"Judging" someone's choice of snack food is absolutely more acceptable than judging someone's worth/ability/fortitude/level of whatever because they chose to leave a toxic marriage. The snack food thing is completely trivial and effects no one in any meaningful way. It was hyperbole. I thought that was clear. I guess I'll spell it out better in the future
(I guess I should also apologize to anyone who likes Munchos more than Pringles that got offended.)
Don't mess with my Munchos. Seriously. That said, I did get that it was hyperbole. My point, more broadly, was that the limitation of discussion to trivialities is just that -- trivial. I see no reason why people cannot use their moral compass or judgment to assess what we think of a person by their intimate deeds and acts, especially when broadcast on a message board. It would seem to me that a dogmatic withholding of judgment is indicative of a sort of creeping and yet forced relativism into our discourse, and I don't agree with it.
As far as it affecting me, that is true. It generally doesn't. But I don't think that is relevant. We judge people by how they treat and affect others all the time. I'm certainly allowed to judge people, much like people are allowed to tell me to go eff the pooch. One thing I might quibble with: I'd be careful in characterizing my argument as simply stating that all divorce is about self-gratification. It isn't necessarily. It's one reason why I think divorce is abused in its modern form, but I certainly wouldn't argue that self-gratification is always a reason (primary or secondary) for divorce. I'm aware of that.
On a personal note, my brother and cousin are divorced. I've made it a point to come to terms with their decisions in a manner that I think is fair to all parties. Nobody has ever liked a scold or a ninny; in modern times, nobody likes to be a scold or a ninny. But I can't help but wonder if there isn't a sort of middle ground -- one that allows for a judgment against frivolous and selfish reasons for divorce while also permitting for compassion and understanding when all precautions have been taken going into the marriage and all attempts have been made to reconcile.
That's really my gig. I've taken a shot about divorce here at someone, and I'm not sure it was my place to do so. (Forget that, it wasn't.) That said, the ability to judge or discern a person's moral and ethical makeup from their behavior, both broadcast and in action, is also something I reserve the right to do.