mr fancypants
Footballguy
Harry I could believe, but Meghan's relishing in the spotlight.The whole point is they ARE trying to go away. The royal family and tabloids won't leave them alone.
Harry I could believe, but Meghan's relishing in the spotlight.The whole point is they ARE trying to go away. The royal family and tabloids won't leave them alone.
Could be, I'm not familiar with their situation. But Harry seeing his mother die fleeing from the paparazzi makes me believe they both know what's at stake. And Diana didn't have to deal with the added toxicity that is racist British media. To be treated as a lesser human because you were born with more melanin.Harry I could believe, but Meghan's relishing in the spotlight.
The same reason we care about the Kardasians, Taylor Swift, etc.this country cares why? look, i understand harry’s mom died, but i think many other people have also had a parent pass.
Agreed - people have been obsessed with the Royal Family for ages. I guess many like to like vicariously and fantasize about a world that, on the surface at least, seems so glamorous.I dunno, why do you care about football? People like what they like and the royals have been a topic of conversation for centuries now. It’s weird to me people are constantly surprised by this.
I don’t understand that either.The same reason we care about the Kardasians, Taylor Swift, etc.
Plenty of people wouldn’t understand why people play fantasy sports or post on message boards. Different strokes . . .DocHolliday said:I don’t understand that either.
And the "firm" won't pay for their securityThe Z Machine said:The British royal family sucks, tabloids suck, some royals are racist, and Meghan was suicidal at one point.
Oh, and Charles wouldn't take calls from his son for some time period.
So they want out but still want the perks? Makes sense.And the "firm" won't pay for their security
Yep, one could just as easily make the point about why people care so much about Tom Brady or LeBron James. Cheering on millionaires and buying overpriced tickets from billionaires who use our tax money to build their stadiums.Capella said:I dunno, why do you care about football? People like what they like and the royals have been a topic of conversation for centuries now. It’s weird to me people are constantly surprised by this.
And the "firm" won't pay for their security
Interesting dynamic there. I don't really care one way or the other aside from Harry's service in the army, props for that. Can you imagine the security though? Royals that aren't royal any longer but can't ever not be royals because if they got kidnapped, imagine what would happen? Like I said, interesting dynamic.So they want out but still want the perks? Makes sense.
Basically it comes down to, they bring in more money to England than they are paid. The country benefits from having them.Alex P Keaton said:I’m not surprised. I just don’t understand it. The royals should have been booted out decades ago.
But keep in mind this is one side of the story. I seriously doubt its this cut and dry or even if its legit or not. Sounds incredibly suspect.From what I understand, they left after security was denied for their baby, the first multi-race royal baby. I mean, what were they supposed to do at that point?
so they a "sit down" with Oprah? i mean, people kind of hang on oprah's every word here. remember the time she made a speech and that qualified her to be president?EYLive said:The whole point is they ARE trying to go away. The royal family and tabloids won't leave them alone.
Well Harry backed it up and I can’t believe that guy would openly lie about his future king dad like that.But keep in mind this is one side of the story. I seriously doubt its this cut and dry or even if its legit or not. Sounds incredibly suspect.
Well they didn't get a penny for the interviews and in the past 6mths have signed a Netflix and Spotify deal worth ~60M.My wife had this on last night, and I missed most of it. But one moment I caught was Oprah starting to ask a question and then kind of emphasizes "you" to Meghan. I don't even remember what the question was about. But the totally FAKE reaction to being asked the question that Meghan had was borderline comical. I am sure there is some truth to what was said, but some of this should not have been a surprise to her at all. And if they just wanted freedom from the press to go do what they want, there is no reason to go on national TV and talk about your family like this. This isn't Diana (non-blood relative alone) or some lower royal -- this is the queen's grandson. Totally a money grab to keep their names in the news.
If Harry had gone right to the police, this never would have happened.Pretty sure she’s got Harry sprung.
That may be their plan but she is never going to be insignificant lol. She’s one of the most popular people in the world right now.It feels like she got into this whole relationship with the intent of undermining the royal family and making them implode....and she's off to a pretty good start.
That family is so teflon, they'll likely just sit back with their mouths shut and wait for her to be insignificant so let's see what she has lined up for the next round.
Anybody that grew up in any type of "family business" and got out, can relate...The Duff Man said:Per my wife “this is her Super Bowl”. Her mom was a big royal follower and she hasn’t followed suit (thank god) but she was excited for this.
I believe everything that was said. The royals have a symbiotic relationship with British media. They need them to remain relevant, but hate them at the same time.
That whole “institution” seems archaic and messed up so don’t mind seeing it get knocked down a bit.
One thing not mentioned above. Harry said he was trapped and is now free. He said his dad and brother are trapped and don’t even know it, just like he used to be. Thought that was interesting and rang true.
The royals are a pretty big income generator for the UK.Alex P Keaton said:I’m not surprised. I just don’t understand it. The royals should have been booted out decades ago.
Yeah, you said "may have" but lets not get crazy loose with the facts. Less than 20M watched this. The SB gets about 100M.Anarchy99 said:Clearly people care. More people may have watched their interview than watched the SB. Can’t explain why, but the world is a pretty big place and the Royal Family is big news in many other places.
A lot of these are general, but serious charges like this need to be backed up. I assume there was no specifics on this part, just a woe is me story?The Z Machine said:The British royal family sucks, tabloids suck, some royals are racist, and Meghan was suicidal at one point.
Not sure why you'd assume that. Meghan claimed (and Harry backed up) that someone(s) in the royal family speculated on how dark her baby's skin would be and how that would look. Terrible, terrible comment. I don't think that's a "woe is me" story at all.A lot of these are general, but serious charges like this need to be backed up. I assume there was no specifics on this part, just a woe is me story?
Wrong assumption. She gave details.A lot of these are general, but serious charges like this need to be backed up. I assume there was no specifics on this part, just a woe is me story?
She can say whatever she wants the crown will never respondWrong assumption. She gave details.
Harry confirmed it. They wouldn’t say the name. You can believe it or not, I truly don’t care.Cool - which royal said that?
Of course he confirmed itHarry confirmed it. They wouldn’t say the name. You can believe it or not, I truly don’t care.
I will say thinking Harry would go on worldwide tv and lie about his family like that is a pretty big leap.
Probably not. Odd thing to say, too. When you look at that couple you have to think is that they are very likely going to have some pretty good looking kids.Harry confirmed it. They wouldn’t say the name. You can believe it or not, I truly don’t care.
I will say thinking Harry would go on worldwide tv and lie about his family like that is a pretty big leap.
2. "It looks like the kind of thing my daughter would bring back from her school art lessons," he muttered while being shown Ethiopian art in 1965.
7. "If you stay here much longer you will all be slitty-eyed," the Prince told British exchange students who lived in Xian in 1986. When asked on his opinion of Beijing, he replied: "Ghastly."
8. "If it has four legs and it is not a chair, if it has two wings and flies but is not an aeroplane, and if it swims and it is not a submarine, the Cantonese will eat it." Again with the Chinese insults, when he addressed a World Wildlife Fund meeting in 1986.
11. "You can't have been here that long — you haven't got a pot belly," he told a British tourist during a visit to Budapest in 1993.
12. "Aren't most of you descended from pirates?," he enquired to an islander while in the Cayman Islands in 1994.
15. "You managed not to get eaten then?" the Prince asked a British student who had been trekking in Papua New Guinea, in 1998.
19. "Do you still throw spears at each other?" he asked a group of Indigenous Australians in 2002, while on a visit to Australia with the Queen.
20. "So who's on drugs here?... He looks as if he's on drugs," he said of a 14-year-old boy while at a Bangladeshi youth club in 2002.
21. "You look like you're ready for bed!" he told the President of Nigeria in 2003, who was dressed in traditional robes.
Is that really racist? People always wonder what color hair or eyes a baby would have. I imagine many biracial couples also wonder how dark the babies skin will be.Not sure why you'd assume that. Meghan claimed (and Harry backed up) that someone(s) in the royal family speculated on how dark her baby's skin would be and how that would look. Terrible, terrible comment. I don't think that's a "woe is me" story at all.
Harry, the same guy who wore a Nazi costume at a Halloween partyHarry confirmed it. They wouldn’t say the name. You can believe it or not, I truly don’t care.
I will say thinking Harry would go on worldwide tv and lie about his family like that is a pretty big leap.
Don't lump Taylor Swift into this realm. She's earned everything she has in life.FairWarning said:The same reason we care about the Kardasians, Taylor Swift, etc.
We'll have to see what the global numbers are. The total probably is less than the hype they gave it (and thus less than the SB), but in other countries it was probably more of interest than American football. It probably won't get near 140-150 million global viewers like the SB, but I think it still will be one of the most watched programs of the year.Yeah, you said "may have" but lets not get crazy loose with the facts. Less than 20M watched this. The SB gets about 100M.
Swift in regards to her personal life.Don't lump Taylor Swift into this realm. She's earned everything she has in life.
Them and James Bond.The royals are a pretty big income generator for the UK.
Gotcha. Thought maybe you were comparing her to the Kardashians who have money in fame for reasons I don't understand.Swift in regards to her personal life.
"Right now". The Royal Family has their sights set on longer timelines than what's trending on TMZ this morning.That may be their plan but she is never going to be insignificant lol. She’s one of the most popular people in the world right now.
Harry doesn't mind if he doesn't make the scenemr fancypants said:Harry I could believe, but Meghan's relishing in the spotlight.EYLive said:The whole point is they ARE trying to go away. The royal family and tabloids won't leave them alone.