What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

La'el Collins stock just dropped (1 Viewer)

so sorry Stumpie
Thank you, this happened 12 years ago but was still an unfortunate circumstance.

I was just hoping to point out that being asked to speak with investigators doesn't necessarily point to suspicion or innocence, but is a process that police need to take in an effort to determine the person(s) responsible for the crimes in question.

 
This is why as I said above, if he really is just being bought in because of his relationship to the woman and not because he's a real suspect. He should sue the department as it's despicable that this leaked from the department 2 days before he was expected to be a Top 20 draft pick.
The police know full well what kind of risk they are taking by naming Collins publicly right before the draft. I don't believe they take a chance like this and act the way they have if he's not a major suspect.
What is this business of the police naming Collins publicly?

The PD has a spokesperson. When the media comes around asking questions, the spokesperson does his/her best to answer those questions (as generally as possible, with an investigation ongoing).

It's not like the PD called a press conference here.

 
so sorry Stumpie
Thank you, this happened 12 years ago but was still an unfortunate circumstance.

I was just hoping to point out that being asked to speak with investigators doesn't necessarily point to suspicion or innocence, but is a process that police need to take in an effort to determine the person(s) responsible for the crimes in question.
You'd think what you just posted would be common sense. But apparently here, if the police want to speak with you, then obviously you're guilty.

Sorry for your loss.

 
This is why as I said above, if he really is just being bought in because of his relationship to the woman and not because he's a real suspect. He should sue the department as it's despicable that this leaked from the department 2 days before he was expected to be a Top 20 draft pick.
The police know full well what kind of risk they are taking by naming Collins publicly right before the draft. I don't believe they take a chance like this and act the way they have if he's not a major suspect.
What is this business of the police naming Collins publicly?

The PD has a spokesperson. When the media comes around asking questions, the spokesperson does his/her best to answer those questions (as generally as possible, with an investigation ongoing).

It's not like the PD called a press conference here.
Perhaps I missed it - did they name other people they wanted to speak to?

 
Rotoworld:

ESPN's Todd McShay said on SportsCenter that he spoke to six NFL teams on Wednesday night, and "all six" predicted LSU T/G La'El Collins will fall out of the first round.

Although not necessarily seen as a suspect, Collins is wanted for questioning regarding a murder of his ex-girlfriend in Baton Rouge, Louisiana. His situation won't be settled until after the draft. Per McShay, "almost all" of the six teams said they've removed Collins from their boards, meaning they wouldn't draft Collins even if he were available in the seventh round.

Apr 30 - 12:51 PM
 
cstu said:
When my brother was robbed and killed coming out of a store I was asked to come in a speak with the detectives. I was never a POI or suspect, however before I had a chance to speak with the detectives the person responsible was identified and my interview was delayed several days.
I assume you immediately hired a lawyer.
This is wildly inappropriate. You're becoming obnoxious about stuff like this.

 
When my brother was robbed and killed coming out of a store I was asked to come in a speak with the detectives. I was never a POI or suspect, however before I had a chance to speak with the detectives the person responsible was identified and my interview was delayed several days.
Sorry for your loss, stumpie.

Apples and oranges, though.

 
Jay Glazer ‏@JayGlazer 9m9 minutes ago

Scoopage: Agent for LSU's La'el Collins trying to pull him from this draft allowing him time to clear his name then enter Supplemental Draft

Jay Glazer ‏@JayGlazer 6m6 minutes ago

NFL's call if Collins can get pulled from this draft

 
This is why as I said above, if he really is just being bought in because of his relationship to the woman and not because he's a real suspect. He should sue the department as it's despicable that this leaked from the department 2 days before he was expected to be a Top 20 draft pick.
The police know full well what kind of risk they are taking by naming Collins publicly right before the draft. I don't believe they take a chance like this and act the way they have if he's not a major suspect.
What is this business of the police naming Collins publicly?

The PD has a spokesperson. When the media comes around asking questions, the spokesperson does his/her best to answer those questions (as generally as possible, with an investigation ongoing).

It's not like the PD called a press conference here.
Perhaps I missed it - did they name other people they wanted to speak to?
Why would they?

The spokesperson was asked by the media about Collins specifically. And he answered.

 
Rotoworld:

FOX's Jay Glazer reports the agent for LSU G/T La'El Collins is trying to have him declared ineligible for this week's draft so he can clear his name in a Baton Rouge murder investigation, and then enter the Supplemental Draft.

Collins isn't a suspect in the death of his ex-girlfriend, but he's reportedly being removed from draft boards all the same. Per Glazer, most teams are "asking for a full police report clearing him before they are willing to draft him." Collins isn't slated to meet with police until after the draft.
 
cstu said:
When my brother was robbed and killed coming out of a store I was asked to come in a speak with the detectives. I was never a POI or suspect, however before I had a chance to speak with the detectives the person responsible was identified and my interview was delayed several days.
I assume you immediately hired a lawyer.
No, but I keep an attorney on retainer, and yes he did accompany to the interview, and I have a full transcript of the interview.

 
Rotoworld:

FOX's Jay Glazer reports the agent for LSU G/T La'El Collins is trying to have him declared ineligible for this week's draft so he can clear his name in a Baton Rouge murder investigation, and then enter the Supplemental Draft.

Collins isn't a suspect in the death of his ex-girlfriend, but he's reportedly being removed from draft boards all the same. Per Glazer, most teams are "asking for a full police report clearing him before they are willing to draft him." Collins isn't slated to meet with police until after the draft.
Called that in the air, it's the only thing that makes sense.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
cstu said:
When my brother was robbed and killed coming out of a store I was asked to come in a speak with the detectives. I was never a POI or suspect, however before I had a chance to speak with the detectives the person responsible was identified and my interview was delayed several days.
I assume you immediately hired a lawyer.
This is wildly inappropriate. You're becoming obnoxious about stuff like this.
I'm sure his compassion is appreciated.

* There was a question about whether the rules would permit him withdrawing to be entered into the sup. draft. Sounds like it would be unprecedented, but maybe they could make some kind of exception or rewrite the rules for him?

If you are drafted in the seventh round (or any round), pretty sure it is an option to not sign, sit out the entire year and re-enter the draft the following year?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
so sorry Stumpie
Thank you, this happened 12 years ago but was still an unfortunate circumstance.

I was just hoping to point out that being asked to speak with investigators doesn't necessarily point to suspicion or innocence, but is a process that police need to take in an effort to determine the person(s) responsible for the crimes in question.
You'd think what you just posted would be common sense. But apparently here, if the police want to speak with you, then obviously you're guilty.

Sorry for your loss.
I don't think anyone in here thinks that. Maybe one person in the whole thread. But the fact that Collins name has now been tarnished and his livelihood affected is real and true. Plus given his social status, you gotta think this is either terrible timing or maybe there is more to it. We are just trying to make heads and tails out of the information we are fed. If anyone is saying he is guilty or not guilty at this point they are wrong. But I don't think anyone has said that. And the one guy who did backed off of it.

 
cstu said:
When my brother was robbed and killed coming out of a store I was asked to come in a speak with the detectives. I was never a POI or suspect, however before I had a chance to speak with the detectives the person responsible was identified and my interview was delayed several days.
I assume you immediately hired a lawyer.
This is wildly inappropriate. You're becoming obnoxious about stuff like this.
I'm sure his compassion is appreciated.

* There was a question about whether the rules would permit him withdrawing to be entered into the sup. draft. Sounds like it would be unprecedented, but maybe they could make some kind of exception or rewrite the rules for him?

If you are drafted in the seventh round (or any round), pretty sure it is an option to not sign, sit out the entire year and re-enter the draft the following year?
As I understand it understanding news is breaking every minute, he has taken his request to the nflpa, but since he's not yet a member, there's not much the union can do. So far it looks like he will be in the draft. The NFL probably doesn't want to do him a favor and later find out he was involved. That's not worth the PR risk.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
As I understand it understanding news is breaking every minute, he has taken his request to the nflpa, but since he's not yet a member, there's not much the union can do. So far it looks like he will be in the draft. The NFL probably doesn't want to do him a favor and later find out he was involved. That's not worth the PR risk.
If he is involved, they're doing the 32 teams a favor (and themselves).

I'm not sure what the PR risk is to the league in saying "we're putting this guy into a holding pattern until we can determine what went on here."

 
As I understand it understanding news is breaking every minute, he has taken his request to the nflpa, but since he's not yet a member, there's not much the union can do. So far it looks like he will be in the draft. The NFL probably doesn't want to do him a favor and later find out he was involved. That's not worth the PR risk.
If he is involved, they're doing the 32 teams a favor (and themselves).

I'm not sure what the PR risk is to the league in saying "we're putting this guy into a holding pattern until we can determine what went on here."
Exactly. If he ends up being innocent it benefits him. Guilty it benefits the NFL teams. Win win. Well not as much of a win as being drafted 15 overall, but best he can hope for.

 
As I understand it understanding news is breaking every minute, he has taken his request to the nflpa, but since he's not yet a member, there's not much the union can do. So far it looks like he will be in the draft. The NFL probably doesn't want to do him a favor and later find out he was involved. That's not worth the PR risk.
If he is involved, they're doing the 32 teams a favor (and themselves).

I'm not sure what the PR risk is to the league in saying "we're putting this guy into a holding pattern until we can determine what went on here."
I agree, but the NFL would not want to set a precedence such as this.

 
Why can't his attorney just say "Talk to my guy today, or you don't talk to him"? Delaying this conversation could cost him millions, assuming he's not really a suspect.
Because attorney's aren't the President? And they can't just pardon a guy if the police don't want to talk to him today?
Easy there slugger. We all have a right against self-incrimination, and just because the cops want to talk to him doesn't mean that they are entitled to talk to him without his consent. Without holding elected office, his attorney can very easily pull the plug on any interview at any time. Sure, they could compel him to appear and testify by subpoena, but they aren't anywhere close to that point now.

 
If he does end up going into the supplemental draft, he could be taken at a roughly-equivalent spot to 15th overall.

 
I agree, but the NFL would not want to set a precedence such as this.
This is my feeling as well. It is a lot to throw on the NFL in the hours leading up to the draft. I think everyone just has to ride this out.

I don't know if he gets drafted at all now. The whole late round draft pick and sitting out a year sounds like a plausible scenario and not an additional headache a GM would want.

 
As I understand it understanding news is breaking every minute, he has taken his request to the nflpa, but since he's not yet a member, there's not much the union can do. So far it looks like he will be in the draft. The NFL probably doesn't want to do him a favor and later find out he was involved. That's not worth the PR risk.
If he is involved, they're doing the 32 teams a favor (and themselves).

I'm not sure what the PR risk is to the league in saying "we're putting this guy into a holding pattern until we can determine what went on here."
I agree, but the NFL would not want to set a precedence such as this.
Agreed. This a tough call either way. Also if he goes into the Supplemental Draft and goes at say, the 15th pick, would his compensation be equivalent to the #15 pick on the normal draft day?

Just wondering how that works...

 
The Bucs should take this guy at some point. The later the better. Nobody will be talking about the Jameis rape allegations when you just drafted a potential murderer.

 
Stumpie, I'm sorry if my post was offensive, I deleted it. My condolences about your brother.
Thank you, but I wasn't offended. However I was just trying to point out that the police have a specific job to do, and in interviews anything you say can become an issue regardless of innocence or guilt even if it's not related to the crime in question.

 
Couldn't a team draft Collins, wait for the investigation to settle, and then just not sign him if it turns out that he's involved?

If he does turn out to be involved, you're out a draft pick and a little bit of bad publicity, but probably not that much since he was never on your roster and you didn't pay him a cent. If he gets cleared within the next couple months, then you got a nice value pick who maybe shows up for camp a little late. The tricky thing would be if the investigation drags on for months, in which case you'd have to choose between letting the "holdout" continue into the season or signing him to a deal that makes it easy to get rid of him if things go bad.

 
Couldn't a team draft Collins, wait for the investigation to settle, and then just not sign him if it turns out that he's involved?

If he does turn out to be involved, you're out a draft pick and a little bit of bad publicity, but probably not that much since he was never on your roster and you didn't pay him a cent. If he gets cleared within the next couple months, then you got a nice value pick who maybe shows up for camp a little late. The tricky thing would be if the investigation drags on for months, in which case you'd have to choose between letting the "holdout" continue into the season or signing him to a deal that makes it easy to get rid of him if things go bad.
He's drafted if a team believes there's even a 1% chance he's not involved. If he goes undrafted you know they all think he's involved.

 
Couldn't a team draft Collins, wait for the investigation to settle, and then just not sign him if it turns out that he's involved?

If he does turn out to be involved, you're out a draft pick and a little bit of bad publicity, but probably not that much since he was never on your roster and you didn't pay him a cent. If he gets cleared within the next couple months, then you got a nice value pick who maybe shows up for camp a little late. The tricky thing would be if the investigation drags on for months, in which case you'd have to choose between letting the "holdout" continue into the season or signing him to a deal that makes it easy to get rid of him if things go bad.
There will definitely be a point in this draft where the reward will outweigh the risk. As I said, I can see plenty of these tackle needy teams taking him in the 3rd round or on if they don't make a move for an OT prior to him. Hell, even if they did. Collins was viewed as some as the top Tackle in the draft. If they Giants don't take an OL in the 1st or 2nd and he's sitting there during the 3rd when they're on the clock I'd be livid if they passed on him. They haven't had a successful 3rd round pick since Justin Tuck. Sure, Manningham was a 3rd rounder too but he wasn't really a world breaker at WR. After Tuck you have to go all the way to 1991 when they selected Ed McCaffery in the 3rd round. Why not take a shot on Collins in the 3rd? A guy who could be a potential pro-bowl OT. Odds are about 3% whoever they select over him is successful anyway. Are the odds really that much worse Collins is a murderer?

That said, same goes for a bunch of teams. But you get my point.

 
He will go in the top 2 rounds. I think teams are so desperate for OL help and it only takes one team to buy into him and his agent's claims he's not involved. It's not like the guy has been identified as a subject. If the police felt strongly he was guilty of this crime, wouldn't they be in Chicago putting him in handcuffs now?

 
Couldn't a team draft Collins, wait for the investigation to settle, and then just not sign him if it turns out that he's involved?

If he does turn out to be involved, you're out a draft pick and a little bit of bad publicity, but probably not that much since he was never on your roster and you didn't pay him a cent. If he gets cleared within the next couple months, then you got a nice value pick who maybe shows up for camp a little late. The tricky thing would be if the investigation drags on for months, in which case you'd have to choose between letting the "holdout" continue into the season or signing him to a deal that makes it easy to get rid of him if things go bad.
He's drafted if a team believes there's even a 1% chance he's not involved. If he goes undrafted you know they all think he's involved.
NFL teams are risk-averse, you hear it all the time.

Suppose he falls to the 3rd. Steal, right? But what about the possibility of him holding out, and wanting top 20 money? He was a late riser, meaning the media was catching up to NFL teams, and was being mocked very, very early.

If he falls even lower, maybe he sits out the year, rather than take 5th round money, or whatever.

Plus the remote possibility he was involved.

Big old mess teams might just avoid.

 
Couldn't a team draft Collins, wait for the investigation to settle, and then just not sign him if it turns out that he's involved?

If he does turn out to be involved, you're out a draft pick and a little bit of bad publicity, but probably not that much since he was never on your roster and you didn't pay him a cent. If he gets cleared within the next couple months, then you got a nice value pick who maybe shows up for camp a little late. The tricky thing would be if the investigation drags on for months, in which case you'd have to choose between letting the "holdout" continue into the season or signing him to a deal that makes it easy to get rid of him if things go bad.
He's drafted if a team believes there's even a 1% chance he's not involved. If he goes undrafted you know they all think he's involved.
NFL teams are risk-averse, you hear it all the time.

Suppose he falls to the 3rd. Steal, right? But what about the possibility of him holding out, and wanting top 20 money? He was a late riser, meaning the media was catching up to NFL teams, and was being mocked very, very early.

If he falls even lower, maybe he sits out the year, rather than take 5th round money, or whatever.

Plus the remote possibility he was involved.

Big old mess teams might just avoid.
The new CBA sets parameters on rookie deals. If he gets drafted in the 3rd he gets 3rd round money.
 
Couldn't a team draft Collins, wait for the investigation to settle, and then just not sign him if it turns out that he's involved?

If he does turn out to be involved, you're out a draft pick and a little bit of bad publicity, but probably not that much since he was never on your roster and you didn't pay him a cent. If he gets cleared within the next couple months, then you got a nice value pick who maybe shows up for camp a little late. The tricky thing would be if the investigation drags on for months, in which case you'd have to choose between letting the "holdout" continue into the season or signing him to a deal that makes it easy to get rid of him if things go bad.
He's drafted if a team believes there's even a 1% chance he's not involved. If he goes undrafted you know they all think he's involved.
NFL teams are risk-averse, you hear it all the time.

Suppose he falls to the 3rd. Steal, right? But what about the possibility of him holding out, and wanting top 20 money? He was a late riser, meaning the media was catching up to NFL teams, and was being mocked very, very early.

If he falls even lower, maybe he sits out the year, rather than take 5th round money, or whatever.

Plus the remote possibility he was involved.

Big old mess teams might just avoid.
The new CBA sets parameters on rookie deals. If he gets drafted in the 3rd he gets 3rd round money.
Yeah, thanks I know.

The point is, maybe teams don't want to take a guy in the 3rd that they know is going to feel like he got screwed through no fault of his own,and may spend 4 years #####ing about his money.

You want your 3rd round pick to be happy he got 3rd round money, not thinking about millions he didn't get.

 
Couldn't a team draft Collins, wait for the investigation to settle, and then just not sign him if it turns out that he's involved?

If he does turn out to be involved, you're out a draft pick and a little bit of bad publicity, but probably not that much since he was never on your roster and you didn't pay him a cent. If he gets cleared within the next couple months, then you got a nice value pick who maybe shows up for camp a little late. The tricky thing would be if the investigation drags on for months, in which case you'd have to choose between letting the "holdout" continue into the season or signing him to a deal that makes it easy to get rid of him if things go bad.
He's drafted if a team believes there's even a 1% chance he's not involved. If he goes undrafted you know they all think he's involved.
NFL teams are risk-averse, you hear it all the time.

Suppose he falls to the 3rd. Steal, right? But what about the possibility of him holding out, and wanting top 20 money? He was a late riser, meaning the media was catching up to NFL teams, and was being mocked very, very early.

If he falls even lower, maybe he sits out the year, rather than take 5th round money, or whatever.

Plus the remote possibility he was involved.

Big old mess teams might just avoid.
The new CBA sets parameters on rookie deals. If he gets drafted in the 3rd he gets 3rd round money.
Yeah, thanks I know.

The point is, maybe teams don't want to take a guy in the 3rd that they know is going to feel like he got screwed through no fault of his own,and may spend 4 years #####ing about his money.

You want your 3rd round pick to be happy he got 3rd round money, not thinking about millions he didn't get.
No matter when he gets drafted he's going to have the nagging thought that he should have gone earlier. Bad break for the kid.
 
Police have confirmed he isn't a suspect and he's provided alibis already from my understanding.

This isn't an Aaron Hernandez situation. Why would hit stock drop for knowing a girl who was shot?

Honestly, whoever broke this story should be hit with a brick upside the head for even trying to cast doubt on Collins in the slightest way without knowing the facts. The most important day in this kids life is coming up tomorrow and he's confirmed not to be a suspect, why try to ruin his draft stock?
He immediately lawyered up instead of talking to the police. That's suspicious to me. You weren't there and have alibis, tell the police directly if you have nothing to hide.
I haven't looked into the story at all, so no thoughts on that part of it. But if his agent didn't have him lawyer up immediately, he's terrible at his job.
Yeah, pretty much this... getting a lawyer is your right as an American. It's not suspicious. If I were a First Round NFL prospect I'd get a lawyer if the Cops just wanted to talk to me about a traffic accident that happened out front of my house. That's not suspicious, it's just smart.

This BS is the same crap where people say "If you tell a cop he can't search the car, it's suspicious". No dammit, suspicious is having a dime bag on your floor. Telling the cop he can't search your car is just using your rights. Whether you have something to hide or not, once you say "Yes" it opens the door for them to start finding anything to charge you with.

Same goes for this situation, get a lawyer so you don't accidentally say something stupid that could potentially make you a suspect. All it takes is for you to say you know one of their actual suspects for them to start investigating you for an accessory charge.

Tl;dr: This is smart, not suspicious.
Here is law school lecture on not talking to the police before getting a lawyer. http://www.richfiorellalaw.com/?p=23

 
Depending on how low his value plummets in day two (or even three), at some point, he may just want to sit out a year and reenter the 2016 draft. I assume teams could check with him or his agent and ask about his intentions before investing a pick. The problem is, he could have been picked in the middle third of the first round this year, but no guarantee he would after sitting a year (that ended badly for Clarett and BMW). Maybe he would be best to play if he is picked in day two, otherwise not?

All of this contingent on his not being involved (I'm not assuming this, but it would be remiss to not consider the possibility). As noted, if so, he has much more serious issues.

 
La’el Collins expected to meet with Baton Rouge PD on Monday

Posted by Josh Alper on May 1, 2015, 2:50 PM EDT

The first round came and went without LSU tackle La’El Collins being selected, which was expected after the Baton Rouge police expressed a desire to speak to Collins in regard to the recent murder of his ex-girlfriend Brittany Mills.

Collins has not been named a suspect in the crime, but he also hasn’t been exonerated at this point and that was enough to make teams shy away from drafting him in the first round. There’s been speculation that teams will pass him up altogether unless he gets that exoneration, but Collins won’t be meeting with the police until the draft is over.

Ian Rapoport of NFL Media reports that Collins is scheduled to talk to the investigators on Monday, but his camp isn’t waiting until then to try to clarify the situation for teams that might be interested in selecting him. Rapoport’s colleague Albert Breer reported that Collins’s attorney reached out to the security directors from all 32 teams to tell his client’s side of the story and Rapoport adds that teams hope to have reports from their security teams before the second round gets underway on Friday night.

By the time the night is over, we’ll find out if anyone was suitably convinced that taking Collins is a good idea or if one of the more unusual draft stories in recent memory continues into Saturday.
 
Could Collins, instructed by his agents to contact teams, agree as a sign of good faith, to contract language that voids future money if legal problems should make him unavailable?

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top