What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

members of West Memphis 3 released (1 Viewer)

Lieutenant Dan

Footballguy
http://www.wmctv.com...-west-memphis-3

JONESBORO, AR - (WMC-TV) - The father of one of the boys brutally killed in West Memphis in 1993 told Action News 5 that two of the men convicted will be released during a hearing Friday.

Thursday afternoon, Action News 5 learned that all three men convicted in the infamous murder left a Super Max prison with all their belongings. The men were placed in the custody of Craighead County officers ahead of Friday's hearing in a Jonesboro courtroom.

Craighead County Circuit Judge David Laser's office on Thursday said that Damien Echols, Jessie Misskelley and Jason Baldwin will be in court Friday in Jonesboro. Laser's office refused to release any more details about the hearing. A gag order issued by Laser in April prohibits attorneys from talking to reporters.

The three men were convicted in 1994 of killing Stevie Branch, Christopher Byers and Michael Moore and leaving their bound bodies in a water-filled ditch in West Memphis. Echols was sentenced to death while Misskelley and Baldwin received life sentences.

The three have each asked for a new trial on the grounds that DNA evidence exonerates them.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
if they're ever set free I hope the sue the ever lovin hell out of the #######s who locked them up.

 
http://www.wreg.com/news/wreg-west-memphis-3-freed,0,5347577.story

UPDATE:

[*]All three will admit guilt to the crime and two will be released with time served

[*]Steve Branch, the father of one of the victims tells us Damien Echols will be one of the men released

(Memphis 8/18/2011) WREG-TV has learned an agreement has been reached to release two of the West Memphis 3.

Multiple sources, including the father of one of the victims, have confirmed this will be announced at a special hearing Friday.

That hearing is scheduled to be held in Jonesboro, AR.

Damien Echols was sentenced to death, Jessie Misskelley, Jr. was sentenced to life imprisonment plus two 20-year sentences, and Jason Baldwin was sentenced to life imprisonment.
WAT?
 
http://www.wreg.com/news/wreg-west-memphis-3-freed,0,5347577.story

UPDATE:

[*]All three will admit guilt to the crime and two will be released with time served

[*]Steve Branch, the father of one of the victims tells us Damien Echols will be one of the men released

(Memphis 8/18/2011) WREG-TV has learned an agreement has been reached to release two of the West Memphis 3.

Multiple sources, including the father of one of the victims, have confirmed this will be announced at a special hearing Friday.

That hearing is scheduled to be held in Jonesboro, AR.

Damien Echols was sentenced to death, Jessie Misskelley, Jr. was sentenced to life imprisonment plus two 20-year sentences, and Jason Baldwin was sentenced to life imprisonment.
WAT?
Just coming to post that too - seems odd, given all they have fought for these years, with no DNA evidence tying them to the crime.

 
http://www.wreg.com/...0,5347577.story

UPDATE:

[*]All three will admit guilt to the crime and two will be released with time served

[*]Steve Branch, the father of one of the victims tells us Damien Echols will be one of the men released

(Memphis 8/18/2011) WREG-TV has learned an agreement has been reached to release two of the West Memphis 3.

Multiple sources, including the father of one of the victims, have confirmed this will be announced at a special hearing Friday.

That hearing is scheduled to be held in Jonesboro, AR.

Damien Echols was sentenced to death, Jessie Misskelley, Jr. was sentenced to life imprisonment plus two 20-year sentences, and Jason Baldwin was sentenced to life imprisonment.
WAT?
Just coming to post that too - seems odd, given all they have fought for these years, with no DNA evidence tying them to the crime.
maybe by agreeing to this they get out now, but can't sue for anything? :shrug:

 
Defense attorneys claim new DNA tests show biological materials collected at the crime scene do not match Echols, Baldwin or Misskelley. They also say they have other new evidence that disproves theories prosecutors presented at the men’s trials.In November, the Arkansas Supreme Court ordered a new evidentiary hearing in the case based on the new evidence. That hearing is set for Dec. 5.Lonnie Soury, a press representative for the defendants, said today he could not discuss the subject of the hearing but said that “we’re optimistic.”“There’s tremendous evidence of their innocence,” Soury said. “New DNA, new witnesses, new forensic evidence.”
:shuked:Maybe this will simply eliminate the need for a re-trial. But this sounds a little fishy.
 
Looking over some old stories - the DNA evidence does not really exonerate the WM3. It just shows that teh DNA of someone else was there, and that none of the evidence tested contained their DNA - so it not like a rape kit where the DNS does not match.

The DA still vigorously opposes even a new trial, so maybe this was just a plea bargain that allows the DA to save face, but the defendants to go free. Not sure why it would be 2 out of 3 though, unless there were other issues with the third defendant.

 
Looking over some old stories - the DNA evidence does not really exonerate the WM3. It just shows that teh DNA of someone else was there, and that none of the evidence tested contained their DNA - so it not like a rape kit where the DNS does not match.The DA still vigorously opposes even a new trial, so maybe this was just a plea bargain that allows the DA to save face, but the defendants to go free. Not sure why it would be 2 out of 3 though, unless there were other issues with the third defendant.
maybe because Echols got the death penalty and the others didn't.ETA - looks like they are saying that Echols will be one of the two released, so I guess that's not the reason.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
http://www.wreg.com/news/wreg-west-memphis-3-freed,0,5347577.story

UPDATE:

[*]All three will admit guilt to the crime and two will be released with time served

[*]Steve Branch, the father of one of the victims tells us Damien Echols will be one of the men released

(Memphis 8/18/2011) WREG-TV has learned an agreement has been reached to release two of the West Memphis 3.

Multiple sources, including the father of one of the victims, have confirmed this will be announced at a special hearing Friday.

That hearing is scheduled to be held in Jonesboro, AR.

Damien Echols was sentenced to death, Jessie Misskelley, Jr. was sentenced to life imprisonment plus two 20-year sentences, and Jason Baldwin was sentenced to life imprisonment.
WAT?
Given a choice of freedom vs. spending the rest of your life in jail......some people choose freedom.
 
Looking over some old stories - the DNA evidence does not really exonerate the WM3. It just shows that teh DNA of someone else was there, and that none of the evidence tested contained their DNA - so it not like a rape kit where the DNS does not match.The DA still vigorously opposes even a new trial, so maybe this was just a plea bargain that allows the DA to save face, but the defendants to go free. Not sure why it would be 2 out of 3 though, unless there were other issues with the third defendant.
maybe because Echols got the death penalty and the others didn't.ETA - looks like they are saying that Echols will be one of the two released, so I guess that's not the reason.
If it is 2 of 3, it could be Miskelly that isn't released...possibly because he confessed and pled.Also, the DNA issue is only one of the reasons for the hearing on a new trial...there also is a huge issue over juror misconduct that was to be evaluated by the trial court in December. The juror misconduct claim had legs.
 
Looks like it will be an Alford plea which allows the defendants to maintain innocence, but acknowledge the prosecution has enough evidence to convict.

Really just keeps the defendants from suing the state, and allows the prosecution to save face.

 
Looking over some old stories - the DNA evidence does not really exonerate the WM3. It just shows that teh DNA of someone else was there, and that none of the evidence tested contained their DNA - so it not like a rape kit where the DNS does not match.

The DA still vigorously opposes even a new trial, so maybe this was just a plea bargain that allows the DA to save face, but the defendants to go free. Not sure why it would be 2 out of 3 though, unless there were other issues with the third defendant.
Yeah, Terry Hobbs.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
So they are basically agreeing not to sue the state and In exchange get to go free? How is that justice? They either did it and deserve to be behind bars or try have been falsely imprisoned and deserve to be compensated for their lives being ruined.

 
So they are basically agreeing not to sue the state and In exchange get to go free? How is that justice? They either did it and deserve to be behind bars or try have been falsely imprisoned and deserve to be compensated for their lives being ruined.
Real life is rarely that simple.But I'd agree justice hasn't been served here.
 
So they are basically agreeing not to sue the state and In exchange get to go free? How is that justice? They either did it and deserve to be behind bars or try have been falsely imprisoned and deserve to be compensated for their lives being ruined.
Real life is rarely that simple.But I'd agree justice hasn't been served here.
Yeah. If it were me, I would definitely be pissed, but I would much rather be free than be able to sue.
 
'Bull Dozier said:
'Abraham said:
So they are basically agreeing not to sue the state and In exchange get to go free? How is that justice? They either did it and deserve to be behind bars or try have been falsely imprisoned and deserve to be compensated for their lives being ruined.
Real life is rarely that simple.But I'd agree justice hasn't been served here.
Love the avatar. Carry on.
 
'Ray Karpis said:
'Dan said:
'Sinn Fein said:
Looking over some old stories - the DNA evidence does not really exonerate the WM3. It just shows that teh DNA of someone else was there, and that none of the evidence tested contained their DNA - so it not like a rape kit where the DNS does not match.The DA still vigorously opposes even a new trial, so maybe this was just a plea bargain that allows the DA to save face, but the defendants to go free. Not sure why it would be 2 out of 3 though, unless there were other issues with the third defendant.
maybe because Echols got the death penalty and the others didn't.ETA - looks like they are saying that Echols will be one of the two released, so I guess that's not the reason.
If it is 2 of 3, it could be Miskelly that isn't released...possibly because he confessed and pled.Also, the DNA issue is only one of the reasons for the hearing on a new trial...there also is a huge issue over juror misconduct that was to be evaluated by the trial court in December. The juror misconduct claim had legs.
The local paper says and I quote;"The case against the three was built on the confession of Misskelly, who has been diagnosed as borderline mentally ######ed."Looking at his picture on the front page he appears to have that look.If you looked at all three of their pictures and were told pick one that looks like he might be mentally challenged, he'd be the choice.
 
'Bull Dozier said:
'Abraham said:
So they are basically agreeing not to sue the state and In exchange get to go free? How is that justice? They either did it and deserve to be behind bars or try have been falsely imprisoned and deserve to be compensated for their lives being ruined.
Real life is rarely that simple.But I'd agree justice hasn't been served here.
Love the avatar. Carry on.
:thumbup:
 
What if they did it?
then they should go golfing and look for the "real killers"
I think it was the step-father.
A lot of people do
I have a hard time imgining three independant minds coming together and concluding "yeah, this sounds like a good idea - let's do it." I know groups of people collectively do sick things but this was beyond sick.
not sure any one person could hog-tie three eight year old boys on his own, either. Not impossible, but...
 
What a strange ending to a truly bizarre case. I come down on the side that they got railroaded. Then again, most of my info came from the Paradise Lost documentaries. The lingering issue I face with it is that if these three didn't do it then what explanation is there? The stepfather is most likely, but I doubt he could have pulled all this off by himself. Furthermore, if more then one person was involved (which seems reasonable) then that is a HELL of a secret to have kept for all these years.

 
I'll put Nancy Grace on the case.

oops, sorry Aruba is calling. Much juicier.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What if they did it?
then they should go golfing and look for the "real killers"
I think it was the step-father.
A lot of people do
I have a hard time imgining three independant minds coming together and concluding "yeah, this sounds like a good idea - let's do it." I know groups of people collectively do sick things but this was beyond sick.
not sure any one person could hog-tie three eight year old boys on his own, either. Not impossible, but...
Its been awhile, and I don't remember the extent of the injuries. I thought the lack of blood at the dump site indicated that they were killed somewhere and dumped there. Especially if they knew them, you don't think a 200+ lb man could corner overpower a few boys 1/2 his size?
 
you don't think a 200+ lb man could corner overpower a few boys 1/2 his size?
Not to make light of the situation, but I'm pretty sure we have a pole (or two) around here that got to the bottom of the question above.
 
What if they did it?
then they should go golfing and look for the "real killers"
I think it was the step-father.
A lot of people do
I have a hard time imgining three independant minds coming together and concluding "yeah, this sounds like a good idea - let's do it." I know groups of people collectively do sick things but this was beyond sick.
not sure any one person could hog-tie three eight year old boys on his own, either. Not impossible, but...
Its been awhile, and I don't remember the extent of the injuries. I thought the lack of blood at the dump site indicated that they were killed somewhere and dumped there. Especially if they knew them, you don't think a 200+ lb man could corner overpower a few boys 1/2 his size?
There is hair/dna evidence that puts the step father at the scene - hair in one of the knots on one of the boys, and hair/dna evidence that puts a friend of the step-father at the scene.
 
Why wasn't Damien ever executed?
because apparently, he didn’t do it.
Well, that would be why isn't going to be executed, but that doesn't really answer why he wasn't executed in the past. I doubt they sentenced him to death but said, "But don't actually execute him because he didn't do it."He was on death row for about 20 years? Is that normal?
 
Why wasn't Damien ever executed?
because apparently, he didn’t do it.
Well, that would be why isn't going to be executed, but that doesn't really answer why he wasn't executed in the past. I doubt they sentenced him to death but said, "But don't actually execute him because he didn't do it."He was on death row for about 20 years? Is that normal?
Yea, high profile cases like this can drag out for a long time.
 
'Ray Karpis said:
'Dan said:
'Sinn Fein said:
Looking over some old stories - the DNA evidence does not really exonerate the WM3. It just shows that teh DNA of someone else was there, and that none of the evidence tested contained their DNA - so it not like a rape kit where the DNS does not match.The DA still vigorously opposes even a new trial, so maybe this was just a plea bargain that allows the DA to save face, but the defendants to go free. Not sure why it would be 2 out of 3 though, unless there were other issues with the third defendant.
maybe because Echols got the death penalty and the others didn't.ETA - looks like they are saying that Echols will be one of the two released, so I guess that's not the reason.
If it is 2 of 3, it could be Miskelly that isn't released...possibly because he confessed and pled.Also, the DNA issue is only one of the reasons for the hearing on a new trial...there also is a huge issue over juror misconduct that was to be evaluated by the trial court in December. The juror misconduct claim had legs.
The local paper says and I quote;"The case against the three was built on the confession of Misskelly, who has been diagnosed as borderline mentally ######ed."Looking at his picture on the front page he appears to have that look.If you looked at all three of their pictures and were told pick one that looks like he might be mentally challenged, he'd be the choice.
Yep, and some crucial points of his confession didn't coincide with the facts of the case. For example, Misskelly said WM3 abducted the children in the morning....but the kids were documented in school all day. Stuff like that made his "confession" inadmissible as evidence. It's likely he was berated by authorities and confused into confessing something he didn't do. And, from memory, one of the defense team's biggest issues was they felt the jury knew about the "confession" anyway and it influenced their decision.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In the USA, you can now go free as long as you admit to the killing. We aren't sure if you did it but just admit it and we will let you out and close the case. WTF? This country is just circling the bowl waiting for someone to flush it.

 
http://www.wreg.com/...0,5347577.story

UPDATE:

[*]All three will admit guilt to the crime and two will be released with time served

[*]Steve Branch, the father of one of the victims tells us Damien Echols will be one of the men released

(Memphis 8/18/2011) WREG-TV has learned an agreement has been reached to release two of the West Memphis 3.

Multiple sources, including the father of one of the victims, have confirmed this will be announced at a special hearing Friday.

That hearing is scheduled to be held in Jonesboro, AR.

Damien Echols was sentenced to death, Jessie Misskelley, Jr. was sentenced to life imprisonment plus two 20-year sentences, and Jason Baldwin was sentenced to life imprisonment.
WAT?
The paper got it wrong. They used a rarely used type of plea that allows the defendant to plead guilty without admitting guilt. It is often used in these kind of cases to allow the local cops/courts/prosecutors o save face and to stave off 'wrongful imprisonment' lawsuits etc. It essentially mans "i will take the punishment since I fear that I may be found guilty based on the evidence/whats at stake etc, but i do not acknowledge guilt. It's called an alford plea.

http://en.wikipedia....iki/Alford_plea

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top