What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Johnny Knox & Devin Aromashodu, WRs, Chicago Bears (1 Viewer)

That was tongue-in-cheek, az_prof...I think the answer is none of the above because they will spread it around with different guys getting double digit targets week to week.

The Lions had RoY in Martz first year (at the time, still seen as a riser), and Megatron in Year two. Those guys on the outside tied up coverages, and Kitna's read was often to the slot guy. Not sure that Cutler will be going through the same kind of progression. Plus Olsen is way more talented than anyone the Lions had at the time (Pollard?).
Has Martz EVER made use of a talented tight end? I'm not factoring in TE production until I see Martz actually use one. Olsen is a nice player, but if Martz couldn't use Vernon Davis in the passing game, is he really likely to use Olsen?
Martz uses TE to block mostly.Olsen, as a featured H back, will line up anywhere - in the slot, motioned out of the backfield, whatevs.

Is Lovie still the coach? Because regardless of how much control you think Martz has, the HC still talks about Olsen as a special player who will be featured.

 
Aromashodu is the best WR on the Bears. It doesn't matter who's the split end, who's the flanker, and who's in the slot. The slot can lead the team in receptions in a Mike Martz offense (see: Mike Furrey, 2006).

Knox and Hester both have more big-play ability. But Aromashodu runs the best patterns and has the best hands. He's going to be Cutler's security blanket. Mark it down. ;)
Knox has way more upside and has accomplished just as much in the NFL. Aromashodu is the epitome of NFL journeyman.
Far from it.
Ok, debate otherwise then. His career is that of a journeyman NFL player and he's not an overly skilled WR.
Ok, lets look at the definition of journeyman:"any experienced, competent but routine worker or performer."

He had 22 receptions for 282 yards and 4 tds his last 4 games of last year. 2009 was his first chance at actually playing in an NFL regular season game. He shined when he was given the chance to. That many receptions in a 4 game period shows that Cutler had the confidence in him to keep throwing it his way. He's 26, an age when WRs are proven to hit their primes.

He has prototype size for a NFL WR. Take a look at the beginning of Joe Horn's career, a very comparable player.

Joe Horn had 53 catches for 879 yards his first four years in the NFL, only to develop into a 4 time pro bowler with the Saints. Of course this isn't the norm, but prototype size and speed is the first thing I look at when evaluating whether or not a WR can shine, Devin has this and now he has the opportunity in a Mike Martz system.

Writing Aromashodu off as a journeyman at the age of 26 is your loss.
5'11" and 190 lbs is the prototype size for a wr?
 
Something else to consider- Martz' offense is incredibly complicated. When you see the Bears having trouble knowing where to line-up in preseason, you can bet they don't know where theyre sposed to end up either. Hester and Bennett are alleged to be slow learners (thats being very kind). Not sure about Knox and Aromashodu, but pretty good bet they are picking things up somewhat quicker. A big part of whether this offense ever gets off the ground despite a porous O-line is how much faith Cutler will have in these two being where he expects them to be when the ball arrives. That being said, Hester and Bennett are not going to take their jobs... particularly Hester. He may be the fastest and most experienced WR, but he'll have to be given limited plays to learn in a limited role or he'll be running into goal posts all season. So the upside is these two guys are probably going to be there all season come what may.

 
Aromashodu is the best WR on the Bears. It doesn't matter who's the split end, who's the flanker, and who's in the slot. The slot can lead the team in receptions in a Mike Martz offense (see: Mike Furrey, 2006).

Knox and Hester both have more big-play ability. But Aromashodu runs the best patterns and has the best hands. He's going to be Cutler's security blanket. Mark it down. :shrug:
Knox has way more upside and has accomplished just as much in the NFL. Aromashodu is the epitome of NFL journeyman.
Far from it.
Ok, debate otherwise then. His career is that of a journeyman NFL player and he's not an overly skilled WR.
Ok, lets look at the definition of journeyman:"any experienced, competent but routine worker or performer."

He had 22 receptions for 282 yards and 4 tds his last 4 games of last year. 2009 was his first chance at actually playing in an NFL regular season game. He shined when he was given the chance to. That many receptions in a 4 game period shows that Cutler had the confidence in him to keep throwing it his way. He's 26, an age when WRs are proven to hit their primes.

He has prototype size for a NFL WR. Take a look at the beginning of Joe Horn's career, a very comparable player.

Joe Horn had 53 catches for 879 yards his first four years in the NFL, only to develop into a 4 time pro bowler with the Saints. Of course this isn't the norm, but prototype size and speed is the first thing I look at when evaluating whether or not a WR can shine, Devin has this and now he has the opportunity in a Mike Martz system.

Writing Aromashodu off as a journeyman at the age of 26 is your loss.
So basically your argument is that he has good size and that Joe Horn ended up developing into a pro bowler. Size is not a skill and Joe Horn was one in a 100. I'll say it again, Aromashadu is the epitome of an NFL journeyman. His career reads verbatim the deffenition of a journeyman. With that said, me, nor anybody else is writing him off. He's just not "easily the most talented WR on the team".
 
That was tongue-in-cheek, az_prof...I think the answer is none of the above because they will spread it around with different guys getting double digit targets week to week.

The Lions had RoY in Martz first year (at the time, still seen as a riser), and Megatron in Year two. Those guys on the outside tied up coverages, and Kitna's read was often to the slot guy. Not sure that Cutler will be going through the same kind of progression. Plus Olsen is way more talented than anyone the Lions had at the time (Pollard?).
Has Martz EVER made use of a talented tight end? I'm not factoring in TE production until I see Martz actually use one. Olsen is a nice player, but if Martz couldn't use Vernon Davis in the passing game, is he really likely to use Olsen?
Martz uses TE to block mostly.Olsen, as a featured H back, will line up anywhere - in the slot, motioned out of the backfield, whatevs.

Is Lovie still the coach? Because regardless of how much control you think Martz has, the HC still talks about Olsen as a special player who will be featured.
Why would you bring in a coordinator that historically gets little production out of TEs if your TE is such a special player? I like Olsen, but I'm not going to ignore Martz' history. I'm not saying Olsen will suck. I expect a little less than what he produced last year. It's just tough to expect a Martz TE to get over 50 catches....in spite of all the nice things everyone says in July/August.

 
So basically your argument is that he has good size and that Joe Horn ended up developing into a pro bowler. Size is not a skill and Joe Horn was one in a 100. I'll say it again, Aromashadu is the epitome of an NFL journeyman. His career reads verbatim the deffenition of a journeyman. With that said, me, nor anybody else is writing him off. He's just not "easily the most talented WR on the team".
I just don't understand how a player still in the developmental stages of his career can be labeled a "journeyman". This term is generally reserved for players past their prime or who have been given an opportunity and failed with it. He is just entering his prime. It's not like he was ever given a chance to perform on any of those other teams. A journeyman is what you see, what you get. I never claimed he is easily the most talented WR on the team, my claim was that "journeyman" status is absurd.
 
So basically your argument is that he has good size and that Joe Horn ended up developing into a pro bowler. Size is not a skill and Joe Horn was one in a 100. I'll say it again, Aromashadu is the epitome of an NFL journeyman. His career reads verbatim the deffenition of a journeyman. With that said, me, nor anybody else is writing him off. He's just not "easily the most talented WR on the team".
I just don't understand how a player still in the developmental stages of his career can be labeled a "journeyman". This term is generally reserved for players past their prime or who have been given an opportunity and failed with it. He is just entering his prime. It's not like he was ever given a chance to perform on any of those other teams. A journeyman is what you see, what you get. I never claimed he is easily the most talented WR on the team, my claim was that "journeyman" status is absurd.
Drafted in 2006 and stints with:DolphinsColtsTexansRedskinsBearsSounds like a journeyman to me, and actually "journeyman" might be a bit generous.
 
5'11" and 190 lbs is the prototype size for a wr?
:confused: :confused: :confused: No, but 6'2" 201 lbs sure is, and is what the NFL lists him as.Did he shrink or what?
My bad...combining too many trains of thought in my mind and confusing one Bears wr named Devin with the other. Aromashodu does have the size/speed you look for in a wr. Seriously, I'm an idiot. :bag: Now that I'm caught up, Aromashodu does have good measurables. I wouldn't call him a prototype...I think that is something around 6'4" and 225 lbs (Andre Johnson, Calvin Johnson, Terrell Owens) However, it is difficult to ignore that he was a 7th rd pick that is now on his 5th team. He has done less in his career than Knox did in his rookie year. At THIS point, DA is a journeyman. However, he is the type that should not be written off because, as you noted, he has the physical skills and opportunity to now become something more. I wouldn't be too optimistic...there is likely a reason 4 other teams gave up on him, but the #2 receiver (I know, some say he can be #1, some say 3 or 4) in an offense that figures to put up over 4,000 passing yards and 30ish passing tds is intriguing.
 
So basically your argument is that he has good size and that Joe Horn ended up developing into a pro bowler. Size is not a skill and Joe Horn was one in a 100. I'll say it again, Aromashadu is the epitome of an NFL journeyman. His career reads verbatim the deffenition of a journeyman. With that said, me, nor anybody else is writing him off. He's just not "easily the most talented WR on the team".
I just don't understand how a player still in the developmental stages of his career can be labeled a "journeyman". This term is generally reserved for players past their prime or who have been given an opportunity and failed with it. He is just entering his prime. It's not like he was ever given a chance to perform on any of those other teams. A journeyman is what you see, what you get. I never claimed he is easily the most talented WR on the team, my claim was that "journeyman" status is absurd.
I suppose there are differing definitions or interpretations of what exactly a journeyman is. TO has played for several teams, but he's always been a featured starter if not the focal point of the offense, so I don't consider him a journeyman. However, any player that has played for more than 2 teams in which he was not at least a regular starter I probably would consider to be a journeyman. Even some regular starters I might consider to be journeymen if teams never seem to want to commit to the players for more than a few years.
 
lol at the journeyman talk.....who cares....call him a turkey baster if you want.....

DA has skills and was the best WR on this team at the end of last year in terms of production (which is all we really care about) with all the same guys he is around now.......the system has changed and that's where the discussion should really begin and end......and what affect, if any, it will have on the production of these guys......

right now it looks like the system will increase Knox, possibly decrease Hester and Bennett, and maybe an overall increase for DA, as it is unrealistic to think that he will perform the way he did down the stetch for an entire season, but his season totals will be better as it appears he is now maybe a #2 as opposed to the turkey baster he was entering last season.....

 
lol at the journeyman talk.....who cares....call him a turkey baster if you want.....DA has skills and was the best WR on this team at the end of last year in terms of production (which is all we really care about) with all the same guys he is around now.......the system has changed and that's where the discussion should really begin and end......and what affect, if any, it will have on the production of these guys......right now it looks like the system will increase Knox, possibly decrease Hester and Bennett, and maybe an overall increase for DA, as it is unrealistic to think that he will perform the way he did down the stetch for an entire season, but his season totals will be better as it appears he is now maybe a #2 as opposed to the turkey baster he was entering last season.....
:lmao: Anticipating Martz's impact on the various receivers is the key. I agree on the likely Knox uptick and Bennett downgrade, but I admit I'm throwing darts when it comes to Hester and DA. If Hester assumes a consistent slot role, which my untrained eye thinks is his best fit, then I think DA could be right there with Knox.
 
I think Martz takes over as head coach if the Bears fail to make the playoffs this year. It's asking a bit too much out of a young QB like Cutler, and hell, all of the young skill position players on the Bears to learn 3 systems in 3 years, so I believe they stick with Martz and hope that everything is clicking by year 2 and 3. As a Bears fan, I'll give Cutler and company another mulligan year due to the complexity of this offense. Not the thing Bears fans want to hear, but it is the logical expectation. Cutler 'aint a cagy 32 year old vet, he is still a young, immature QB who isn't going to have Martz's system mastered by the end of this season. By the end of 2011? I think we will start to see the 400 yard, 4 TD games...assuming the Bears do the right thing and spend a ton of money upgrading the offensive line.

Re: Knox ?

He is the future #2 WR in the Martz/Bears era(I'm assuming at least 3-4 years, hopefully more as a fan)...but for this year, 1000 yards, and a dozen or so big plays isn't out of the question.

Re: Aromashodu?

He may have some decent games this year, but the guy isn't, or I should say, shouldn't be starting in the NFL. Spot start him at your own peril, as he will have a 100 yard/2TD game once or twice, and a bunch of duds.

The stud WR of the Bears/Martz era isn't on the team yet. Ideally it is a player in the NFL who is in a contract year, and one who has serious talent but a weak QB who fails to take advantage of his skills. Any FBG see a guy like this on an NFL roster? Of course, the Bears could trade up for the best WR in the 2011 draft, and if that stud free agent isn't available, I'd be shocked if they DIDN'T trade for an elite 2011 rookie WR...time will tell.

Re: Hester ?

He can help any team win games with a few touches per game, but after this season and the inflated stats that will come along with it, he will return to his ideal role as a #3/#4 that can scare the crap out of the opponents worst CB/S...

So, for you hardcore draftnicks/NFL free agency fans...who is the best WR prospect for the Bears in 2011? Assuming they will trade up for him, and also assuming that he can perform well on grass(although if Martz gets full control of the team, you will see turf put down at Soldier Field, at least he will do everything in his power to get turf...but it may be out of his control. So, is there a quick/agile/tall stud with excellent acceleration on grass available in the college ranks? Or is this guy getting ready to break out in 2010 for a bad NFL team? I'd love to hear any opinions...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That was tongue-in-cheek, az_prof...I think the answer is none of the above because they will spread it around with different guys getting double digit targets week to week.

The Lions had RoY in Martz first year (at the time, still seen as a riser), and Megatron in Year two. Those guys on the outside tied up coverages, and Kitna's read was often to the slot guy. Not sure that Cutler will be going through the same kind of progression. Plus Olsen is way more talented than anyone the Lions had at the time (Pollard?).
Has Martz EVER made use of a talented tight end? I'm not factoring in TE production until I see Martz actually use one. Olsen is a nice player, but if Martz couldn't use Vernon Davis in the passing game, is he really likely to use Olsen?
Martz uses TE to block mostly.Olsen, as a featured H back, will line up anywhere - in the slot, motioned out of the backfield, whatevs.

Is Lovie still the coach? Because regardless of how much control you think Martz has, the HC still talks about Olsen as a special player who will be featured.
I love pancakes and rofls. Thanks :goodposting: Look, it's one thing to speculate on stats from player to player. They're always in different systems, different coaches, different everything. So basing arguments on past stat's is a swiss cheese tool that we use because it's the best we have.

However, every single one of Martz's offenses all have two things in common :

1) The TE is always mediocre fantasy wise.

2) Martz is the HC/OC.

Regardless of anything else, the one common denominator that you CAN pinpoint that is the same amongst every team he's been on which is himself. I heard the same crap when he was in San Fran. Never had a specimen quite like Vernon. Blah blah blah. Olson will struggle this year to get attention. It's that simple.

 
I have them currently as Knox, Aro, Hester.How about everyone else?
I think Knox is the clear #1, yes, but I would probably have Hester as #2, since he is technically starting, while Aromashodu only comes in on 3 wide sets. It's possible that Aromashodu could outperform Hester with fewer snaps, but it's probably not super likely. If Aromashodu were to be moved to a starting position in place of Hester, that could change, but regardless, I think Hester and Aromashodu are probably not guys you want to be starting consistently in all but very deep leagues. Knox is a great #3 with huge upside, and Hester and Aromashodu will probably negate each others fantasy value.
 
I have them currently as Knox, Aro, Hester.

How about everyone else?
I think Knox is the clear #1, yes, but I would probably have Hester as #2, since he is technically starting, while Aromashodu only comes in on 3 wide sets. It's possible that Aromashodu could outperform Hester with fewer snaps, but it's probably not super likely. If Aromashodu were to be moved to a starting position in place of Hester, that could change, but regardless, I think Hester and Aromashodu are probably not guys you want to be starting consistently in all but very deep leagues. Knox is a great #3 with huge upside, and Hester and Aromashodu will probably negate each others fantasy value.
So he will be on the field 90% of the time.
 
That was tongue-in-cheek, az_prof...I think the answer is none of the above because they will spread it around with different guys getting double digit targets week to week.

The Lions had RoY in Martz first year (at the time, still seen as a riser), and Megatron in Year two. Those guys on the outside tied up coverages, and Kitna's read was often to the slot guy. Not sure that Cutler will be going through the same kind of progression. Plus Olsen is way more talented than anyone the Lions had at the time (Pollard?).
Has Martz EVER made use of a talented tight end? I'm not factoring in TE production until I see Martz actually use one. Olsen is a nice player, but if Martz couldn't use Vernon Davis in the passing game, is he really likely to use Olsen?
Martz uses TE to block mostly.Olsen, as a featured H back, will line up anywhere - in the slot, motioned out of the backfield, whatevs.

Is Lovie still the coach? Because regardless of how much control you think Martz has, the HC still talks about Olsen as a special player who will be featured.
I love pancakes and rofls. Thanks :rolleyes: Look, it's one thing to speculate on stats from player to player. They're always in different systems, different coaches, different everything. So basing arguments on past stat's is a swiss cheese tool that we use because it's the best we have.

However, every single one of Martz's offenses all have two things in common :

1) The TE is always mediocre fantasy wise.

2) Martz is the HC/OC.

Regardless of anything else, the one common denominator that you CAN pinpoint that is the same amongst every team he's been on which is himself. I heard the same crap when he was in San Fran. Never had a specimen quite like Vernon. Blah blah blah. Olson will struggle this year to get attention. It's that simple.
:thumbdown: I grew up in Missouri, the Show-Me state. And it comes in handy in cases like this. Dont tell me what you're going to do, show me what you've done.

I think Martz has shown us again and again and despite the August lip service anyone who invests in a Bear TE this year will have no one to blame but themselves. But it's their choice to make.

 
5'11" and 190 lbs is the prototype size for a wr?
:thumbdown: :rolleyes: ;) No, but 6'2" 201 lbs sure is, and is what the NFL lists him as.Did he shrink or what?
My bad...combining too many trains of thought in my mind and confusing one Bears wr named Devin with the other. Aromashodu does have the size/speed you look for in a wr. Seriously, I'm an idiot. :( Now that I'm caught up, Aromashodu does have good measurables. I wouldn't call him a prototype...I think that is something around 6'4" and 225 lbs (Andre Johnson, Calvin Johnson, Terrell Owens) However, it is difficult to ignore that he was a 7th rd pick that is now on his 5th team. He has done less in his career than Knox did in his rookie year. At THIS point, DA is a journeyman. However, he is the type that should not be written off because, as you noted, he has the physical skills and opportunity to now become something more. I wouldn't be too optimistic...there is likely a reason 4 other teams gave up on him, but the #2 receiver (I know, some say he can be #1, some say 3 or 4) in an offense that figures to put up over 4,000 passing yards and 30ish passing tds is intriguing.
No worries man, it's that time of year again. Information overload.
 
Interesting read from the Tribune:

Cutler watch: QB completes 68% of camp passes

By Brad Biggs

BOURBONNAIS -- Jay Cutler wound up completing 68 percent of his passes in 7-on-7 and 11-on-11 drills during training camp.

The Tribune charted the quarterback throughout training camp to get a sense for how he was settling into Mike Martz's offense and to learn how the ball was being distributed.

Martz's offense demands accuracy with the quarterback often throwing the ball to a spot before the wide receiver has come open out of his break. Cutler completed 60.5 percent of his passes last season, his lowest figure in three full seasons starting. When the Greatest Show on Turf was clicking in St. Louis, Kurt Warner was completing more than 65 percent of his passes.

The charting project determined that Johnny Knox was the most popular wide receiver target based on time on the field and number of targets. He finished tied with Devin Aromashodu but Knox missed time this week with a sore hamstring. Knox, Aromashodu and tight end Greg Olsen were the most pooular deep targets.

Here's how it broke down:

CUTLER CUMULATIVE

323-of-475 .680, 10 interceptions

WIDE RECEIVERS, TIGHT ENDS

Name Catches Targets Short/Medium/Deep

Greg Olsen: 55-of-86 (50 S, 24 M, 12 D)

Devin Aromashodu: 51-of-77 (34 S, 31 M, 12 D)

Johnny Knox: 50-of-77 (23 S, 42 M, 12 D)

Devin Hester: 59-of-76 (32 s, 35 M, 9 D)

Rashied Davis: 20-of-39 (17 S, 15M, 7D)

Matt Forte: 27-of-38 (30 S, 6M, 2D)

Chester Taylor: 23-of-31 (28 S, 2M, 1 D)

Desmond Clark: -16-of-23 (10 S, 9 M, 4 D)

Earl Bennett: 7-of-9 (3 S, 4 M, 2 D)

Brandon Manumaleuna: 5-of-7 (4 S, 1 M, 2 D)

Will Ta'ufo'ou: 3-of-5 (5 S)

Juaquin Iglesias: 1-of-1 (1 M)

Eddie Williams: 1-of-1 (1 S)

Kellen Davis: 3-of-3 (2 S, 1 D)

Richard Angulo: 2-of-2 (2 M)

* Key: Short 10 yards or less. Medium 11-19 yards. Deep 20 or more yards.*
Olsen had 5 targets (3 receptions) in the 2nd exhibition, but didn't have any catches in the other two games.Overall it seems like Aromashodu/Hester/Knox have had similar targets/receptions stats in the 3 games (think they have 6/5/6 catches).

 
I have them currently as Knox, Aro, Hester.

How about everyone else?
I think Knox is the clear #1, yes, but I would probably have Hester as #2, since he is technically starting, while Aromashodu only comes in on 3 wide sets. It's possible that Aromashodu could outperform Hester with fewer snaps, but it's probably not super likely. If Aromashodu were to be moved to a starting position in place of Hester, that could change, but regardless, I think Hester and Aromashodu are probably not guys you want to be starting consistently in all but very deep leagues. Knox is a great #3 with huge upside, and Hester and Aromashodu will probably negate each others fantasy value.
So he will be on the field 90% of the time.
I think that's a bit of an overstatement. All three TEs get snaps with the first team, and I don't believe the Bears were 3 wide 90% of the time so far in the preseason. Regardless, Aromashodu will simply not be on the field as much as Hester barring a change in the depth chart. Since we're talking about WRs that are going to be 3rd or 4th option in the offense, it's hard to fault someone for maybe giving the guy with more snaps a slight edge. Either way, they're still going to be the #3 option...
 
Some great posting/info in this thread. I agree with all the main sentiments about Martz (as a STL fan and loving the greatest show on turf... to being a DET homer).

TE (and H-Back or whatever else you want to call it) = underutilized. As others said TE is for blocking because the QB needs protection while going through a long progression of reads. That's what makes Martz offense so complicated.. if a guy isn't open--the QB can come back to him after going through other progressions. That's also why the QBs in Martz system end up getting hurt--they hold the ball so long. Trent Green, Warner, Bulger, Kitna, the revolving door in SF. How many QB's in Martz system lasted a whole year?

WR's that excel in Martz system: As someone mentioned.. guys who run routes and are where they're supposed to be when they're supposed to be there. Martz system is timing and great route running.

Mike Furrey reminded me of Wes Welker (but a little slower). Not the most gifted guy athletically--but great hands--but was always where he should have been and had no problems picking up Martz's schemes... and Kitna was a great QB at putting the ball where it was supposed to be. Someone said Kitna ran his checkdowns and Furrey was the outlet guy... that's true--Roy Williams especially never seemed to have separation from the defender... so Kitna moved on to the next WR in the progression = Furrey. I forget the stats.. but Furrey was THE man in DET at crunch time--on 3rd down it wasn't ROY who got the target--it was Furrey.

I haven't watched enough of CHI to know who has those skills.. but I will say it doesn't (based on history) seem to be Hester. He's superfast obvioiusly.. but didn't seem to be a great route runner in the past. Now maybe that's changed under Martz. I give Martz mad props for developing QB talent and recognizing what WR's fit his schemes. That DA was previously a journeyman doesn't matter... Look at Furrey and MacDonald prior to playing under Martz. Nada. Lookat ROY since playing for Martz... nada.

As people said--Martz likes WR's who fit his system (who can learn the routes/run them well).. hence him bringing McDonald from STL to DET. Not an easy system to learn--and McD had the time under Martz to learn it in STL. Same with him bringing Bruce to SF. From commentary in the thread--it sounds like Knox and DA fit the mold a bit better than Hester... (and Bennett being hurt/not getting reps seems like it would kill his chances for moving into a role in a complicated O). There's definitely a case for the #1 and 2 having value in Martz O if its hitting on all cylinders.. and (Az-Hakim) even the #3 WR.

Finally--Martz is all about himself... his genius is rivaled only by his ego. In DET they ended up yanking Martz playcalling responsibilities as OC because he refused to listen to the HC and run in the redzone. I don't see him now listening to Lovie about utilizing Olsen unless Olsen fits what Martz wants from a receiver (and like others said--V Davis didn't.. not sure how Olsen would)... but we'll see.

 
As a Bears fan, it pains me to say this:

Cutler had some serious happy feet this weekend. He doesn't trust his O-line. That's bad news for each and every offensive player on the team. Without confidence in the line this is going to be a long, INT-ridden year for Cutler and the Bears.

 
As a Bears fan, it pains me to say this:Cutler had some serious happy feet this weekend. He doesn't trust his O-line. That's bad news for each and every offensive player on the team. Without confidence in the line this is going to be a long, INT-ridden year for Cutler and the Bears.
and the sacks, don't forget about the sacks.
 
I dont quite get the knock on DA. Have you guys seen him play? The few attempts he has had with OK passes from Cutler he has made. Personally, I think Knox is a tad better, but they have different skill sets. Knox is small or at least plays like it. DA plays more physical. To me its a very good compliment. They can throw the occasional bomb to hester and hope he gets a PI called.

Unfortunately, none of this matters at the start. Lovie, IMO, has shown a propensity to favor his guys (Hester and Olsen) no matter how bad they suck. Once things get bad (like when they are under .500), Lovie will go with what the public outcry is, just a week late.

So, IMO, DA will be a monster in the 2nd half this season, if not sooner because the Bears blow, just like he was the last 4 games of the season...

 
Mike Martz is NOT taking over the Bears. Absolutely not a fit with the McCaskeys. If this season goes south, the whole management and coaching gang is out wholesale and Martz is not going to be held over. They only brought him on in the first place because nobody else was available- its not like the Bears went shopping for Mike Martz. There's a reason the guy was available.

 
I am not sure that Cutler is better than Kitna. Kitna was a very underrated QB. The players that emerged in Detroit were not the ones people imagined would emerge: Furrey, a converted FS, and Shaun McDonald. I would be interested in hearing from Detroit observers how they would describe the skills and abilities of Furrey and McDonald. Which Chicago player most resembles them?However, my gut feeling is that it is going to be difficult to predict which CHI WR will be worth owning in 2010.
cutler is very underrated too.regardless, imo, all bears wr are great value at their adp. good chance that 2 of them are well worth owning. ill gladly take that risk in rounds 7-11.
 
Something else to consider- Martz' offense is incredibly complicated. When you see the Bears having trouble knowing where to line-up in preseason, you can bet they don't know where theyre sposed to end up either. Hester and Bennett are alleged to be slow learners (thats being very kind). Not sure about Knox and Aromashodu, but pretty good bet they are picking things up somewhat quicker. A big part of whether this offense ever gets off the ground despite a porous O-line is how much faith Cutler will have in these two being where he expects them to be when the ball arrives. That being said, Hester and Bennett are not going to take their jobs... particularly Hester. He may be the fastest and most experienced WR, but he'll have to be given limited plays to learn in a limited role or he'll be running into goal posts all season. So the upside is these two guys are probably going to be there all season come what may.
surprised that hester has that reputation considering the strides he made as a wr, basically starting from scratch, over a 3 yr period.
 
Something else to consider- Martz' offense is incredibly complicated. When you see the Bears having trouble knowing where to line-up in preseason, you can bet they don't know where theyre sposed to end up either. Hester and Bennett are alleged to be slow learners (thats being very kind). Not sure about Knox and Aromashodu, but pretty good bet they are picking things up somewhat quicker. A big part of whether this offense ever gets off the ground despite a porous O-line is how much faith Cutler will have in these two being where he expects them to be when the ball arrives. That being said, Hester and Bennett are not going to take their jobs... particularly Hester. He may be the fastest and most experienced WR, but he'll have to be given limited plays to learn in a limited role or he'll be running into goal posts all season. So the upside is these two guys are probably going to be there all season come what may.
surprised that hester has that reputation considering the strides he made as a wr, basically starting from scratch, over a 3 yr period.
How long do you figure it should take? Didn't somebody just mention Mike Furrey? You could play a drinking game involving Hester running around presnap trying to figure out where he should be... and thats 3 years in. He just doesnt have the brain power to understand the systems (probably doesn't help that they keep changing).
 
For those saying they have Hester over Aro simply because Hester is listed as the starter and Aro will only get in on 3 WR sets ... this is Mike Martz. 90% + of his plays are 3 WR sets. That is why the Bears coaches have been quoted as saying, "We have 3 starting WRs."

It is really just a gamble at this point, but I'm putting my money on Aro > Hester. Could certainly be wrong, and wouldn't be the first time....

 
In typical Bear fashion, their best, most reliable receiver is not even in the mix. Earl Bennett is nursing a hamstring injury right now, but even before the injuy it didnt look as if he would be a big part of the offense.

With Lovie and Martz, speed kills, and thats why Knox will get the most opportunities this year to make plays.

 
In typical Bear fashion, their best, most reliable receiver is not even in the mix. Earl Bennett is nursing a hamstring injury right now, but even before the injuy it didnt look as if he would be a big part of the offense.
Is this the guys that couldn't win a spot on the sideline his rookie year and then scored 2 tds last season? If he's their best, they are in bigger trouble than we think. Bennett is a bust. He doesn't do anything particularly well, and he certainly doesn't have any stand out athleticism to get by on.
 
How long do you figure it should take? Didn't somebody just mention Mike Furrey? You could play a drinking game involving Hester running around presnap trying to figure out where he should be... and thats 3 years in. He just doesnt have the brain power to understand the systems (probably doesn't help that they keep changing).
well, ppl like to say that there is a big adjustment from college to the pros at wr. usually takes 2-3 yrs even for high draft picks. and thats guys who have played wr their whole lives. not really sure why you mention furrey, he played wr for 4 yrs of college then like 5 yrs of nfl. doesnt really matter as there are always exceptions.
 
In typical Bear fashion, their best, most reliable receiver is not even in the mix. Earl Bennett is nursing a hamstring injury right now, but even before the injuy it didnt look as if he would be a big part of the offense.
Is this the guys that couldn't win a spot on the sideline his rookie year and then scored 2 tds last season? If he's their best, they are in bigger trouble than we think. Bennett is a bust. He doesn't do anything particularly well, and he certainly doesn't have any stand out athleticism to get by on.
Not getting PT his rookie year means nothing with this idiot staff. You trust any of them to recognize talent? I sure as hell don't.Yea, I watched every game last year and he was their best receiver. Adequate speed, good blocker, and most importantly, by far the best hands. Anytime Cutler needed to make a big play he went to Bennett and Bennett came through. Aren't you supposed to be a Bears fan? Did you watch last year?
 
In typical Bear fashion, their best, most reliable receiver is not even in the mix. Earl Bennett is nursing a hamstring injury right now, but even before the injuy it didnt look as if he would be a big part of the offense.
Is this the guys that couldn't win a spot on the sideline his rookie year and then scored 2 tds last season? If he's their best, they are in bigger trouble than we think. Bennett is a bust. He doesn't do anything particularly well, and he certainly doesn't have any stand out athleticism to get by on.
Not getting PT his rookie year means nothing with this idiot staff. You trust any of them to recognize talent? I sure as hell don't.Yea, I watched every game last year and he was their best receiver. Adequate speed, good blocker, and most importantly, by far the best hands. Anytime Cutler needed to make a big play he went to Bennett and Bennett came through. Aren't you supposed to be a Bears fan? Did you watch last year?
Indeed. Aside from Knox and a few flashes from Aromashodu in garbage time there wasn't anything to suggest any potential for an NFL caliber WR on the team. What have you ever seen from Bennett that suggests even a mediocre DB wouldn't make him disappear? And he was another one that never seemed to know where he was supposed to be. I agree this organization has no clue what to do with rookies... but Bennett was drafted because he was supposed to be game ready and he has to date still never looked game ready. Yeah, he can make a tough catch on occasion, but finding a guy that can give you 3 catches a game for 43 yards is supposed to be tough?
 
In typical Bear fashion, their best, most reliable receiver is not even in the mix. Earl Bennett is nursing a hamstring injury right now, but even before the injuy it didnt look as if he would be a big part of the offense.
Is this the guys that couldn't win a spot on the sideline his rookie year and then scored 2 tds last season? If he's their best, they are in bigger trouble than we think. Bennett is a bust. He doesn't do anything particularly well, and he certainly doesn't have any stand out athleticism to get by on.
Not getting PT his rookie year means nothing with this idiot staff. You trust any of them to recognize talent? I sure as hell don't.Yea, I watched every game last year and he was their best receiver. Adequate speed, good blocker, and most importantly, by far the best hands. Anytime Cutler needed to make a big play he went to Bennett and Bennett came through.

Aren't you supposed to be a Bears fan? Did you watch last year?
Indeed. Aside from Knox and a few flashes from Aromashodu in garbage time there wasn't anything to suggest any potential for an NFL caliber WR on the team. What have you ever seen from Bennett that suggests even a mediocre DB wouldn't make him disappear? And he was another one that never seemed to know where he was supposed to be. I agree this organization has no clue what to do with rookies... but Bennett was drafted because he was supposed to be game ready and he has to date still never looked game ready. Yeah, he can make a tough catch on occasion, but finding a guy that can give you 3 catches a game for 43 yards is supposed to be tough?
Like Juquan Iglesias :X 3 for 43 is a big game for a Bear receiver. Im not saying Bennett is an elite wr, just solid and most importantly, reliable, which I don't see from Knox, Hester or Aroma.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'll take over inconsistent but occasionally explosive over reliably below average. At least Knox and Hester give the defense something to think about.

 
mbuehner said:
RBM said:
In typical Bear fashion, their best, most reliable receiver is not even in the mix. Earl Bennett is nursing a hamstring injury right now, but even before the injuy it didnt look as if he would be a big part of the offense.
Is this the guys that couldn't win a spot on the sideline his rookie year and then scored 2 tds last season? If he's their best, they are in bigger trouble than we think. Bennett is a bust. He doesn't do anything particularly well, and he certainly doesn't have any stand out athleticism to get by on.
A bust? He was drafted in the 3rd round 2 years ago. "Bust" is a little much. He's pretty average for most WR's drafted in the 3rd round. As someone else said, I wouldn't put too much weight into Lovie not letting him even get on the field as a rookie. Their offense was terrible, and you're telling me Lovie didn't even let him play any. I was once behind Lovie, but his ignorance has won out at this point. I don't care what a rookie does. You let a 3rd round wr on the field at least some. Lovie's an idiot
 
RBM said:
mbuehner said:
RBM said:
In typical Bear fashion, their best, most reliable receiver is not even in the mix. Earl Bennett is nursing a hamstring injury right now, but even before the injuy it didnt look as if he would be a big part of the offense.
Is this the guys that couldn't win a spot on the sideline his rookie year and then scored 2 tds last season? If he's their best, they are in bigger trouble than we think. Bennett is a bust. He doesn't do anything particularly well, and he certainly doesn't have any stand out athleticism to get by on.
Not getting PT his rookie year means nothing with this idiot staff. You trust any of them to recognize talent? I sure as hell don't.Yea, I watched every game last year and he was their best receiver. Adequate speed, good blocker, and most importantly, by far the best hands. Anytime Cutler needed to make a big play he went to Bennett and Bennett came through.

Aren't you supposed to be a Bears fan? Did you watch last year?
Indeed. Aside from Knox and a few flashes from Aromashodu in garbage time there wasn't anything to suggest any potential for an NFL caliber WR on the team. What have you ever seen from Bennett that suggests even a mediocre DB wouldn't make him disappear? And he was another one that never seemed to know where he was supposed to be. I agree this organization has no clue what to do with rookies... but Bennett was drafted because he was supposed to be game ready and he has to date still never looked game ready. Yeah, he can make a tough catch on occasion, but finding a guy that can give you 3 catches a game for 43 yards is supposed to be tough?
Like Juquan Iglesias :blackdot: 3 for 43 is a big game for a Bear receiver. Im not saying Bennett is an elite wr, just solid and most importantly, reliable, which I don't see from Knox, Hester or Aroma.
I get the stance about Bennett being reliable, but it seemed he never could separation. What I thought odd ws the statement that you felt Aromashadu wasn't reliable?? I never felt that from him watching him play....Curious as to why you think that?
 
I get the stance about Bennett being reliable, but it seemed he never could separation. What I thought odd ws the statement that you felt Aromashadu wasn't reliable?? I never felt that from him watching him play....Curious as to why you think that?
Ya know what, to be fair to him he shouldn't be lumped in with the others. The games he played in he was outstanding.
 
I get the stance about Bennett being reliable, but it seemed he never could separation. What I thought odd ws the statement that you felt Aromashadu wasn't reliable?? I never felt that from him watching him play....Curious as to why you think that?
Ya know what, to be fair to him he shouldn't be lumped in with the others. The games he played in he was outstanding.
Your thoughts on my post #81 above? Am I drinking the Kool-Aid.....
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top