What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

maurice stovall (1 Viewer)

Jackal

Footballguy
since his position has been changed? bloom called him a middling talent for fantasy. does this change raise his appeal since they think of him as a number 1?

Rookie WR Maurice Stovall is working as the Bucs flanker.

Stovall was a split end in college coach Charlie Weis' offense but the Bucs see him as a No. 1 receiver type. Flanker is considered the top receiver position in Jon Gruden's offense.

Source: Tampa Tribune

 
since his position has been changed? bloom called him a middling talent for fantasy. does this change raise his appeal since they think of him as a number 1?

Rookie WR Maurice Stovall is working as the Bucs flanker.

Stovall was a split end in college coach Charlie Weis' offense but the Bucs see him as a No. 1 receiver type. Flanker is considered the top receiver position in Jon Gruden's offense.

Source: Tampa Tribune
No, but it makes me question Michael Clayton and every other youngish WR in Tampa. Galloway gets a pass.
 
Any WR has a good chance in a WCO. I don't think he's all that great but he sure landed in a good spot.

 
He was known as Stonehands until his senior year. He's sure made quite a jump if this is true.

He'll be a possession type receiver in the NFL. He'll be that guy who'll go over the middle and use his frame to box out DBs and get the tough yards. By no means is he a speedster.

If Gruden and company can keep developing what Weis and Ianello fostered his senior year I think he can be a solid performer for the Bucs.

As for fantasy I wouldn't expect a guy who gets too many yards after the catch. Think more along the lines of the guy who'll get lots of 1 catch for 8 yards and the 3rd and goal fade lobs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top