Perhaps better than half of them, depending on the second half of this year...What teams would he be considered better than the current (if healthy) starting options?
Right now, I'd sayDefinitely better option:BALTENKCCIN ( if Palmer has a long term issue )MINDETSFMaybe better option:MIACLEOAKHowever, I have seen some progression in his game over the past few weeks, to the point that I think this question should be revisited in December. It may have a very different answer.What teams would he be considered better than the current (if healthy) starting options?
well, I suspect we can rule out BAL (Flacco), TEN (too much invested in Young), CLE (Quinn on the horizon), and OAK (WAY too much invested in Russell). I also don't think he'd be better than the MIA options.That narrows it down to KC, MIN, DET, and SF (assuming Palmer is ok).For those thinking he is a viable starter, he's basically had one good game and has been so so in all the others (with most of his games against fairly weak defenses). At this point I would consider him a mediocre backup. Remember, he's also leading the most potent offense in league history so consider that when moving him to another team.Right now, I'd sayDefinitely better option:BALTENKCCIN ( if Palmer has a long term issue )MINDETSFMaybe better option:MIACLEOAKHowever, I have seen some progression in his game over the past few weeks, to the point that I think this question should be revisited in December. It may have a very different answer.What teams would he be considered better than the current (if healthy) starting options?
The jury's out in Detroit as long as Stanton is untested, butwell, I suspect we can rule out BAL (Flacco), TEN (too much invested in Young), CLE (Quinn on the horizon), and OAK (WAY too much invested in Russell). I also don't think he'd be better than the MIA options.That narrows it down to KC, MIN, DET, and SF (assuming Palmer is ok).For those thinking he is a viable starter, he's basically had one good game and has been so so in all the others (with most of his games against fairly weak defenses). At this point I would consider him a mediocre backup. Remember, he's also leading the most potent offense in league history so consider that when moving him to another team.Right now, I'd sayDefinitely better option:BALTENKCCIN ( if Palmer has a long term issue )MINDETSFMaybe better option:MIACLEOAKHowever, I have seen some progression in his game over the past few weeks, to the point that I think this question should be revisited in December. It may have a very different answer.What teams would he be considered better than the current (if healthy) starting options?
True, but that doesn'tmean they all should be starters. Cassel is not NFL starting QB caliber IMOkevinallen said:There are several "career backups" that end up being a starting QB in the NFL.Magic_Man said:He's a career backup
May need to get rid of Childress first; he and Belichick hate each other.Minny would be a spot
Hes already been Chaile Batch, Cassel has like 2 or 3 of Brady's rings.Hes improved a lot since he 1st took over, say what you want but he is 5 - 2... and hes playing in a very complex system.I'm impressed by him, I'm sure a couple of decent teams will offer a starting job or a competition for it.Jets (if Farve leaves) Tenn (I think thier about done w/ VY.. dude is Benched during his 3rd season; never a good sign)KC, not a good spotMinny, I think this would be a great spot.. for any FA QBDet, but that would be to smart of them to doBucsZona, Warner is in his last yr... and I'm sure Zona will attempt to lowball an extension, but Cassel could replace LienartSea, The end of Hass is apon us49ersplenty of teams will be interested in a 27 yr old FA QB, not many people want to be a back up all thier life...I don't know what he prefersRob Johnson - Start on a couple of crappy teams and then goodbyeCharlie Batch - Backup a better qb and have a shot at a ring/ have good talent around you when you have to playMe I would take the starting job because I would prefer to play than to sit so that is how I will vote.
Where did you stand on P.Manning after his rookie season?He had a lower completion percentage and QB rating than does Cassel, he also had more INT's than TD's, unlike Cassel. And Manning had plenty of playing time in college.I'm not saying Cassel is anywhere near Manning in terms of talent or skill, I'm just saying he's been improving and we don't really have any idea how good he is or can be. He's still an unknown. We usually give a first round pick a mulligan for his first season as far as deciding whether or not he can make it in the NFL. I'm not sure why we wouldn't give Cassel the same benefit of the doubt, especially when he hasn't played a significant number of live-fire snaps since high school.True, but that doesn'tmean they all should be starters. Cassel is not NFL starting QB caliber IMOkevinallen said:There are several "career backups" that end up being a starting QB in the NFL.Magic_Man said:He's a career backup
I didn't see him holding on to the ball too long this past weekend, I saw him take some hits from guys who came in untouched or barely touched before he could even set up and make his reads.Besides, how much pocket presence is a guy going to have developed during practices over the past 7 years? Guys like Rob Johnson and David Carr faced plenty of pass rushes while in college. But not Cassel.Rookie QB's tend to hold on to the ball to long. Some grow out of it, some don't. We don't have any idea yet which category Cassel falls into. Cassel is on pace for 64 sacks on the season which would rank him 4th worst for a single season. Carr holds two of those top 3 spots, but Randall Cunningham holds the other one. Randall ended up being a pretty good QB.BTW, Brady got hurt during a pass rush, didn't he? He also started getting beat up late in the 2007 season, in the playoffs and let's not forget the Super Bowl. Everyone this season has known that the secret to derailing the NE offense is to put pressure on the QB. And everyone knows that it's very possible to do just that regardless of who's under center. I think what we are seeing this season as far as sacks is largely a continuation of last season. It's a copycat league after all. There wasn't great pass protection at the end of last season, and it's continued to be pretty spotty this season as well.Cassel has Rob Johnson/David Carr syndrome..He has the tools, but not the football IQ or awareness to sense the rush coming. The guy spends more time on his back than Paris Hilton
How could you be hearing this? Belichick has publicly stated the Cassel is his guy. He's winning games and the Patriots are competitive and will make the playoffs. How on earth could they switch to O'Connell? It makes less than 0 sense.The NFL is short on QBs that are just considered decent or serviceable. He will get some solid offers. With Brady coming off of reconstructive surgery the Pats will probably have to match the offers.I still am hearing that O'Connell will be a threat to Cassel this year or next (at least as a QB2), as he will be a cheaper option with potentially more upside. If Cassel would break the back by comparison the Pats may just let him walk. But that's a long way away.
Define irony.Edit to add: Remember when Brady didn't look that impressive at the begining of his career but just kept winning. Not saying Cassell = Brady but let's give the guy a chance. This situation reminds me of the 49ers with Young, Bono and Grbac. O'Connell has some talent back there too.Hes already been Chaile Batch, Cassel has like 2 or 3 of Brady's rings.Hes improved a lot since he 1st took over, say what you want but he is 5 - 2... and hes playing in a very complex system.I don't know what he prefers
Rob Johnson - Start on a couple of crappy teams and then goodbye
Charlie Batch - Backup a better qb and have a shot at a ring/ have good talent around you when you have to play
Me I would take the starting job because I would prefer to play than to sit so that is how I will vote.
I'm impressed by him, I'm sure a couple of decent teams will offer a starting job or a competition for it.
Jets (if Farve leaves)
Tenn (I think thier about done w/ VY.. dude is Benched during his 3rd season; never a good sign)
KC, not a good spot
Minny, I think this would be a great spot.. for any FA QB
Det, but that would be to smart of them to do
Bucs
Zona, Warner is in his last yr... and I'm sure Zona will attempt to lowball an extension, but Cassel could replace Lienart
Sea, The end of Hass is apon us
49ers
plenty of teams will be interested in a 27 yr old FA QB, not many people want to be a back up all thier life...
If the Pats go on a losing streak, Cassel could get the hook later in the year. I've said all along that it's a fluid situation. Suppose the Pats go 1-4 over the next month against the Colts, Bills, Jets, Dolphins, and Steelers. Pats would be 6-5 and clinging to a playoff spot (or chasing one). Not saying that it's going to happen or likely to happen, but if it did happen I'm still not convinced they are married to Cassel.Oh . . . and we should believe Belichick because he has such an impecable track record for truthfulness? I suspect what he MEANT to say was Cassel is his guy . . . as long as they are winning.How could you be hearing this? Belichick has publicly stated the Cassel is his guy. He's winning games and the Patriots are competitive and will make the playoffs. How on earth could they switch to O'Connell? It makes less than 0 sense.The NFL is short on QBs that are just considered decent or serviceable. He will get some solid offers. With Brady coming off of reconstructive surgery the Pats will probably have to match the offers.I still am hearing that O'Connell will be a threat to Cassel this year or next (at least as a QB2), as he will be a cheaper option with potentially more upside. If Cassel would break the back by comparison the Pats may just let him walk. But that's a long way away.
Why would they even entertain tendering him? Their options are franchising him or transition tagging him . . . either of which would cost them a fortune. An exclusive franchise tag this year was worth $10.7 million for a QB and a non-exclusive franchise tag was worth $12.8 milllion. I'm not sure what a transition tag would cost.The question I asked before... can NE tender him, can they afford to do so?
Rookie contracts are cheap. They can afford to keep this arrangement with Cassel and O'Connell backing Brady up for several more years if Cassel resigns with a reasonable deal . . . if they want to. If they've already decided that O'Connell is developing enough to be relied upon next year, then the size of the contracts won't matter and Cassel is out.The Pats used a 3rd round pick on Kevin O'Connell last year. It would seem they'd be grooming him to be their backup next year.
Pats will insist on fair value for him in a QB starved market.Perhaps a running back?Rookie contracts are cheap. They can afford to keep this arrangement with Cassel and O'Connell backing Brady up for several more years if Cassel resigns with a reasonable deal . . . if they want to. If they've already decided that O'Connell is developing enough to be relied upon next year, then the size of the contracts won't matter and Cassel is out.The Pats used a 3rd round pick on Kevin O'Connell last year. It would seem they'd be grooming him to be their backup next year.
They have no rights to trade Cassel. He will be a free agent after this year (unless they tag him for $10+ million).Pats will insist on fair value for him in a QB starved market.Perhaps a running back?Rookie contracts are cheap. They can afford to keep this arrangement with Cassel and O'Connell backing Brady up for several more years if Cassel resigns with a reasonable deal . . . if they want to. If they've already decided that O'Connell is developing enough to be relied upon next year, then the size of the contracts won't matter and Cassel is out.The Pats used a 3rd round pick on Kevin O'Connell last year. It would seem they'd be grooming him to be their backup next year.
So he's to be a UFA and not a RFA?They have no rights to trade Cassel. He will be a free agent after this year (unless they tag him for $10+ million).Pats will insist on fair value for him in a QB starved market.Perhaps a running back?Rookie contracts are cheap. They can afford to keep this arrangement with Cassel and O'Connell backing Brady up for several more years if Cassel resigns with a reasonable deal . . . if they want to. If they've already decided that O'Connell is developing enough to be relied upon next year, then the size of the contracts won't matter and Cassel is out.The Pats used a 3rd round pick on Kevin O'Connell last year. It would seem they'd be grooming him to be their backup next year.
He will be an UFA after accruing 4 years of service.So he's to be a UFA and not a RFA?They have no rights to trade Cassel. He will be a free agent after this year (unless they tag him for $10+ million).Pats will insist on fair value for him in a QB starved market.Perhaps a running back?Rookie contracts are cheap. They can afford to keep this arrangement with Cassel and O'Connell backing Brady up for several more years if Cassel resigns with a reasonable deal . . . if they want to. If they've already decided that O'Connell is developing enough to be relied upon next year, then the size of the contracts won't matter and Cassel is out.The Pats used a 3rd round pick on Kevin O'Connell last year. It would seem they'd be grooming him to be their backup next year.
Quick; who else would they tag? Any big name like Seymour coming up? Maybe Cassel gets tagged because there aren't any other needed tags?They have no rights to trade Cassel. He will be a free agent after this year (unless they tag him for $10+ million).Pats will insist on fair value for him in a QB starved market.Perhaps a running back?Rookie contracts are cheap. They can afford to keep this arrangement with Cassel and O'Connell backing Brady up for several more years if Cassel resigns with a reasonable deal . . . if they want to. If they've already decided that O'Connell is developing enough to be relied upon next year, then the size of the contracts won't matter and Cassel is out.The Pats used a 3rd round pick on Kevin O'Connell last year. It would seem they'd be grooming him to be their backup next year.
how much is a 2nd round tender? Can't be too much.Quick; who else would they tag? Any big name like Seymour coming up? Maybe Cassel gets tagged because there aren't any other needed tags?They have no rights to trade Cassel. He will be a free agent after this year (unless they tag him for $10+ million).Pats will insist on fair value for him in a QB starved market.Perhaps a running back?Rookie contracts are cheap. They can afford to keep this arrangement with Cassel and O'Connell backing Brady up for several more years if Cassel resigns with a reasonable deal . . . if they want to. If they've already decided that O'Connell is developing enough to be relied upon next year, then the size of the contracts won't matter and Cassel is out.The Pats used a 3rd round pick on Kevin O'Connell last year. It would seem they'd be grooming him to be their backup next year.
Finless knows things.After the Patriots build on to their dynasty status this year Cassel will be due a pretty large contract. We may see Brady rest the knee well into next season.
They can't tender him as an RFA or a 2nd round tender. He will be a UFA meaning franchise or transition tag only.how much is a 2nd round tender? Can't be too much.Quick; who else would they tag? Any big name like Seymour coming up? Maybe Cassel gets tagged because there aren't any other needed tags?They have no rights to trade Cassel. He will be a free agent after this year (unless they tag him for $10+ million).Pats will insist on fair value for him in a QB starved market.Perhaps a running back?Rookie contracts are cheap. They can afford to keep this arrangement with Cassel and O'Connell backing Brady up for several more years if Cassel resigns with a reasonable deal . . . if they want to. If they've already decided that O'Connell is developing enough to be relied upon next year, then the size of the contracts won't matter and Cassel is out.The Pats used a 3rd round pick on Kevin O'Connell last year. It would seem they'd be grooming him to be their backup next year.
Thanks Dave... theres little doubt then that hes out of there baring a horrible injury or total meltdownThey can't tender him as an RFA or a 2nd round tender. He will be a UFA meaning franchise or transition tag only.how much is a 2nd round tender? Can't be too much.Quick; who else would they tag? Any big name like Seymour coming up? Maybe Cassel gets tagged because there aren't any other needed tags?They have no rights to trade Cassel. He will be a free agent after this year (unless they tag him for $10+ million).Pats will insist on fair value for him in a QB starved market.Perhaps a running back?Rookie contracts are cheap. They can afford to keep this arrangement with Cassel and O'Connell backing Brady up for several more years if Cassel resigns with a reasonable deal . . . if they want to. If they've already decided that O'Connell is developing enough to be relied upon next year, then the size of the contracts won't matter and Cassel is out.The Pats used a 3rd round pick on Kevin O'Connell last year. It would seem they'd be grooming him to be their backup next year.
I think you are dreaming, but we'll see. I don't see anyway they invest $12 million in a backup QB when from all I am hearing they like O'Connell better.I think this all depends on how Brady's rehab progresses, and how well Cassel plays down the stretch. He seems to be getting better by the game (in terms of his decision making). If Brady needs more time than what is expected, I don't think it is crazy to think NE will use the tag on him if the situation warrants it.
Yudkin, You're just the kind of guy we need on board here. Can't you fall in line just a little bit? 2001 wasn't that long ago. Bledoe's sheered artery, 199th pick Tom Brady (last minute decision of Rattay) who came on board at Michigan buried on the depth chart, the tuck, and the dismantling of the greatest show on turf. Can we get just a hair of positivity out of you? It's not like the world has not witnessed greatness like this before.To clarify . . . they like O'Connell better as a QB2.
Really? The "secret" to derailing the NE offense is to put pressure on the QB? As opposed to what alternative strategy - dropping 8 men back and giving the QB all day long to throw?Pretty sure putting pressure on the QB would be the so-called "secret" to derailing pretty much any passing offense in the league.Everyone this season has known that the secret to derailing the NE offense is to put pressure on the QB. And everyone knows that it's very possible to do just that regardless of who's under center.
Strange, with everybody knowing the secret they've still managed to win 5 games with a guy who hadn't thrown a football competitively in 8 years.Really? The "secret" to derailing the NE offense is to put pressure on the QB? As opposed to what alternative strategy - dropping 8 men back and giving the QB all day long to throw?Pretty sure putting pressure on the QB would be the so-called "secret" to derailing pretty much any passing offense in the league.Everyone this season has known that the secret to derailing the NE offense is to put pressure on the QB. And everyone knows that it's very possible to do just that regardless of who's under center.
Cassel has been a decent game manager and has done better than he did in the first couple of games. That still doesn't mean he is a great option, and had he faced some tougher teams the likelihood is that the Pats would not be 5-2 right now.People forget that oddly enough there is a difference between fantasy sports and real world sports, and talent evaluators (as far as the Pats go) still are liking the things O'Connell does over what Cassel does. O'Connell is not ready to handle taking over cold turkey with very little experience which is why the Pats went with Cassel and will ride him while they are winning. On the plus side for O'Connell are accuracy, arm strength, pocket presence, and mobility (at least from what I've heard).This is not to say that Cassel can't emerge or learn to do more, but the Pats drafted O'Connell to replace Cassel. That certainbly could change if Matt goes on to win a title, but I am skeptical he is no more than an average replacement running one of the league's best offenses.Finless said:Yudkin, You're just the kind of guy we need on board here. Can't you fall in line just a little bit? 2001 wasn't that long ago. Bledoe's sheered artery, 199th pick Tom Brady (last minute decision of Rattay) who came on board at Michigan buried on the depth chart, the tuck, and the dismantling of the greatest show on turf. Can we get just a hair of positivity out of you? It's not like the world has not witnessed greatness like this before.David Yudkin said:To clarify . . . they like O'Connell better as a QB2.