jamny
Footballguy
You got your a, you got your b, you got your c and you got your d. D, those are the big ones.You know about the cups?
You got your a, you got your b, you got your c and you got your d. D, those are the big ones.You know about the cups?
She looks 14 and photoshopped.Just to throw out an example.
While an ample bosom is noteworthy, something less isn't undesirable either
We really need a school to ban bikinisA boob thread without pics isn't a boob thread. Oof.
http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=721784We really need a school to ban bikinisA boob thread without pics isn't a boob thread. Oof.
Amenhttp://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=721784We really need a school to ban bikinisA boob thread without pics isn't a boob thread. Oof.
I haven't read the book, but that doesn't make a lot of biological sense to me. For one thing, most men find boobs more attractive than butt cheeks -- so the idea that men like boobs because they look like butt cheeks seems, if anything, exactly backwards.The Naked Ape by Desmond Morris. It's been a long time, but I believe the conclusion is: big boobs = butt cheeks.
This seems like a testable idea. Do large-breasted women produce more milk than small-breasted women? If not, I think we can discard that theory.Pretty sure that it's about getting your offspring fed, right? Caveman wants to keep his bloodline going so a female that looks like she can feed the offspring with ease, before the pregnancy boost, is/was more desirable than one that seemed like the offspring would be on a diet.
Line up some women and I'll do some feeding. For science.This seems like a testable idea. Do large-breasted women produce more milk than small-breasted women? If not, I think we can discard that theory.Pretty sure that it's about getting your offspring fed, right? Caveman wants to keep his bloodline going so a female that looks like she can feed the offspring with ease, before the pregnancy boost, is/was more desirable than one that seemed like the offspring would be on a diet.
Does it matter, or is perception enough?This seems like a testable idea. Do large-breasted women produce more milk than small-breasted women? If not, I think we can discard that theory.Pretty sure that it's about getting your offspring fed, right? Caveman wants to keep his bloodline going so a female that looks like she can feed the offspring with ease, before the pregnancy boost, is/was more desirable than one that seemed like the offspring would be on a diet.
Yeah, guys are pretty stupid. Truth never gets in the way of a good time.Does it matter, or is perception enough?This seems like a testable idea. Do large-breasted women produce more milk than small-breasted women? If not, I think we can discard that theory.Pretty sure that it's about getting your offspring fed, right? Caveman wants to keep his bloodline going so a female that looks like she can feed the offspring with ease, before the pregnancy boost, is/was more desirable than one that seemed like the offspring would be on a diet.
D cup for me. YMMV.How big is too Big ?
No idea, but my guess is that the perception that they do is what mattered thousands of years ago. Could be wrong though.This seems like a testable idea. Do large-breasted women produce more milk than small-breasted women? If not, I think we can discard that theory.Pretty sure that it's about getting your offspring fed, right? Caveman wants to keep his bloodline going so a female that looks like she can feed the offspring with ease, before the pregnancy boost, is/was more desirable than one that seemed like the offspring would be on a diet.
When they're really disproportionate to the rest of the body (assuing the rest is fairly fit)How big is too Big ?
Perception shouldn't matter. Nobody reasons, "It looks like she'd be a good mother; therefore, I hereby consciously decide to find her hawt." Sexual attraction isn't a choice; it's subconscious. If large-breasted women actually do make better mothers (because they're better at breast-feeding), men who are attracted to large-breasted women will have a reproductive advantage, and attraction to large-breasted women will be selected for -- independent of men's belief about why. Contrariwise, if large-breasted women do not make better mothers, a mistaken belief that they do will not cause an attraction to large-breasted women to be selected for. In that case, attraction to large-breasted women must be driven by something else.Does it matter, or is perception enough?This seems like a testable idea. Do large-breasted women produce more milk than small-breasted women? If not, I think we can discard that theory.Pretty sure that it's about getting your offspring fed, right? Caveman wants to keep his bloodline going so a female that looks like she can feed the offspring with ease, before the pregnancy boost, is/was more desirable than one that seemed like the offspring would be on a diet.
Interesting since I never wanted kids. I still prefer large breasts but don't have a problem with small ones like some guys do. I would take a perky pair over giant sloppy ones. Maybe not for one night...I might have to go with the big sloppy ones there.Perception shouldn't matter. Nobody reasons, "It looks like she'd be a good mother; therefore, I hereby consciously decide to find her hawt." Sexual attraction isn't a choice; it's subconscious. If large-breasted women actually do make better mothers (because they're better at breast-feeding), men who are attracted to large-breasted women will have a reproductive advantage, and attraction to large-breasted women will be selected for -- independent of men's belief about why. Contrariwise, if large-breasted women do not make better mothers, a mistaken belief that they do will not cause an attraction to large-breasted women to be selected for. In that case, attraction to large-breasted women must be driven by something else.Does it matter, or is perception enough?This seems like a testable idea. Do large-breasted women produce more milk than small-breasted women? If not, I think we can discard that theory.Pretty sure that it's about getting your offspring fed, right? Caveman wants to keep his bloodline going so a female that looks like she can feed the offspring with ease, before the pregnancy boost, is/was more desirable than one that seemed like the offspring would be on a diet.
Good points. What are other reasons that men are "subconsciously" attracted to large breasted women? Sexual pleasure? Media-induced peer pressure?Perception shouldn't matter. Nobody reasons, "It looks like she'd be a good mother; therefore, I hereby consciously decide to find her hawt." Sexual attraction isn't a choice; it's subconscious. If large-breasted women actually do make better mothers (because they're better at breast-feeding), men who are attracted to large-breasted women will have a reproductive advantage, and attraction to large-breasted women will be selected for -- independent of men's belief about why. Contrariwise, if large-breasted women do not make better mothers, a mistaken belief that they do will not cause an attraction to large-breasted women to be selected for. In that case, attraction to large-breasted women must be driven by something else.Does it matter, or is perception enough?This seems like a testable idea. Do large-breasted women produce more milk than small-breasted women? If not, I think we can discard that theory.Pretty sure that it's about getting your offspring fed, right? Caveman wants to keep his bloodline going so a female that looks like she can feed the offspring with ease, before the pregnancy boost, is/was more desirable than one that seemed like the offspring would be on a diet.
If you can't post a link, at least perform an interpretive dance for us describing said link.What was wrong with the pic I posted?![]()
No nudity, seen way worse here.
I am outraged that she's photoshopped!She looks 14 and photoshopped.Just to throw out an example.
While an ample bosom is noteworthy, something less isn't undesirable either
or breast size has no impact on maternal quality and it therefore remains a purely subjective preference. Size actually has very little to do with the ability to feed an infantGood points. What are other reasons that men are "subconsciously" attracted to large breasted women? Sexual pleasure? Media-induced peer pressure?Perception shouldn't matter. Nobody reasons, "It looks like she'd be a good mother; therefore, I hereby consciously decide to find her hawt." Sexual attraction isn't a choice; it's subconscious. If large-breasted women actually do make better mothers (because they're better at breast-feeding), men who are attracted to large-breasted women will have a reproductive advantage, and attraction to large-breasted women will be selected for -- independent of men's belief about why. Contrariwise, if large-breasted women do not make better mothers, a mistaken belief that they do will not cause an attraction to large-breasted women to be selected for. In that case, attraction to large-breasted women must be driven by something else.Does it matter, or is perception enough?This seems like a testable idea. Do large-breasted women produce more milk than small-breasted women? If not, I think we can discard that theory.Pretty sure that it's about getting your offspring fed, right? Caveman wants to keep his bloodline going so a female that looks like she can feed the offspring with ease, before the pregnancy boost, is/was more desirable than one that seemed like the offspring would be on a diet.
i posted such a pic in post # 79...judge for yourselfjon_mx said:If breasts lacked nipples would they still be hot?
Yeah she does.She looks 14 and photoshopped.Just to throw out an example.
While an ample bosom is noteworthy, something less isn't undesirable either
or as i refer to them ...''fantasy teets''Fake boobs, if done well, are awesome.
Yoga tops! We need to invent yoga tops!*The breasts need an article of clothing which properly exhibits them but is socially acceptable such as yoga pants are to the woman's ###. Tube tops were pretty good, but they have gone away. One requirement is that they must be compatible with yoga pants such that both can be worn at the same time.
Butts don't have nipples.If breasts lacked nipples would they still be hot?
Hell, my wife is the one who wants to get it done (2 kids as well.) All I'd have to do is say "Yep, we've got the money."I think perkiness is probably an more important factor than size.
My wife, when I married her, had some gravity defying Ds. But after using them to feed two kids, gravity won out.
Probably should send her for a lift. How do you suggest that to the wife without coming off like a complete jerk?
I always wondered that myself. Do women cover them up because men like to look at them, or do men like to look at them BECAUSE they're covered up?If we grew up with topless beaches being the norm in this country, would we have the fascination?
ETA: Are strip clubs popular in places where topless beaches are the norm?
There is a nude beach in NJ that I go to pretty regularly the last few years. I can say with good authority that I still have the fascination, although I don't know if it would be the same had I been going there all my life.I always wondered that myself. Do women cover them up because men like to look at them, or do men like to look at them BECAUSE they're covered up?If we grew up with topless beaches being the norm in this country, would we have the fascination?
ETA: Are strip clubs popular in places where topless beaches are the norm?
Just like a big butt does not necessarily equal big dumps.or breast size has no impact on maternal quality and it therefore remains a purely subjective preference. Size actually has very little to do with the ability to feed an infantGood points. What are other reasons that men are "subconsciously" attracted to large breasted women? Sexual pleasure? Media-induced peer pressure?Perception shouldn't matter. Nobody reasons, "It looks like she'd be a good mother; therefore, I hereby consciously decide to find her hawt." Sexual attraction isn't a choice; it's subconscious. If large-breasted women actually do make better mothers (because they're better at breast-feeding), men who are attracted to large-breasted women will have a reproductive advantage, and attraction to large-breasted women will be selected for -- independent of men's belief about why. Contrariwise, if large-breasted women do not make better mothers, a mistaken belief that they do will not cause an attraction to large-breasted women to be selected for. In that case, attraction to large-breasted women must be driven by something else.Does it matter, or is perception enough?This seems like a testable idea. Do large-breasted women produce more milk than small-breasted women? If not, I think we can discard that theory.Pretty sure that it's about getting your offspring fed, right? Caveman wants to keep his bloodline going so a female that looks like she can feed the offspring with ease, before the pregnancy boost, is/was more desirable than one that seemed like the offspring would be on a diet.
Nope. People look at breasts in Europe too, covered or uncoveredI always wondered that myself. Do women cover them up because men like to look at them, or do men like to look at them BECAUSE they're covered up?If we grew up with topless beaches being the norm in this country, would we have the fascination?
ETA: Are strip clubs popular in places where topless beaches are the norm?
Fake boobs, if done well, are awesome.
It's mind blowing how many times you are wrong about the simplest of things.Dunno. I would rather play with nice fakes than flapjacks.Fake boobs, if done well, are awesome.It's mind blowing how many times you are wrong about the simplest of things.
Not a big fan of fakers myself, but I present Exhibit A (more like Exhibit D amiright???) on when they're done right.Fake boobs, if done well, are awesome.It's mind blowing how many times you are wrong about the simplest of things.