Google is your friend.But it's "Lake"How do you pronounce his name?
LATCH
LAYTCH
LATCHAY
LECHE
LAYCHAY
LeCHAY
LeSHAY
LAYSH
LASH?
Which are what? And you know this how?The intangibles necessary to see the field. He has exactly none of them.
His current situation despite blatant talent. It's kind of easy to deduce. Word is he's also ### in pass protection.Which are what? And you know this how?The intangibles necessary to see the field. He has exactly none of them.
That could be pretty revealing, please pass on whatever you hear.BigTex said:My best friend's son played with him at Baylor. I will ask him.....
What scouts? Real NFL scouts or the website "scouts"? Because the ones who get paid by NFL teams apparently don't think too much of him since he went late in the draft and then went unsigned after getting released. As I said earlier he doesn't fit the style Carolina runs. Maybe another team that uses outside zone/stretch could use him.gianmarco said:Aside from the fact that clearly a LOT of people like how he looks, he was widely considered by many scouts heading into last year as the top RB in the class and a 2nd round pick. This isn't by people who just watch Youtube but this was reported everywhere. His fall was very surprising to many. And even if he's not as good as people think, there are most definitely far worse RBs that somehow maintain backup jobs and he can't even make it on a practice squad.bigmarc27 said:Maybe that he's not very good and people should stop thinking that if they watch a few highlights on YouTube, they can accurately judge someone's talent?gianmarco said:There's gotta be something going on here with him. Just doesn't make sense.
There is most definitely something else going on.
Poole had an advantage in that he'd been with Carolina before. He quite possibly had a better grasp of their playbook and schemes.socrates said:While I was hopeful Seatrunk might get a shot in Carolina, I am not ready to completely write him off yet. It seems possible that the move by the Panthers to release Seastrunk in favor of Poole had more to do with the Panthers' injury situation and need for someone who was further along in his development. Seastrunk is still a project by most reports, and Carolina may not have the luxury of developing a RB at this time.
In the right situation, and given time and good coaching to develop, I still believe Seatrunk could have a future, but that window of opportunity undoubtedly just got smaller.
I think he's saying it wrong.gianmarco said:Google is your friend.But it's "Lake"tandl71 said:How do you pronounce his name?
LATCH
LAYTCH
LATCHAY
LECHE
LAYCHAY
LeCHAY
LeSHAY
LAYSH
LASH?
The short-term memory is fascinating. Do you think people are making up that many were discussing him as a top prospect at RB a year ago? It doesn't take much to look it up and find out.What scouts? Real NFL scouts or the website "scouts"? Because the ones who get paid by NFL teams apparently don't think too much of him since he went late in the draft and then went unsigned after getting released. As I said earlier he doesn't fit the style Carolina runs. Maybe another team that uses outside zone/stretch could use him.gianmarco said:Aside from the fact that clearly a LOT of people like how he looks, he was widely considered by many scouts heading into last year as the top RB in the class and a 2nd round pick. This isn't by people who just watch Youtube but this was reported everywhere. His fall was very surprising to many. And even if he's not as good as people think, there are most definitely far worse RBs that somehow maintain backup jobs and he can't even make it on a practice squad.bigmarc27 said:Maybe that he's not very good and people should stop thinking that if they watch a few highlights on YouTube, they can accurately judge someone's talent?gianmarco said:There's gotta be something going on here with him. Just doesn't make sense.
There is most definitely something else going on.
And here was Todd McShay's Big Board where he had him at #40 OVERALL--The way Seastrunk played in those last six contests vaulted him into ESPN NFL Draft analyst’s 2014 Big Board at No. 34, the highest-ranked player from the Big 12 and the second-highest ranked running back, second only behind Oregon speedster De’Anthony Thomas (No. 28).
Here's another spot written by nfldraftscout where they considered him the best RB on the board and he was compared to Vereen by Albert Breer at nfl.com1. Clowney DE S. Carol 17. Ekpre-Olomu CB Oregon
2. Bridgewater QB Louis 18. Tuitt DT NDame
3. Kouandjio OT Ala 19. Purifoy CB Flo
4. Lee WR USC 20. Attaochu OLB GTech
5. Barr OLB UCLA 21. Watkins WR Clemson
6. Matthews OT Ta&m 22. Johnson DT LSU
7. Nix NT NDame 23. McCullers DT Tenn
8. Boyd QB Clemson 24. Clinton-Dix S Ala
9. Manziel QB Ta&m 25. Verrett CB TCU
10. Hubbard OLB Ala 26. Yankey OG Stan
11, Roby CB OhioSt 27. Van Noy OLB BYU
12. Mosley LB Ala 28. Lynch DT S. Flor
13. Lewan OT Mich 29. Carey RB Ariz
14. Jernigan DT FlorSt. 30. Evans WR Ta&m
15 McCarron QB Ala 31. Shazier OLB OhioSt
16. Richardson OT Tenn 32. Thomas RB Oreg
Next 10:
1. Breslin DE USC 6. Jones OLB FlorSt.
2. Chricton DE OregSt. 7. Murphy OLB Stan
3. Coleman WR Rutgers 8. Seastrunk RB Baylor
4. Fales QB San Jose 9. Sefarian-Jenkins TE Wash
5. Johnson OLB Tenn 10. Sutton DL ArizSt.
Here's another writeup at FirstRoundGrade by a guy who has been involved in scouting college players for the NFL for 20 years who had him projected in 2nd-3rd roundTo succeed at the NFL level these days, backs must be able to contribute in the passing game. That is good news for Seastrunk, who excels in a wide-open scheme and compares favorably to New England's Shane Vereen per Albert Breer of NFL.com.
At 5'10" and 210 pounds, Seastrunk is built to last at the next level. He missed two games this year, but still ran for 982 yards and 11 touchdowns on 126 carries—giving him a superb 7.8 yards per carry.
Seastrunk may very well end up in the first round, especially if a team with the right system has a specific need.
Now, if you want to discount McShay and Kiper and all of these other guys, that's up to you. But this was not about some folks at FBG just watching some YouTube highlights and thinking he was awesome like someone pointed out above that I responded to. That was the consensus thought on him last year by pretty much everyone involved with the draft that we hear about until his fall in the draft. So, either all these folks were completely wrong, which is incredibly uncommon for so many to miss so severely, or something happened during interviews or during their draft prep that has caused his huge slide. And it's not as if the guy bombed the combine like some guys do that causes them to fall (i.e. J. Dwyer or K. Carey). This guy blew up the combine with his measureables. What's strange is we usually hear SOMETHING about why a guy might have fallen and that has never been shared anywhere as far as I know.On the next level, Seastrunk projects as a starting-level running back that can provide big plays and chunks of yards to an offense. He has the necessary “juice” to get through an NFL hole before it closes, and the burst to race past defenders on all levels of the field. While not the strongest runner in the class, Seastrunk has enough natural toughness to lower his shoulder and be effective enough between the tackles. In today’s wide-open NFL, Seastrunk is a prototype starting runner. While the value of the running back position in the Draft has declined, there is still a demand for “one touch” players: The game changing weapon that can score from anywhere. Seastrunk is just that.
GRADE: 7.4 (Late-2nd, Early-3rd)http://firstroundgrade.com/grading-scale/
I just sent him a text.That could be pretty revealing, please pass on whatever you hear.BigTex said:My best friend's son played with him at Baylor. I will ask him.....
Like I said, not real NFL scouts. Just talking heads with websites.The short-term memory is fascinating. Do you think people are making up that many were discussing him as a top prospect at RB a year ago? It doesn't take much to look it up and find out.What scouts? Real NFL scouts or the website "scouts"? Because the ones who get paid by NFL teams apparently don't think too much of him since he went late in the draft and then went unsigned after getting released. As I said earlier he doesn't fit the style Carolina runs. Maybe another team that uses outside zone/stretch could use him.gianmarco said:Aside from the fact that clearly a LOT of people like how he looks, he was widely considered by many scouts heading into last year as the top RB in the class and a 2nd round pick. This isn't by people who just watch Youtube but this was reported everywhere. His fall was very surprising to many. And even if he's not as good as people think, there are most definitely far worse RBs that somehow maintain backup jobs and he can't even make it on a practice squad.bigmarc27 said:Maybe that he's not very good and people should stop thinking that if they watch a few highlights on YouTube, they can accurately judge someone's talent?gianmarco said:There's gotta be something going on here with him. Just doesn't make sense.
There is most definitely something else going on.
Here it talks about Kiper's Big Board -- Kiper had him at #34 overall.
And here was Todd McShay's Big Board where he had him at #40 OVERALL--The way Seastrunk played in those last six contests vaulted him into ESPN NFL Draft analyst’s 2014 Big Board at No. 34, the highest-ranked player from the Big 12 and the second-highest ranked running back, second only behind Oregon speedster De’Anthony Thomas (No. 28).
Here's another spot written by nfldraftscout where they considered him the best RB on the board and he was compared to Vereen by Albert Breer at nfl.com1. Clowney DE S. Carol 17. Ekpre-Olomu CB Oregon
2. Bridgewater QB Louis 18. Tuitt DT NDame
3. Kouandjio OT Ala 19. Purifoy CB Flo
4. Lee WR USC 20. Attaochu OLB GTech
5. Barr OLB UCLA 21. Watkins WR Clemson
6. Matthews OT Ta&m 22. Johnson DT LSU
7. Nix NT NDame 23. McCullers DT Tenn
8. Boyd QB Clemson 24. Clinton-Dix S Ala
9. Manziel QB Ta&m 25. Verrett CB TCU
10. Hubbard OLB Ala 26. Yankey OG Stan
11, Roby CB OhioSt 27. Van Noy OLB BYU
12. Mosley LB Ala 28. Lynch DT S. Flor
13. Lewan OT Mich 29. Carey RB Ariz
14. Jernigan DT FlorSt. 30. Evans WR Ta&m
15 McCarron QB Ala 31. Shazier OLB OhioSt
16. Richardson OT Tenn 32. Thomas RB Oreg
Next 10:
1. Breslin DE USC 6. Jones OLB FlorSt.
2. Chricton DE OregSt. 7. Murphy OLB Stan
3. Coleman WR Rutgers 8. Seastrunk RB Baylor
4. Fales QB San Jose 9. Sefarian-Jenkins TE Wash
5. Johnson OLB Tenn 10. Sutton DL ArizSt.
Here's another writeup at FirstRoundGrade by a guy who has been involved in scouting college players for the NFL for 20 years who had him projected in 2nd-3rd roundTo succeed at the NFL level these days, backs must be able to contribute in the passing game. That is good news for Seastrunk, who excels in a wide-open scheme and compares favorably to New England's Shane Vereen per Albert Breer of NFL.com.
At 5'10" and 210 pounds, Seastrunk is built to last at the next level. He missed two games this year, but still ran for 982 yards and 11 touchdowns on 126 carries—giving him a superb 7.8 yards per carry.
Seastrunk may very well end up in the first round, especially if a team with the right system has a specific need.
Now, if you want to discount McShay and Kiper and all of these other guys, that's up to you. But this was not about some folks at FBG just watching some YouTube highlights and thinking he was awesome like someone pointed out above that I responded to. That was the consensus thought on him last year by pretty much everyone involved with the draft that we hear about until his fall in the draft. So, either all these folks were completely wrong, which is incredibly uncommon for so many to miss so severely, or something happened during interviews or during their draft prep that has caused his huge slide. And it's not as if the guy bombed the combine like some guys do that causes them to fall (i.e. J. Dwyer or K. Carey). This guy blew up the combine with his measureables. What's strange is we usually hear SOMETHING about why a guy might have fallen and that has never been shared anywhere as far as I know.On the next level, Seastrunk projects as a starting-level running back that can provide big plays and chunks of yards to an offense. He has the necessary “juice” to get through an NFL hole before it closes, and the burst to race past defenders on all levels of the field. While not the strongest runner in the class, Seastrunk has enough natural toughness to lower his shoulder and be effective enough between the tackles. In today’s wide-open NFL, Seastrunk is a prototype starting runner. While the value of the running back position in the Draft has declined, there is still a demand for “one touch” players: The game changing weapon that can score from anywhere. Seastrunk is just that.
GRADE: 7.4 (Late-2nd, Early-3rd)http://firstroundgrade.com/grading-scale/
I just don't get this revisionist history that some are trying to suggest this guy was never thought that highly of.
Character issue: says own name wrongI think he's saying it wrong.gianmarco said:Google is your friend.But it's "Lake"tandl71 said:How do you pronounce his name?
LATCH
LAYTCH
LATCHAY
LECHE
LAYCHAY
LeCHAY
LeSHAY
LAYSH
LASH?
I'm right here -- took him late in the 2nd of a 16-team start 2 RB league where RBs are gold... looking at some of the guys that went after him in that league, I regret the move (as it obviously didn't pan out), but I have had others from the league tell me he would have gone in the next few picks (e.g. they wanted him).JohnnyU said:I totally whiffed on this guy and it's time some others finally admit it as well. I'm not sure if it's character issues or ability either, or both. We all do this in fantasy football and isn't a big deal, but there comes a time when you just have to realize you were wrong about a player.
I don't believe it's talent. If he ends up in Canada I think he's the CFL MVP.I'm right here -- took him late in the 2nd of a 16-team start 2 RB league where RBs are gold... looking at some of the guys that went after him in that league, I regret the move (as it obviously didn't pan out), but I have had others from the league tell me he would have gone in the next few picks (e.g. they wanted him).JohnnyU said:I totally whiffed on this guy and it's time some others finally admit it as well. I'm not sure if it's character issues or ability either, or both. We all do this in fantasy football and isn't a big deal, but there comes a time when you just have to realize you were wrong about a player.
Dropped him when cut and not added to PS... then added again when Carolina picked him up. At this point I'm rather jaded toward him ever getting a shot.
Obviously the guys on here saying he's just not that good have more evidence in their favor right now... and perhaps he just isn't that good. Or perhaps there's something else at play beyond just pure talent? Either outcome makes it an uphill climb for fantasy value.
You're ignoring the entire devy league thing, which is probably the only reason he gets a big "still on page one" thread here. Otherwise, he's Storm Johnson.3C said:Like I said, not real NFL scouts. Just talking heads with websites.The short-term memory is fascinating. Do you think people are making up that many were discussing him as a top prospect at RB a year ago? It doesn't take much to look it up and find out.What scouts? Real NFL scouts or the website "scouts"? Because the ones who get paid by NFL teams apparently don't think too much of him since he went late in the draft and then went unsigned after getting released. As I said earlier he doesn't fit the style Carolina runs. Maybe another team that uses outside zone/stretch could use him.Aside from the fact that clearly a LOT of people like how he looks, he was widely considered by many scouts heading into last year as the top RB in the class and a 2nd round pick. This isn't by people who just watch Youtube but this was reported everywhere. His fall was very surprising to many. And even if he's not as good as people think, there are most definitely far worse RBs that somehow maintain backup jobs and he can't even make it on a practice squad.Maybe that he's not very good and people should stop thinking that if they watch a few highlights on YouTube, they can accurately judge someone's talent?There's gotta be something going on here with him. Just doesn't make sense.
There is most definitely something else going on.
Here it talks about Kiper's Big Board -- Kiper had him at #34 overall.
And here was Todd McShay's Big Board where he had him at #40 OVERALL--The way Seastrunk played in those last six contests vaulted him into ESPN NFL Draft analyst’s 2014 Big Board at No. 34, the highest-ranked player from the Big 12 and the second-highest ranked running back, second only behind Oregon speedster De’Anthony Thomas (No. 28).
Here's another spot written by nfldraftscout where they considered him the best RB on the board and he was compared to Vereen by Albert Breer at nfl.com1. Clowney DE S. Carol 17. Ekpre-Olomu CB Oregon
2. Bridgewater QB Louis 18. Tuitt DT NDame
3. Kouandjio OT Ala 19. Purifoy CB Flo
4. Lee WR USC 20. Attaochu OLB GTech
5. Barr OLB UCLA 21. Watkins WR Clemson
6. Matthews OT Ta&m 22. Johnson DT LSU
7. Nix NT NDame 23. McCullers DT Tenn
8. Boyd QB Clemson 24. Clinton-Dix S Ala
9. Manziel QB Ta&m 25. Verrett CB TCU
10. Hubbard OLB Ala 26. Yankey OG Stan
11, Roby CB OhioSt 27. Van Noy OLB BYU
12. Mosley LB Ala 28. Lynch DT S. Flor
13. Lewan OT Mich 29. Carey RB Ariz
14. Jernigan DT FlorSt. 30. Evans WR Ta&m
15 McCarron QB Ala 31. Shazier OLB OhioSt
16. Richardson OT Tenn 32. Thomas RB Oreg
Next 10:
1. Breslin DE USC 6. Jones OLB FlorSt.
2. Chricton DE OregSt. 7. Murphy OLB Stan
3. Coleman WR Rutgers 8. Seastrunk RB Baylor
4. Fales QB San Jose 9. Sefarian-Jenkins TE Wash
5. Johnson OLB Tenn 10. Sutton DL ArizSt.
Here's another writeup at FirstRoundGrade by a guy who has been involved in scouting college players for the NFL for 20 years who had him projected in 2nd-3rd roundTo succeed at the NFL level these days, backs must be able to contribute in the passing game. That is good news for Seastrunk, who excels in a wide-open scheme and compares favorably to New England's Shane Vereen per Albert Breer of NFL.com.
At 5'10" and 210 pounds, Seastrunk is built to last at the next level. He missed two games this year, but still ran for 982 yards and 11 touchdowns on 126 carries—giving him a superb 7.8 yards per carry.
Seastrunk may very well end up in the first round, especially if a team with the right system has a specific need.
Now, if you want to discount McShay and Kiper and all of these other guys, that's up to you. But this was not about some folks at FBG just watching some YouTube highlights and thinking he was awesome like someone pointed out above that I responded to. That was the consensus thought on him last year by pretty much everyone involved with the draft that we hear about until his fall in the draft. So, either all these folks were completely wrong, which is incredibly uncommon for so many to miss so severely, or something happened during interviews or during their draft prep that has caused his huge slide. And it's not as if the guy bombed the combine like some guys do that causes them to fall (i.e. J. Dwyer or K. Carey). This guy blew up the combine with his measureables. What's strange is we usually hear SOMETHING about why a guy might have fallen and that has never been shared anywhere as far as I know.On the next level, Seastrunk projects as a starting-level running back that can provide big plays and chunks of yards to an offense. He has the necessary “juice” to get through an NFL hole before it closes, and the burst to race past defenders on all levels of the field. While not the strongest runner in the class, Seastrunk has enough natural toughness to lower his shoulder and be effective enough between the tackles. In today’s wide-open NFL, Seastrunk is a prototype starting runner. While the value of the running back position in the Draft has declined, there is still a demand for “one touch” players: The game changing weapon that can score from anywhere. Seastrunk is just that.
GRADE: 7.4 (Late-2nd, Early-3rd)http://firstroundgrade.com/grading-scale/
I just don't get this revisionist history that some are trying to suggest this guy was never thought that highly of.
I'm talking ability to make an NFL squad. If he can't make an NFL squad he's useless to you. And I've said several times he will likely get another shot somewhere. He has talent but he's a bit 1 dimensional. His first 2 stops were not to his advantage. Washington had a logjam and he wasn't good enough to beat several incumbent players and a rookie who is more NFL ready. Carolina is a bad fit both in scheme and their injury situation. They need someone now but he's not ready.You're ignoring the entire devy league thing, which is probably the only reason he gets a big "still on page one" thread here. Otherwise, he's Storm Johnson.
In a devy league (which quite a few of us play), you have to be on these guys a year or two out from their draft eligibility. But unless you are a hardcore college football fan, it's almost impossible. Take NFL FF, and times it by 50.
So you have to rely on guys like McShay and Kiper to help sort through it all. And from my years of playing devy leagues, they are pretty decent at getting the top right, and a consensus forms a year or two before they get drafted.
For most of us, Seastrunk was a shocking, almost unprecedented fall.
You're essentially dismissing the FF angle on a FF board.
Is this supposed to mean that generally speaking NFL scouts are the best in the world at their job? I'm not sure that's true; every year there are guys that go late and/or undrafted that "talking heads with websites" were much higher on than "real NFL scouts". In general, I think this board puts too much emphasis on the position a guy holds rather than whether or not he is qualified for the position. It's pretty obvious that many NFL scout/GMs are clueless.Like I said, not real NFL scouts. Just talking heads with websites.The short-term memory is fascinating. Do you think people are making up that many were discussing him as a top prospect at RB a year ago? It doesn't take much to look it up and find out.What scouts? Real NFL scouts or the website "scouts"? Because the ones who get paid by NFL teams apparently don't think too much of him since he went late in the draft and then went unsigned after getting released. As I said earlier he doesn't fit the style Carolina runs. Maybe another team that uses outside zone/stretch could use him.Aside from the fact that clearly a LOT of people like how he looks, he was widely considered by many scouts heading into last year as the top RB in the class and a 2nd round pick. This isn't by people who just watch Youtube but this was reported everywhere. His fall was very surprising to many. And even if he's not as good as people think, there are most definitely far worse RBs that somehow maintain backup jobs and he can't even make it on a practice squad.Maybe that he's not very good and people should stop thinking that if they watch a few highlights on YouTube, they can accurately judge someone's talent?There's gotta be something going on here with him. Just doesn't make sense.
There is most definitely something else going on.
Here it talks about Kiper's Big Board -- Kiper had him at #34 overall.
And here was Todd McShay's Big Board where he had him at #40 OVERALL--The way Seastrunk played in those last six contests vaulted him into ESPN NFL Draft analyst’s 2014 Big Board at No. 34, the highest-ranked player from the Big 12 and the second-highest ranked running back, second only behind Oregon speedster De’Anthony Thomas (No. 28).
Here's another spot written by nfldraftscout where they considered him the best RB on the board and he was compared to Vereen by Albert Breer at nfl.com1. Clowney DE S. Carol 17. Ekpre-Olomu CB Oregon
2. Bridgewater QB Louis 18. Tuitt DT NDame
3. Kouandjio OT Ala 19. Purifoy CB Flo
4. Lee WR USC 20. Attaochu OLB GTech
5. Barr OLB UCLA 21. Watkins WR Clemson
6. Matthews OT Ta&m 22. Johnson DT LSU
7. Nix NT NDame 23. McCullers DT Tenn
8. Boyd QB Clemson 24. Clinton-Dix S Ala
9. Manziel QB Ta&m 25. Verrett CB TCU
10. Hubbard OLB Ala 26. Yankey OG Stan
11, Roby CB OhioSt 27. Van Noy OLB BYU
12. Mosley LB Ala 28. Lynch DT S. Flor
13. Lewan OT Mich 29. Carey RB Ariz
14. Jernigan DT FlorSt. 30. Evans WR Ta&m
15 McCarron QB Ala 31. Shazier OLB OhioSt
16. Richardson OT Tenn 32. Thomas RB Oreg
Next 10:
1. Breslin DE USC 6. Jones OLB FlorSt.
2. Chricton DE OregSt. 7. Murphy OLB Stan
3. Coleman WR Rutgers 8. Seastrunk RB Baylor
4. Fales QB San Jose 9. Sefarian-Jenkins TE Wash
5. Johnson OLB Tenn 10. Sutton DL ArizSt.
Here's another writeup at FirstRoundGrade by a guy who has been involved in scouting college players for the NFL for 20 years who had him projected in 2nd-3rd roundTo succeed at the NFL level these days, backs must be able to contribute in the passing game. That is good news for Seastrunk, who excels in a wide-open scheme and compares favorably to New England's Shane Vereen per Albert Breer of NFL.com.
At 5'10" and 210 pounds, Seastrunk is built to last at the next level. He missed two games this year, but still ran for 982 yards and 11 touchdowns on 126 carries—giving him a superb 7.8 yards per carry.
Seastrunk may very well end up in the first round, especially if a team with the right system has a specific need.
Now, if you want to discount McShay and Kiper and all of these other guys, that's up to you. But this was not about some folks at FBG just watching some YouTube highlights and thinking he was awesome like someone pointed out above that I responded to. That was the consensus thought on him last year by pretty much everyone involved with the draft that we hear about until his fall in the draft. So, either all these folks were completely wrong, which is incredibly uncommon for so many to miss so severely, or something happened during interviews or during their draft prep that has caused his huge slide. And it's not as if the guy bombed the combine like some guys do that causes them to fall (i.e. J. Dwyer or K. Carey). This guy blew up the combine with his measureables. What's strange is we usually hear SOMETHING about why a guy might have fallen and that has never been shared anywhere as far as I know.On the next level, Seastrunk projects as a starting-level running back that can provide big plays and chunks of yards to an offense. He has the necessary “juice” to get through an NFL hole before it closes, and the burst to race past defenders on all levels of the field. While not the strongest runner in the class, Seastrunk has enough natural toughness to lower his shoulder and be effective enough between the tackles. In today’s wide-open NFL, Seastrunk is a prototype starting runner. While the value of the running back position in the Draft has declined, there is still a demand for “one touch” players: The game changing weapon that can score from anywhere. Seastrunk is just that.
GRADE: 7.4 (Late-2nd, Early-3rd)http://firstroundgrade.com/grading-scale/
I just don't get this revisionist history that some are trying to suggest this guy was never thought that highly of.
Is this supposed to mean that generally speaking NFL scouts are the best in the world at their job? I'm not sure that's true; every year there are guys that go late and/or undrafted that "talking heads with websites" were much higher on than "real NFL scouts". In general, I think this board puts too much emphasis on the position a guy holds rather than whether or not he is qualified for the position. It's pretty obvious that many NFL scout/GMs are clueless.
Looks like a clone of Morris. I would expect him to do alright if he got the chance, but he's not particularly exciting.fatness said:All this talk about Seastrunk, and none about Silas Redd (the rookie who beat him out).
It could be his blocking, receiving, inability to pick up the playbook, character, or something else, but I have a hard time believing it's his running.I totally whiffed on this guy and it's time some others finally admit it as well. I'm not sure if it's character issues or ability either, or both. We all do this in fantasy football and isn't a big deal, but there comes a time when you just have to realize you were wrong about a player.
What's exciting is that he's on an NFL roster. Seastrunk isn't.Looks like a clone of Morris. I would expect him to do alright if he got the chance, but he's not particularly exciting.All this talk about Seastrunk, and none about Silas Redd (the rookie who beat him out).
I remember posting something like this once and getting laughed at. In reality, he is 100% correct. All you have to do is look around where you work. How many complete idiots do you see that have no idea how to do their job yet continue to do so. It's been like that everywhere I have worked in my life. Pretty much proves maxwellidson is spot on.Is this supposed to mean that generally speaking NFL scouts are the best in the world at their job? I'm not sure that's true; every year there are guys that go late and/or undrafted that "talking heads with websites" were much higher on than "real NFL scouts". In general, I think this board puts too much emphasis on the position a guy holds rather than whether or not he is qualified for the position. It's pretty obvious that many NFL scout/GMs are clueless.![]()
There's an old saying in Tennessee... I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee... that says, "Fool me once, shame on... shame on you. Fool me... you can't get fooled again!"Now with the Titans... exactly where some of us predicted back in May
panthers cut him in favor of taurean poole, who was with the team before. with the injuries to stewart, williams, and tolbert it became critical for them to have someone who knew the schemes. seastrunk was with them about a week. it wasn't going to work and he was let go in favor of experience. that much is understandable.I thought he ran well in the preseason.. but that was in the 4th quarter. I hear he lacks in blocking and catching, that's why the skins got rid of him.. assuming that's why the panthers did also. not sure there is much to see here
:golfclap?:Now with the Titans... exactly where some of us predicted back in May
He good enough to get signed to two practice squads. It's not much but it does show that the NFL sees potential in him.JFS171 said:There's an old saying in Tennessee... I know it's in Texas, probably in Tennessee... that says, "Fool me once, shame on... shame on you. Fool me... you can't get fooled again!"Now with the Titans... exactly where some of us predicted back in May