This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
The arguments exist supporting other hot recent pickups like Tashard Choice, Javarris James, Anthony Dixon, and Westbrook. When you look at these options in terms of inter-team competition, it seems like Starks only has to worry about Brandon Jackson, while the rest of them seem to be sharing with more than one mouth (once other RBs return from injury).
Another thing to consider is that GB has less than an attractive schedule for the rest of the year.
The arguments exist supporting other hot recent pickups like Tashard Choice, Javarris James, Anthony Dixon, and Westbrook. When you look at these options in terms of inter-team competition, it seems like Starks only has to worry about Brandon Jackson, while the rest of them seem to be sharing with more than one mouth (once other RBs return from injury).Another thing to consider is that GB has less than an attractive schedule for the rest of the year.
And McCarthy is hard to read with the running game. Against SF he gave Starks 18 carries so he decides against the Lions they should go RBBC and use Starks, Jackson and Nance.
I think that depends on both what is available on your WW and what you need. I probably wouldn't start him this week without seeing how things shake out more. Without Rodgers, the packers will use BJack heavily not only for pass protection skills but also his receiving ability.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.