I'm a Chiefs fan and a Charles owner. I dropped Davis for Snead last week. I have the no. 1 waiver and will be dropping Snead for West this week.ETA: Well, the way Snead has been playing, I may drop Golden Tate instead.With Charles out, what are the values of West and Davis respectively?
As is the chiefs season and probably pretty much the value of most chiefsLocal radio just said his season is over :(
Wrong.....it will be a committee.Sorry Kniles Davis handcuff owners, its Chacandrick West.
Roddy white style.Wrong.....it will be a committee.We are all screwed.Sorry Kniles Davis handcuff owners, its Chacandrick West.
With Andy Reid there to screw things up it doesn't really matterSorry Kniles Davis handcuff owners, its Chacandrick West.
Pretty much this. At least in years past when Charles went down, you could have the peace of mind that Knile would slot right in and put up RB2 numbers.Wrong.....it will be a committee.Sorry Kniles Davis handcuff owners, its Chacandrick West.
We are all screwed.
Of course they will, without a doubt.Is Yahoo going to take Charles off the "No Cut List".
I agree. Its not because I own him in a league or because I'm a Chiefs fans or anything but when a guy like him gets hurt, it's just bad all around for football. You lose a guy that you just can't replicate. It's like Big Ben being out. He's a unique guy that's good for the game. If JJ Watt was out or a guy like that, its the same deal.Man I hate to see this. He is one exciting guy to watch. That kind of talent is the reason we watch football...
Exactly. I don't own him in any league, but I admire his skills and will stop on that game if I hear, "And the handoff to Charles," just to see what he's going to do.I agree. Its not because I own him in a league or because I'm a Chiefs fans or anything but when a guy like him gets hurt, it's just bad all around for football. You lose a guy that you just can't replicate. It's like Big Ben being out. He's a unique guy that's good for the game. If JJ Watt was out or a guy like that, its the same deal.Man I hate to see this. He is one exciting guy to watch. That kind of talent is the reason we watch football...
I don't know about toast, but he'll be pushing 30 by the time next season rolls around. Hard to expect the same comeback as the last time he tore his ACL just before he turned 25.think he is toast in Dyno formats now?
No. I think he is one of these guys that can keep on going and he really has low miles, overall. There are probably some people thinking an ACL is particularly bad for a player like him but, for lack of other things to point to, he's already had that injury and he came back and looked just as great as he always had. Certain players just have that look that they can age gracefully and, to me, Charles is one of them,think he is toast in Dyno formats now?
Getting old and his skinny little legs cant keep up it seems
Yea yesterday I was thinking I would dump all my BB money on west. Now I am thinking screw it I'll go low and if I don't get him so be it. Plus I really don't know if its west or davis anyways.Lascelle said:Pretty much this. At least in years past when Charles went down, you could have the peace of mind that Knile would slot right in and put up RB2 numbers.Wrong.....it will be a committee.Sorry Kniles Davis handcuff owners, its Chacandrick West.
We are all screwed.
Charcandrick West ruined that dream.
In the offseason, as noted on espn, they were not happy with Kniles lack of production (3.5yr1, 3.5yr2), problems with pass blocking, receiving and ball control issues.I haven't been following the Chiefs since I moved away and haven't seen West play. That said, I find it really hard to believe that Knile has been supplanted by a relative newcomer. Davis is the trustworthy back who has performed when called upon. In what reality is West *that* much better?
I am not sure about toast, but pushing 30 with 2 ACL tears and rehabs made me deal Charles for a 2016 1st Round Rookie Pick (top 7) in dynasty.I don't know about toast, but he'll be pushing 30 by the time next season rolls around. Hard to expect the same comeback as the last time he tore his ACL just before he turned 25.think he is toast in Dyno formats now?
The good news for Charles is that he recovered fully from the first ACL which was in his left knee. This one is in his right and he knows how to rehab successfully. The biggest concern for him to me is not the knee, but him turning 29 this month. Still think he has a couple big seasons ahead of him.I am not sure about toast, but pushing 30 with 2 ACL tears and rehabs made me deal Charles for a 2016 1st Round Rookie Pick (top 7) in dynasty.I don't know about toast, but he'll be pushing 30 by the time next season rolls around. Hard to expect the same comeback as the last time he tore his ACL just before he turned 25.think he is toast in Dyno formats now?
"That's the goal," he said. I had 11 (games) left in the season when I did it, so it's a lot of time to come back from it. The way I'm moving, I'll be back before the season starts. I want to be back. I want to play. I want to be out there again."
Chiefs GM John Dorsey fully expects Jamaal Charles to remain with the team for 2016.
"I love him to death, love how dirty tough he is," Dorsey said. "Yeah, he's a Chief." Going on 30, Charles is recovering from a torn ACL, but was averaging 5.1 yards per carry before going down in October. He's due an eminently reasonable $5.75 million between salary and bonuses in 2016. We'd expect the Chiefs to roll with more of a committee in an effort to keep Charles fresh and healthy, but there's little doubt he'll be the chairman.
Source: Adam Teicher on Twitter
Jan 21 - 2:39 PM
Not sure why Faulk is trying to get Charles fired."The conversation is, 'Why does Kansas City keepJamaal Charles when you saw Spencer Ware andCharcandrick West? For what reason?'" Faulkrecently asked the Kansas City Star. "I can't even see what reason they would continue to pay (him) if they have a way of getting up from under that contract and dispersing money elsewhere to fill some of the gaps that they have. And that's just real talk -- that's the business of the game.
I enjoy candid opinions like that. I don`t agree with him but I am sure some people do. If they have setbacks on the defense and OL due to the fact they couldn`t spend more $ a lot of people will share his opinion next offseason.Marshall Faulk: Why do Chiefs keep Jamaal Charles?
Not sure why Faulk is trying to get Charles fired.
5 mill is a big savings. ShrugWhy would they dump him to save $5.3M? Not a huge number and I'd rather have a backfield of Charles, West, and Ware than only West and Ware.
Coach Andy Reid said Jamaal Charles (ACL) might not be cleared for training camp.
"We’ll have to see with Jamaal," said Reid. "You don’t want to take any steps back." Charles did some individual work at OTAs, but isn’t going to be full-go at the start of camp. Kansas City could rest Charles the entire preseason. Charles has setback risks coming off two knee surgeries in the last four years, but remains on track for Week 1.
Source: ESPN