the snake would have had at least 2 more rings if it weren't for the steelers. can he help it he played against one of the best dynasty teams of all time? he deserves to be in if smokin joe is in.
If this were a valid argument (which it isn't) then by that logic Staubach would have had 4 rings, and Stabler still wouldn't stack up well against him. Of course, that would reduce Bradshaw to only 2 rings, giving Stabler and his theoretical 3 rings the edge there. In that case, we wouldn't be thinking of Bradshaw's Steelers as one of the best dynasty teams of all time anyway, and we'd be arguing that if it weren't for the Cowboys, Bradshaw would have had at least 2 more rings. After all, could he help it that he played against Staubach's Cowboys?Chicken ... meet Egg, Egg ... Chicken
Here's what's wrong with this premise.John Madden's Raiders team with Stabler beat every team in the NFL consistantly. Except for Pittsburgh in the playoffs. So Stabler would have had the extra SB rings, and not Staubach. As Dallas
NEVER beat Oakland in those days. For the exact same reason Dallas
NEVER beat Pittsburgh in those days. Dallas could not hang against the toughest and most physical teams in the league. Dallas besides being "America's Team" back in the day...were also "America's

" back in the day. The Dallas D always played tough, but their offense was the biggest bunch of whiners in the NFL at the time.
The other thing wrong with this premise is that Bradshaw's Steelers would not have had two more rings, and it has nothing to do with Staubach's Cowboys, as Dallas could not beat Pittsburgh back in the day. Pittsburgh would have had one more ring had Stabler's Raiders not interrupted their string of 4 Super Bowls back in '76.