Not gonna happen once he gets the HIV from a unsolicited prison shower session.Could be worse. He could be fat.
It is a defense to the charge that you received it on a cell phone/tablet or through visiting social media.So if an acquaintance of mine texts me a child pornographic pic without my solicitation, and I immediately delete the text and respond, "Don't ever send me something like that again," I can still be charged with possession OR reception of child pornographic materials?
Similarly, if I receive a package in the mail with physical photographs and throw them away immediately, and the police raid my trash, can the same logic be applied?
I gave an example of a way it could mess him up publicly, not a quote from an actual news report.17 minor or ??"Today, FBI investigators found out that the person at the center of this ring texted one of the photos identified as a nude photograph of a minor to Jarred two months ago. This stands in direct opposition to his previous statement that he had never 'viewed' child pornography. Further, Jarred appears to have deleted the text message some time between receiving it and now - despite his claim that he would fully cooperate with the investigation."
The NY Post has a new story up with some details. I assume they could have hit him with 15+ charges. He would have spent the rest of his meaningful life in prison.I'm curious as to what he would've gotten if he had not taken the plea deal and gotten convicted.
I fully retract the above statement. Rot in hell, Jared.Because someone texted him a pic? Seems like he got a raw deal.BroncoFreak_2K3 said:effinHenry Ford said:Looks like he may never see the inside of a prison. He's pleading guilty to possession, which is the lowest level felony possible - and it looks like judges have the discretion to enter judgment as a Class A misdemeanor sometimes in Indiana for a Level 6 felony conviction. That would be messed up![]()
Trials are long and difficult and occasionally get lost even when you have the guy by the #####. A case like this could require that the victims take the stand and testify about having sex with Jared. The photos of child pornography victims engaged in underage sex acts would be shown to judge/jury/etc. And at the end of the day, juries are generally idiots.Hang 10 said:Why would they offer him a plea when it's pretty obvious they found evidence at his house? What's the advantage for the FBI?Henry Ford said:Looks like he may never see the inside of a prison. He's pleading guilty to possession, which is the lowest level felony possible - and it looks like judges have the discretion to enter judgment as a Class A misdemeanor sometimes in Indiana for a Level 6 felony conviction. That would be messed up
Let me put it this way:
If you could get $5,000.00 for winning and your head would be cut off and mounted on a pike if you lost, would you take the following challenge?
Pick twelve random people who could not get out of jury duty, and convince them that the Earth is not flat.
I'd imagine they at least take his face off the kids menu.Does Subway do anything additional to seperate themselves from this, or do they never mention Jared again?
Now make it $50,000.00, but someone is arguing against you in front of them that the world is flat, and he makes about $500K a year to argue that all the time.Let me put it this way:
If you could get $5,000.00 for winning and your head would be cut off and mounted on a pike if you lost, would you take the following challenge?
Pick twelve random people who could not get out of jury duty, and convince them that the Earth is not flat.![]()
Sex/human trafficking is a problem in the US, not just overseas.I would of thought "traveling" would have been overseas. It's crazy to think there are child prostitution rings here in the US. Hopefully the FBI gets all the people involved in this. The victims families have to be involved in this as well.
Him responding to the text with "DEELISH!" probably didn't help him.Because someone texted him a pic? Seems like he got a raw deal.BroncoFreak_2K3 said:effinHenry Ford said:Looks like he may never see the inside of a prison. He's pleading guilty to possession, which is the lowest level felony possible - and it looks like judges have the discretion to enter judgment as a Class A misdemeanor sometimes in Indiana for a Level 6 felony conviction. That would be messed up![]()
Oh, I don't know, this old Jared Subway ad seems perfect right about now. Could be a good sardonic campaign.Does Subway do anything additional to seperate themselves from this, or do they never mention Jared again?
Yeah, but they already cut ties with him when he was a person of interest with child porn. Now he's been having sex with minors. A smidgen more severe.Oh, I don't know, this old Jared Subway ad seems perfect right about now. Could be a good sardonic campaign.Does Subway do anything additional to seperate themselves from this, or do they never mention Jared again?
Last few days, FBI found text messages.Haven't really been following the story. Is all of this "paid to have sex with minors" stuff new?
I hope he gets abused badly in prison.
Should be 50 to 130 years in a pound me in the @$$ prison.Wow. 5 to 13 years.
Now make it $50,000.00, but someone is arguing against you in front of them that the world is flat, and he makes about $500K a year to argue that all the time.Let me put it this way:
If you could get $5,000.00 for winning and your head would be cut off and mounted on a pike if you lost, would you take the following challenge?
Pick twelve random people who could not get out of jury duty, and convince them that the Earth is not flat.![]()

I sure hope its much more than 5 years.Jared Fogle was just charged with "travel to engage in elicit sexual conduct with minors."
Up to now, the only information in the case was that he allegedly possessed child porn, but the case is far more serious. According to the complaint, between 2010 and 2013, Fogle traveled between Indiana and NYC to engage in sexual acts with minors. The complaint says Fogle paid for sex.
The complaint says in text messages with one of the 14 minor victims, Fogle said he would accept a 16-year-old girl while stating that "the younger the girl, the better."
The complaint says he asked some of the victims to send him pictures of themselves.
The complaint says the child porn authorities found photos and videos of boys and girls. It's unclear the gender of those with whom he had sex.
Part of the case involves images Fogle received from Russell Taylor, the head of Fogle's foundation. According to the complaint, Taylor sent Fogle photos and videos from hidden cameras in Taylor's house, featuring children as young as approximately 6.
Under the plea deal, Fogle agreed to serve at least 5 years in prison and must pay restitution of $1.4 million -- $100,000 per victim. And he must register as a sex offender.
Part of Fogle's punishment ... he can't possess obscene materials, he must participate in a sexual disorders program, can't have unsupervised meetings with minors, and his computers will be subject to random checks.
Fogle turned himself into the FBI today and he's currently being processed.
Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2015/08/19/jared-fogle-underage-sex-child-pornography-charges-plea-prison/#ixzz3jGvHh3sJ
I was thinking shack up with Sandusky in whatever they call the protected wing.Maybe he can flee the country and live with Roman Polanski.
Sounds like it was a shopping list or catalog he was reviewing, deciding which minor to purchase sex with.FWIW, the possession charges are a lot more extensive than just "receiving a text message" as well.
I was more talking about the part where he knew the guy with his foundation was surreptitiously taping minors staying at his home and then sharing the images with Jared. Really gross stuff.Sounds like it was a shopping list or catalog he was reviewing, deciding which minor to purchase sex with.FWIW, the possession charges are a lot more extensive than just "receiving a text message" as well.
With so much depravity being revealed at once, one can hardly blame me for missing your point. That said, agreed that the behavior you single out does indeed shock my conscience.I was more talking about the part where he knew the guy with his foundation was surreptitiously taping minors staying at his home and then sharing the images with Jared. Really gross stuff.Sounds like it was a shopping list or catalog he was reviewing, deciding which minor to purchase sex with.FWIW, the possession charges are a lot more extensive than just "receiving a text message" as well.
JFC.http://www.tmz.com/2015/08/19/jared-fogle-underage-sex-child-pornography-charges-plea-prison/#ixzz3jGkbslQi
Sorry for TMZ.
Apparently he had paid to have sex with under aged kids multiple times.
Part of the case involves images Fogle received from Russell Taylor, the head of Fogle's foundation. According to the complaint, Taylor sent Fogle photos and videos from hidden cameras in Taylor's house, featuring children as young as approximately 6.
Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2015/08/19/jared-fogle-underage-sex-child-pornography-charges-plea-prison/#ixzz3jH7ZfP5v
I posted along the lines of this before.The recklessness of it is so baffling. How could the face of a company put himself in those kind of situations? Maybe the risk was part of the thrill for him? Even "regular" infidelity would have been risky from an image standpoint. This is obviously a million times worse. What the hell was he thinking?
Hopefully does not make it to 5 years.So will he serve at least 5 years? Could he serve more?
Not me. I hope he suffers until he's eligible for parole and then he dies a terrible death at the hands of his fellow prisoners.I sure hope its much more than 5 years.Jared Fogle was just charged with "travel to engage in elicit sexual conduct with minors."
Up to now, the only information in the case was that he allegedly possessed child porn, but the case is far more serious. According to the complaint, between 2010 and 2013, Fogle traveled between Indiana and NYC to engage in sexual acts with minors. The complaint says Fogle paid for sex.
The complaint says in text messages with one of the 14 minor victims, Fogle said he would accept a 16-year-old girl while stating that "the younger the girl, the better."
The complaint says he asked some of the victims to send him pictures of themselves.
The complaint says the child porn authorities found photos and videos of boys and girls. It's unclear the gender of those with whom he had sex.
Part of the case involves images Fogle received from Russell Taylor, the head of Fogle's foundation. According to the complaint, Taylor sent Fogle photos and videos from hidden cameras in Taylor's house, featuring children as young as approximately 6.
Under the plea deal, Fogle agreed to serve at least 5 years in prison and must pay restitution of $1.4 million -- $100,000 per victim. And he must register as a sex offender.
Part of Fogle's punishment ... he can't possess obscene materials, he must participate in a sexual disorders program, can't have unsupervised meetings with minors, and his computers will be subject to random checks.
Fogle turned himself into the FBI today and he's currently being processed.
Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2015/08/19/jared-fogle-underage-sex-child-pornography-charges-plea-prison/#ixzz3jGvHh3sJ
Became famous for consuming six inch subs.JFC.http://www.tmz.com/2015/08/19/jared-fogle-underage-sex-child-pornography-charges-plea-prison/#ixzz3jGkbslQi
Sorry for TMZ.
Apparently he had paid to have sex with under aged kids multiple times.
Part of the case involves images Fogle received from Russell Taylor, the head of Fogle's foundation. According to the complaint, Taylor sent Fogle photos and videos from hidden cameras in Taylor's house, featuring children as young as approximately 6.
Read more: http://www.tmz.com/2015/08/19/jared-fogle-underage-sex-child-pornography-charges-plea-prison/#ixzz3jH7ZfP5v
My prediction: on parole after 36 months, maximum.Hopefully does not make it to 5 years.So will he serve at least 5 years? Could he serve more?
You have no problem if thats what happens?My prediction: on parole after 36 months, maximum.Hopefully does not make it to 5 years.So will he serve at least 5 years? Could he serve more?
Maybe it's just me... I have no problem with that.