Matt Flynn (1 Viewer)

[waybackwhen]

The qb franchise number is going to be really high. If they tag him and can't find a taker...

Yeah isn't the franchise tag mean he has to be top 5 paid QB? I don't think even Rodgers is top 5 anymore. No way the Pack does this.

I think it's now the average of the top $ at that position for the last 5 years. It will still be a hefty number (13M+?) and a big gamble if nobody else bites.

You know that someone will bite. Maybe 3-5 teams

Someone always bites.

$13 million for a QB who has all of two starts under his belt? That is a pretty big risk, but probably a better risk than drafting a rookie QB and hopes he develops.

As I said earlier in the thread, the team that will trade picks for him will sign him to an extension of some length that will average out the insane QB franchise number. I don't think it is as risky as some here think. Unfortunately for this Bears fan, Ted Thompson will most likely get some value out of him.Look what Philly got for Kolb, and what Kolb got paid. I think more highly of Flynn now, than I did of Kolb at this time last year.

 

[loose circuits]

Flynn should be starting for someone next year.....Raiders, Seahawks, Vikings, Redskins....

you really think the Raiders are gonna give up on Palmer that soon considering what they gave up, not to mention Pryor's development?

 

[pittstownkiller]

Vikings should make a serious run at this guy.

 

[loose circuits]

I'm surprised no one has mentioned SF as a possible landing spot. They have just about every piece of the puzzle besides a QB. And I think many feel that Alex Smith is not the long term answer. If they stumble in the playoffs (especially against a team like New Orleans) I think the Niners have to be linked to him in some way.They have lots of a cap room, need a QB with potential that can win now, and have a former QB for a coach. They'd be stupid to not consider it wouldn't they?

Are they going to give up on the 36th overall pick that quickly? Kaepernick seemed like an intelligent kid, would think he would have things figured out by next season

 

[Abraham]

If I'm the browns I take whoevers left of Blackmon and Richardson at 5 and send my other first rounder to gb for Flynn.

 

[duaneok66]

If I'm the browns I take whoevers left of Blackmon and Richardson at 5 and send my other first rounder to gb for Flynn.

what if they are both gone??

 

[Jeff Tefertiller]

Where is the talk of trading picks for Flynn coming from? He is a UFA after the year. Yes, he could get "tagged" but the Packers also need to address Finley and Wells. The team is more likely to tag Finley than Flynn, imo.

 

[Dr. Awesome]

I'm surprised no one has mentioned SF as a possible landing spot. They have just about every piece of the puzzle besides a QB. And I think many feel that Alex Smith is not the long term answer. If they stumble in the playoffs (especially against a team like New Orleans) I think the Niners have to be linked to him in some way.They have lots of a cap room, need a QB with potential that can win now, and have a former QB for a coach. They'd be stupid to not consider it wouldn't they?

Are they going to give up on the 36th overall pick that quickly? Kaepernick seemed like an intelligent kid, would think he would have things figured out by next season

If they believe Kaepernick is less than what they thought when they drafted him and they also think Flynn is a stud, then why wouldn't they bail on their second round pick? No sense in holding onto a lost cause simply because he's a fairly high pick (see Taylor Mays). While there are very legitimate excuses, Kaepernick did not look good in the preseason.

 

[loose circuits]

I'm surprised no one has mentioned SF as a possible landing spot. They have just about every piece of the puzzle besides a QB. And I think many feel that Alex Smith is not the long term answer. If they stumble in the playoffs (especially against a team like New Orleans) I think the Niners have to be linked to him in some way.They have lots of a cap room, need a QB with potential that can win now, and have a former QB for a coach. They'd be stupid to not consider it wouldn't they?

Are they going to give up on the 36th overall pick that quickly? Kaepernick seemed like an intelligent kid, would think he would have things figured out by next season

If they believe Kaepernick is less than what they thought when they drafted him and they also think Flynn is a stud, then why wouldn't they bail on their second round pick? No sense in holding onto a lost cause simply because he's a fairly high pick (see Taylor Mays). While there are very legitimate excuses, Kaepernick did not look good in the preseason.

Kaepernick was never considered NFL ready (especially with minimal off season), but has loads of upside. Taylor Mays was picked by the previous staff so I am not sure how that compares.

 

[Abraham]

If I'm the browns I take whoevers left of Blackmon and Richardson at 5 and send my other first rounder to gb for Flynn.

what if they are both gone??

Then take Khalil.

 

[metoo]

The qb franchise number is going to be really high. If they tag him and can't find a taker...

Yeah isn't the franchise tag mean he has to be top 5 paid QB? I don't think even Rodgers is top 5 anymore. No way the Pack does this.

I think it's now the average of the top $ at that position for the last 5 years. It will still be a hefty number (13M+?) and a big gamble if nobody else bites.

You know that someone will bite. Maybe 3-5 teams

Someone always bites.

$13 million for a QB who has all of two starts under his belt? That is a pretty big risk, but probably a better risk than drafting a rookie QB and hopes he develops.

As I said earlier in the thread, the team that will trade picks for him will sign him to an extension of some length that will average out the insane QB franchise number. I don't think it is as risky as some here think. Unfortunately for this Bears fan, Ted Thompson will most likely get some value out of him.Look what Philly got for Kolb, and what Kolb got paid. I think more highly of Flynn now, than I did of Kolb at this time last year.

Kolb sucked and got paid. I don't see why Flynn wouldn't as he's looked better than Kolb.

 

[waybackwhen]

Where is the talk of trading picks for Flynn coming from? He is a UFA after the year. Yes, he could get "tagged" but the Packers also need to address Finley and Wells. The team is more likely to tag Finley than Flynn, imo.

When I first brought up the point of tagging Flynn, I included that I thought they might be more inclined to sign Finley now instead of having to use the tag on him. If they don't sign Finley, then yes, I do believe they tag him first.

 

[jon_mx]

The two leading contenders for Flynn:

1. The Bengals hold two first-round picks in this year’s draft, and three picks within the first two rounds of the 2013 NFL draft.

2. The Browns now hold two first-round selections for the 2012 NFL draft

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

The two leading contenders for Flynn:1. The Bengals hold two first-round picks in this year’s draft, and three picks within the first two rounds of the 2013 NFL draft. 2. The Browns now hold two first-round selections for the 2012 NFL draft

The Bengals won't with Andy Dalton performing so well as a rookie.

 

[duaneok66]

The two leading contenders for Flynn:1. The Bengals hold two first-round picks in this year’s draft, and three picks within the first two rounds of the 2013 NFL draft. 2. The Browns now hold two first-round selections for the 2012 NFL draft

The Bengals won't with Andy Dalton performing so well as a rookie.

agreed - don't know where that came from.

 

[Shutout]

Wow, this couldn't have worked out better for Flynn (and me and the other Flynn holders). I'm really excited about his dynasty value because I now know for certain that I am in a position to use a draft pick on one of these QBs in my dynasty or just keep Flynn. But enough about my self-absorbed thoughts, on to follow up on my comments a few weeks ago.

With the showing last year against the Patriots and now this, against a team that had EVERYTHING to play for, the ONLY thing I see holding Flynn back is teams MIGHT still be looking at how Kolb worked out for the Cards and be leery. But I give that a slight pass because of the lack of off season and Kolb going to a completely different system.

But how that DOES play into things: I really thought in the past that The Redskins would be set on drafting a QB and I still think that. I don't think Shanahan can check his ego at the door long enough to pass on hand selecting a QB. So I thought this would come down to Miami or Seattle and either would put their WRs on major value boost.

I still see those two as options but now have to really think about Cleveland (not my favorite but when teams are looking at transitioning similar offenses, it makes more real life sense). The darkhorse: New York Jets. It is a wild and unlikely long shot for sure, but there has been just enough questioning of Sanchez lately to make a team entertain the thought and the two teams have some connections if it came down to a trade.

Overall though, I can't see the Packers franchising him so that should leave Flynn free to sign with whomever he wants so who knows; he may be in Jacksonville for all we know but I think he may look at Miami, depending on who takes over there, and see a nice fit.

 

[jon_mx]

The two leading contenders for Flynn:1. The Bengals hold two first-round picks in this year’s draft, and three picks within the first two rounds of the 2013 NFL draft. 2. The Browns now hold two first-round selections for the 2012 NFL draft

The Bengals won't with Andy Dalton performing so well as a rookie.

agreed - don't know where that came from.

That was based solely on who was in the best position to give up draft picks, not necessarily need. You are probably right, Cinci won't be looking for a QB next year.

 

[pittstownkiller]

If GB franchises Flynn and no one takes him, he would make more than Rodgers, correct; that would be interesting.

 

[Sabertooth]

If GB franchises Flynn and no one takes him, he would make more than Rodgers, correct; that would be interesting.

I think Rodgers could deal with that. They are good friend. They have hands on each others' legs in the team photo.

 

[cstu]

If GB franchises Flynn and no one takes him, he would make more than Rodgers, correct; that would be interesting.

I think Rodgers could deal with that. They are good friend. They have hands on each others' legs in the team photo.

At least they weren't holding hands - that would be weird.

 

[Kitrick Taylor]

Where is the talk of trading picks for Flynn coming from? He is a UFA after the year. Yes, he could get "tagged" but the Packers also need to address Finley and Wells. The team is more likely to tag Finley than Flynn, imo.

When I first brought up the point of tagging Flynn, I included that I thought they might be more inclined to sign Finley now instead of having to use the tag on him. If they don't sign Finley, then yes, I do believe they tag him first.

If a team (such as the Browns) wanted to assure themselves of getting Flynn, they could come to terms with the Packers on trade compensation before the Packers exercise the franchise tag. A behind the scenes kind of agreement. Much like what probably happened with Cassel.Mike Holmgren and Ted Thompson have worked together for a long time in the past, both in GB and Seattle. It would also be in Flynns best interst to go to a team running the WCO. Seems like a win-win-win scenario to me.Incidentally, anybody know the rules on when teams can trade again? Is it possible for the Packers to tag Flynn, accept a trade for him, then slap the tag on Finley or Wells?

 

[Sabertooth]

Where is the talk of trading picks for Flynn coming from? He is a UFA after the year. Yes, he could get "tagged" but the Packers also need to address Finley and Wells. The team is more likely to tag Finley than Flynn, imo.

Not sure about Finley. He's good. But he had a ton of drops after getting mouthy about not being used.

 

[Sudoku_in_the_Bathtub]

Where is the talk of trading picks for Flynn coming from? He is a UFA after the year. Yes, he could get "tagged" but the Packers also need to address Finley and Wells.

Fairly simple really.Franchise Flynn. Get pick(s) for him -- worst case is 2nd+. Either sign Finley long term (coming off down year) or draft his replacement (who they'll pay peanuts)This team already won a Super Bowl w/o Finley. And he was far less than impressive this year.GB's built through the draft and franchising Flynn will continue with that. There's zero risk franchising Flynn (that's what I'm most confused about.....someone will trade & sign him long term). Kolb did a nice Trent Edwards impersonation in 2010 & even with no offseason, landed a huge contract (and great return for Philly)

 

[Sabertooth]

Where is the talk of trading picks for Flynn coming from? He is a UFA after the year. Yes, he could get "tagged" but the Packers also need to address Finley and Wells.

Fairly simple really.Franchise Flynn. Get pick(s) for him -- worst case is 2nd+. Either sign Finley long term (coming off down year) or draft his replacement (who they'll pay peanuts)This team already won a Super Bowl w/o Finley. And he was far less than impressive this year.GB's built through the draft and franchising Flynn will continue with that. There's zero risk franchising Flynn (that's what I'm most confused about.....someone will trade & sign him long term). Kolb did a nice Trent Edwards impersonation in 2010 & even with no offseason, landed a huge contract (and great return for Philly)

Agree with all of this.

 

[Abraham]

Not to steer this in another direction, but Kolb wasn't that bad all things considered (injuries, short offseason). I actually think he is a great buy-low candidate.

 

[Multiple Scores]

Green Bay ain't getting jack squat for him. If they franchise him let him make more than Rodgers on the bench, that would destroy that team.

 

[Kitrick Taylor]

Where is the talk of trading picks for Flynn coming from? He is a UFA after the year. Yes, he could get "tagged" but the Packers also need to address Finley and Wells.

Fairly simple really.Franchise Flynn. Get pick(s) for him -- worst case is 2nd+. Either sign Finley long term (coming off down year) or draft his replacement (who they'll pay peanuts)This team already won a Super Bowl w/o Finley. And he was far less than impressive this year.GB's built through the draft and franchising Flynn will continue with that. There's zero risk franchising Flynn (that's what I'm most confused about.....someone will trade & sign him long term). Kolb did a nice Trent Edwards impersonation in 2010 & even with no offseason, landed a huge contract (and great return for Philly)

Agree with all of this.

I'll add that the Packers have drafted 4 TEs in the last two drafts. All of whom made the team this year. i.e the Packers have rostered 5 TEs for most of the season. (until Quarless got hurt). Also consider that even though Driver is likely to retire after this season, Cobb looks like he will be able to fill that role quite nicely. Jennings, Nelson, Cobb, Jones and Gurley are likely the WR crew next year. Even if the Packers downgrade the TE position from Finley to DJ Williams or Quarless, I think this offense will continue to hum along just fine.

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

Where is the talk of trading picks for Flynn coming from? He is a UFA after the year. Yes, he could get "tagged" but the Packers also need to address Finley and Wells.

Fairly simple really.Franchise Flynn. Get pick(s) for him -- worst case is 2nd+. Either sign Finley long term (coming off down year) or draft his replacement (who they'll pay peanuts)

This team already won a Super Bowl w/o Finley. And he was far less than impressive this year.

GB's built through the draft and franchising Flynn will continue with that. There's zero risk franchising Flynn (that's what I'm most confused about.....someone will trade & sign him long term). Kolb did a nice Trent Edwards impersonation in 2010 & even with no offseason, landed a huge contract (and great return for Philly)

Here's the flaw in the theory. The rest of the NFL knows the Packers can't keep both him and Rodgers, so why would they trade anything for him?Teams that need a QB:

-Washington

-Seattle

-Miami

-Cleveland

-Indy

Available options at QB:

-Andrew Luck

-Robert Griffin III

-Peyton Manning

-Matt Flynn

Seattle may or may not stick with Jackson because they spent a lot of money last offseason for a bunch of weapons. I don't see them spending draft picks + money for another QB.

Indy is drafting Luck

Cleveland has Holmgren who hasn't historically given up much in terms of the QB position. Traded for Matt Hasselbeck and drafted Colt McCoy later in the draft.

Miami trades for QB's often

Washington spends like nobody's business.

However, Peyton Manning will be available just like Matt Flynn. Manning drives down the leverage that people think GB has versus the league.

 

[Sudoku_in_the_Bathtub]

Not to steer this in another direction, but Kolb wasn't that bad all things considered (injuries, short offseason). I actually think he is a great buy-low candidate.

Kolb was brutal. Absolutely ####### brutal this year.His numbers sucked....and he played far worse than those indicate.Buy low -- Sure, if plan on making him your QB3. Value him no differently than Chad Henne/Jason Campbell coming this year. Simply put, he's a stopgap.He's no Kyle Lowry for sure.

 

[Sudoku_in_the_Bathtub]

Here's the flaw in the theory. The rest of the NFL knows the Packers can't keep both him and Rodgers, so why would they trade anything for him?However, Peyton Manning will be available just like Matt Flynn. Manning drives down the leverage that people think GB has versus the league.

And the NFL knew likewise with Brady/Cassell, Vick/Kolb. Teams dealt for them because they had a huge need....and felt it'd make THEIR team better.Until Manning becomes available, silly to assume it IMO.

 

[ninerfanatic492000]

The next Cassel ?

thats hoyer

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

Here's the flaw in the theory. The rest of the NFL knows the Packers can't keep both him and Rodgers, so why would they trade anything for him?However, Peyton Manning will be available just like Matt Flynn. Manning drives down the leverage that people think GB has versus the league.

And the NFL knew likewise with Brady/Cassell, Vick/Kolb. Teams dealt for them because they had a huge need....and felt it'd make THEIR team better.Until Manning becomes available, silly to assume it IMO.

You don't think Manning will be available?Also, am I crazy to assume Manning is more valuable than Flynn? That's why I think it pushes down his value.I agree that Brady/Cassel, Vick/Kolb were similar. But a tag of $13 million wasn't placed on their heads I didn't think. Kolb was overpaid for, but Cassel performed for an entire season.

 

[Sabertooth]

Green Bay ain't getting jack squat for him. If they franchise him let him make more than Rodgers on the bench, that would destroy that team.

Please tell us more. You are so insightful.

 

[Sabertooth]

Here's the flaw in the theory. The rest of the NFL knows the Packers can't keep both him and Rodgers, so why would they trade anything for him?However, Peyton Manning will be available just like Matt Flynn. Manning drives down the leverage that people think GB has versus the league.

And the NFL knew likewise with Brady/Cassell, Vick/Kolb. Teams dealt for them because they had a huge need....and felt it'd make THEIR team better.Until Manning becomes available, silly to assume it IMO.

You don't think Manning will be available?Also, am I crazy to assume Manning is more valuable than Flynn? That's why I think it pushes down his value.I agree that Brady/Cassel, Vick/Kolb were similar. But a tag of $13 million wasn't placed on their heads I didn't think. Kolb was overpaid for, but Cassel performed for an entire season.

We don't know anything about Manning really. He may have already played his last snap. He may be the Colts QB. He may be cut. He may be trade bait. We just don't know.

 

[Kitrick Taylor]

Just posted this in another thread, but I thinks its also relevant here:

This is from todays Milwaukee Journal:

One prominent agent who has represented a franchise player said that he thinks the Packers could get a first-round pick at the minimum for Flynn and maybe first- and third-round picks. He said the desire for a franchise quarterback is so great that teams would be willing to pay a lot to obtain a polished product like Flynn.

This is from football outsiders: (They present a very good case on why they feel this way as well.)

Flynn is 26 years old and has four years of apprenticeship in one of the best offenses in the league. His ceiling is Hall of Famer; his realistic floor is something at least close to a Pro Bowler. That's got to be worth more than an unproven rookie, doesn't it?



If the Packers can get a first round pick or more for Flynn, they'd be crazy not to franchise him. They can still transition tag either Wells or Finley, and could also sign either/both as they choose. (although the tag gives them more leverage.)

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

Here's the flaw in the theory. The rest of the NFL knows the Packers can't keep both him and Rodgers, so why would they trade anything for him?However, Peyton Manning will be available just like Matt Flynn. Manning drives down the leverage that people think GB has versus the league.

And the NFL knew likewise with Brady/Cassell, Vick/Kolb. Teams dealt for them because they had a huge need....and felt it'd make THEIR team better.Until Manning becomes available, silly to assume it IMO.

You don't think Manning will be available?Also, am I crazy to assume Manning is more valuable than Flynn? That's why I think it pushes down his value.I agree that Brady/Cassel, Vick/Kolb were similar. But a tag of $13 million wasn't placed on their heads I didn't think. Kolb was overpaid for, but Cassel performed for an entire season.

We don't know anything about Manning really. He may have already played his last snap. He may be the Colts QB. He may be cut. He may be trade bait. We just don't know.

We don't know anything about Matt Flynn either, that's why we're in here discussing it.I don't think Peyton is done and I don't think they can pay him that $26 million bonus in march either on a rebuilding team. Therefore, I conclude that he will be available.

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

Just posted this in another thread, but I thinks its also relevant here:

This is from todays Milwaukee Journal:

One prominent agent who has represented a franchise player said that he thinks the Packers could get a first-round pick at the minimum for Flynn and maybe first- and third-round picks. He said the desire for a franchise quarterback is so great that teams would be willing to pay a lot to obtain a polished product like Flynn.

This is from football outsiders: (They present a very good case on why they feel this way as well.)

Flynn is 26 years old and has four years of apprenticeship in one of the best offenses in the league. His ceiling is Hall of Famer; his realistic floor is something at least close to a Pro Bowler. That's got to be worth more than an unproven rookie, doesn't it?



If the Packers can get a first round pick or more for Flynn, they'd be crazy not to franchise him. They can still transition tag either Wells or Finley, and could also sign either/both as they choose. (although the tag gives them more leverage.)

The value on a franchise QB is high. But it's extremely low on a RB.

 

[Hoosier16]

Just posted this in another thread, but I thinks its also relevant here:

This is from todays Milwaukee Journal:

One prominent agent who has represented a franchise player said that he thinks the Packers could get a first-round pick at the minimum for Flynn and maybe first- and third-round picks. He said the desire for a franchise quarterback is so great that teams would be willing to pay a lot to obtain a polished product like Flynn.

This is from football outsiders: (They present a very good case on why they feel this way as well.)

Flynn is 26 years old and has four years of apprenticeship in one of the best offenses in the league. His ceiling is Hall of Famer; his realistic floor is something at least close to a Pro Bowler. That's got to be worth more than an unproven rookie, doesn't it?



If the Packers can get a first round pick or more for Flynn, they'd be crazy not to franchise him. They can still transition tag either Wells or Finley, and could also sign either/both as they choose. (although the tag gives them more leverage.)

How can anyone call him "polished" or say "his realistic floor is something at least close to a pro bowler"? He's got 132 career attempts!

 

[Dr. Awesome]

I'm surprised no one has mentioned SF as a possible landing spot. They have just about every piece of the puzzle besides a QB. And I think many feel that Alex Smith is not the long term answer. If they stumble in the playoffs (especially against a team like New Orleans) I think the Niners have to be linked to him in some way.

They have lots of a cap room, need a QB with potential that can win now, and have a former QB for a coach. They'd be stupid to not consider it wouldn't they?

Are they going to give up on the 36th overall pick that quickly? Kaepernick seemed like an intelligent kid, would think he would have things figured out by next season

If they believe Kaepernick is less than what they thought when they drafted him and they also think Flynn is a stud, then why wouldn't they bail on their second round pick? No sense in holding onto a lost cause simply because he's a fairly high pick (see Taylor Mays). While there are very legitimate excuses, Kaepernick did not look good in the preseason.

Kaepernick was never considered NFL ready (especially with minimal off season), but has loads of upside. Taylor Mays was picked by the previous staff so I am not sure how that compares.

I said there were legitimate reasons for him not looking good last year. The Taylor Mays example is just to show a team won't hold onto a guy once they see he's a bust. If they felt Kaepernick were a bust (from seeing him in practice), I highly doubt this regime would hesitate to cut ties.

 

[Luke Skywalker]

How can anyone call him "polished" or say "his realistic floor is something at least close to a pro bowler"? He's got 132 career attempts!

Agreed. These are ridiculous assumptions. Especially when you consider he is likely to go to a very bad team.

 

[Sabertooth]

Here's the flaw in the theory. The rest of the NFL knows the Packers can't keep both him and Rodgers, so why would they trade anything for him?However, Peyton Manning will be available just like Matt Flynn. Manning drives down the leverage that people think GB has versus the league.

And the NFL knew likewise with Brady/Cassell, Vick/Kolb. Teams dealt for them because they had a huge need....and felt it'd make THEIR team better.Until Manning becomes available, silly to assume it IMO.

You don't think Manning will be available?Also, am I crazy to assume Manning is more valuable than Flynn? That's why I think it pushes down his value.I agree that Brady/Cassel, Vick/Kolb were similar. But a tag of $13 million wasn't placed on their heads I didn't think. Kolb was overpaid for, but Cassel performed for an entire season.

We don't know anything about Manning really. He may have already played his last snap. He may be the Colts QB. He may be cut. He may be trade bait. We just don't know.

We don't know anything about Matt Flynn either, that's why we're in here discussing it.I don't think Peyton is done and I don't think they can pay him that $26 million bonus in march either on a rebuilding team. Therefore, I conclude that he will be available.

Ok. Your opinion though. We don't know any of that. He might be done. He is still a Colt. Team owner has not stated he is available.

 

[Kitrick Taylor]

How can anyone call him "polished" or say "his realistic floor is something at least close to a pro bowler"? He's got 132 career attempts!

Agreed. These are ridiculous assumptions. Especially when you consider he is likely to go to a very bad team.

Those are not my words. They are from a "prominent agent" and Football outsiders. I don't make my living having anything to do with the NFL. But people that do, and people that cover the game for a living are generating a lot of stir over Flynn.

Just because he was a relative unknown to most casual observers doesn't mean he can't be highly valued by NFL teams. If Shanahan evaluates the tape and thinks Flynn would be a better fit for his team than RGIII or Landry Jones, why wouldn't he make a strong play to get him?

Peter King also tweeted after the game. Luck, RGIII, Flynn. Not necessarily in that order.

This was just posted on Rotoworld:

According to ESPN 980 Washington's Chris Russell, impending free agent Matt Flynn's six-touchdown Week 17 game "generated a lot of buzz and positive chatter" in the Redskins' organization.

The Redskins might be the Packers' ideal target for a sign-and-trade scenario if Flynn is indeed franchise tagged, because Washington has a documented history of making blockbuster-type moves. They've been much more well-run since GM Bruce Allen came into the picture two years ago, however. Flynn does make sense in D.C. because of his familiarity with a West Coast-style system.

 

[Luke Skywalker]

How can anyone call him "polished" or say "his realistic floor is something at least close to a pro bowler"? He's got 132 career attempts!

Agreed. These are ridiculous assumptions. Especially when you consider he is likely to go to a very bad team.

Those are not my words. They are from a "prominent agent" and Football outsiders. I don't make my living having anything to do with the NFL. But people that do, and people that cover the game for a living are generating a lot of stir over Flynn.

Just because he was a relative unknown to most casual observers doesn't mean he can't be highly valued by NFL teams. If Shanahan evaluates the tape and thinks Flynn would be a better fit for his team than RGIII or Landry Jones, why wouldn't he make a strong play to get him?

Peter King also tweeted after the game. Luck, RGIII, Flynn. Not necessarily in that order.

This was just posted on Rotoworld:

According to ESPN 980 Washington's Chris Russell, impending free agent Matt Flynn's six-touchdown Week 17 game "generated a lot of buzz and positive chatter" in the Redskins' organization.

The Redskins might be the Packers' ideal target for a sign-and-trade scenario if Flynn is indeed franchise tagged, because Washington has a documented history of making blockbuster-type moves. They've been much more well-run since GM Bruce Allen came into the picture two years ago, however. Flynn does make sense in D.C. because of his familiarity with a West Coast-style system.

Well, if Peter King and the Redskins think so.....

 

[pittstownkiller]

Does anyone know if GB can franchise him if the resulting salary (top-5 QB) pushes them over the cap-limit, even if they plan to trade him?

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

What about Baltimore/NYJ as potential landing spots for Flynn?

Both teams are in a win now mode and both teams have spent 3 years waiting for their QB to develop. However, Flacco/Sanchez have proven to not be the answer.

 

[Hoosier16]

Does anyone know if GB can franchise him if the resulting salary (top-5 QB) pushes them over the cap-limit, even if they plan to trade him?

I wouldn't think the cap limits would be in effect until the season began.

 

[Hoosier16]

What about Baltimore/NYJ as potential landing spots for Flynn?Both teams are in a win now mode and both teams have spent 3 years waiting for their QB to develop. However, Flacco/Sanchez have proven to not be the answer.

Do you really think Flynn is more developed than Flacco?

 

[The Hank]

I think GB would be more likely to use transition tag on Flynn; he wont get paid big starter $$$ so there is a chance they can match contract that a team that will make that would be franchise type $$$

 

[benson_will_lead_the_way]

What about Baltimore/NYJ as potential landing spots for Flynn?Both teams are in a win now mode and both teams have spent 3 years waiting for their QB to develop. However, Flacco/Sanchez have proven to not be the answer.

Do you really think Flynn is more developed than Flacco?

I can't come to that conclusion. But I can come to the conclusion that Joe Flacco is not a very good QB.

 

[DoubleG]

How can anyone call him "polished" or say "his realistic floor is something at least close to a pro bowler"? He's got 132 career attempts!

Agreed. These are ridiculous assumptions. Especially when you consider he is likely to go to a very bad team.

Those are not my words. They are from a "prominent agent" and Football outsiders.

Matt Flynn's agent???Oh lord...