What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Looting in Missouri after cops shoot 18 year old (1 Viewer)

Workers who were witnesses provide new perspective on Michael Brown shooting

Among the claims that ignited the fury over the fatal shooting of Michael Brown were that Ferguson police Officer Darren Wilson chased the unarmed teen on foot, shot at him as he ran away, then fired a barrage of fatal shots after Brown had turned around with his hands up.

Almost all of the witnesses who shared these accounts with media either knew Brown; lived at or near the Canfield Green apartments, where the shooting occurred; or were visiting friends or relatives there.

But there were two outsiders who happened to be working outside at the apartment complex on Aug. 9 — two men from a company in Jefferson County — who heard a single gunshot, looked up from their work and witnessed the shooting.

Both have given their statements to the St. Louis County police and the FBI. One of the men agreed to share his account with a Post-Dispatch reporter on the condition that his name and employer not be used.

The worker, who has not previously spoken with reporters, said he did not see what happened at the officer’s car — where Wilson and Brown engaged in an initial struggle and a shot was fired from Wilson’s gun.

His account largely matches those who reported that Wilson chased Brown on foot away from the car after the initial gunshot and fired at least one more shot in the direction of Brown as he was fleeing; that Brown stopped, turned around and put his hands up; and that the officer killed Brown in a barrage of gunfire.

But his account does little to clarify perhaps the most critical moment of the confrontation, on which members of the grand jury in St. Louis County may focus to determine whether the officer was justified in using lethal force: whether Brown moved toward Wilson just before the fatal shots, and if he did, how aggressively.


At least one witness has said Brown was not moving. Others didn’t mention him moving, while still others have said he was heading toward Wilson.

There is no way to determine how many witnesses have spoken to law enforcement without making public statements. The worker acknowledged that his account could be valuable to the case because he did not know either Brown or Wilson and had no ties to Ferguson.

The worker said he saw Brown on Aug. 9 about 11 a.m. as Brown was walking west on Canfield Drive, toward West Florissant Avenue.

He said Brown struck up a rambling, half-hour conversation with his co-worker.

The co-worker could not be reached for comment through his employer. He previously told KTVI (Channel 2) that he had uttered a profanity in frustration after hitting a tree root while digging. Brown heard him and stopped to talk.

Brown “told me he was feeling some bad vibes,” the co-worker told KTVI in a video that aired Aug. 12. “That the Lord Jesus Christ would help me through that as long as I didn’t get all angry at what I was doing.”

The worker interviewed by the Post-Dispatch said he paid attention to little of the conversation. He said he heard Brown tell his co-worker that he had a picture of Jesus on his wall; and the co-worker joked that the devil had a picture of him on the wall.

The co-worker told KTVI that Brown promised to come back and resume their conversation; Brown walked away, and the workers returned to their job.

About a half-hour later, the worker heard a gunshot. Then he saw Brown running away from a police car. Wilson trailed about 10 to 15 feet behind, gun in hand. About 90 feet away from the car, the worker said, Wilson fired another shot at Brown, whose back was turned.

The worker said Brown stumbled and then stopped, put his hands up, turned around and said, “OK, OK, OK, OK, OK.” He said he told investigators from the St. Louis County police and the FBI that because of the stumble, it seemed to him that Brown had been wounded.

A private autopsy showed that all but one of his gunshot wounds came while Brown was facing Wilson. Shawn L. Parcells, who participated in the autopsy, said one of the wounds to the arm could have occurred when Brown was facing away from Wilson. “It’s inconclusive,” he said. St. Louis County and federal autopsy results have not been released.

Wilson, gun drawn, also stopped about 10 feet in front of Brown, the worker said.

Then Brown moved, the worker said. “He’s kind of walking back toward the cop.” He said Brown’s hands were still up.

Wilson began backing up as he fired, the worker said.

After the third shot, Brown’s hands started going down, and he moved about 25 feet toward Wilson, who kept backing away and firing. The worker said he could not tell from where he watched — about 50 feet away — if Brown’s motion toward Wilson after the shots was “a stumble to the ground” or “OK, I’m going to get you, you’re already shooting me.”

Among people who have spoken to the media, there hasn’t been a clear consensus on what happened after Brown turned around.

Dorian Johnson — a friend of Brown’s who said he was walking with him when Wilson approached them on Canfield and told them to get off the street — told CNN that Brown was “beginning to tell the officer he was unarmed and to tell him to stop shooting.” Johnson, 22, told KTVI Brown was starting to get down when he was shot.

Johnson also told MSNBC that Wilson began shooting before Brown “could get his last words out.”

Another witness who lives nearby, Michael T. Brady, 32, told CNN that Brown turned with his hands under his stomach. He also said Brown took one or two steps toward Wilson as he was going down when Wilson fired three or four more times.

Piaget Crenshaw, who lives in the Canfield apartments, and Tiffany Mitchell, her boss, were in different places in the complex. Crenshaw told CNN that Brown didn’t move toward Wilson. In several statements to reporters, neither has mentioned Brown moving toward Wilson.

The New York Times quoted James McKnight as saying Brown stumbled toward Wilson, who was 6 to 7 feet away.

Phillip Walker, 40, another Canfield Green resident, told the Post-Dispatch on Tuesday that Brown was walking at a steady pace toward Wilson, with his hands up. “Not quickly,” Walker said. “He did not rush the officer.” Walker, who is distantly related to a Post-Dispatch reporter not involved in this report, said the last shot, into the top of Brown’s head, was from about 4 feet away.

“It wasn’t justified because he didn’t pose no threat to the officer. I don’t understand why he didn’t Tase him if he deemed him to be hostile. He didn’t have no weapon on him. I was confused on why he was shooting his rounds off like that into this individual,” Walker said.

The co-worker in the KTVI interview said he “starting hearing pops and when I look over … I seen somebody staggering and running. And when he finally caught himself he threw his hands up and started screaming, ‘OK, OK, OK, OK, OK, OK.’”

He said the officer “didn’t say, ‘Get on the ground.’ He didn’t say anything. At first his gun was down and then he … got about 8 to 10 feet away from him … I heard six, seven shots … it seemed like seven. Then he put his gun down. That’s when Michael stumbled forward. I’d say about 25 feet or so and then fell right on his face.”

No witness has ever publicly claimed that Brown charged at Wilson. The worker interviewed by the Post-Dispatch disputed claims by Wilson’s defenders that Brown was running full speed at the officer.

“I don’t know if he was going after him or if he was falling down to die,” he said. “It wasn’t a bull rush.”

David Hunn and Stephen Deere of the Post-Dispatch contributed to this report.

video

 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2014/09/04/darren-wilson-injury-photo-ferguson_n_5768510.html

Chicago firefighter Kevin O'Grady shared a Facebook photo he claimed showed a injured Wilson in the hospital after the incident. As it turned out, the man pictured is not Darren Wilson, but that didn't stop the image from going viral.
image

The man in the photo is actually motocross rider Jim McNeil, who died in a crash while practicing at the Texas Motor Speedway in 2011. The photo above was taken in 2006 after a motor accident at a friend’s house.
Original image in 2006.

Despite the fact that these two men share barely a passing resemblance to one another, the bogus image posted by Kevin O'Grady had racked up nearly 50,000 shares by Thursday evening and had been circulated on Twitter and parts of the blogosphere.
for example

 
http://www.ksdk.com/story/news/local/2014/08/19/mike-brown-being-misidentified-on-social-media/14273807/

As discussion turned into fierce debate over the decades long mistrust of police by the African-American community, multiple photos emerged of Mike Brown. One image in particular has spread across social media, painting an unfair image of the man:

Unfair because the young man in the picture is not Mike Brown.

Late Monday evening, The Oregonian newspaper reported an Instagram picture of Joda Cain was being passed off as a photo of Brown. Cain, 18, is one of two men facing charges in the October 2013 murder of his great-grandmother.

A police officer in Kansas City is facing a disciplinary review for posting the photo of Cain on his Facebook page and claiming it to be Mike Brown, along with the comment, "I'm sure young Michael Brown is innocent and just misunderstood. I'm sure he is a pillar of the Ferguson community."
Photo Catron posted

Oregon paper story

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Thanks for all the posts, Fatness. 2 points:

1. I wish those witnesses were just a little more definitive and united on how and when Brown turned around and if he was approaching Wilson. I still believe Wilson is likely guilty of murder, but I sure as heck don't see how you could ever go about proving it in a court of law. You'd think that with all those witnesses somebody might have filmed it on a cellphone. Too bad.

2. There sure is a lot of racism prevalent on the internet. All these people willing to go viral with these fake photos in order to prove Brown was a bad man. Pretty disgusting...

 
Thanks for all the posts, Fatness. 2 points:

1. I wish those witnesses were just a little more definitive and united on how and when Brown turned around and if he was approaching Wilson. I still believe Wilson is likely guilty of murder, but I sure as heck don't see how you could ever go about proving it in a court of law. You'd think that with all those witnesses somebody might have filmed it on a cellphone. Too bad.

2. There sure is a lot of racism prevalent on the internet. All these people willing to go viral with these fake photos in order to prove Brown was a bad man. Pretty disgusting...
Video of 2 white construction workers who witnesses the shooting and confirm the other eye witness accounts

 
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

I don't like the possible influence this case could have either way it ends. If Wilson is acquitted, it could validate among police officers that it's OK to use deadly force in situations that might not require it. But if Wilson is convicted, some criminals may think it's worth a try to hit the cop and runaway because the cop probably won't shoot out of fear of getting convicted.

 
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

.
I'm not convinced of this. Are there enough witnesses willing to testify in a court of law, all of whom tell an intelligent, consistent narrative supported by the facts? If that is the case then maybe you're right. But I'm not at all sure this is the case. I'm pretty sure that Wilson committed murder and I'd like to see him convicted. But unless the prosecution really can prove it, let's not have another trial like George Zimmerman.

 
timschochet said:
Gary Coal Man said:
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

.
I'm not convinced of this. Are there enough witnesses willing to testify in a court of law, all of whom tell an intelligent, consistent narrative supported by the facts? If that is the case then maybe you're right. But I'm not at all sure this is the case.I'm pretty sure that Wilson committed murder and I'd like to see him convicted. But unless the prosecution really can prove it, let's not have another trial like George Zimmerman.
Eye-witness accounts alway have inconsistancies. This guy is going to jail, in my opinion. The prosecution in the Zimmerman trial pretty conclusively proved his innocence. It is a crappy analogy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
That scribbling sound you here is the police report being revised for the 14th time to react to the latest witness reports.

 
timschochet said:
Gary Coal Man said:
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

.
I'm not convinced of this. Are there enough witnesses willing to testify in a court of law, all of whom tell an intelligent, consistent narrative supported by the facts? If that is the case then maybe you're right. But I'm not at all sure this is the case.I'm pretty sure that Wilson committed murder and I'd like to see him convicted. But unless the prosecution really can prove it, let's not have another trial like George Zimmerman.
Eye-witness accounts alway have inconsistancies. This guy is going to jail, in my opinion. The prosecution in the Zimmerman trial pretty conclusively proved his innocence. It is a crappy analogy.
That was awfully nice of them

 
My unidentified cell phone recording of audio is better than yours!!@~!@~!@

What's sad, but true, the white guy version is going to carry more weight. Granted, the language was much clearer, but still.

Perhaps in some weird karmic way, racial stereotypes will end up putting this cop in jail via the backdoor.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Gary Coal Man said:
I don't like the possible influence this case could have either way it ends. If Wilson is acquitted, it could validate among police officers that it's OK to use deadly force in situations that might not require it. But if Wilson is convicted, some criminals may think it's worth a try to hit the cop and runaway because the cop probably won't shoot out of fear of getting convicted.
Better that a few cops get hit and a few criminals get away than people getting gunned down in the street without due process when deadly force is uncalled for.

 
My unidentified cell phone recording of audio is better than yours!!@~!@~!@

What's sad, but true, the white guy version is going to carry more weight. Granted, the language was much clearer, but still.

Perhaps in some weird karmic way, racial stereotypes will end up putting this cop in jail via the backdoor.
he's gonna get plenty of that

 
timschochet said:
Gary Coal Man said:
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

.
I'm not convinced of this. Are there enough witnesses willing to testify in a court of law, all of whom tell an intelligent, consistent narrative supported by the facts? If that is the case then maybe you're right. But I'm not at all sure this is the case.I'm pretty sure that Wilson committed murder and I'd like to see him convicted. But unless the prosecution really can prove it, let's not have another trial like George Zimmerman.
Eye-witness accounts alway have inconsistancies. This guy is going to jail, in my opinion. The prosecution in the Zimmerman trial pretty conclusively proved his innocence. It is a crappy analogy.
That was awfully nice of them
They did a much better job than the defense at proving Zimmerman's case. Their witnesses included the lead investigator who tried to trick Zimmerman, but couldn't and ended up concluding that Zimmerman was being honest. Jon testified that Martin was on top beating up Zimmerman and Zimmerman was calling for help. Jon also testified that Zimmerman looked beaten up afterwards. The emergency personal testified that the back of Zimmerman jacket was wet and had grass on it. The recorded 911 call had a man screaming for help and was obviously in fear of being hurt, which by any non-moronic account taken with all the other testimony and evidence had to be Zimmerman. The forensic evidence showed the gun was fired at close range, again supporting Zimmerman's story. The supposed evidence against Zimmerman was he was a wannabe cop and did not follow a suggestion from the dispatch girl very well. None of which proves murder.

This case is the exact opposite. The witnesses and evidence will show the cop was not in danger.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
timschochet said:
Gary Coal Man said:
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

.
I'm not convinced of this. Are there enough witnesses willing to testify in a court of law, all of whom tell an intelligent, consistent narrative supported by the facts? If that is the case then maybe you're right. But I'm not at all sure this is the case.I'm pretty sure that Wilson committed murder and I'd like to see him convicted. But unless the prosecution really can prove it, let's not have another trial like George Zimmerman.
Lets see:

Moving away - shots fired - 5 or 6 witness

Arms up - shots fire - 4 witness

Dropping to his knees - shot fired - 3 witness

Audio Recording - 10-12 shots in two groups

Video Recording - spontaneous utterances of he had his hands up etc

Fighting with Officer - Officer by others

Fighting over Weapon in car - Officer by others

Weapon discharged in car - Officer by others

Damage to officers eye - Medical report not released

Officers statement - not released

Police logs of incident ( radio report) - not released

I forgot an third review of the wounds that showed he was shot at least twice while "down".

Any witness yet that support the "unofficial" officers's version of the incident?

 
I hope you're right, BK. If there is enough evidence to put this guy away, then by all means they should do so. I haven't been convinced, but you make a compelling argument.

Unfortunately, as always seems to happen in these cases that touch upon racial issues, there are people out there want to see this guy convicted regardless of the facts, and there are also people out there that want to see him acquitted regardless of the facts. Those guys have all made up their minds already.

 
timschochet said:
Gary Coal Man said:
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

.
I'm not convinced of this. Are there enough witnesses willing to testify in a court of law, all of whom tell an intelligent, consistent narrative supported by the facts? If that is the case then maybe you're right. But I'm not at all sure this is the case.I'm pretty sure that Wilson committed murder and I'd like to see him convicted. But unless the prosecution really can prove it, let's not have another trial like George Zimmerman.
Lets see:

Moving away - shots fired - 5 or 6 witness

Arms up - shots fire - 4 witness

Dropping to his knees - shot fired - 3 witness

Audio Recording - 10-12 shots in two groups

Video Recording - spontaneous utterances of he had his hands up etc

Fighting with Officer - Officer by others

Fighting over Weapon in car - Officer by others

Weapon discharged in car - Officer by others

Damage to officers eye - Medical report not released

Officers statement - not released

Police logs of incident ( radio report) - not released

I forgot an third review of the wounds that showed he was shot at least twice while "down".

Any witness yet that support the "unofficial" officers's version of the incident?
But why wouldn't you just take the police officer's possible but unconfirmed word over those other people?

 
Bucky86 said:
:popcorn: Let's see the Wilson defenders spin this one now.
Who's defending him? Everything I've seen in this thread has been folks urging caution on throwing the guy under the bus because we don't know what happened here. I still think this is even money as to whether this leads to a conviction.

 
I hope you're right, BK. If there is enough evidence to put this guy away, then by all means they should do so. I haven't been convinced, but you make a compelling argument.

Unfortunately, as always seems to happen in these cases that touch upon racial issues, there are people out there want to see this guy convicted regardless of the facts, and there are also people out there that want to see him acquitted regardless of the facts. Those guys have all made up their minds already.
The vast majority of people care about what is right and what is wrong regardless of race.

 
I hope you're right, BK. If there is enough evidence to put this guy away, then by all means they should do so. I haven't been convinced, but you make a compelling argument.

Unfortunately, as always seems to happen in these cases that touch upon racial issues, there are people out there want to see this guy convicted regardless of the facts, and there are also people out there that want to see him acquitted regardless of the facts. Those guys have all made up their minds already.
The vast majority of people care about what is right and what is wrong regardless of race.
This is true, but it is not well reflected in this thread (nor in the Zimmerman thread, either.)

 
Bucky86 said:
:popcorn: Let's see the Wilson defenders spin this one now.
Who's defending him? Everything I've seen in this thread has been folks urging caution on throwing the guy under the bus because we don't know what happened here. I still think this is even money as to whether this leads to a conviction.
I don't think this word means what you think it does.

 
Bucky86 said:
:popcorn: Let's see the Wilson defenders spin this one now.
Who's defending him? Everything I've seen in this thread has been folks urging caution on throwing the guy under the bus because we don't know what happened here. I still think this is even money as to whether this leads to a conviction.
Sand, if you have the stomach for it, go back and read through this thread. Some of the posts defending Wilson using any kind of excuse or unconfirmed source they can think of are pretty nauseating. Bucky's comments weren't directed at you, but they are very accurate.

 
I hope you're right, BK. If there is enough evidence to put this guy away, then by all means they should do so. I haven't been convinced, but you make a compelling argument.

Unfortunately, as always seems to happen in these cases that touch upon racial issues, there are people out there want to see this guy convicted regardless of the facts, and there are also people out there that want to see him acquitted regardless of the facts. Those guys have all made up their minds already.
The vast majority of people care about what is right and what is wrong regardless of race.
This is true, but it is not well reflected in this thread (nor in the Zimmerman thread, either.)
Yes it is, but you choose to frame and twist each and every arguement in terms of race. There are a handful of insensitive comments, but those are exceptions.

 
Bucky86 said:
:popcorn: Let's see the Wilson defenders spin this one now.
Who's defending him? Everything I've seen in this thread has been folks urging caution on throwing the guy under the bus because we don't know what happened here. I still think this is even money as to whether this leads to a conviction.
It is amazing to me that anyone can at this point fault the cop. With everything that is out there there is no doubt in my mind that it was totally justified. Lots of crow going to be eaten by you all.
:goodposting:
 
I hope you're right, BK. If there is enough evidence to put this guy away, then by all means they should do so. I haven't been convinced, but you make a compelling argument.

Unfortunately, as always seems to happen in these cases that touch upon racial issues, there are people out there want to see this guy convicted regardless of the facts, and there are also people out there that want to see him acquitted regardless of the facts. Those guys have all made up their minds already.
The vast majority of people care about what is right and what is wrong regardless of race.
This is true, but it is not well reflected in this thread (nor in the Zimmerman thread, either.)
This thread is not as combustible as the Zimmerman thread. In the Z thread, you had people flip flopping on their positions like crazy as well as a core who either were convinced he was guilty or innocent with little give. In this thread, I think its more wait and see. I must say though, it isn't looking good right now if you're a Wilson supporter.

 
I hope you're right, BK. If there is enough evidence to put this guy away, then by all means they should do so. I haven't been convinced, but you make a compelling argument.

Unfortunately, as always seems to happen in these cases that touch upon racial issues, there are people out there want to see this guy convicted regardless of the facts, and there are also people out there that want to see him acquitted regardless of the facts. Those guys have all made up their minds already.
The vast majority of people care about what is right and what is wrong regardless of race.
This is true, but it is not well reflected in this thread (nor in the Zimmerman thread, either.)
This thread is not as combustible as the Zimmerman thread. In the Z thread, you had people flip flopping on their positions like crazy as well as a core who either were convinced he was guilty or innocent with little give. In this thread, I think its more wait and see. I must say though, it isn't looking good right now if you're a Wilson supporter.
Racist (just playin)

 
timschochet said:
Gary Coal Man said:
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

.
I'm not convinced of this. Are there enough witnesses willing to testify in a court of law, all of whom tell an intelligent, consistent narrative supported by the facts? If that is the case then maybe you're right. But I'm not at all sure this is the case.I'm pretty sure that Wilson committed murder and I'd like to see him convicted. But unless the prosecution really can prove it, let's not have another trial like George Zimmerman.
Lets see:

Moving away - shots fired - 5 or 6 witness

Arms up - shots fire - 4 witness

Dropping to his knees - shot fired - 3 witness

Audio Recording - 10-12 shots in two groups

Video Recording - spontaneous utterances of he had his hands up etc

Fighting with Officer - Officer by others

Fighting over Weapon in car - Officer by others

Weapon discharged in car - Officer by others

Damage to officers eye - Medical report not released

Officers statement - not released

Police logs of incident ( radio report) - not released

I forgot an third review of the wounds that showed he was shot at least twice while "down".

Any witness yet that support the "unofficial" officers's version of the incident?
But why wouldn't you just take the police officer's possible but unconfirmed word over those other people?
good post. after all, the guy's got a gun.

 
timschochet said:
Gary Coal Man said:
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

.
I'm not convinced of this. Are there enough witnesses willing to testify in a court of law, all of whom tell an intelligent, consistent narrative supported by the facts? If that is the case then maybe you're right. But I'm not at all sure this is the case.I'm pretty sure that Wilson committed murder and I'd like to see him convicted. But unless the prosecution really can prove it, let's not have another trial like George Zimmerman.
Lets see:

Moving away - shots fired - 5 or 6 witness

Arms up - shots fire - 4 witness

Dropping to his knees - shot fired - 3 witness

Audio Recording - 10-12 shots in two groups

Video Recording - spontaneous utterances of he had his hands up etc

Fighting with Officer - Officer by others

Fighting over Weapon in car - Officer by others

Weapon discharged in car - Officer by others

Damage to officers eye - Medical report not released

Officers statement - not released

Police logs of incident ( radio report) - not released

I forgot an third review of the wounds that showed he was shot at least twice while "down".

Any witness yet that support the "unofficial" officers's version of the incident?
The one point I would make of the video recording was that someone who supposedly witnessed the event stated (in the background) that Brown charged Wilson. There was no confirmation however that this background statement wasn't doctored - although it didn't seem so to me. Early on, when there was only two witnesses and this video, I put more weight to the background statement than those others as there was no intent to get in the limelight (of the person heard in the video). With all these other witnesses coming forward, the background statement no longer carries the weight it once did.

 
timschochet said:
Gary Coal Man said:
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

.
I'm not convinced of this. Are there enough witnesses willing to testify in a court of law, all of whom tell an intelligent, consistent narrative supported by the facts? If that is the case then maybe you're right. But I'm not at all sure this is the case.I'm pretty sure that Wilson committed murder and I'd like to see him convicted. But unless the prosecution really can prove it, let's not have another trial like George Zimmerman.
Lets see:

Moving away - shots fired - 5 or 6 witness

Arms up - shots fire - 4 witness

Dropping to his knees - shot fired - 3 witness

Audio Recording - 10-12 shots in two groups

Video Recording - spontaneous utterances of he had his hands up etc

Fighting with Officer - Officer by others

Fighting over Weapon in car - Officer by others

Weapon discharged in car - Officer by others

Damage to officers eye - Medical report not released

Officers statement - not released

Police logs of incident ( radio report) - not released

I forgot an third review of the wounds that showed he was shot at least twice while "down".

Any witness yet that support the "unofficial" officers's version of the incident?
The one point I would make of the video recording was that someone who supposedly witnessed the event stated (in the background) that Brown charged Wilson. There was no confirmation however that this background statement wasn't doctored - although it didn't seem so to me. Early on, when there was only two witnesses and this video, I put more weight to the background statement than those others as there was no intent to get in the limelight (of the person heard in the video). With all these other witnesses coming forward, the background statement no longer carries the weight it once did.
but i would add that the background statement says that brown kept coming ...he didnt say that he was charging the cop...just that he was moving towards the cop...and thats exactly what the 2 white guys said...he staggered forward for like 25 feet before he dropped ...but not in a threatening way ...like he was a dead man walking

 
timschochet said:
Gary Coal Man said:
There are enough similar witness accounts relaying that Brown posed no threat to Wilson as Wilson continued to unload that the grand jury should indict.

.
I'm not convinced of this. Are there enough witnesses willing to testify in a court of law, all of whom tell an intelligent, consistent narrative supported by the facts? If that is the case then maybe you're right. But I'm not at all sure this is the case.I'm pretty sure that Wilson committed murder and I'd like to see him convicted. But unless the prosecution really can prove it, let's not have another trial like George Zimmerman.
Lets see:

Moving away - shots fired - 5 or 6 witness

Arms up - shots fire - 4 witness

Dropping to his knees - shot fired - 3 witness

Audio Recording - 10-12 shots in two groups

Video Recording - spontaneous utterances of he had his hands up etc

Fighting with Officer - Officer by others

Fighting over Weapon in car - Officer by others

Weapon discharged in car - Officer by others

Damage to officers eye - Medical report not released

Officers statement - not released

Police logs of incident ( radio report) - not released

I forgot an third review of the wounds that showed he was shot at least twice while "down".

Any witness yet that support the "unofficial" officers's version of the incident?
The one point I would make of the video recording was that someone who supposedly witnessed the event stated (in the background) that Brown charged Wilson. There was no confirmation however that this background statement wasn't doctored - although it didn't seem so to me. Early on, when there was only two witnesses and this video, I put more weight to the background statement than those others as there was no intent to get in the limelight (of the person heard in the video). With all these other witnesses coming forward, the background statement no longer carries the weight it once did.
but i would add that the background statement says that brown kept coming ...he didnt say that he was charging the cop...just that he was moving towards the cop...and thats exactly what the 2 white guys said...he staggered forward for like 25 feet before he dropped ...but not in a threatening way ...like he was a dead man walking
I'd have to find the video and listen again. I thought that he said something like "going at him". I got the impression that it was of an aggressive nature. But then I'm just your run of the mill racist, so I may have read into it. ;-)

 
There were several people in this thread who seriously argued that Brown continued to charge Wilson even as bullets were being slammed into him- like some sort of monster whom you just can't kill, and keeps coming at you.

 
Thanks for all the posts, Fatness. 2 points:

1. I wish those witnesses were just a little more definitive and united on how and when Brown turned around and if he was approaching Wilson. I still believe Wilson is likely guilty of murder, but I sure as heck don't see how you could ever go about proving it in a court of law. You'd think that with all those witnesses somebody might have filmed it on a cellphone. Too bad.

2. There sure is a lot of racism prevalent on the internet. All these people willing to go viral with these fake photos in order to prove Brown was a bad man. Pretty disgusting...
Video of 2 white construction workers who witnesses the shooting and confirm the other eye witness accounts
that's a very compelling story.

 
There were several people in this thread who seriously argued that Brown continued to charge Wilson even as bullets were being slammed into him- like some sort of monster whom you just can't kill, and keeps coming at you.
I've never been hit in the arm by a bullet, but then I'm not 6'4" tall and 290 pounds. I'm thinking once someone that size gets up a bit of speed their momentum may be a bit difficult to arrest. I'm not saying that Brown was running at Wilson, but he was a big guy. Think Terminator without the metal skeleton.

 
Thanks for all the posts, Fatness. 2 points:

1. I wish those witnesses were just a little more definitive and united on how and when Brown turned around and if he was approaching Wilson. I still believe Wilson is likely guilty of murder, but I sure as heck don't see how you could ever go about proving it in a court of law. You'd think that with all those witnesses somebody might have filmed it on a cellphone. Too bad.

2. There sure is a lot of racism prevalent on the internet. All these people willing to go viral with these fake photos in order to prove Brown was a bad man. Pretty disgusting...
Video of 2 white construction workers who witnesses the shooting and confirm the other eye witness accounts
that's a very compelling story.
A hands up position would definitely explain the majority of bullet wounds on the arm.

 
There were several people in this thread who seriously argued that Brown continued to charge Wilson even as bullets were being slammed into him- like some sort of monster whom you just can't kill, and keeps coming at you.
I've never been hit in the arm by a bullet, but then I'm not 6'4" tall and 290 pounds. I'm thinking once someone that size gets up a bit of speed their momentum may be a bit difficult to arrest. I'm not saying that Brown was running at Wilson, but he was a big guy. Think Terminator without the metal skeleton.
kinda more like this

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I've been kind of wondering how high do your hands have to be up for it to be a sign of surrender? I would think they have to be straight up vertical but I haven't heard anyone say they were straight up. If you face your opponent and throw your hands up at a 45 degree angle above the horizontal but your palms are faced upward it is more like a "WTF are you doing, screw you" response rather than a "I give up" response. But from a distance it might look like a "I give up" response.

 
I've been kind of wondering how high do your hands have to be up for it to be a sign of surrender? I would think they have to be straight up vertical but I haven't heard anyone say they were straight up. If you face your opponent and throw your hands up at a 45 degree angle above the horizontal but your palms are faced upward it is more like a "WTF are you doing, screw you" response rather than a "I give up" response. But from a distance it might look like a "I give up" response.
I guess there's no concrete answer but I'd say that if observers would describe you as having your hands up it means you met the threshold. Generally "he had his hands up" means you were surrendering; otherwise they'd provide some other detail, like. "he was kinda raising his arms" or "he had his hands in the air and was waving them like he just don't care" or whatever

 
I've been kind of wondering how high do your hands have to be up for it to be a sign of surrender? I would think they have to be straight up vertical but I haven't heard anyone say they were straight up. If you face your opponent and throw your hands up at a 45 degree angle above the horizontal but your palms are faced upward it is more like a "WTF are you doing, screw you" response rather than a "I give up" response. But from a distance it might look like a "I give up" response.
I'd generally agree, but it appears he was also saying "OK OK OK".

see 41 seconds in on this video.

Video of 2 white construction workers who witnesses the shooting and confirm the other eye witness accounts

on a side note, Is spreagle short for spread eagle?

 
That pink shirted guy in the video was not compelling to me, because he did such a sloppy job putting his hands in the air. Straight up folks. He motioned like he was agitated, and not like he was giving up.

 
I've been kind of wondering how high do your hands have to be up for it to be a sign of surrender? I would think they have to be straight up vertical but I haven't heard anyone say they were straight up. If you face your opponent and throw your hands up at a 45 degree angle above the horizontal but your palms are faced upward it is more like a "WTF are you doing, screw you" response rather than a "I give up" response. But from a distance it might look like a "I give up" response.
I'd generally agree, but it appears he was also saying "OK OK OK".

see 41 seconds in on this video.

Video of 2 white construction workers who witnesses the shooting and confirm the other eye witness accounts

on a side note, Is spreagle short for spread eagle?
im guessing that if someone is shooting a gun at you from a distance you`re not really raising your hands in a challenging way...just a guess mind you

 
That pink shirted guy in the video was not compelling to me, because he did such a sloppy job putting his hands in the air. Straight up folks. He motioned like he was agitated, and not like he was giving up.
He may have looked agitated because he was pretty overweight and lifting those arms must have worn him out.

 
I've been kind of wondering how high do your hands have to be up for it to be a sign of surrender? I would think they have to be straight up vertical but I haven't heard anyone say they were straight up. If you face your opponent and throw your hands up at a 45 degree angle above the horizontal but your palms are faced upward it is more like a "WTF are you doing, screw you" response rather than a "I give up" response. But from a distance it might look like a "I give up" response.
I'd generally agree, but it appears he was also saying "OK OK OK".

see 41 seconds in on this video.

Video of 2 white construction workers who witnesses the shooting and confirm the other eye witness accounts

on a side note, Is spreagle short for spread eagle?
im guessing that if someone is shooting a gun at you from a distance you`re not really raising your hands in a challenging way...just a guess mind you
I'm of Italian heritage and we raise our hands up like that all the time. Usually we say, "Whats amata for you" when we raise them though rather than "OK OK OK"

 
That pink shirted guy in the video was not compelling to me, because he did such a sloppy job putting his hands in the air. Straight up folks. He motioned like he was agitated, and not like he was giving up.
what makes his comments so compelling is the fact he didnt know he was being taped...thats just him reacting to something he just witnessed ...no pre planning or made up story...and it just so happens to more or less coincide with the other witness statements

 
That pink shirted guy in the video was not compelling to me, because he did such a sloppy job putting his hands in the air. Straight up folks. He motioned like he was agitated, and not like he was giving up.
what makes his comments so compelling is the fact he didnt know he was being taped...thats just him reacting to something he just witnessed ...no pre planning or made up story...and it just so happens to more or less coincide with the other witness

I've been kind of wondering how high do your hands have to be up for it to be a sign of surrender? I would think they have to be straight up vertical but I haven't heard anyone say they were straight up. If you face your opponent and throw your hands up at a 45 degree angle above the horizontal but your palms are faced upward it is more like a "WTF are you doing, screw you" response rather than a "I give up" response. But from a distance it might look like a "I give up" response.
I'd generally agree, but it appears he was also saying "OK OK OK".

see 41 seconds in on this video.

Video of 2 white construction workers who witnesses the shooting and confirm the other eye witness accounts

on a side note, Is spreagle short for spread eagle?
im guessing that if someone is shooting a gun at you from a distance you`re not really raising your hands in a challenging way...just a guess mind you
I'm of Italian heritage and we raise our hands up like that all the time. Usually we say, "Whats amata for you" when we raise them though rather than "OK OK OK"
I think what we might have here is another failure of the public school system, specifically, failing to teach the kids how to properly give up to the police. Anyways, I'm going to give my kids a test tonight and see how high they throw up their arms when giving up to the police. I'll report back on results.
 
White kids, supposedly from Ferguson, mock black people and invoke hateful racial stereotypes, for profit.

Link
Those kids look kind of not white to me.

I did notice several of them had their hands up which might be kind of threatening. And I think one of them charged.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top