The Chargers have been telling reporters that they'd bring Collins in only as a guard, not a tackle. So if he wants to play tackle in the NFL, the Chargers are out of the running.
I hadn't heard that. On the way home from work yesterday, I heard an interview with Telesco on the subject and his position was not addressed. The radio host was suggesting that since the money will be fixed, two of the discriminators could/should be:
1. Guaranteeing his contract for all 3 years. Not a big risk, as he will only stand to make a total of $1.6M. Seems worth it, given he is cleared.
2. Guaranteeing him at least a chance to compete for the RT spot, if not outright guaranteeing him of starting at RT. The rationale is that tackles get paid more, so if he spends his three years on the low contract at tackle rather than guard, he will stand to get paid more on his second contract. That assumes he will play well, but looking at it from Collins' standpoint, he is sure to assume that.
Personally, I thought the Chargers were an unlikely candidate, anyway, for tax reasons. Given the money is fixed, if he has a chance to start for multiple teams, it seems that going where he will lose less money to taxes could easily be a tiebreaker. If so, that's not California.