He is probably victim to that petty theft a lot and didn't think it was a big deal. Hence, he didn't call 911. Whomever did over reacted. The police didn't care either until they connected the dots of the proximity of the location and the description of the guy. Then they got a warrant and the video for pure PR. Police aren't normally getting a warrant to view a video for stolen swisher sweets and a guy getting pushed without injuries or even falling down.
It's overreacting to call the cops when your pizza isn't delievered on time. It's
not overreacting to call the cops after witnessing blatant theft and a store proprietor being manhandled by a much larger guy.
If people simply allowed such instances to occur because calling the police would be overreating then more of those instances would occur and the area would quickly devolve into a craphole.
A box of cigars and a push is a 911 emergency? If the person who owns the store and/or was pushed doesn't call, then it is probably not a big deal. Regardless, the larger point was/is that no police force is getting a warrant for that surveillance video to conduct an investigation into such an incident. It was only after they realized who could have been on that video that it was seeked out and then released to purely shift the focus from the police themselves. People focusing on this incident are just grasping for some way to place blame on the dead black guy who wasn't a perfect person. So what? He deserved shot 6 times and left in the street for 4+ hours. You guys are ridiculous.
Why would the store owner call 911 knowing someone else had already done so. Maybe this is the auto accident scenario. The incident happens, 911 needs to be called, a helpful good Samaritan does so. that doesn't indicate that the victim would not have done so, or that it did not need to be done, just that it has already been done. Police forces obtain warrants for store video all the time, all the time. Generally they do not have to, but still, the amount of times they do is such that the matter is routine. That is not to dispute your ultimate conclusion, which may be correct, it is just to say that your conclusion is based on a faulty premise. Still speak on.