What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

La'el Collins stock just dropped (1 Viewer)

Your link establishes that he didn't delay talking to the police, as you erroneously stated.

the police and Collins agreed to set a time to meet after the draft
In fact the police were not ready to speak with Collins, and they (the police) pushed the meeting off until this week -- despite Collins leaving Chicago early expressly to have that meeting.

http://www.kcci.com/sports/nfl-will-not-move-lsus-collins-to-supplemental-draft/32661826

Collins, a possible first-round pick, was at an NFL event in Chicago on Wednesday morning but declined to answer questions from reporters. He then returned to Baton Rouge, La., in the hope of speaking with authorities and clearing his name.

But, because the investigation is not complete, the police are not ready to meet with him, according to NFL Media sources who have spoken to the police.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
davearm said:
Your link establishes that he didn't delay talking to the police, as you erroneously stated.

the police and Collins agreed to set a time to meet after the draft
In fact the police were not ready to speak with Collins, and they (the police) pushed the meeting off until this week -- despite Collins leaving Chicago early expressly to have that meeting.

http://www.kcci.com/sports/nfl-will-not-move-lsus-collins-to-supplemental-draft/32661826

Collins, a possible first-round pick, was at an NFL event in Chicago on Wednesday morning but declined to answer questions from reporters. He then returned to Baton Rouge, La., in the hope of speaking with authorities and clearing his name.

But, because the investigation is not complete, the police are not ready to meet with him, according to NFL Media sources who have spoken to the police.
I believe that report is from Thursday so the police may have wanted the weekend to investigate and decide how to question him.

We'll never know what would have happened had he responded right away when they started trying to find him on Saturday.

 
I just want to see what his contract will look like.
His contract is going to look the same wherever he goes. 3 years for a total of $1.57 million. Signing bonus of a nominal amount ($25-30K?). The only real variable will be how much of the contract is guaranteed, but other than that the contract offer has to be the same from all 32 teams.

 
So what exactly is the evidence against this guy?
According to cstu:

1) Hiring a lawyer.

2) Being a fugitive from the police (actually it was just a text from the local media when he was boarding a plane).

3) Avoiding questioning (actually he made himself available but they scheduled it on Monday, which he complied with).

Clearly he is a GHOST FACE KILLAH.
It's more likely than not that he killed her. The police are staying quiet for a reason.
dude, what?
 
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sm3b7t

From Josina Anderson, ESPN on Twitter

Breaking: I've been notified by representatives of OT La'el Collins that his paternity test results were negative. Specifically, Collins is not the father of Brittney Mills' child and Collins passed A polygraph test administered by an independent investigator in connection with Mills' case.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
and had you drafted this kid like some of us suggested, you could easily do one of these things:

- trade away his rights for a 4th rounder in 2016 right now

- get him to sign with your team

IMO, the threat of going back in the draft was likely always an empty one

 
This isn't synonymous with being cleared by the police (cynic might say he THOUGHT he was the father?), but could be a step in that direction.

* Thinking he might be the father might not seem as strong a motive as actually being the father, but if he couldn't have known (unless he knew he hadn't had sex with her within the time frame that would have been needed?), it is unclear what difference it makes for practical purposes?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sm3b7t

From Josina Anderson, ESPN on Twitter

Breaking: I've been notified by representatives of OT La'el Collins that his paternity test results were negative. Specifically, Collins is not the father of Brittney Mills' child and Collins passed A polygraph test administered by an independent investigator in connection with Mills' case.
Oh by the way:

Collins passed A polygraph test administered by an independent investigator in connection with Mills' case.
 
SacramentoBob said:
So... no evidence then.
um, Robert Blake and Aaron Hernandez were once referred to as "not a suspect". Not sure what the hell else you need to know.
Those cases were very different, though.

If Hernandez had taken a selfie saying Just killed this dude, LOL, it would have hardly been more obvious than it already was (rental car returned with shell, breaking security system, known to be with Lloyd that night, etc.).

Details of the Blake case below*, I kind of remember the gist, but am a little fuzzy on the details. As far as we know, Collins case not remotely as obvious as Hernandez. To be like Blake, that would be like if he had previously asked around for a hit man, contract killer, and than the night of the murder, they went to a restaurant, the woman was in the car, Collins said he went back to retrieve his gun, and she got shot in the head waiting in the car. So nothing remotely like that, either, as far as the facts that pertain to the case we know about so far. Doesn't mean he isn't involved, but the cases are so dissimilar that, imo, there isn't the same cause for suspicion in the court of public opinion (whereas it was absolutely justified in the case of Hernandez and Blake).

* Robert "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time, don't do it, don't do it" Blake murder investigation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Blake_(actor)

Arrest and trial for murder[edit]

On May 4, 2001, Blake took Bakley for an Italian dinner at Vitello's Restaurant at 4349 Tujunga Avenue in Studio City. Afterward, Bakley was killed by a gunshot to the head while sitting in the car, which was parked on a side street around the corner from the restaurant. Blake claimed that he had returned to the restaurant to collect a gun which he had left there, and was not present when the shooting occurred. The gun that Blake claimed he had left in the restaurant was later determined not to have fired the shots that killed Bakley.

On April 18, 2002, Blake was arrested and charged in connection with the murder of his wife. His longtime bodyguard, Earle Caldwell, was also arrested and charged with conspiracy in connection with murder. A key event that gave the LAPD the confidence to arrest Blake came when a retired stuntman, Ronald "Duffy" Hambleton, agreed to testify against him. Hambleton alleged that Blake tried to hire him to kill Bonnie Lee Bakley. Another retired stuntman and an associate of Hambleton's, Gary McLarty, came forward with a similar story.

According to author Miles Corwin, Hambleton agreed to testify against Blake only after being told he would be subject to a grand jury subpoena and a pending misdemeanor charge. Hambleton's motives for testifying were called into question by Blake's defense team during the criminal trial.

On April 22, 2002, Blake was charged with one count of murder with special circumstances, an offense eligible for the death penalty. He was also charged with two counts of solicitation of murder and one count of murder conspiracy. Blake pleaded not guilty to all charges. Caldwell was charged with a single count of murder conspiracy and also pleaded not guilty. Three days later, the Los Angeles District Attorney's office announced they would not seek the death penalty against Blake should he be convicted, but prosecutors would seek a sentence of life in prison without parole.

After Blake posted US$1 million bail, Caldwell was released, but a judge denied bail for Blake. On March 13, 2003, after almost a year in jail, Blake was granted bail, which was set at US$1.5 million, and he was allowed to go free to await trial. Blake was placed on house arrest during this time. On Oct. 31, in a major reversal for the prosecution, the judge dismissed the conspiracy charge against Blake and Caldwell during a pre-trial hearing. The junior prosecutor who handled the case, Shellie Samuels, was interviewed by CBS reporter Peter Van Sant for the CBS program 48 Hours Investigates. During the interview, broadcast in November 2003, she admitted the prosecutors had no forensic evidence implicating Blake, could not tie him to the murder weapon, had no witnesses and had virtually nothing in the way of hard evidence.

Murder trial and acquittal

Blake's criminal trial for murder began on December 20, 2004, with opening statements by the prosecution and then the defense the following day. The prosecution contended that Blake intentionally murdered Bakley to free himself from a loveless marriage, while the defense challenged all of the evidence, claiming that Blake was an innocent victim of circumstantial and fabricated evidence.

Prosecution testimony began with various witnesses detailing the night of the murder and the murder weapon used. Bakley was shot twice while sitting in the passenger side of the parked car and the passenger window was rolled down, indicating she may have been familiar with her assailant. The murder weapon was revealed to be a semi-automatic Walther P-38 pistol, which was found in a dumpster a few yards away from the parked car where the shooting took place.

On February 7, 2005, Gary McLarty claimed that in March 2001, Blake attempted to contract him to murder his wife; McLarty allegedly declined. McLarty's testimony was pulled apart under intense cross-examination, including a history of mental problems and his inability to remember any key details of the alleged contract offer. On February 9, testimony came from Ronald "Duffy" Hambleton, who also claimed that Blake tried to solicit him to murder his wife. His testimony was also called into question during cross-examination when his past criminal record of various petty crimes for drug and gun possession was made known.

The prosecution rested its case on February 14. The defense began its case with a series of witnesses who poked holes in various parts of the prosecution's case, including relatives of Gary McLarty. On February 19, testimony was heard about the effects of chronic drug use on the mind—specifically, the minds of the two key prosecution witnesses, Ronald "Duffy" Hambleton and Gary McLarty, who were noted drug users during their stuntman careers. The lack of gunshot residue on Blake's hands was also a key part of the defense's case that Blake was not the shooter. Robert Blake chose not to testify. The defense rested its case on February 23, and after closing arguments were made on March 2–3, the jury retired to deliberate on March 4.

On March 16, 2005, Blake was found not guilty of the murder of Bonnie Lee Bakley and of one of the two counts of solicitation of murder. The other count, the solicitation of Gary McLarty, was dropped after it was revealed that the jury was deadlocked 11–1 in favor of an acquittal. Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley, commenting on this ruling, called Blake a "miserable human being" and the jurors "incredibly stupid to fall for the defenses claims." Blake's defense team, led by attorney M. Gerald Schwartzbach, and members of the jury responded that the prosecution had failed to prove its case. One trial analyst also agreed with the jury's verdict. Public opinion of the verdict was mixed with some feeling Blake was guilty though many felt there was not enough evidence to convict him. On the night of his acquittal several fans celebrated at Blake's favorite haunt, Vitello's.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.twitlonger.com/show/n_1sm3b7t

From Josina Anderson, ESPN on Twitter

Breaking: I've been notified by representatives of OT La'el Collins that his paternity test results were negative. Specifically, Collins is not the father of Brittney Mills' child and Collins passed A polygraph test administered by an independent investigator in connection with Mills' case.
Oh by the way:

Collins passed A polygraph test administered by an independent investigator in connection with Mills' case.
Is this a new one or the one he took on Thursday?

Jason Cole @JasonPhilCole

OL La'el Collins reps hired firm to do a polygraph test on him Thursday regarding case of murdered ex-girlfriend. He passed, FWIW.

3:47 PM - 1 May 2015
 
SacramentoBob said:
So... no evidence then.
um, Robert Blake and Aaron Hernandez were once referred to as "not a suspect". Not sure what the hell else you need to know.
Those cases were very different, though.

If Hernandez had taken a selfie saying Just killed this dude, LOL, it would have hardly been more obvious than it already was (rental car returned with shell, breaking security system, known to be with Lloyd that night, etc.).

Details of the Blake case below*, I kind of remember the gist, but am a little fuzzy on the details. As far as we know, Collins case not remotely as obvious as Hernandez. To be like Blake, that would be like if he had previously asked around for a hit man, contract killer, and than the night of the murder, they went to a restaurant, the woman was in the car, Collins said he went back to retrieve his gun, and she got shot in the head waiting in the car. So nothing remotely like that, either, as far as the facts that pertain to the case we know about so far. Doesn't mean he isn't involved, but the cases are so dissimilar that, imo, there isn't the same cause for suspicion in the court of public opinion (whereas it was absolutely justified in the case of Hernandez and Blake).

* Robert "Don't do the crime if you can't do the time, don't do it, don't do it" Blake murder investigation.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Robert_Blake_(actor)

Arrest and trial for murder[edit]

On May 4, 2001, Blake took Bakley for an Italian dinner at Vitello's Restaurant at 4349 Tujunga Avenue in Studio City. Afterward, Bakley was killed by a gunshot to the head while sitting in the car, which was parked on a side street around the corner from the restaurant. Blake claimed that he had returned to the restaurant to collect a gun which he had left there, and was not present when the shooting occurred. The gun that Blake claimed he had left in the restaurant was later determined not to have fired the shots that killed Bakley.

On April 18, 2002, Blake was arrested and charged in connection with the murder of his wife. His longtime bodyguard, Earle Caldwell, was also arrested and charged with conspiracy in connection with murder. A key event that gave the LAPD the confidence to arrest Blake came when a retired stuntman, Ronald "Duffy" Hambleton, agreed to testify against him. Hambleton alleged that Blake tried to hire him to kill Bonnie Lee Bakley. Another retired stuntman and an associate of Hambleton's, Gary McLarty, came forward with a similar story.

According to author Miles Corwin, Hambleton agreed to testify against Blake only after being told he would be subject to a grand jury subpoena and a pending misdemeanor charge. Hambleton's motives for testifying were called into question by Blake's defense team during the criminal trial.

On April 22, 2002, Blake was charged with one count of murder with special circumstances, an offense eligible for the death penalty. He was also charged with two counts of solicitation of murder and one count of murder conspiracy. Blake pleaded not guilty to all charges. Caldwell was charged with a single count of murder conspiracy and also pleaded not guilty. Three days later, the Los Angeles District Attorney's office announced they would not seek the death penalty against Blake should he be convicted, but prosecutors would seek a sentence of life in prison without parole.

After Blake posted US$1 million bail, Caldwell was released, but a judge denied bail for Blake. On March 13, 2003, after almost a year in jail, Blake was granted bail, which was set at US$1.5 million, and he was allowed to go free to await trial. Blake was placed on house arrest during this time. On Oct. 31, in a major reversal for the prosecution, the judge dismissed the conspiracy charge against Blake and Caldwell during a pre-trial hearing. The junior prosecutor who handled the case, Shellie Samuels, was interviewed by CBS reporter Peter Van Sant for the CBS program 48 Hours Investigates. During the interview, broadcast in November 2003, she admitted the prosecutors had no forensic evidence implicating Blake, could not tie him to the murder weapon, had no witnesses and had virtually nothing in the way of hard evidence.

Murder trial and acquittal

Blake's criminal trial for murder began on December 20, 2004, with opening statements by the prosecution and then the defense the following day. The prosecution contended that Blake intentionally murdered Bakley to free himself from a loveless marriage, while the defense challenged all of the evidence, claiming that Blake was an innocent victim of circumstantial and fabricated evidence.

Prosecution testimony began with various witnesses detailing the night of the murder and the murder weapon used. Bakley was shot twice while sitting in the passenger side of the parked car and the passenger window was rolled down, indicating she may have been familiar with her assailant. The murder weapon was revealed to be a semi-automatic Walther P-38 pistol, which was found in a dumpster a few yards away from the parked car where the shooting took place.

On February 7, 2005, Gary McLarty claimed that in March 2001, Blake attempted to contract him to murder his wife; McLarty allegedly declined. McLarty's testimony was pulled apart under intense cross-examination, including a history of mental problems and his inability to remember any key details of the alleged contract offer. On February 9, testimony came from Ronald "Duffy" Hambleton, who also claimed that Blake tried to solicit him to murder his wife. His testimony was also called into question during cross-examination when his past criminal record of various petty crimes for drug and gun possession was made known.

The prosecution rested its case on February 14. The defense began its case with a series of witnesses who poked holes in various parts of the prosecution's case, including relatives of Gary McLarty. On February 19, testimony was heard about the effects of chronic drug use on the mind—specifically, the minds of the two key prosecution witnesses, Ronald "Duffy" Hambleton and Gary McLarty, who were noted drug users during their stuntman careers. The lack of gunshot residue on Blake's hands was also a key part of the defense's case that Blake was not the shooter. Robert Blake chose not to testify. The defense rested its case on February 23, and after closing arguments were made on March 2–3, the jury retired to deliberate on March 4.

On March 16, 2005, Blake was found not guilty of the murder of Bonnie Lee Bakley and of one of the two counts of solicitation of murder. The other count, the solicitation of Gary McLarty, was dropped after it was revealed that the jury was deadlocked 11–1 in favor of an acquittal. Los Angeles District Attorney Steve Cooley, commenting on this ruling, called Blake a "miserable human being" and the jurors "incredibly stupid to fall for the defenses claims." Blake's defense team, led by attorney M. Gerald Schwartzbach, and members of the jury responded that the prosecution had failed to prove its case. One trial analyst also agreed with the jury's verdict. Public opinion of the verdict was mixed with some feeling Blake was guilty though many felt there was not enough evidence to convict him. On the night of his acquittal several fans celebrated at Blake's favorite haunt, Vitello's.
I think Long Ball Larry's post was sarcastic, as if he were cstu or spider123.

 
Rotoworld:

La'El Collins - T - Player

CBS Sports' Jason La Canfora reports LSU T/G La'El Collins' first visit will be to the Cowboys.

La Canfora deems Collins "the most coveted undrafted free agent in NFL history," which really isn't an exaggeration considering he was seen as a lock first-rounder before an unfortunate series of events resulted in Collins falling out of the draft entirely. Collins' chances of starting in Dallas wouldn't be great when compared to other potential destinations, though we imagine he may be a better left guard option than Ronald Leary, who is the relative weakness on the Cowboys' line.

Related: Cowboys

Source: Jason La Canfora on Twitter

May 6 - 10:55 PM
 
Ex-LSU football star La'el Collins has told police he has an airtight alibi in the murder of the pregnant woman suspected of carrying his child ... TMZ Sports has learned.

Sources close to the investigation tell us ... Collins -- who was a projected 1st round NFL draft pick before the double murder -- spoke with investigators and said he has witnesses and phone records that prove he was nowhere close to Brittney Mills on the night she was gunned down.

Mills was shot to death around 10:30 PM on April 24th at her apartment in Baton Rouge.

But Collins told investigators he was an hour away in New Orleans at the time of the shooting -- as part of an overnight trip with friends and family to watch the New Orleans Pelicans take on the Golden State Warriors on Saturday April 25th.

We're told Collins also claims he has texts and emails proving the group had planned the trip several days before the killing ... and he believes GPS records on his cell phone will back up his story.

For the record, Collins has NOT been named a suspect in the murder of Brittney and her unborn son.

Our sources say La'el told cops he hadn't spoken with Brittney for several months -- when she first suggested that he could be the father of her child.
If this is his story, why not come out and say this from the get go instead of immediately hiring an attorney, leaving town, not contacting the police, not issuing a statement, and otherwise not getting in front of this so he could still get drafted.
anything you say can, and will, be used against you.

and the rest of your post is pure speculation. you dont know that he didnt contact the police. hiring an attorney to interact with law enforcement is not an admission of guilt. issuing a statement would not get him drafted.

 
From Collins standpoint, why do you do this? Cowboys starting 5 are pretty freaking good aren't they? As far as playing time goes he'll probably hardly get any. But maybe he beats out Leary or something.

 
@AlbertBreer: Per source, La'el Collins' 3-year deal is worth about $1.7 million. It's fully guaranteed, which is believed to be unprecedented for a UDFA.

And he can negotiate a new deal after 2 years.

 
Strange decision, given that he would have been courted by all 32 teams, all of whom would (I assume) have paid him the same, and most of whom would have given him a much clearer path to playing time. This is like marrying the first chick who gives you a hand jibber, when you look like Brad Pitt.

 
Strange decision, given that he would have been courted by all 32 teams, all of whom would (I assume) have paid him the same, and most of whom would have given him a much clearer path to playing time. This is like marrying the first chick who gives you a hand jibber, when you look like Brad Pitt.
:lol:

 
Dez, Hardy, Gregory, Collins - Jerry Jones, no fks given
America's Team indeed.
Almost wondering if this will be a bit disruptive on the OL. You go from hearing that your are the best OL in the NFL to signing a guy who is going to take someone's spot. Just seems like while he is a bargain, it might not be great for cohesiveness. Kind of like Hardy getting into a fight with teammates already.

 
Another huge botch by the NFL on this one IMO. A team just got a free top 10 pick for basically no financial risk, without having to use a pick. Given the circumstances, he should have gone into the supplemental draft both to be fair to him, and to be fair to the other 31 teams that didnt get a free top 10 pick out of this mess.

ETA - Before someone else says it...I know a team could have spent a late pick on him, but given all the risk associated with that (him being guilty, him refusing to sign as he stated, PR nightmare, etc) I can understand the reluctancy to do so. Even if one had, it woudl have still been a botch job, as a team would have gotten a top 10 pick for a 7th round pick.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Another huge botch by the NFL on this one IMO. A team just got a free top 10 pick for basically no financial risk, without having to use a pick. Given the circumstances, he should have gone into the supplemental draft both to be fair to him, and to be fair to the other 31 teams that didnt get a free top 10 pick out of this mess.

ETA - Before someone else says it...I know a team could have spent a late pick on him, but given all the risk associated with that (him being guilty, him refusing to sign as he stated, PR nightmare, etc) I can understand the reluctancy to do so. Even if one had, it woudl have still been a botch job, as a team would have gotten a top 10 pick for a 7th round pick.
After what has happened with Rice, Peterson, Hernandez, and Hardy to some extent if you used even a 7th rd pick on the guy it isn't a smart play. No one was touching him. Worked out in Dallas' favor.

 
Another huge botch by the NFL on this one IMO. A team just got a free top 10 pick for basically no financial risk, without having to use a pick. Given the circumstances, he should have gone into the supplemental draft both to be fair to him, and to be fair to the other 31 teams that didnt get a free top 10 pick out of this mess.

ETA - Before someone else says it...I know a team could have spent a late pick on him, but given all the risk associated with that (him being guilty, him refusing to sign as he stated, PR nightmare, etc) I can understand the reluctancy to do so. Even if one had, it woudl have still been a botch job, as a team would have gotten a top 10 pick for a 7th round pick.
After what has happened with Rice, Peterson, Hernandez, and Hardy to some extent if you used even a 7th rd pick on the guy it isn't a smart play. No one was touching him. Worked out in Dallas' favor.
I'd have to look but Joe Banner went into some pretty great detail about how it would have been the way to go. I'm paraphrasing but I believe by drafting him he couldn't go back into the draft because he was already told he couldn't by the Union. He would also lose a year before hitting FA if he did go back into the draft. He was emphatic that some team should have taken him and simply cut him if he was involved with pretty much no reprecussions

 
Another huge botch by the NFL on this one IMO. A team just got a free top 10 pick for basically no financial risk, without having to use a pick. Given the circumstances, he should have gone into the supplemental draft both to be fair to him, and to be fair to the other 31 teams that didnt get a free top 10 pick out of this mess.

ETA - Before someone else says it...I know a team could have spent a late pick on him, but given all the risk associated with that (him being guilty, him refusing to sign as he stated, PR nightmare, etc) I can understand the reluctancy to do so. Even if one had, it woudl have still been a botch job, as a team would have gotten a top 10 pick for a 7th round pick.
After what has happened with Rice, Peterson, Hernandez, and Hardy to some extent if you used even a 7th rd pick on the guy it isn't a smart play. No one was touching him. Worked out in Dallas' favor.
I'd have to look but Joe Banner went into some pretty great detail about how it would have been the way to go. I'm paraphrasing but I believe by drafting him he couldn't go back into the draft because he was already told he couldn't by the Union. He would also lose a year before hitting FA if he did go back into the draft. He was emphatic that some team should have taken him and simply cut him if he was involved with pretty much no reprecussions
I also heard that Collins would not sign with a team out of spite if he wasn't selected in the 1st, but don't know how you do that and not completely destroy and chance of playing on any NFL team period. Banner makes a valid point.

 
If drafted this year, he could have refused to sign and be drafted again next year. If undrafted, he could not reenter the draft in any other season.

 
From Collins standpoint, why do you do this? Cowboys starting 5 are pretty freaking good aren't they? As far as playing time goes he'll probably hardly get any. But maybe he beats out Leary or something.
Jones seems like a guy willing to do an under the table payment.

 
If drafted this year, he could have refused to sign and be drafted again next year. If undrafted, he could not reenter the draft in any other season.
If accurate (I am sure it is), then he was undraftable this year. Given the incredible extenuating circumstances here, the only fair resolution was to put him in the supplemental draft, as he requested. If innocent, this BS cost him millions of dollars that he deserved due to his NCAA performance, and it also provided a very unfair advantage to one of 32 teams. NFL was way too rigid on this IMO, and in the end, it created a lose-lose scenario for everyone involved, except the Dallas Cowboys, who basically got a free (financially and as an extra pick) top 10 pick.

 
Another huge botch by the NFL on this one IMO. A team just got a free top 10 pick for basically no financial risk, without having to use a pick. Given the circumstances, he should have gone into the supplemental draft both to be fair to him, and to be fair to the other 31 teams that didnt get a free top 10 pick out of this mess.

ETA - Before someone else says it...I know a team could have spent a late pick on him, but given all the risk associated with that (him being guilty, him refusing to sign as he stated, PR nightmare, etc) I can understand the reluctancy to do so. Even if one had, it woudl have still been a botch job, as a team would have gotten a top 10 pick for a 7th round pick.
After what has happened with Rice, Peterson, Hernandez, and Hardy to some extent if you used even a 7th rd pick on the guy it isn't a smart play. No one was touching him. Worked out in Dallas' favor.
I'd have to look but Joe Banner went into some pretty great detail about how it would have been the way to go. I'm paraphrasing but I believe by drafting him he couldn't go back into the draft because he was already told he couldn't by the Union. He would also lose a year before hitting FA if he did go back into the draft. He was emphatic that some team should have taken him and simply cut him if he was involved with pretty much no reprecussions
This is his fastest way to get to the money. Banner isn't taking into account the mess of a situation.

 
If all it took was taking a paternity test to get signed, he was an idiot for not getting one right after the murder. Could have been a 1st round pick.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top