SleeperPix
Footballguy
Either a better start than Fargas this week????
Why does every thread turn into a WDIS?Either a better start than Fargas this week????
apples and oranges then. just sayin.I would assume he does get paid.i'm just curious.Why would we care?does he still get paid if he's deactivated vs. suspended?Tomato/tomahto.Herm's press conference is now. Johnson is not suspended, just deactivated for wk 7 broke some team rules. Per Herm.
I don't think so. They like what they see in Charles... which is why they have officially moved Charles ahead of Smith on the depth chart.I have watched every Chiefs game this year, and Charles has played almost every snap after LJ... much more than Kolby. However, my opinion is that this is true due to the fact that Charles is a better screen/pass catcher than Kolby Smith, but they did not draft him to be an every down back. Kolby was also hurt to start the season, which is why Charles played initially. IMO, it will be a 50/50 split b/w the two, but don't be surprised to see Kolby in on the 1st series of the game! Herm knows that Kolby played well last year after LJ went down, so I see that having influence on the deicision.
Also if Smith was so great and proven to the point he shouldn't be questioned, why draft Charles in the first place? How is Charles in picking up the blitz? That should be the deciding factor since they're playing the Titans.I don't think so. They like what they see in Charles... which is why they have officially moved Charles ahead of Smith on the depth chart.I have watched every Chiefs game this year, and Charles has played almost every snap after LJ... much more than Kolby. However, my opinion is that this is true due to the fact that Charles is a better screen/pass catcher than Kolby Smith, but they did not draft him to be an every down back. Kolby was also hurt to start the season, which is why Charles played initially. IMO, it will be a 50/50 split b/w the two, but don't be surprised to see Kolby in on the 1st series of the game! Herm knows that Kolby played well last year after LJ went down, so I see that having influence on the deicision.
You answer mine, I'll answer yoursWhy does every thread turn into a WDIS?Either a better start than Fargas this week????
I don't know what the deal is, but I doubt the media knows anything. Isn't that their job, to break BIG stories?Wish i would have had a more stable DSL connection today to break this one.The speculation is that the deactivation is NOT related to the news of the incident in February....but it is something even bigger -- but no one is saying what it is. Edwards was asked several times and said he could not answer. Even some of the media seem to know and are not saying.Only thing I can think of is that something is coming down from the league.Also being speculated is that since Herm told LJ yesterday, that this somehow retaliation towards Carl Peterson for not trading Tony Gonzalez. The prevailing thought among the media is that Herm and Carl are in a severe power struggle right now. Herm wants young guys who want to play -- Gonzalez and Johnson are Carl's trophies -- #1 picks he hit on and gave horrible deals to. Many think this is why Peterson increased the price on TG with 10 minutes to go before the deadline.It really is a soap opera in KC right now -- and the only undefeated team is coming in this weekend lolFWIW, any of you hoping to get much from Smith or Charles are kdding yourselves. The only value they hold is in PPR leagues, because they will be catching dumpoffs after KC gets down 21 in the first half.
No. The Chiefs have numerous problems, but LJ isn't one of them.How would you be able to differentiate a humiliation with LJ and a humiliation without him. KC has been awful with LJ and he only played well against an incredibly easy rushing defense vs DEN.The problem with LJ is that his running style doesn't fit an offense without a good offensive line. LJ is a big bruising back like Jamal Lewis. Opposing defenses know that to beat KC, all they have to do is stack the line and stop LJ until they get a lead and then they know that KC will have to pass to get back into the game and LJ won't see the ball because they don't throw the ball to him. KC needs an RB that is versatile enough to throw the ball to. Jamal Charles appears to be a better receiver than LJ since he's quicker than LJ and can be used like Reggie Bush, Chris Johnson, Warrick Dunn, LT, etc...I don't blame the Chiefs for "deactivating" him for one game... but I hope the Chiefs get humiliated by the Titans. Then maybe Herm will see how much they need Johnson, cuz without him, there isn't much going on.
Note for fairness: I'm not sure that LJ isn't a good receiver, all I know is that KC hasn't ever used him much in this role. So he's either a poor receiver or the coaches suck or both.
Unless it is a privacy rights issueI don't know what the deal is, but I doubt the media knows anything. Isn't that their job, to break BIG stories?Wish i would have had a more stable DSL connection today to break this one.The speculation is that the deactivation is NOT related to the news of the incident in February....but it is something even bigger -- but no one is saying what it is. Edwards was asked several times and said he could not answer. Even some of the media seem to know and are not saying.Only thing I can think of is that something is coming down from the league.Also being speculated is that since Herm told LJ yesterday, that this somehow retaliation towards Carl Peterson for not trading Tony Gonzalez. The prevailing thought among the media is that Herm and Carl are in a severe power struggle right now. Herm wants young guys who want to play -- Gonzalez and Johnson are Carl's trophies -- #1 picks he hit on and gave horrible deals to. Many think this is why Peterson increased the price on TG with 10 minutes to go before the deadline.It really is a soap opera in KC right now -- and the only undefeated team is coming in this weekend lolFWIW, any of you hoping to get much from Smith or Charles are kdding yourselves. The only value they hold is in PPR leagues, because they will be catching dumpoffs after KC gets down 21 in the first half.
Roto world is teh suck. Did a coach say this, or are they speculating?Kolby Smith to draw the start in place of LJ
With Larry Johnson suspended Kolby Smith will be the Chiefs' starting tailback Sunday against the Titans. Jamaal Charles will play off the bench.
Charles may still end up with more touches, as he possesses a quicker first step and his speed could create problems for a heavy Titans front. Clearly, neither back is a desirable option, but Charles is a better bet for yards and catches. Smith is probably the slight favorite for goal-line carries. Oct. 16 - 4:08 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star
Rotoworld
I don't know what you mean by that.Unless it is a privacy rights issueI don't know what the deal is, but I doubt the media knows anything. Isn't that their job, to break BIG stories?Wish i would have had a more stable DSL connection today to break this one.The speculation is that the deactivation is NOT related to the news of the incident in February....but it is something even bigger -- but no one is saying what it is. Edwards was asked several times and said he could not answer. Even some of the media seem to know and are not saying.Only thing I can think of is that something is coming down from the league.Also being speculated is that since Herm told LJ yesterday, that this somehow retaliation towards Carl Peterson for not trading Tony Gonzalez. The prevailing thought among the media is that Herm and Carl are in a severe power struggle right now. Herm wants young guys who want to play -- Gonzalez and Johnson are Carl's trophies -- #1 picks he hit on and gave horrible deals to. Many think this is why Peterson increased the price on TG with 10 minutes to go before the deadline.It really is a soap opera in KC right now -- and the only undefeated team is coming in this weekend lolFWIW, any of you hoping to get much from Smith or Charles are kdding yourselves. The only value they hold is in PPR leagues, because they will be catching dumpoffs after KC gets down 21 in the first half.
the media works with the players, coaches and front office. if the team requests the media not report certain things, or to hold off on stories, its almost always in the best interest of the media member to comply. if they dont, well, their future stories could be limited.I don't know what the deal is, but I doubt the media knows anything. Isn't that their job, to break BIG stories?Wish i would have had a more stable DSL connection today to break this one.The speculation is that the deactivation is NOT related to the news of the incident in February....but it is something even bigger -- but no one is saying what it is. Edwards was asked several times and said he could not answer. Even some of the media seem to know and are not saying.Only thing I can think of is that something is coming down from the league.Also being speculated is that since Herm told LJ yesterday, that this somehow retaliation towards Carl Peterson for not trading Tony Gonzalez. The prevailing thought among the media is that Herm and Carl are in a severe power struggle right now. Herm wants young guys who want to play -- Gonzalez and Johnson are Carl's trophies -- #1 picks he hit on and gave horrible deals to. Many think this is why Peterson increased the price on TG with 10 minutes to go before the deadline.It really is a soap opera in KC right now -- and the only undefeated team is coming in this weekend lolFWIW, any of you hoping to get much from Smith or Charles are kdding yourselves. The only value they hold is in PPR leagues, because they will be catching dumpoffs after KC gets down 21 in the first half.
That makes sense I guess. I hope it's not the case though.the media works with the players, coaches and front office. if the team requests the media not report certain things, or to hold off on stories, its almost always in the best interest of the media member to comply. if they dont, well, their future stories could be limited.I don't know what the deal is, but I doubt the media knows anything. Isn't that their job, to break BIG stories?Wish i would have had a more stable DSL connection today to break this one.The speculation is that the deactivation is NOT related to the news of the incident in February....but it is something even bigger -- but no one is saying what it is. Edwards was asked several times and said he could not answer. Even some of the media seem to know and are not saying.Only thing I can think of is that something is coming down from the league.Also being speculated is that since Herm told LJ yesterday, that this somehow retaliation towards Carl Peterson for not trading Tony Gonzalez. The prevailing thought among the media is that Herm and Carl are in a severe power struggle right now. Herm wants young guys who want to play -- Gonzalez and Johnson are Carl's trophies -- #1 picks he hit on and gave horrible deals to. Many think this is why Peterson increased the price on TG with 10 minutes to go before the deadline.It really is a soap opera in KC right now -- and the only undefeated team is coming in this weekend lolFWIW, any of you hoping to get much from Smith or Charles are kdding yourselves. The only value they hold is in PPR leagues, because they will be catching dumpoffs after KC gets down 21 in the first half.
<Jim Mora voice> Goal line carries? Goal line carries? GOAL LINE CARRIES?Kolby Smith to draw the start in place of LJ
With Larry Johnson suspended Kolby Smith will be the Chiefs' starting tailback Sunday against the Titans. Jamaal Charles will play off the bench.
Charles may still end up with more touches, as he possesses a quicker first step and his speed could create problems for a heavy Titans front. Clearly, neither back is a desirable option, but Charles is a better bet for yards and catches. Smith is probably the slight favorite for goal-line carries. Oct. 16 - 4:08 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star
Rotoworld
<Jim Mora voice> Goal line carries? Goal line carries? GOAL LINE CARRIES?Kolby Smith to draw the start in place of LJ
With Larry Johnson suspended Kolby Smith will be the Chiefs' starting tailback Sunday against the Titans. Jamaal Charles will play off the bench.
Charles may still end up with more touches, as he possesses a quicker first step and his speed could create problems for a heavy Titans front. Clearly, neither back is a desirable option, but Charles is a better bet for yards and catches. Smith is probably the slight favorite for goal-line carries. Oct. 16 - 4:08 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star
Rotoworld

Like what? I'm honestly struggling to come up with an explanation for this silence that would arise from a type of incident we haven't already seen reported somewhere in the NFL at some point.Unless it is a privacy rights issueI don't know what the deal is, but I doubt the media knows anything. Isn't that their job, to break BIG stories?Wish i would have had a more stable DSL connection today to break this one.
The speculation is that the deactivation is NOT related to the news of the incident in February....but it is something even bigger -- but no one is saying what it is. Edwards was asked several times and said he could not answer. Even some of the media seem to know and are not saying.
Only thing I can think of is that something is coming down from the league.
Also being speculated is that since Herm told LJ yesterday, that this somehow retaliation towards Carl Peterson for not trading Tony Gonzalez. The prevailing thought among the media is that Herm and Carl are in a severe power struggle right now. Herm wants young guys who want to play -- Gonzalez and Johnson are Carl's trophies -- #1 picks he hit on and gave horrible deals to. Many think this is why Peterson increased the price on TG with 10 minutes to go before the deadline.
It really is a soap opera in KC right now -- and the only undefeated team is coming in this weekend lol
FWIW, any of you hoping to get much from Smith or Charles are kdding yourselves. The only value they hold is in PPR leagues, because they will be catching dumpoffs after KC gets down 21 in the first half.

cvnpoka had a great response.......I have no clue.....I am simply speculating like everyone else. Herm plainly said today that it is NOT related to the latest news about the Feb. incident. The KC Star has a blurb on their blog that it is for missing meetings ala Plaxico Burress. But something like that does not require that much secrecy.Like what? I'm honestly struggling to come up with an explanation for this silence that would arise from a type of incident we haven't already seen reported somewhere in the NFL at some point.Unless it is a privacy rights issueI don't know what the deal is, but I doubt the media knows anything. Isn't that their job, to break BIG stories?Wish i would have had a more stable DSL connection today to break this one.
The speculation is that the deactivation is NOT related to the news of the incident in February....but it is something even bigger -- but no one is saying what it is. Edwards was asked several times and said he could not answer. Even some of the media seem to know and are not saying.
Only thing I can think of is that something is coming down from the league.
Also being speculated is that since Herm told LJ yesterday, that this somehow retaliation towards Carl Peterson for not trading Tony Gonzalez. The prevailing thought among the media is that Herm and Carl are in a severe power struggle right now. Herm wants young guys who want to play -- Gonzalez and Johnson are Carl's trophies -- #1 picks he hit on and gave horrible deals to. Many think this is why Peterson increased the price on TG with 10 minutes to go before the deadline.
It really is a soap opera in KC right now -- and the only undefeated team is coming in this weekend lol
FWIW, any of you hoping to get much from Smith or Charles are kdding yourselves. The only value they hold is in PPR leagues, because they will be catching dumpoffs after KC gets down 21 in the first half.![]()
As per usual, they are speculating. But it appears to be a true statement b/c I think it has been reported in more than one place.Roto world is teh suck. Did a coach say this, or are they speculating?Kolby Smith to draw the start in place of LJ
With Larry Johnson suspended Kolby Smith will be the Chiefs' starting tailback Sunday against the Titans. Jamaal Charles will play off the bench.
Charles may still end up with more touches, as he possesses a quicker first step and his speed could create problems for a heavy Titans front. Clearly, neither back is a desirable option, but Charles is a better bet for yards and catches. Smith is probably the slight favorite for goal-line carries. Oct. 16 - 4:08 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star
Rotoworld
Congrats, you're up for tool of the weekKeep us updated, daily or hourly if possible.Well this is surely true b/c I have no #2 RB to start now. MJD on bye, Jones & Mendy down, Bradshaw useless & Torain not in yet![]()
In this case, even though it's speculation, it does sound like a very sound point of view and one that I would agree with. PPR leagues should benefit more with Charles, IMO and goal line opportunities will be few for Kolby Smith.Plugging in Kolby would be in keeping with KC's strategy of using Charles as a change of pace RB.As per usual, they are speculating. But it appears to be a true statement b/c I think it has been reported in more than one place.Roto world is teh suck. Did a coach say this, or are they speculating?Kolby Smith to draw the start in place of LJ
With Larry Johnson suspended Kolby Smith will be the Chiefs' starting tailback Sunday against the Titans. Jamaal Charles will play off the bench.
Charles may still end up with more touches, as he possesses a quicker first step and his speed could create problems for a heavy Titans front. Clearly, neither back is a desirable option, but Charles is a better bet for yards and catches. Smith is probably the slight favorite for goal-line carries. Oct. 16 - 4:08 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star
Rotoworld
I found the sarcasm entertaining. But seriously, how else do recommend that posters be educated that posts that pertain solely to their team are useless to everyone else.Congrats, you're up for tool of the weekKeep us updated, daily or hourly if possible.Well this is surely true b/c I have no #2 RB to start now. MJD on bye, Jones & Mendy down, Bradshaw useless & Torain not in yet![]()
I'd love to hear your analysis of what KC needs for LJ to be successful. I've stated the obvious by saying that they need an offensive line. I believe that a quicker ball catching RB would give KC the versatility that they need so that the line isn't stacked against the run. Why wouldn't a pass catching RB be a better option for KC?No. The Chiefs have numerous problems, but LJ isn't one of them.How would you be able to differentiate a humiliation with LJ and a humiliation without him. KC has been awful with LJ and he only played well against an incredibly easy rushing defense vs DEN.The problem with LJ is that his running style doesn't fit an offense without a good offensive line. LJ is a big bruising back like Jamal Lewis. Opposing defenses know that to beat KC, all they have to do is stack the line and stop LJ until they get a lead and then they know that KC will have to pass to get back into the game and LJ won't see the ball because they don't throw the ball to him. KC needs an RB that is versatile enough to throw the ball to. Jamal Charles appears to be a better receiver than LJ since he's quicker than LJ and can be used like Reggie Bush, Chris Johnson, Warrick Dunn, LT, etc...I don't blame the Chiefs for "deactivating" him for one game... but I hope the Chiefs get humiliated by the Titans. Then maybe Herm will see how much they need Johnson, cuz without him, there isn't much going on.
Note for fairness: I'm not sure that LJ isn't a good receiver, all I know is that KC hasn't ever used him much in this role. So he's either a poor receiver or the coaches suck or both.
Rotoworld quoted Kansas City Star, and if you click the link it says that Kolby Smith will start. How is that speculating on RotoWorld's part? Kansas City StarAs per usual, they are speculating. But it appears to be a true statement b/c I think it has been reported in more than one place.Roto world is teh suck. Did a coach say this, or are they speculating?Kolby Smith to draw the start in place of LJ
With Larry Johnson suspended Kolby Smith will be the Chiefs' starting tailback Sunday against the Titans. Jamaal Charles will play off the bench.
Charles may still end up with more touches, as he possesses a quicker first step and his speed could create problems for a heavy Titans front. Clearly, neither back is a desirable option, but Charles is a better bet for yards and catches. Smith is probably the slight favorite for goal-line carries. Oct. 16 - 4:08 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star
Rotoworld
I don't know...perhaps simply ignore?I found the sarcasm entertaining. But seriously, how else do recommend that posters be educated that posts that pertain solely to their team are useless to everyone else.Congrats, you're up for tool of the weekKeep us updated, daily or hourly if possible.Well this is surely true b/c I have no #2 RB to start now. MJD on bye, Jones & Mendy down, Bradshaw useless & Torain not in yet![]()
That may be what they did, but that is not how Rotoworld reported it. It was the KCStar I was referencing when I said it was reported in more than one source.Your post contains no link or citation to the Star:Rotoworld quoted Kansas City Star, and if you click the link it says that Kolby Smith will start. How is that speculating on RotoWorld's part? Kansas City StarAs per usual, they are speculating. But it appears to be a true statement b/c I think it has been reported in more than one place.Roto world is teh suck. Did a coach say this, or are they speculating?Kolby Smith to draw the start in place of LJ
With Larry Johnson suspended Kolby Smith will be the Chiefs' starting tailback Sunday against the Titans. Jamaal Charles will play off the bench.
Charles may still end up with more touches, as he possesses a quicker first step and his speed could create problems for a heavy Titans front. Clearly, neither back is a desirable option, but Charles is a better bet for yards and catches. Smith is probably the slight favorite for goal-line carries. Oct. 16 - 4:08 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star
Rotoworld
It's nice to defend your source, but Rotoworld IS the suck and Rotoworld DOES speculate more often than they report. Finally, the last paragraph above is Rotoworld's speculation - presented as part of the factual story - so it is, at root, another Rotoworld speculation.Kolby Smith to draw the start in place of LJ
With Larry Johnson suspended Kolby Smith will be the Chiefs' starting tailback Sunday against the Titans. Jamaal Charles will play off the bench.
Charles may still end up with more touches, as he possesses a quicker first step and his speed could create problems for a heavy Titans front. Clearly, neither back is a desirable option, but Charles is a better bet for yards and catches. Smith is probably the slight favorite for goal-line carries. Oct. 16 - 4:08 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star
Rotoworld
nothing stated as of yet... he isnt going on trial til DecemberSo any chief homers with inside information as to whether or not there will be additional games for February stuff?
How is this any different than what has already been said? All I see is free advertising to competing sites.Saw this on Draftsharks.com:
"Latest on Larry Johnson's trouble Chiefs RB Larry Johnson is being inactivated for violating unspecified team rules. He's believed to have flat skipped a team meeting, a la Plaxico Burress. "Herman Edwards said Johnson had not been suspended and that the decision to sit the running back has nothing to do with the charges Johnson will face after an alleged incident in February at a midtown bar," writes Kent Babb of the KC Star. "
And I saw this on thehuddle.com:
"Updating previous reports, The Kansas City Star reports Kansas City Chiefs RB Larry Johnson will not be suspended, and head coach Herman Edwards does not expect Johnson to miss additional games. Johnson was declared inactive for an unspecified team rules violation, according to Edwards, which is not related to the simple assault charges filed against him earlier this week.
The Huddle's Take: Interesting. It looks like this will be just a one week deal... for now "
If you read it, one said he is suspended for missing a team meeting, which I didn't read anywhere. The other said that Herm doesn't think that he's going to miss any more time. I believe that to be new and relevent information. But if you just want me to post things that I see on FBG from now on, you let me know.How is this any different than what has already been said? All I see is free advertising to competing sites.Saw this on Draftsharks.com:
"Latest on Larry Johnson's trouble Chiefs RB Larry Johnson is being inactivated for violating unspecified team rules. He's believed to have flat skipped a team meeting, a la Plaxico Burress. "Herman Edwards said Johnson had not been suspended and that the decision to sit the running back has nothing to do with the charges Johnson will face after an alleged incident in February at a midtown bar," writes Kent Babb of the KC Star. "
And I saw this on thehuddle.com:
"Updating previous reports, The Kansas City Star reports Kansas City Chiefs RB Larry Johnson will not be suspended, and head coach Herman Edwards does not expect Johnson to miss additional games. Johnson was declared inactive for an unspecified team rules violation, according to Edwards, which is not related to the simple assault charges filed against him earlier this week.
The Huddle's Take: Interesting. It looks like this will be just a one week deal... for now "
Ok, but don't cloud the fact that Rotoworld quoted the KC Star as a source and KC Star said that Smith would start. That part is not speculation. If you want to highlight the last paragraph as speculation, then fine, but the original source and what they said wasn't speculation by Rotoworld.Marc Levin said:That may be what they did, but that is not how Rotoworld reported it. It was the KCStar I was referencing when I said it was reported in more than one source.Your post contains no link or citation to the Star:Rotoworld quoted Kansas City Star, and if you click the link it says that Kolby Smith will start. How is that speculating on RotoWorld's part? Kansas City StarAs per usual, they are speculating. But it appears to be a true statement b/c I think it has been reported in more than one place.Roto world is teh suck. Did a coach say this, or are they speculating?Kolby Smith to draw the start in place of LJ
With Larry Johnson suspended Kolby Smith will be the Chiefs' starting tailback Sunday against the Titans. Jamaal Charles will play off the bench.
Charles may still end up with more touches, as he possesses a quicker first step and his speed could create problems for a heavy Titans front. Clearly, neither back is a desirable option, but Charles is a better bet for yards and catches. Smith is probably the slight favorite for goal-line carries. Oct. 16 - 4:08 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star
Rotoworld
It's nice to defend your source, but Rotoworld IS the suck and Rotoworld DOES speculate more often than they report. Finally, the last paragraph above is Rotoworld's speculation - presented as part of the factual story - so it is, at root, another Rotoworld speculation.Kolby Smith to draw the start in place of LJ
With Larry Johnson suspended Kolby Smith will be the Chiefs' starting tailback Sunday against the Titans. Jamaal Charles will play off the bench.
Charles may still end up with more touches, as he possesses a quicker first step and his speed could create problems for a heavy Titans front. Clearly, neither back is a desirable option, but Charles is a better bet for yards and catches. Smith is probably the slight favorite for goal-line carries. Oct. 16 - 4:08 pm et
Source: Kansas City Star
Rotoworld
You think he gets 8 even though none of these have gone to court yet? Why 8, not 4 or 2?In Post #55 of this thread I relayed what I was hearing that KC media were all being hushed about a story they all knew about but because they wanted to be responsible media, they sat on it. Well, I have to believe this was it. LJ got into trouble in the bye week. Also during the bye week, the February incident was brought to light when charges were field.My best speculation would be that he gets eight games, which depending on when it comes down, could be the rest of the season.And I would not be surprised if that is the end of his KC career. To be honest, the Chiefs have enough cap room that I think outright releasing him before the end of the season would put all of the cap hit on this year's cap, which would free up space for next season, with hopefully a new GM, a new HC etc.But knowing how things are going in KC, Carl & Herm will return, and LJ will be back next season.
Take into account the handful of "incidents" in the last five seasons, and you have Pacman Jr. here. The commish -- to his credit -- has showed that just because the player may not legally be held liable, that the player negatively represented the league.I really do expect 8 games.You think he gets 8 even though none of these have gone to court yet? Why 8, not 4 or 2?In Post #55 of this thread I relayed what I was hearing that KC media were all being hushed about a story they all knew about but because they wanted to be responsible media, they sat on it. Well, I have to believe this was it. LJ got into trouble in the bye week. Also during the bye week, the February incident was brought to light when charges were field.My best speculation would be that he gets eight games, which depending on when it comes down, could be the rest of the season.And I would not be surprised if that is the end of his KC career. To be honest, the Chiefs have enough cap room that I think outright releasing him before the end of the season would put all of the cap hit on this year's cap, which would free up space for next season, with hopefully a new GM, a new HC etc.But knowing how things are going in KC, Carl & Herm will return, and LJ will be back next season.
Brandon Marshall had multiple issues with beating woman and he only got 1 game.No way LJ gets 8. Goodall is a soft commish and he set the precedent with Marshall that beating woman isn't a major offense in his eyes.Take into account the handful of "incidents" in the last five seasons, and you have Pacman Jr. here. The commish -- to his credit -- has showed that just because the player may not legally be held liable, that the player negatively represented the league.I really do expect 8 games.You think he gets 8 even though none of these have gone to court yet? Why 8, not 4 or 2?In Post #55 of this thread I relayed what I was hearing that KC media were all being hushed about a story they all knew about but because they wanted to be responsible media, they sat on it. Well, I have to believe this was it. LJ got into trouble in the bye week. Also during the bye week, the February incident was brought to light when charges were field.My best speculation would be that he gets eight games, which depending on when it comes down, could be the rest of the season.And I would not be surprised if that is the end of his KC career. To be honest, the Chiefs have enough cap room that I think outright releasing him before the end of the season would put all of the cap hit on this year's cap, which would free up space for next season, with hopefully a new GM, a new HC etc.But knowing how things are going in KC, Carl & Herm will return, and LJ will be back next season.