What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Jarrett Boykin (1 Viewer)

Most back up QBs have a better relationship or chemistry with back up receivers. It's no surprise that Tolzien might have a radar lock on Boykin when he first is on the field. I would expect Nelson to get a few more targets but someone other than Nelson has to catch the football. Expect a huge dose of Lacy on the ground but also Boykin will continue a solid run as he likely has been working with Tolzien a little more than say Jordy Nelson who spends all his time with Aaron Rodgers.

 
Give Tolzien a full week of starter reps with Jordy & J.Jones and it is very possible that the Boykin love will diminish.

 
Premature evacuation?

13 targets yesterday...
"Weekend Update" recognizes its responsibility to present responsible opposing viewpoints to our editorials. Here, with an editiorial reply, is Miss Emily Litella.

Emily Litella: What’s all this fuss I’ve been hearing about the 1976 presidential erection? Now, I know they erected a monument for Mr. Lincoln and President Washington, but that’s because they’re DEAD! Hopefully, the 1976 President won’t be DEAD! So he won’t NEED an erection! If Americans are going to spend money to erect anything, why don’t we tear down those nasty slums and erect luxury high rises for poor people and senior citizens! Not for presidents who can afford to pay for their OWN erections!

Chevy Chase: Miss Litella --

Emily Litella: I can’t believe the way things are turning out in this country -- what?

Chevy Chase: I'm sorry. That’s election. The editorial was about the presidential election, not the presidential erection. Election.

Emily Litella: Oh, that’s very different.

Chevy Chase: Yes.

Emily Litella: Never mind.

Chevy Chase: And that's the news. Good night. Good night, and have a pleasant tomorrow.

 
Premature evacuation?

13 targets yesterday...
"Weekend Update" recognizes its responsibility to present responsible opposing viewpoints to our editorials. Here, with an editiorial reply, is Miss Emily Litella.

Emily Litella: What’s all this fuss I’ve been hearing about the 1976 presidential erection? Now, I know they erected a monument for Mr. Lincoln and President Washington, but that’s because they’re DEAD! Hopefully, the 1976 President won’t be DEAD! So he won’t NEED an erection! If Americans are going to spend money to erect anything, why don’t we tear down those nasty slums and erect luxury high rises for poor people and senior citizens! Not for presidents who can afford to pay for their OWN erections!

Chevy Chase: Miss Litella --

Emily Litella: I can’t believe the way things are turning out in this country -- what?

Chevy Chase: I'm sorry. That’s election. The editorial was about the presidential election, not the presidential erection. Election.

Emily Litella: Oh, that’s very different.

Chevy Chase: Yes.

Emily Litella: Never mind.

Chevy Chase: And that's the news. Good night. Good night, and have a pleasant tomorrow.
Winner!!!

 
These rides always end the same. Thankfully this one ended today and not in playoffs like DX last year. Probably cost me a bye, but he's back to a roster stash as opposed to starter for me

 
So where is everyone on his dynasty value given his production to date? Somewhat consistent WR3 or more upside potential. GB landscape will be much different next year with ARod, Cobb healthy.

 
Not sure what his contract situation will be. To be honest I don't think Rodgers will look to him as much and his role will be reduced. Cobb is too good to leave off the field as is Jordy. I don't see Boykin having the juice to bench either of those two. So He will most likely be relegated to a situational role in 3 or 4 wide sets.

 
Right now I see him as the WR3 in GB, which has some value in dynasty. I don't think Jones will be back next year. Curious about the TE position, too. Maybe Quarless is the front runner with Finley's injury. The emergence of Lacy does help "balance" the offense, but GB was never a throw 600+ team. Very interested to see how this team looks in 2014

 
WR3...but a lot of things to look at going forward.

-Jones is a UFA after this season.

-Nelson and Cobb's deals are up after next season.

-TE? Is it Quarless, Bostick...Finley (doubtful)

But even as a WR3 he could have a nice niche in the offense. Cobb and Nelson also have not always been the picture of perfect health.

 
Rotoworld:

Coach Mike McCarthy said he's "as high on [Jarrett] Boykin as anybody in our building."

This should put the nail in free agent James Jones' Packers coffin. The head coach is a good guy to have in your corner, and Boykin appears to have made quite an impression. "He had a heck of a year, and I still think he has another jump in him. ... I've always liked Jarrett. I've always felt he had it," said McCarthy, who added that he sees Boykin evolving into an eventual No. 2 receiver. For now, he'll be the No. 3 man behind Jordy Nelson and slot receiver Randall Cobb. It's nearly an every-down role in the Packers' scheme, leaving Boykin with plenty of 2014 upside.

Related: James Jones

Source: Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel
 
WR3...but a lot of things to look at going forward.

-Jones is a UFA after this season.

-Nelson and Cobb's deals are up after next season.

-TE? Is it Quarless, Bostick...Finley (doubtful)

But even as a WR3 he could have a nice niche in the offense. Cobb and Nelson also have not always been the picture of perfect health.
I'm not sure how startable he'll be with Nelson and Cobb healthy, but he's great insurance if (when?) one of them goes down. Solid WR2 if he starts.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mike McCarthy: Jarrett Boykin will 'step up' for PackBy Chris Wesseling

Around the League Writer

Prior to free agency, coach Mike McCarthy suggested wide receiver Jarrett Boykin's emergence would make it easier for the Green Bay Packers to move on from James Jones.

Now that Jones is returning home to Oakland, McCarthy said he "fully expects" Boykin to "step up."

"I can't say enough about Boykin," McCarthy told reporters at the NFL Annual Meeting on Wednesday. "The young man is a heck of a player, he's done it the right way, special teams, he's performed every opportunity he's given."

Boykin landed on our Making the Leap list last November, when he averaged 82 yards over a five-game span with Jones hobbled and Randall Cobb out of the lineup.

In a Week 10 loss to the Eagles, Boykin was the best player on the field for the Packers.

The coaches found out Virginia Tech's all-time leading receiver was a keeper when injuries struck last season. If that stretch of bad luck happens again this year, they better hope No. 4 receiver Myles White is up to the same task.

The latest "Around The League Podcast" broke down all the latest news at the NFL Annual Meetin
 
I think you can just plug Boykin right into that lineup to be honest. I don't expect much dropoff from James Jones. And if the Packers get their annual injury epidemic again, he'll be a top 20 receiver most weeks filling in for Cobb or Nelson.

 
Coach Mike McCarthy continued to fawn over Jarrett Boykin at the NFL Annual Meeting.

McCarthy first unloaded praise on Boykin a month ago, signaling the end of James Jones' Packers career. Now he's at it again as Boykin prepares to be Aaron Rodgers' clear-cut No. 3 target behind Jordy Nelson and Randalll Cobb. "I can't say enough about Boykin," McCarthy said Wednesday. "The young man is a heck of a player." He remains an obvious breakout candidate.
 
I think you can just plug Boykin right into that lineup to be honest. I don't expect much dropoff from James Jones. And if the Packers get their annual injury epidemic again, he'll be a top 20 receiver most weeks filling in for Cobb or Nelson.
Deeper leagues sure and 3 WR leagues.

Also will have to wait to see if they do anything else at TE.

Great guy to at least stash if Cobb or Nelson miss time.

 
I will be drafting Boykin as a top 35 receiver this year. I love the upside and even without injuries I can see him putting up 950 and 10 TDs.

 
Man, I just wonder if that's some sorta smokescreen. I don't think anyone questioned them not signing Jones to the contract he received. But with so many highly touted WR's and as a holder of Boykin in dynasty I wonder if he could beat out a 2nd-3rd rounder from this year even with his knowledge of the system. Hope he's the Packers Lance Moore. A FA spending 8 years in a prolific passing offense. Maybe this is just a preemptive strike on them not drafting a WR early.

 
Man, I just wonder if that's some sorta smokescreen. I don't think anyone questioned them not signing Jones to the contract he received. But with so many highly touted WR's and as a holder of Boykin in dynasty I wonder if he could beat out a 2nd-3rd rounder from this year even with his knowledge of the system. Hope he's the Packers Lance Moore. A FA spending 8 years in a prolific passing offense. Maybe this is just a preemptive strike on them not drafting a WR early.
Smokescreen? Just to draft a WR in the 2nd or 3rd? They probably will draft a WR somewhere but does not make Boykin any less loved by the coach or less talented. Comments like this is exactly how people over think some stuff.

 
Probably in the minority but I don't think Boykin will carry the type of fantasy impact some are tossing out here. At the end of the day, he is still in a pecking order of

Nelson, Cobb, and possibly a TE and/or Lacy in terms of distribution. I think that equates to inconsistency which, at what will likely end up at Boykin's hyped price, is too much.

THe Packers have had guys in and out of their lineup for two years now so its hard to just look at it and say he will replace Jones because a lot of those games Nelson was out, Finley was out, Cobb was out, or it was before they had Lacy running well.

I think it ends with some promising games but I want to pay the true WR3/flex price and I doubt I can get him for that.

 
Man, I just wonder if that's some sorta smokescreen. I don't think anyone questioned them not signing Jones to the contract he received. But with so many highly touted WR's and as a holder of Boykin in dynasty I wonder if he could beat out a 2nd-3rd rounder from this year even with his knowledge of the system. Hope he's the Packers Lance Moore. A FA spending 8 years in a prolific passing offense. Maybe this is just a preemptive strike on them not drafting a WR early.
Smokescreen? Just to draft a WR in the 2nd or 3rd? They probably will draft a WR somewhere but does not make Boykin any less loved by the coach or less talented. Comments like this is exactly how people over think some stuff.
The March coachspeak isn't exactly worth anything, either. If a WR that the Packers like falls to a spot in the draft that they feel represents good value, they'll take him. And there are quite a few WRs in this year's class that can give Boykin a serious challenge for that WR3 spot. It's way too early to put anything down in other than pencil.

 
Probably in the minority but I don't think Boykin will carry the type of fantasy impact some are tossing out here. At the end of the day, he is still in a pecking order of

Nelson, Cobb, and possibly a TE and/or Lacy in terms of distribution. I think that equates to inconsistency which, at what will likely end up at Boykin's hyped price, is too much.

THe Packers have had guys in and out of their lineup for two years now so its hard to just look at it and say he will replace Jones because a lot of those games Nelson was out, Finley was out, Cobb was out, or it was before they had Lacy running well.

I think it ends with some promising games but I want to pay the true WR3/flex price and I doubt I can get him for that.
He didnt play early in the season but weeks 7-16 he only had two games of less than 5 catches, he had two games of 100+ yards and three others of 80+ yards, has good size and speed at prototypical #1 WR size. From Weeks 7-16 when he played he was WR21 in my league beating out the likes of Michael Floyd, Torrey Smith and Fitz. Yeah, I roll my eyes at the consistency question and why would they be smoke screening when people with eyes can look at his production and talent.

Oh and he had that consistency with Flynn and Tolzien throwing him the ball, panic away and over think it though, enjoy.

 
Probably in the minority but I don't think Boykin will carry the type of fantasy impact some are tossing out here. At the end of the day, he is still in a pecking order of

Nelson, Cobb, and possibly a TE and/or Lacy in terms of distribution. I think that equates to inconsistency which, at what will likely end up at Boykin's hyped price, is too much.

THe Packers have had guys in and out of their lineup for two years now so its hard to just look at it and say he will replace Jones because a lot of those games Nelson was out, Finley was out, Cobb was out, or it was before they had Lacy running well.

I think it ends with some promising games but I want to pay the true WR3/flex price and I doubt I can get him for that.
He didnt play early in the season but weeks 7-16 he only had two games of less than 5 catches, he had two games of 100+ yards and three others of 80+ yards, has good size and speed at prototypical #1 WR size. From Weeks 7-16 when he played he was WR21 in my league beating out the likes of Michael Floyd, Torrey Smith and Fitz. Yeah, I roll my eyes at the consistency question and why would they be smoke screening when people with eyes can look at his production and talent.

Oh and he had that consistency with Flynn and Tolzien throwing him the ball, panic away and over think it though, enjoy.
You must be a proud rose-colored glasses-wearing Boykin owner. THe info is right there in front of you.

Cobb goes out in game 5. Finley goes out in game 6. THEN, a team without Cobb or Finley (and just getting Lacy in the groove) has a Wr with numbers that go from nothing to notable.

What exactly do you think is going to happen? Cobb AND Nelson AND their Te AND their running game, which they have been starving for and finally have, is going to get pushed to the background so that this guy can get 8-10 targets (so that he can get the 5-8 catches he needs to be CONSISTENTLY fantasy relevant)? C'mon.

He'll have his moments. But it is NOT going to happen consistently and that's the problem. You can't buy him at a Nate Burleson/Lance Moore/Martellius Bennett price and enjoy those random 3-5 games a year where it was good he was a starter in your lineup. You are going to ahve to buy him at a much higher price and you will get burned more often than not, barring an injury to the three guys that are clearly higher in the pecking order in that offense.

And you mention the backup QBs. That should be a BIG RED FLAG. Backup qbs very often find themselves in games throwing to backup WRS because those are the guys THEY KNOW. the guys they practice with and understand the timing.

When Rodgers comes back, he KNOWS Nelson and Cobb, etc. He's not going to have the same kind of immediate, natural love for Boykin that he has for Nelson, Cobb, etc.

You're going to be disappointed if you are hitching your wagon to Boykin thinking he is going to be some surprising darling. enjoy.

In the game with Rodgers at the end of the season: 2 catches/8 yards. Rodgers is not Flynn. Its a different game when all the guys are healthy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Probably in the minority but I don't think Boykin will carry the type of fantasy impact some are tossing out here. At the end of the day, he is still in a pecking order of

Nelson, Cobb, and possibly a TE and/or Lacy in terms of distribution. I think that equates to inconsistency which, at what will likely end up at Boykin's hyped price, is too much.

THe Packers have had guys in and out of their lineup for two years now so its hard to just look at it and say he will replace Jones because a lot of those games Nelson was out, Finley was out, Cobb was out, or it was before they had Lacy running well.

I think it ends with some promising games but I want to pay the true WR3/flex price and I doubt I can get him for that.
He didnt play early in the season but weeks 7-16 he only had two games of less than 5 catches, he had two games of 100+ yards and three others of 80+ yards, has good size and speed at prototypical #1 WR size. From Weeks 7-16 when he played he was WR21 in my league beating out the likes of Michael Floyd, Torrey Smith and Fitz. Yeah, I roll my eyes at the consistency question and why would they be smoke screening when people with eyes can look at his production and talent.

Oh and he had that consistency with Flynn and Tolzien throwing him the ball, panic away and over think it though, enjoy.
You must be a proud rose-colored glasses-wearing Boykin owner. THe info is right there in front of you.Cobb goes out in game 5. Finley goes out in game 6. THEN, a team without Cobb or Finley (and just getting Lacy in the groove) has a Wr with numbers that go from nothing to notable.

What exactly do you think is going to happen? Cobb AND Nelson AND their Te AND their running game, which they have been starving for and finally have, is going to get pushed to the background so that this guy can get 8-10 targets (so that he can get the 5-8 catches he needs to be CONSISTENTLY fantasy relevant)? C'mon.

He'll have his moments. But it is NOT going to happen consistently and that's the problem. You can't buy him at a Nate Burleson/Lance Moore/Martellius Bennett price and enjoy those random 3-5 games a year where it was good he was a starter in your lineup. You are going to ahve to buy him at a much higher price and you will get burned more often than not, barring an injury to the three guys that are clearly higher in the pecking order in that offense.

And you mention the backup QBs. That should be a BIG RED FLAG. Backup qbs very often find themselves in games throwing to backup WRS because those are the guys THEY KNOW. the guys they practice with and understand the timing.

When Rodgers comes back, he KNOWS Nelson and Cobb, etc. He's not going to have the same kind of immediate, natural love for Boykin that he has for Nelson, Cobb, etc.

You're going to be disappointed if you are hitching your wagon to Boykin thinking he is going to be some surprising darling. enjoy.

In the game with Rodgers at the end of the season: 2 catches/8 yards. Rodgers is not Flynn. Its a different game when all the guys are healthy.
:goodposting:

I like Boykin as a dynasty investment, but anyone expecting him to do what he did last year, with different QBs and a bunch of injuries, is kidding themselves. GB's WR3 hasn't historically been a hugely productive spot most years, and Boykin isn't going to overtake Nelson or Cobb. You're not going to want him in your lineup unless your league is hugely deep or injury strikes one of the top two guys.

 
Probably in the minority but I don't think Boykin will carry the type of fantasy impact some are tossing out here. At the end of the day, he is still in a pecking order of

Nelson, Cobb, and possibly a TE and/or Lacy in terms of distribution. I think that equates to inconsistency which, at what will likely end up at Boykin's hyped price, is too much.

THe Packers have had guys in and out of their lineup for two years now so its hard to just look at it and say he will replace Jones because a lot of those games Nelson was out, Finley was out, Cobb was out, or it was before they had Lacy running well.

I think it ends with some promising games but I want to pay the true WR3/flex price and I doubt I can get him for that.
He didnt play early in the season but weeks 7-16 he only had two games of less than 5 catches, he had two games of 100+ yards and three others of 80+ yards, has good size and speed at prototypical #1 WR size. From Weeks 7-16 when he played he was WR21 in my league beating out the likes of Michael Floyd, Torrey Smith and Fitz. Yeah, I roll my eyes at the consistency question and why would they be smoke screening when people with eyes can look at his production and talent.

Oh and he had that consistency with Flynn and Tolzien throwing him the ball, panic away and over think it though, enjoy.
You guys are making this too complicated. He's a solid, ascending young pro in an elite offense. Jones didn't cost anything but they still decided to let him walk because they were clearly sold on Boykin's future. I think that speaks volumes. The contract Jones signed with the Raiders puts him around the 50th highest paid WR in the league. Obviously, they think Boykin has a ceiling beyond that.

Boykin is a big receiver that catches the ball very well and runs routes crisply. His only knock is long-range speed... definitely not a burner. But this offense could use a dependable intermediate possession receiver. My guess is that he becomes one of the main red-zone targets in the offense. That's an area that was sorely lacking last year after Finley got hurt. They need a big body to post up on the goal-line, and right now Boykin is the best bet. I wouldn't be surprised to see him with an 800/8 line next year, which would put him in WR4 territory. That said, he's going to disappear in games where the matchups don't favor him, so he's very much a spot starter or bye-week filler. But hey! You need those kind of guys on your roster. If you can get one of them that has major upside with injury, then all the better!

No, he's not going to be the next great thing. But he's clearly a solid value at WR4 because of the offense and upside with injuries.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
And its a different game when he is now likely the #3 WR...Finley not likely going to be back either.
Chance the Packers draft a wr in this draft? (I have no idea..just asking and just asking to say we have to keep that in mind because it could be nothing...could be everything in terms of Boykin's role and that in itself lends weight to the idea of Boykin's variance in value. The Packers could draft a top 5 Wr in this draft and it doesn't affect Cobb or Nelson. But it would be death to Boykin. On the other hand, they could pick up a guy in the 4th and 6th and, at a minimu, it would muddle the field.

But what happens if they draft a top TE? Now its like it was before with Finley: Nelson, Cobb, good Te all in front of you.

 
And its a different game when he is now likely the #3 WR...Finley not likely going to be back either.
Chance the Packers draft a wr in this draft? (I have no idea..just asking and just asking to say we have to keep that in mind because it could be nothing...could be everything in terms of Boykin's role and that in itself lends weight to the idea of Boykin's variance in value. The Packers could draft a top 5 Wr in this draft and it doesn't affect Cobb or Nelson. But it would be death to Boykin. On the other hand, they could pick up a guy in the 4th and 6th and, at a minimu, it would muddle the field.

But what happens if they draft a top TE? Now its like it was before with Finley: Nelson, Cobb, good Te all in front of you.
I think its a very good chance they use something like a 3rd-4th round pick on a WR.

Though, I don't think that is an indication of how they feel about Boykin. More of protecting themselves with Cobb and Nelson contracts being up.

I doubt you see them drafting a top 5 WR though.

And you keep saying it was just Finley, Nelson and Cobb in front of him...but Jones was in front of him too...he was the #4 guy.

When called into action, he stepped up. I think he will see a bigger role this year as the #3 guy than he had...no stretch there with Jones gone.

Rookie WRs aren't typically going to step into this offense and jump right up and overtake him.

 
Man, I just wonder if that's some sorta smokescreen. I don't think anyone questioned them not signing Jones to the contract he received. But with so many highly touted WR's and as a holder of Boykin in dynasty I wonder if he could beat out a 2nd-3rd rounder from this year even with his knowledge of the system. Hope he's the Packers Lance Moore. A FA spending 8 years in a prolific passing offense. Maybe this is just a preemptive strike on them not drafting a WR early.
Smokescreen? Just to draft a WR in the 2nd or 3rd? They probably will draft a WR somewhere but does not make Boykin any less loved by the coach or less talented. Comments like this is exactly how people over think some stuff.
I'm only wondering if he can beat out a 2nd-3rd rounder. A smokescreen would impact more of a 1st or 2nd round receiver. I know Boykin would be destined to be replaced if they drafted a first round WR which is why I didn't include that.

 
The odds at this point are very good that Boykin will be third in WR productivity for the Packers in 2014. Looking back at recent history (2010 - 2013), the Packers #3 WR (measured by end of year production) produced on average 45/660/5 and the numbers for those four years were very consistent.

2013: 49/681/3 - Boykin

2012: 49/745/7 - Nelson

2011: 38/635/7 - Jones

2010: 45/582/2 - Nelson

A 45/660/5 line gets you about WR42 in PPR. I think Boykin can do bit better than that in 2014 but don't think he should be relied on as more than a WR4 this year.

 
Some interesting comments about Jarrett Boykin in here . . .

"Of Boykin, McCarthy said the third-year wide receiver was ready to become the team's next breakout offensive star."

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000372386/article/inside-training-camp-live-whispers
After signing Jordy to good money, I wonder if they let Cobb walk with Boykin waiting in the wings?
It wouldn't surprise me if they sign Cobb too and keep Boykin as a RFA next year. This is a team that loves to be 4+ WR's deep.

 
Some interesting comments about Jarrett Boykin in here . . .

"Of Boykin, McCarthy said the third-year wide receiver was ready to become the team's next breakout offensive star."

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000372386/article/inside-training-camp-live-whispers
After signing Jordy to good money, I wonder if they let Cobb walk with Boykin waiting in the wings?
It wouldn't surprise me if they sign Cobb too and keep Boykin as a RFA next year. This is a team that loves to be 4+ WR's deep.
It has served them well. As a Cobb dynasty owner I hope they sign him.

 
The top three receivers in fantasy points per target over the last three years are Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb, and James Jones.

 
Some interesting comments about Jarrett Boykin in here . . .

"Of Boykin, McCarthy said the third-year wide receiver was ready to become the team's next breakout offensive star."

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000372386/article/inside-training-camp-live-whispers
Was... until they drafted Devonte Adams.
His actual comments:

"...We have excellent veteran leadership in Jordy (Nelson), and Randall (Cobb) in there, and Jarrett is just, he's kind of the next guy. He's done everything you've ever asked. He came in here as a free agent, a little hungry after his first opportunity, and just continued to grow with each and every opportunity. It's the most competitive receiver group I think we've had in my time here."
 
Some interesting comments about Jarrett Boykin in here . . .

"Of Boykin, McCarthy said the third-year wide receiver was ready to become the team's next breakout offensive star."

http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000372386/article/inside-training-camp-live-whispers
Was... until they drafted Devonte Adams.
His actual comments:

"...We have excellent veteran leadership in Jordy (Nelson), and Randall (Cobb) in there, and Jarrett is just, he's kind of the next guy. He's done everything you've ever asked. He came in here as a free agent, a little hungry after his first opportunity, and just continued to grow with each and every opportunity. It's the most competitive receiver group I think we've had in my time here."
I wonder if part of McCarthy's quote was left out of the article, or if the author took generous liberty with McCarthy's words, because saying Boykin "is kind of the next guy" certainly differs substantially from Boykin "is ready to become the team's next breakout offensive star."

My apologies for not reading that closer. Thanks for pointing that out, cstu!

I generally tend to trust articles I read on nfl.com more than those from most other NFL news sites, but this gives me reason for pause.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The top three receivers in fantasy points per target over the last three years are Jordy Nelson, Randall Cobb, and James Jones.
Something tells me Boykin and Adams will be near the top of this list for 2014, while Jones falls out of the top 25 (arbitrary cutoff).

How did Jennings do in this stat while with Rodgers? How about last year?

 
Rotoworld:

Jarrett Boykin - WR - Packers

The Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel's Tom Silverstein reports Packers WR Jarrett Boykin has struggled with dropped passes during training camp.

Boykin dropped five of his 75 targets last season, so we don't anticipate this being a major issue. But with the Packers having drafted Davante Adams and Jeff Janis in May, there's plenty of competition in camp. Boykin is still the favorite for No. 3 duties in the James Jones role. We like him as a value pick at his current 11th round ADP. The Packers are going to put up a ton of points.

Source: Tom Silverstein on Twitter

Aug 4 - 7:56 PM
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top