What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Martellus Bennett - playing musical chairs with the NFL (2 Viewers)

Sorry...I read it wrong.  Mid round pick.
No sweat, still  surprised they got what they did.

Always boggles my mind how teams will invest high picks in WR's and TE's and you see guys like Moss go for a 4th, Holmes for a 5th, Marshall and Bennett for peanuts.  Almost all of those players have or had some degree of character issues but those were all huge bargains. Well at the time to me anyway, Holmes did not work out but as a Steeler fan I was high pissed  that day.

 
Welcome to winning unicorn, stay for as long as you catch balls.

The deal was a Pats 4th for Bennett and a Bears 6th

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is going to be HUGE for Bennett. Finally on a focussed team with a HC that will get the best from him and clearly the best TE on the team. A 6'6" giant that you can never double (no way teams double him and not Nicks/Cruz). Signs a one-year deal (e.g., will be playing ball out to earn a big payday next year).

This may be one of the best FA signings there has been!
Since Buck was so upset about recycling the thread, I figured I would just recycle what I wrote four years ago.   Seems even more true today than then.  Well, except the whole "best te on the team" part...but still a great move for him and the patriots.  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm curious as to who's running the ball in New England this year.  Regardless, Bennett is the perfect player who can make the most of the double coverage that Gronk sees.

Bump Finley.

 
...and if Dion Lewis isn't that guy, Donald Brown is their plan B?
I think the Pats can draft a serviceable RB from in the 2nd or 3rd round that can play on 1st and 2nd down.  Bennett paired with Gronk will force D's to really think how they'll cover those two big targets especially in the red zone.  

 
Bennett is going to be a 1b to Gronk's 1a.  This is a HUGE boost for Bennett.  
I think your in a small minority that think this is good for Bennett, never mind a huge boost.

Certainly it's a good offense but the challenge is how well the player adapts to it.  Plenty have failed. 

 
I think its a huge boost from where he was injured or not last year. 

Could see him actually hurting Gronks production. Jules>Gronk/Bennett>Lewis>WR2

 
I think its entirely likely Gronk's production actually goes up compared to last season when he had to stay in and block a lot, now that they have two very competent receiving and block TEs its possible his production could go up or down depending on how the offense shakes out. They aren't going to feed Gronk for the sake of feeding him. 

Jules on the other hand doesn't share a role with anyone. The closest competition he has for his targets is Dion Lewis.

Jules was a WR1 last year before getting hurt, no reason to think that would change this season. NE offense is gonna be very fantasy relevant between the key pieces, and I think the split is the one I posted.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Who the #### is Jules?!  Is it that hard to type Edelman?

i thought you were talking about Julius Thomas for fantasy purposes.  Lol.

 
I see this is only a slight boost for Bennett. If he stayed in Chicago and stayed healthy, I don't think he'd put up the same numbers as he did in the pre-Fox system, when you figure that he'd have to compete with Jeffrey, White and Langford for targets. So it's a better system for him going to the Pats, but he'll still be clear second fiddle to Gronk in the TE and probably also behind Edelman, Lewis and maybe even Hogan in terms of targets. 

 
I do not accept the nickname Jules for Julian Edelman.  Pretty sure 99.99999999% of others don't either. 

And I also thought he was talking about Julius Thomas. 

And also laughed at "Jules>>Gronk".  It wouldnt even matter who Jules actually was

 
Tom calls him Jules so I assume that's why that was used earlier.  Also Jules>>Gronk was the ranking of targets in the system, not that Jules is better than Gronk.  I'm just making assumptions here, so perhaps I'm wrong.

 
Tom calls him Jules so I assume that's why that was used earlier.  Also Jules>>Gronk was the ranking of targets in the system, not that Jules is better than Gronk.  I'm just making assumptions here, so perhaps I'm wrong.
That's Mr. Brady to you.

 
I'm gonna go with no one. Or more correctly, Dion Lewis when they decide to not throw more than once a game.
This seems to be going the way that the Pats do with Rbs. They probably won't draft any noticeable RB anytime remotely early and will end up going with Morris or Foster or someone they feel good about at the time. 

This offense really doesn't need anything they don't have.

 
Pats percentage of running two-tight ends has steadily gone up but does this mean the 'Black Unicorn' has increased his fantasy value? 



EDIT to add:


 
Last edited by a moderator:
Consensus here seems to be this is a big boost for him, can't say I agree. If his head is in the right place I think he's a good get for the team but not so much for his fantasy value. I mean some places, like Arizona, could have been worse but to me this is easily and clearly a downgrade from what he's been in Chicago.

He's had one big year and he was the #1 targeted TE that season and his next best season he was a TE10. He was ok last season in per game production but he grumbled about his role and he was the #8 TE in targets per game. I don't think he'll see that kind of workload this year.

Hernandez and Gronk are/where unique talents. I saw the Sudfeld hype, some Tim Wright hype and a little hype for some others but this is not a plug and play situation in terms of thinking just decent TE is going to come in and post big numbers.

I see a 50/500/6-8TD type season for him, a TE2. I will say in TE premium leagues he might arguably be the most valuable handcuff in fantasy football and that alone gives him big value.

But I'd also put the chances of him not making it through the season with NE around 20-30%. Since they allowed his agent to seek a trade I would assume NE or Bill directly made sure he signed off on this move so I'm sure starting off he's coming in with the right intentions. But he seems like a really poor fit for the Patriot way when you hear things like he loafs in practice, complains about his role, and on a team that likes to try and control what their players say to media  he seems like a hard guy to muzzle. I could see this thing blowing up, especially if he's not happy with his role.

 
This seems to be going the way that the Pats do with Rbs. They probably won't draft any noticeable RB anytime remotely early and will end up going with Morris or Foster or someone they feel good about at the time. 

This offense really doesn't need anything they don't have.
Well olineman

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bennett is a greater physical talent than Hernandez was.  They basically have the same measurables in terms of speed and explosiveness, but Bennett is 5 inches taller and a much better blocker.  

I think he's been one of the most underrated TEs in the league.  He basically sat for the first 4 years of his career behind Jason Witten.  When he signed his deal with the NYG, it was basically a one year prove it deal... and it seemed like he was asked to block too often.  He finally had two career seasons in his first two years with Chicago.  

I'd put his floor at his 2013 season with Chicago... 65 catches, 750 yards, 5 TD's.  I'd anticipate numbers 20-30% greater than that.  This garbage about "he opens things up for Gronk" is b.s.  Gronk is still going to be drawing all the double teams.

 
I'd put his floor at his 2013 season with Chicago... 65 catches, 750 yards, 5 TD's.  I'd anticipate numbers 20-30% greater than that.  This garbage about "he opens things up for Gronk" is b.s.  Gronk is still going to be drawing all the double teams.
No, his floor is what Chandler did last year.  23/259/4

 
 I'd put his floor at his 2013 season with Chicago... 65 catches, 750 yards, 5 TD's.  I'd anticipate numbers 20-30% greater than that.  This garbage about "he opens things up for Gronk" is b.s.  Gronk is still going to be drawing all the double teams.
So you are anticipating between 78-85 catches for 900-975 yards and 6-7 TD's?  

 
Think it's pretty clear he meant the average of both floors and he would take the over. It read just fine, Idk you guys are confused here.

I think it's realistic he could finish with 70-80 catches, 700-900 yards and 7-12 TDs. Really depends on how he settles in to the offense.

But I don't think he will be a bust like Scott Chandler ended up being which is easily attributable to his stone hands, a quality Bennett doesn't have.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
You wanna split the difference, bet $100 - you can have the under, I'll take the over?
44/504.5/4.5 is the median.  What -specifically- are you wanting to be the over on?  All three numbers?

What happens if he gets 42/600/6?  Who wins that?

 
I just don't want you to ##### and complain in December that you don't understand why you lost.
Considering the season doesn't end until January 1st, go #### yourself.  No #####ing here.   :D

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top