, before getting lots of carries and playing very well in Year N. Larry Centers and MacArthuer Lane fit the criteria, but aren't good matches because both had more receiving yards than rushing yards in Year N. Cullent Bryant and Johnny Hector also met the above criteria, but both seemed to just have career years while slightly improving on their Year N-1 performance, and were just pieces of committees.Summary: Unless you think Jamal Lewis can pull an Antowain Smith, or do what Lamar Smith or Tyrone Wheatley did, stay away. The promising thing for Lewis is those three backs were all very similar in running style and athleticism to Lewis, so maybe there's something to it.Two seasons ago, I got filleted when I suggested that Jam's 2,000-yard season was very much the anomaly and outside of that season, he was consistently mediocre. Whether you agree or disagree with that sentiment, it's hard to ignore the facts:*** Lewis has had ONE top-10 fantasy RB season in his career*** It's been three years since that season*** He's averaged less than 4 yards per carry for two seasons and now goes to a team with one of the worst offensive lines in the league conceptually*** He's never been very effective in short yardage or at the goal line (an area the Browns have struggled with in recent years)*** He's never proven himself an average, much less above average, receiverAs a big back that takes a lot of hits, it's difficult to find a proxy for someone rebounding to fantasy stardom with a similar history. I will avoid him like the plague unless his ADP falls into the RB20 or lower range.
For the 100th time.... that is exactly where Lewis' ADP was a year ago and WILL be this year. Matter of fact, Lewis will likely be had cheaper than he was a year ago. He finished as RB16 last year. Probably the biggest fallacy on this board right now is that people, anyone, expects Lewis to be a fantasy RB1. He has not been drafted as such for 2 years and will not come close to being drafted as such this year. I really love this deal for Clev. They fill a pressing needs and upgrade their RB position. I think the hope for them is that now that they have filled the RB spot, hope like hell that Thomas is there at the 3 pick. Thomas not only grades out as the better prospect, but fills a larger need for Clev IMO. My bet is they hope for Thomas to fall to them and if not, shop the pick as Quinn is not really worth the 3rd overall pick. Either way, someone should be willing to pay a nice price to get into the 3 spot and have whoever of Johnson and Peterson falls (if Oak or Det takes Thomas) or 1st pick of the stellar Dlinmen in this draft.As a big back that takes a lot of hits, it's difficult to find a proxy for someone rebounding to fantasy stardom with a similar history. I will avoid him like the plague unless his ADP falls into the RB20 or lower range.
Another spot to check is www.dawgtalkers.com - this is where a lot of the guys from the old browns site went after it changed to "brownschat". same look and feel as the old dawg talk from the official browns site.But even they seem to be split 50/50 on the signing. I don't mind it too much, as Droughns always seemed to be a stop gap type of signing. I still think AD is the pick come April.chris1969 said:That's where the official board is, but if you want to get some real insight from fans that know what they are taking about then try www.dawgbones.comnxmehta said:The team boards aren't here, they're on the official website. Such as http://brownschat.clevelandbrowns.com/eve/forums-primetime- said:sorry to get off topic but where are the team boards here?
and yeah, I am a noob...
LinkIMO...don't mind the signing as it is only one year. I think they dump Droughns next week (if not sooner) making this signing a wash as far as money goes.All of that evidence leads to the conclusion that the Browns won't veer from the scent of Oklahoma's Peterson. The Browns are adamant in employing two feature-type backs next year - as did Super Bowl finalists Indianapolis and Chicago this season.
It's possible, though, that if the Browns retain their current position at No. 3 in the first round, they would have a choice of Peterson, Wisconsin left tackle Joe Thomas and Notre Dame quarterback Brady Quinn.
I think the opposite , but they need to add a veteran QB like Garcia or maybe a Matt Schaub.Then with Winslow , Edwards , Jewis + they might add a good young WR or lineman in this years draft it gives them the potential for a good offense .But they need a QB , Frye is nt the answer if they start the season with Frye then i agree it s the worst place fantasy wise for Lewis .David Yudkin said:Probably the worst spot for Lewis to land for fantasy purposes.
How many of those backs are better than Peterson? Maybe none. Probably Caddy, maybe still Edge, likely Portis, and possibly Ronnie are close enough comparably in talent to not draft him but the rest certainly arent. I'd love to see AP in Atlanta but let's be realistic, they need to consider trading up.rascal said:Let's see here:Oakland...just reneged with LamontDetroit...Just traded for T Bell and has K JonesCleveland...just signed JamalTampa...CaddyCardinals...EdgeWashington...PortisVikings...got Chester last yearHouston...just signed GreenMiami...RonnieFalcons...DING DING DING
Garcia back to the Browns?I think the opposite , but they need to add a veteran QB like Garcia or maybe a Matt Schaub.Then with Winslow , Edwards , Jewis + they might add a good young WR or lineman in this years draft it gives them the potential for a good offense .But they need a QB , Frye is nt the answer if they start the season with Frye then i agree it s the worst place fantasy wise for Lewis .David Yudkin said:Probably the worst spot for Lewis to land for fantasy purposes.
Droughns getting cut seems most logical right now. But I wonder what the odds are that they ride the JLew/Droughns train for one year, let Steinbach/Fraley/Tucker/Shaffer get a year together (NO INJURIES PLEASE), get a player like Johnson/Thomas/Quinn in this years draft, then be aggressive next year for a RB in the draft and/or trade?From today's Cleveland Plain Dealer...
LinkIMO...don't mind the signing as it is only one year. I think they dump Droughns next week (if not sooner) making this signing a wash as far as money goes.All of that evidence leads to the conclusion that the Browns won't veer from the scent of Oklahoma's Peterson. The Browns are adamant in employing two feature-type backs next year - as did Super Bowl finalists Indianapolis and Chicago this season.
It's possible, though, that if the Browns retain their current position at No. 3 in the first round, they would have a choice of Peterson, Wisconsin left tackle Joe Thomas and Notre Dame quarterback Brady Quinn.
since it looks all but certain that Turner will remain a Charger this year perhaps they may consider entering the FA sweepstakes next year.Droughns getting cut seems most logical right now. But I wonder what the odds are that they ride the JLew/Droughns train for one year, let Steinbach/Fraley/Tucker/Shaffer get a year together (NO INJURIES PLEASE), get a player like Johnson/Thomas/Quinn in this years draft, then be aggressive next year for a RB in the draft and/or trade?From today's Cleveland Plain Dealer...
LinkIMO...don't mind the signing as it is only one year. I think they dump Droughns next week (if not sooner) making this signing a wash as far as money goes.All of that evidence leads to the conclusion that the Browns won't veer from the scent of Oklahoma's Peterson. The Browns are adamant in employing two feature-type backs next year - as did Super Bowl finalists Indianapolis and Chicago this season.
It's possible, though, that if the Browns retain their current position at No. 3 in the first round, they would have a choice of Peterson, Wisconsin left tackle Joe Thomas and Notre Dame quarterback Brady Quinn.
Any one of those three, I can see taking AP. All those RBs are old and have lost a step. Each team would be strengthened by utilizing the old pounder and the young beast together a la Dillon/Maroney.Although I do think Cleveland will now take Joe Thomas to solidify what could be a VERY strong line alongside LeChuck Bentley and newly acquired Eric Steinbach. Anyone know how Bentley's injury is coming along??? If he comes back at 100%, a Thomas/Bentley/Steinbach line could be sick. Suddenly Frye/Lewis/Droughens/Soldier/Braylen would all look a lot better next season. Remember that dominant offensive lines can make instant fantasy stars.rascal said:Cleveland...just signed JamalCardinals...EdgeHouston...just signed Green
They're going to trade up with Detroit for the #2.Titus Pullo said:What WR would you like them to reach on at #7?Tag said:Thats probably the last thing the vikes need.EBF said:Why even bother to sign him if you're going to draft Peterson? I know Lewis isn't the back he once was, but there would be almost no point to signing him as a backup. Peterson to the Vikings? Hmmm...You dont think a WR would come in handy for them?
![]()
Possible.Telling stat...since it looks all but certain that Turner will remain a Charger this year perhaps they may consider entering the FA sweepstakes next year.Droughns getting cut seems most logical right now. But I wonder what the odds are that they ride the JLew/Droughns train for one year, let Steinbach/Fraley/Tucker/Shaffer get a year together (NO INJURIES PLEASE), get a player like Johnson/Thomas/Quinn in this years draft, then be aggressive next year for a RB in the draft and/or trade?From today's Cleveland Plain Dealer...
LinkIMO...don't mind the signing as it is only one year. I think they dump Droughns next week (if not sooner) making this signing a wash as far as money goes.All of that evidence leads to the conclusion that the Browns won't veer from the scent of Oklahoma's Peterson. The Browns are adamant in employing two feature-type backs next year - as did Super Bowl finalists Indianapolis and Chicago this season.
It's possible, though, that if the Browns retain their current position at No. 3 in the first round, they would have a choice of Peterson, Wisconsin left tackle Joe Thomas and Notre Dame quarterback Brady Quinn.
whereever he goes I doubt he will be a stater. He essentially lost his job at the end of last year to a nobody on the worst rushing team in the league. Droughns is a below average back on probably any team except Denver.I'm not sure the Browns want to pay both RBs starter money. They may want to keep both a year and then get the RB they want to be the future, but I doubt it.It appears that Lewis essentially got the same money as Droughns is due. Droughn's roster bonus is due on March 17th (I think). IIRC it is about $1.75 million with a salary of $1.25 million. I believe that the Browns may try to: (a) trade Droughns for a low draft pick and avoid the bonus; (b) renegotiate with Droughns.If they are unsuccessful at either, they may cut him.Assuming Droughns is cut, where does he go . . . .back to Denver?Green Bay?Tennessee?New York?
For the 100th time.... that is exactly where Lewis' ADP was a year ago and WILL be this year. Matter of fact, Lewis will likely be had cheaper than he was a year ago. He finished as RB16 last year. Probably the biggest fallacy on this board right now is that people, anyone, expects Lewis to be a fantasy RB1. He has not been drafted as such for 2 years and will not come close to being drafted as such this year. I really love this deal for Clev. They fill a pressing needs and upgrade their RB position. I think the hope for them is that now that they have filled the RB spot, hope like hell that Thomas is there at the 3 pick. Thomas not only grades out as the better prospect, but fills a larger need for Clev IMO. My bet is they hope for Thomas to fall to them and if not, shop the pick as Quinn is not really worth the 3rd overall pick. Either way, someone should be willing to pay a nice price to get into the 3 spot and have whoever of Johnson and Peterson falls (if Oak or Det takes Thomas) or 1st pick of the stellar Dlinmen in this draft.As a big back that takes a lot of hits, it's difficult to find a proxy for someone rebounding to fantasy stardom with a similar history. I will avoid him like the plague unless his ADP falls into the RB20 or lower range.
The Browns already have the newly resigned Jason Wright, as well as the star of the 2006 training camp Jerome Harrison on the roster. Now with Lewis and Droughns, and their two fullbacks Terrell Smith and Vickers, they'd have to make some moves to make room for Peterson. The upcoming roster bonus due Droughns should be telling as to what the Browns may do in the draft. If he is not cut than they probably won't draft Peterson.
Questions answered...I think Lewis took the $200K more than what Baltimore was offering from Cleveland (plus incentives) and is basically thumbing his nose at Baltimore. He now leaves Baltimore with ?'s at RB and can supply Cleveland with all their tendencies.
Lewis took as much money as some bonehead team was going to give him because he is a bum now. Baltimore is damn glad someone was dumb enough to beat their offer.I think Lewis took the $200K more than what Baltimore was offering from Cleveland (plus incentives) and is basically thumbing his nose at Baltimore. He now leaves Baltimore with ?'s at RB and can supply Cleveland with all their tendencies.
Lewis took as much money as some bonehead team was going to give him because he is a bum now. Baltimore is damn glad someone was dumb enough to beat their offer.I think Lewis took the $200K more than what Baltimore was offering from Cleveland (plus incentives) and is basically thumbing his nose at Baltimore. He now leaves Baltimore with ?'s at RB and can supply Cleveland with all their tendencies.
He's a bum. He should have had 1500 and 15 TD's if he ran like a man.Lewis took as much money as some bonehead team was going to give him because he is a bum now. Baltimore is damn glad someone was dumb enough to beat their offer.I think Lewis took the $200K more than what Baltimore was offering from Cleveland (plus incentives) and is basically thumbing his nose at Baltimore. He now leaves Baltimore with ?'s at RB and can supply Cleveland with all their tendencies.1132 yards and 9 TDs = bum?
I guess that makes McGahee and his 900 yards and 6 TDs an uber-bum.
He would if it had not been of his ankle ( He played with bone spurs all season , they removed it after the season ). But i agree that there will be no excuses next season ( remember he is only 27 years old and spent at least one season on IR so he has nt been overused ) .He's a bum. He should have had 1500 and 15 TD's if he ran like a man.Lewis took as much money as some bonehead team was going to give him because he is a bum now. Baltimore is damn glad someone was dumb enough to beat their offer.I think Lewis took the $200K more than what Baltimore was offering from Cleveland (plus incentives) and is basically thumbing his nose at Baltimore. He now leaves Baltimore with ?'s at RB and can supply Cleveland with all their tendencies.1132 yards and 9 TDs = bum?
I guess that makes McGahee and his 900 yards and 6 TDs an uber-bum.