and we've discussed this ad nauseum:
just because a player doesn't miss alot of games does not make them full strength
i applaud JStew's resilience at playing through injuries but he is ALWAYS hurt
and that affects a coach and how often he will give a guy bellcow attempts
so please no more of the JStew is a mountain of health only missing two games talk, it doesn't tell the full story and is a misleading stat
Stewart has proven he's able to play through nagging injuries (a skill Ryan Mathews lacks). He's also fully healthy now for the first time in his career. I would say he's a lower than average injury risk, due to his youth, current health, light workload, and demonstrated ability to play hurt. Nothing misleading there.
yes they have been right before
ONCE
he has beaten his ADP once in his career, and missed it twice with a "push" one year
2011-
ADP: RB33. Finish: RB25. Result = Beaten2010-
ADP: RB22. Finish: RB34. Result = Not Beaten
2009-
ADP: RB31. Finish: RB12. Result = Demolished
2008-
ADP: RB26. Finish: RB24. Result = Push
1 season he demolished ADP, one season he beat ADP, one season he matched ADP, one season he failed to match his ADP. That's two wins, one push, and one loss, for those keeping score at home. And this is from an RB being called the most overrated fantasy RB of all time. The Stewart haters keep coming out and saying that Stewart fans have homer goggles on and they can't see the facts, that they just have an axe to grind. Which side can't see the facts here, again? Which side has an axe to grind? This Stewart fan's vision is crystal clear, and he sees that the market has combined a remarkable tendency to underrate Stewart with a remarkably poor memory of its tendency to underrate Stewart.
'DoubleG said:
Bingo. The problem with Stewart is that if you have him as your RB2, your pretty much riding a roller coaster.
Just as an example, lets compare his weekly production to that of Beannie Wells (another RB2 who is much maligned). Looking at last season, here are the number of times your RB2 would have given you 8 or less fantasy points (standard, nonPPR):
Stewart: 9
Wells: 6*
*- Wells also missed week 17, but you knew he was going to ahead of time.
It's also worth noting that Wells had 2 week where he put up 30+ points. Stewart's highest week was 15 twice.
The point being, week to week, Stewart is inconsistant. Add to that the fact that he also has the "ceiling" of DWill taking touches and his value in redraft is simply a headache. In dynasty, while I agree, his talent puts him in the upper echelon, his touches and continual wait for a boost in touches that would push him out of "RB2" land has been maddeningly slow to come. By the time it does he may so close to the "cliff" of 30, it may not be worth it.
Jonathan Stewart is not demonstrably more inconsistent than anyone else who has scored a comparable number of points. Beanie Wells scored 23% more points per game than Stewart last year. RBs who score more points tend to have more good games than RBs who score fewer points. This is not news. It'd be like saying that Maurice Jones-Drew was more consistent than Michael Turner last year (MJD outscored Turner by about 23%, as well).Let's make a fairer comparison. Last year, Stewart finished as RB24. He had 9 games below 8 points. RB23 last year (BenJarvus Green-Ellis) had 8 games below 8 points. RB25 last year (DeAngelo Williams) had 9 games below 8 points. RB22 last year (Cedric Benson) had 9 games below 8 points (in 15 games). RB26 last year (Pierre Thomas) had 9 games below 8 points. By your own metric (games under 8 points), Stewart was exactly as inconsistent as you'd expect him to have been, based on the inconsistency of the RBs who finished with similar point totals.
Besides, consistency is interesting, but studies have never shown that inconsistency is a trait that is consistent from season to season.
Ex post facto inefficiency metrics might be of some limited use descriptively, but they're relatively useless from a predictive standpoint.