Sabertooth
Footballguy
Simple poll.
Either he will play another down in the NFL or he won't.
Either he will play another down in the NFL or he won't.
Hell, they are still working on how they are going to get him on the field with Manzier this year. Every time they are close to making an announcement of the suspension length, Gordon screws up again and it's back to the drawing board.Of course he'll be back. The NFL isn't going to leave money on the table just because someone likes his mind-altering substances a bit too much.
that's not the question. it's if he can stay clean during his suspension.Goodell bans him for life? That's the 2nd option? That would be outrageous, even for Goodell
Isn't the next offense after a 1 year suspension a lifetime ban?Goodell bans him for life? That's the 2nd option? That would be outrageous, even for Goodell
Yes, polls conducted by Sabertooth historically have had this effect.If anything, this will motivate the guy to come back and be even more dominant.
The other suspensions and arrests have not motivated him?If anything, this will motivate the guy to come back and be even more dominant.
I do not believe so. I believe the next offense would come with another yearlong suspension. The longest Goodell could sanction him for at the start of a suspension is 1 year. Where things get grey is that he could make him jump through hoops at the back end and delay his reinstatement. I do not believe that a commissioner has the authority to permanently ban a play for substance abuse issues, but if it got to that stage it would mean the player could not stay clean and sober (and thus did not comply with the testing protocols).Isn't the next offense after a 1 year suspension a lifetime ban?Goodell bans him for life? That's the 2nd option? That would be outrageous, even for Goodell
Gordon wasn't even able to stay out of trouble for a few weeks with this suspension looming. If he's suspended for a year, I wouldn't put it past him to get dinged again before the year is up.
i don't understand this sentiment which has been brought up several times in the other thread. they've already tried this, and Gordon is still messing up.I really hope cleveland doesnt cut him and either they, or some other team if he is cut, hire a full time babysitter to drive him and watch him. It seriously is a cheap investment considering whats at stake.
Denard Jackson received a one year suspension that caused him to miss two seasons. After he was finally reinstated he tested positive again and received another one year suspension.Anarchy99 said:I do not believe so. I believe the next offense would come with another yearlong suspension. The longest Goodell could sanction him for at the start of a suspension is 1 year. Where things get grey is that he could make him jump through hoops at the back end and delay his reinstatement. I do not believe that a commissioner has the authority to permanently ban a play for substance abuse issues, but if it got to that stage it would mean the player could not stay clean and sober (and thus did not comply with the testing protocols).FreeBaGeL said:Isn't the next offense after a 1 year suspension a lifetime ban?17seconds said:Goodell bans him for life? That's the 2nd option? That would be outrageous, even for Goodell
Gordon wasn't even able to stay out of trouble for a few weeks with this suspension looming. If he's suspended for a year, I wouldn't put it past him to get dinged again before the year is up.
No they haven't. According to an article posted in the long thread, the Browns have done literally nothing to help him. They have not tried what many have suggested, which is with the Dez Bryant Rules.amnesiac said:i don't understand this sentiment which has been brought up several times in the other thread. they've already tried this, and Gordon is still messing up.ldizzle said:I really hope cleveland doesnt cut him and either they, or some other team if he is cut, hire a full time babysitter to drive him and watch him. It seriously is a cheap investment considering whats at stake.
i'll try to find the link to the story that states that they did in fact have a babysitter for him. but either way, you do realize Gordon would have to consent to such treatment.No they haven't. According to an article posted in the long thread, the Browns have done literally nothing to help him. They have not tried what many have suggested, which is with the Dez Bryant Rules.amnesiac said:i don't understand this sentiment which has been brought up several times in the other thread. they've already tried this, and Gordon is still messing up.ldizzle said:I really hope cleveland doesnt cut him and either they, or some other team if he is cut, hire a full time babysitter to drive him and watch him. It seriously is a cheap investment considering whats at stake.
I'm no Gordon fan (I think he should be suspended for the year) but I don't think it's fair to make 2 jumps to conclusions (1. Browns offered him a Dez Bryant-like babysitter and 2. Gordon turned it down) when there is no evidence of either. Gordon's a dumb###, but he hasn't done anything to suggest he'd turn down help offered from the team that I'm aware of.i'll try to find the link to the story that states that they did in fact have a babysitter for him.but either way, you do realize Gordon would have to consent to such treatment.No they haven't. According to an article posted in the long thread, the Browns have done literally nothing to help him. They have not tried what many have suggested, which is with the Dez Bryant Rules.amnesiac said:i don't understand this sentiment which has been brought up several times in the other thread.they've already tried this, and Gordon is still messing up.ldizzle said:I really hope cleveland doesnt cut him and either they, or some other team if he is cut, hire a full time babysitter to drive him and watch him. It seriously is a cheap investment considering whats at stake.
i find it highly unlikely the Browns and / or the NFL offered him no help. and i find it much more likely Gordon has refused such help.
they tried to, but due to the backlash from the Richardson trade, they had to get more than anyone was willing to give them.Browns really screwed up by not trading him when they had the chance.
fair enough. and i will try to find the story. but on the flip side, do we have any evidence the Browns did not try to protect Gordon?I'm no Gordon fan (I think he should be suspended for the year) but I don't think it's fair to make 2 jumps to conclusions (1. Browns offered him a Dez Bryant-like babysitter and 2. Gordon turned it down) when there is no evidence of either. Gordon's a dumb###, but he hasn't done anything to suggest he'd turn down help offered from the team that I'm aware of.i'll try to find the link to the story that states that they did in fact have a babysitter for him.but either way, you do realize Gordon would have to consent to such treatment.No they haven't. According to an article posted in the long thread, the Browns have done literally nothing to help him. They have not tried what many have suggested, which is with the Dez Bryant Rules.amnesiac said:i don't understand this sentiment which has been brought up several times in the other thread.they've already tried this, and Gordon is still messing up.ldizzle said:I really hope cleveland doesnt cut him and either they, or some other team if he is cut, hire a full time babysitter to drive him and watch him. It seriously is a cheap investment considering whats at stake.
i find it highly unlikely the Browns and / or the NFL offered him no help. and i find it much more likely Gordon has refused such help.
As stated earlier. Please, don't get up.fair enough. and i will try to find the story. but on the flip side, do we have any evidence the Browns did not try to protect Gordon?I'm no Gordon fan (I think he should be suspended for the year) but I don't think it's fair to make 2 jumps to conclusions (1. Browns offered him a Dez Bryant-like babysitter and 2. Gordon turned it down) when there is no evidence of either. Gordon's a dumb###, but he hasn't done anything to suggest he'd turn down help offered from the team that I'm aware of.i'll try to find the link to the story that states that they did in fact have a babysitter for him.but either way, you do realize Gordon would have to consent to such treatment.No they haven't. According to an article posted in the long thread, the Browns have done literally nothing to help him. They have not tried what many have suggested, which is with the Dez Bryant Rules.amnesiac said:i don't understand this sentiment which has been brought up several times in the other thread.they've already tried this, and Gordon is still messing up.ldizzle said:I really hope cleveland doesnt cut him and either they, or some other team if he is cut, hire a full time babysitter to drive him and watch him. It seriously is a cheap investment considering whats at stake.
i find it highly unlikely the Browns and / or the NFL offered him no help. and i find it much more likely Gordon has refused such help.
seems counterintuitive that they didn't.
i read your link and there is nothing in it that states that the Browns did not try to support Gordon over the last year or so.it said that there has not been much stability, organizationally, which i would agree with.As stated earlier. Please, don't get up.http://espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/11219714/cleveland-browns-help-troubled-wr-josh-gordon-salvage-careerfair enough. and i will try to find the story. but on the flip side, do we have any evidence the Browns did not try to protect Gordon?I'm no Gordon fan (I think he should be suspended for the year) but I don't think it's fair to make 2 jumps to conclusions (1. Browns offered him a Dez Bryant-like babysitter and 2. Gordon turned it down) when there is no evidence of either. Gordon's a dumb###, but he hasn't done anything to suggest he'd turn down help offered from the team that I'm aware of.i'll try to find the link to the story that states that they did in fact have a babysitter for him.but either way, you do realize Gordon would have to consent to such treatment.No they haven't. According to an article posted in the long thread, the Browns have done literally nothing to help him. They have not tried what many have suggested, which is with the Dez Bryant Rules.amnesiac said:i don't understand this sentiment which has been brought up several times in the other thread.they've already tried this, and Gordon is still messing up.ldizzle said:I really hope cleveland doesnt cut him and either they, or some other team if he is cut, hire a full time babysitter to drive him and watch him. It seriously is a cheap investment considering whats at stake.
i find it highly unlikely the Browns and / or the NFL offered him no help. and i find it much more likely Gordon has refused such help.
seems counterintuitive that they didn't.
Not really. He isn't that big of a name. He's probably most famous for his off the field issues than anything.He'll play, he's an asset to the league.
Ehhh he'll still be a multimillionaire (assuming he hasn't burned through all of the $4 million he's been paid thus far) in his early 20s. My guess is he DGAF at all until his $$$ runs out.You can put me on the ledger that I think we may not see him play again. He has been given a ton of chances already and I have not seen anything to indicate he gets it. He loves the weed, partying, and lifestyle this league has awarded him. Perhaps if it is taken away, he attempts to admit he has a problem and cleans himself up. But I think unless he wants to be a different person, I suspect it will be a serious of missteps with alcohol, drugs, the commish and the law. And even if he somehow gets reinstated, I suspect that he will get suspended again for these same behaviors.
The best thing for Josh Gordon would be to get the 1 year ban, the CLE Browns cut him, and the commish does not allow anyone to sign him for up to a year. That's rock bottom. Let's see how serious he is about being a different person and then we can start speculating whether he will play again in this league. But with his agent appealing and everyone still coddling him, I really doubt he is going to change a thing.
100% falls on Gordon himself dude. He's a grown man making choices. If he wants help, he can get it pretty easily given the resources available to him. And if he doesn't want to change, nothing anyone else does will make one bit of difference. I'm sure many people have tried talking to him -- but it's ultimately up to Josh Gordon himself.The way he parties, that money I bet is gone within a year. To me a lot of this falls on Rosenhaus. Mr. Big shot super agent. He needs to get Gordon the support he needs. If he doesn't, I could see other agents using Gordon's demise as a wedge and it costing him money. I bet he wishes Gordon would fire him.
You don't think Rosenhaus, the Browns, his teammates, the NFL, etc. have sat down and talked to him? GTFO -- I'm sure he knows what's at stake. Gordon is a 23 year old with a few million bucks who cares more about having fun than he does about his job. It's not exactly unheard of or completely crazy. Rosenhaus' job is to negotiate with Cleveland and bring in endorsement money. It's not his job to stay on anyone 24 / 7 keeping them out of trouble. Nor does he probably care too much given his portfolio of athletes worth way more money to him.I agree. But Rosenhaus needs to make him understand the stakes. That's his job.
You're missing the point. Gordon will get the appropriate suspension as dictated by the substance abuse policy, just like any other player. The NFL will move on without any issue. Gordon isn't going to get a lifetime ban -- but he will have to stay clean while facing stage three testing in order to apply for reinstatement, again, just like any other player. If he complies with the program, great, he'll be welcomed back. If he doesn't, it's no skin off of Godell's ### at all. The issue is the policy, with it's incredibly stringent testing protocols. It's not Goddell or the NFL; they're just implementing a policy as dictated by the current CBA.I don't think a player has ever been in a situation like Gordon. Young and truly talented but troubled. Has a league leader under 30 ever been kicked out of the league before without using been convicted of a crime? With no violence on his resume? I think Goodell has a big issue here. He let Vick back in. He let Jolly back in and yet going to prison. Neither is nearly as talented as Gordon.
This is missing the point I think many of us who think it is possible he won't back are trying to make. I don't feel like Josh Gordon is the worst person in the NFL, not by a long shot. I also don't feel like he is deserving of never playing football again. What I do think is that he is likely to force the league's hand. He's facing a likely 1 year ban. During that ban, if I had to bet one way or the other, I would bet on him failing another drug test. Once he starts down that road, of failing tests while he is suspended, the likely conclusion is him eventually just burning out of the league.Is Pac Man Jones still playing in the NFL?
I don't think Gordon has been half as bad as that goof
Again, if he's in stage three, a failed test is an "indefinite" suspension technically, and he can apply for reinstatement 60 days prior to the one year mark. You're still missing the part where this isn't just Roger Goddell arbitrarily handing down a decision; it's actually written into the CBA.Let's just see if he gets the 1 year ban before we start predicting him career ban. Sheesh. Anything is possible at this point.
This.......NFL will find a way to get him back on the field and keep him on the field. Whatever they did for Randy Moss should work with Gordon.It's one thing when Lavon Brazil does something and another when Gordon or Aldon smith do. If you don't believe that, you are naive.
Hahaha right. "If" followed by certainty and absolutes.Again, if......
Well, yeah. But the fact that his suspension last year was initially four games, as well as comments afterward by Gordon himself, indicate pretty strongly that he was likely placed in stage three after returning from that suspension.Again, if......
So you have read the policy in question and found it uncertain and not absolute? Because the substance abuse policy itself is the only thing I've expressed even a little certainty on. Because I've actually, you know, taken the time to read it. Obviously unlike some people.Hahaha right. "If" followed by certainty and absolutes.Again, if......
We have no idea what stage Gordon was or is in. We don't even know if the test was a true positive, or a miss "positive". So it is ALL speculation. To act like, or state, with any certainty is a waste of time. Of course we could outline each scenario: if this is the case, then that happens. But even then, a deal could be worked out and we never get any accurate information as to the violation and the reasoning behind the number of games. By all means, read the rule book until the cows come home. That way you can keep everybody in here straight.So you have read the policy in question and found it uncertain and not absolute? Because the substance abuse policy itself is the only thing I've expressed even a little certainty on. Because I've actually, you know, taken the time to read it. Obviously unlike some people.Hahaha right. "If" followed by certainty and absolutes.Again, if......
f they test him while on suspension....Let me throw a little conspiracy out there. How transparent is the testing? What if Goodell suspends him for this current drug infraction because he has no choice ..But in the future tells the testing people...hands off we need this superstar on the field. Gordon, his agent and the Browns aren't going to say........hey guys you have forgotten to test me....So who would know, outside of the testing people who could most certainly be paid off for their inaction and silence. At that point he only has to stay on the right side of the law.This is missing the point I think many of us who think it is possible he won't back are trying to make. I don't feel like Josh Gordon is the worst person in the NFL, not by a long shot. I also don't feel like he is deserving of never playing football again. What I do think is that he is likely to force the league's hand. He's facing a likely 1 year ban. During that ban, if I had to bet one way or the other, I would bet on him failing another drug test. Once he starts down that road, of failing tests while he is suspended, the likely conclusion is him eventually just burning out of the league.Is Pac Man Jones still playing in the NFL?
I don't think Gordon has been half as bad as that goof
Again, it's not that I, or many of the ones who would bet on him not returning, think he is the most deserving of such a punishment, far from it. It's just that his apathy towards the entire process strikes me as a guy who will just "give up" if you will, and just go about his life partying and getting high. I hope I'm wrong, I really and honestly do, but his actions thus far don't give me any pause in my thinking.
I also think you guys who think his star status will award him special consideration are mistaken. Gordon was a freak last year, but outside of the most diehard NFL fans, and the fantasy community, Josh Gordon will be easily forgotten. He is hardly bigger than the league, to throw a cliche in there.