ChrisCooleyFan
Footballguy
Classic Saints, they lose to the Lions in Detroit.
And if they don't beat the Saints...they'll have their best shot of the year against the 5-9 Packers in week 17...don't lose hope!Sinrman said:Gawd, I hope so... My Lions are horrible, but I really don't want even this crappy squad to be a part of history (and not in a good way).
As I look at the Saints' schedule, that statement appears to be made off a sample size of, what, two? (SF, OAK)New Orleans will likely handle Detroit, but throw around universal qualifiers at your own peril.Saints don't lose to bad teams.
Don't forget about Kansas City.I think it's pretty safe to put KC, SF, OAK, and DET in that bottom tier of crap teams in the NFL, with the Lions smelling the worst. The Saints don't have any problem beating up those guys.Thanks for listening.As I look at the Saints' schedule, that statement appears to be made off a sample size of, what, two? (SF, OAK)New Orleans will likely handle Detroit, but throw around universal qualifiers at your own peril.Saints don't lose to bad teams.
Thank you for that completely irrelevant bit of information.Butters said:Whether they win or not, Megatron remains a must-start and I'm giving serious consideration to starting Kevin Smith above the likes of Larry Johnson and MBIII next week.
Kevin Smith being a legit top RB consideration is not relevant information in a thread about the DET game next week? Man, tough crowd.Thank you for that completely irrelevant bit of information.Butters said:Whether they win or not, Megatron remains a must-start and I'm giving serious consideration to starting Kevin Smith above the likes of Larry Johnson and MBIII next week.
Yeah, I missed KC in that schedule. I stand corrected there.Such a nice, polite young man.Don't forget about Kansas City.I think it's pretty safe to put KC, SF, OAK, and DET in that bottom tier of crap teams in the NFL, with the Lions smelling the worst. The Saints don't have any problem beating up those guys.Thanks for listening.As I look at the Saints' schedule, that statement appears to be made off a sample size of, what, two? (SF, OAK)New Orleans will likely handle Detroit, but throw around universal qualifiers at your own peril.Saints don't lose to bad teams.
You make a great point and all, but you failed to mention who the Saints lost to on the road: All teams, who as of yesterday, who were either a lock for the playoffs, or right in the thick of it.Comparing the Lions and their ferocious HFA to the likes of Carolina, Tampa, Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, and Washington isn't a very good argument, is it?taz said:They've played some very tight games on the road, but other than hanging on to beat KC on a late Brees drive and sealing it with a Thigpen INT, the Saints are 1-6 on the road.
Washington lost to the bunglesYou make a great point and all, but you failed to mention who the Saints lost to on the road: All teams, who as of yesterday, who were either a lock for the playoffs, or right in the thick of it.Comparing the Lions and their ferocious HFA to the likes of Carolina, Tampa, Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, and Washington isn't a very good argument, is it?taz said:They've played some very tight games on the road, but other than hanging on to beat KC on a late Brees drive and sealing it with a Thigpen INT, the Saints are 1-6 on the road.
And Detroit has lost to everybody.This game is fun!Washington lost to the bunglesYou make a great point and all, but you failed to mention who the Saints lost to on the road: All teams, who as of yesterday, who were either a lock for the playoffs, or right in the thick of it.Comparing the Lions and their ferocious HFA to the likes of Carolina, Tampa, Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, and Washington isn't a very good argument, is it?taz said:They've played some very tight games on the road, but other than hanging on to beat KC on a late Brees drive and sealing it with a Thigpen INT, the Saints are 1-6 on the road.
Don't get mad because I poked a hole in your "theory"And Detroit has lost to everybody.This game is fun!Washington lost to the bunglesYou make a great point and all, but you failed to mention who the Saints lost to on the road: All teams, who as of yesterday, who were either a lock for the playoffs, or right in the thick of it.Comparing the Lions and their ferocious HFA to the likes of Carolina, Tampa, Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, and Washington isn't a very good argument, is it?taz said:They've played some very tight games on the road, but other than hanging on to beat KC on a late Brees drive and sealing it with a Thigpen INT, the Saints are 1-6 on the road.
Yes, I was aware of who they lost to. But my point is that the Saints have a history of folding late in the season, and IMO are no lock to go on the road and beat anyone.Are they a better team? Yes, and they're very capable of going into Detroit and winning. I just don't see it as a slam-dunk as some others in this thread. The Saints can be passed on, and Brees is 9/12 TD/INT on the road, compared to 19/4 at home. Brees will put up good numbers, but I can easily see him throwing a couple of picks, and CJohnson coming up with at least two big plays. And that could be enough for the Lions to win.You make a great point and all, but you failed to mention who the Saints lost to on the road: All teams, who as of yesterday, who were either a lock for the playoffs, or right in the thick of it.Comparing the Lions and their ferocious HFA to the likes of Carolina, Tampa, Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, and Washington isn't a very good argument, is it?taz said:They've played some very tight games on the road, but other than hanging on to beat KC on a late Brees drive and sealing it with a Thigpen INT, the Saints are 1-6 on the road.
No theorizing here, neg. I produce facts and leave the dreaming/theorizing up to hopeful Lions fans.Don't get mad because I poked a hole in your "theory"And Detroit has lost to everybody.This game is fun!Washington lost to the bunglesYou make a great point and all, but you failed to mention who the Saints lost to on the road: All teams, who as of yesterday, who were either a lock for the playoffs, or right in the thick of it.Comparing the Lions and their ferocious HFA to the likes of Carolina, Tampa, Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, and Washington isn't a very good argument, is it?taz said:They've played some very tight games on the road, but other than hanging on to beat KC on a late Brees drive and sealing it with a Thigpen INT, the Saints are 1-6 on the road.
No theorizing here, neg. I produce facts and leave the dreaming/theorizing up to hopeful Lions fans.Facts are Washington is not that good. So you don't produce facts Don't get mad because I poked a hole in your "theory"And Detroit has lost to everybody.This game is fun!Washington lost to the bunglesYou make a great point and all, but you failed to mention who the Saints lost to on the road: All teams, who as of yesterday, who were either a lock for the playoffs, or right in the thick of it.Comparing the Lions and their ferocious HFA to the likes of Carolina, Tampa, Atlanta, Chicago, Denver, and Washington isn't a very good argument, is it?taz said:They've played some very tight games on the road, but other than hanging on to beat KC on a late Brees drive and sealing it with a Thigpen INT, the Saints are 1-6 on the road.
And he could be completely wrong too. Can they stop Pierre Thomas and Colston? I want to see the plan.Mimo said:I've thought over and over about this one.......................U could be right on with it.
Maybe not, but Jason David isn't gonna cover CJ either!!!!And he could be completely wrong too. Can they stop Pierre Thomas and Colston? I want to see the plan.Mimo said:I've thought over and over about this one.......................U could be right on with it.