What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Mendenhall (1 Viewer)

Have owned Mendenhall since his rookie year. Held last year on small dynasty keeper rosters (we keep 6 of 19 players - QB, 2RB, 2WR, TE, K, D) and I'm leaning towards keeping him again this offseason as a RB4 (Ridley, McFadden, Gore). In a start 2 WR league, WR's aren't that valuable and I'm probably dropping my WR's altogether (Nicks, Cobb). Here's my take. He finishes as a RB2 this year if he stays healthy. In RB heavy leagues, this guy is immensely valuable. He's a former 1st round back that while not a Pro Bowl talent, is still a median starting caliber back (if he is healthy). He has opportunity and talent. What's not to like? I know my league and the guys with the RB's are the ones holding the cards. the For you guys doubting M., postulate this, if he stays healthy, do you want him? The answer is yes. There are 32 teams in the NFL. Several teams employ RBBC. The average league has 12 owners and each team starts 2 RB's. 24 RB's started by owners a weekend. There's not much wiggle room there. Like it or not, M. is a valuable player. He'll end up starting and be a bell cow and his X points a game count the same if he's sexy or not. There's not a plethora of starting RB's out there and for that reason I'm probably going to keep him.Another thing... Let's say he stays healthy and is able to make it 4 or 5 more years. Assuming his skills have returned to a reasonably close level to where he was pre-injury, there's even more to like. He's on a 1 year deal and is still one of the Top 32 RB's in the league. Maybe in 2014 he's the starter on a more fantasy friendly team. I think you guys should hold, look at the value, respect that he brings value, and show a little foresight. It's not 2011 or 2012. Soon, it will be fall and the letdown of signing on a crappy team will be gone and you'll be happy you have a starting RB. He's not going to have a Top 5 finish and he's not without risk but there aren't many of these guys out there. I think we're underselling how good this kid is and that he's going to have similar points to a lot of guys that are'nt surrounded by subjective negativity. Odds are, he's a decent RB 2. No getting around that.
There is no way I'd be comfortable with Mendy as my RB2 this season. To me, he is a RB3 with some upside. The upside is contingent on Williams being hurt or severely outplayed to the point there is no time share and Arz is able to turn around this pathetic offense they have. Both are possible but not likely IMO. I'd rank Mendy in the RB30 range right now, subject to change as news comes in.
 
As a Mendenhall owner in one league I certainly won't be counting on him to perform, I feel I could be pleasantly surprised though.

Anyone expecting RB2 production is asking for trouble.

 
That's exactly what it is. And you seem to be the only one that doesn't see that. And note, this is COMPLETELY irrelevant to what I think of Mendenhall as a RB. You're arguing he can still be good. I'm not disputing that. You're also arguing it's not bad news that all he could get was a one year contract in Arizona. I'm absolutely disputing that. It's terrible news. If you think it's great, name me anything that could have been worse other than not signing.
That's easy. It would've been a lot worse if he had signed behind an established starter. I also think the fact that Arizona flew him out on the first day of free agency is a minor positive. They didn't wait until after the draft. They didn't wait until training camp to see what they had. Seems like he was their guy all along. If I didn't expect Mendenhall to receive a big contract (see my earlier post) and thought Arizona was one of the likely destinations (see my earlier post), why is the news that he signed with Arizona on a modest contract supposed to change my take on how this might play out? Nonsense.
You can't honestly be taking credit for "calling" him landing in Arz or saying it was likely. That is hilarious. All you did was provide a list of about 12 teams who needed RB help who could be potential suitors. That's not nearly the same thing. You never singled Arz out as a favorite in any way. This has to be one of the biggest stretches I've seen around here in a while.
Why would you parse his words like that? It is an internet message board.
 
That's exactly what it is. And you seem to be the only one that doesn't see that. And note, this is COMPLETELY irrelevant to what I think of Mendenhall as a RB. You're arguing he can still be good. I'm not disputing that. You're also arguing it's not bad news that all he could get was a one year contract in Arizona. I'm absolutely disputing that. It's terrible news. If you think it's great, name me anything that could have been worse other than not signing.
That's easy. It would've been a lot worse if he had signed behind an established starter. I also think the fact that Arizona flew him out on the first day of free agency is a minor positive. They didn't wait until after the draft. They didn't wait until training camp to see what they had. Seems like he was their guy all along. If I didn't expect Mendenhall to receive a big contract (see my earlier post) and thought Arizona was one of the likely destinations (see my earlier post), why is the news that he signed with Arizona on a modest contract supposed to change my take on how this might play out? Nonsense.
You can't honestly be taking credit for "calling" him landing in Arz or saying it was likely. That is hilarious. All you did was provide a list of about 12 teams who needed RB help who could be potential suitors. That's not nearly the same thing. You never singled Arz out as a favorite in any way. This has to be one of the biggest stretches I've seen around here in a while.
Were you drunk when you wrote this? Or just having a hard time reading?
 
Coach Bruce Arians referred to newly signed Rashard Mendenhall as a three-down back Wednesday.
He also said that within minutes of Pittsburgh drafting him....and then proceeded to never, ever utilize him as such.Wouldn't be holding my breath on that.
 
That's exactly what it is. And you seem to be the only one that doesn't see that. And note, this is COMPLETELY irrelevant to what I think of Mendenhall as a RB. You're arguing he can still be good. I'm not disputing that. You're also arguing it's not bad news that all he could get was a one year contract in Arizona. I'm absolutely disputing that. It's terrible news. If you think it's great, name me anything that could have been worse other than not signing.
That's easy. It would've been a lot worse if he had signed behind an established starter. I also think the fact that Arizona flew him out on the first day of free agency is a minor positive. They didn't wait until after the draft. They didn't wait until training camp to see what they had. Seems like he was their guy all along. If I didn't expect Mendenhall to receive a big contract (see my earlier post) and thought Arizona was one of the likely destinations (see my earlier post), why is the news that he signed with Arizona on a modest contract supposed to change my take on how this might play out? Nonsense.
You can't honestly be taking credit for "calling" him landing in Arz or saying it was likely. That is hilarious. All you did was provide a list of about 12 teams who needed RB help who could be potential suitors. That's not nearly the same thing. You never singled Arz out as a favorite in any way. This has to be one of the biggest stretches I've seen around here in a while.
I think in Dec/Jan a lot of the reason people liked him was because they thought Arians would want to bring him back and have him compete with Ballard in IND. The irony here is that this best case scenario kind of did happen, just Arians screwed everything up by taking a job in ARI before FA started. So Mendenhall supporters can claim to have read part of the situation right, in that a team or even a certain coach for a team would bring him in to compete to start. However, the inference they took that this would dramatically change his value was wrong. If your dynasty rankings looked like this on Feb 9
Ryan MathewsAlfred MorrisStevan RidleyRashard MendenhallDavid WilsonDeMarco MurrayJonathan Stewart
You did not read the situation correctly.
 
That's exactly what it is. And you seem to be the only one that doesn't see that. And note, this is COMPLETELY irrelevant to what I think of Mendenhall as a RB. You're arguing he can still be good. I'm not disputing that. You're also arguing it's not bad news that all he could get was a one year contract in Arizona. I'm absolutely disputing that. It's terrible news. If you think it's great, name me anything that could have been worse other than not signing.
That's easy. It would've been a lot worse if he had signed behind an established starter. I also think the fact that Arizona flew him out on the first day of free agency is a minor positive. They didn't wait until after the draft. They didn't wait until training camp to see what they had. Seems like he was their guy all along. If I didn't expect Mendenhall to receive a big contract (see my earlier post) and thought Arizona was one of the likely destinations (see my earlier post), why is the news that he signed with Arizona on a modest contract supposed to change my take on how this might play out? Nonsense.
You can't honestly be taking credit for "calling" him landing in Arz or saying it was likely. That is hilarious. All you did was provide a list of about 12 teams who needed RB help who could be potential suitors. That's not nearly the same thing. You never singled Arz out as a favorite in any way. This has to be one of the biggest stretches I've seen around here in a while.
Were you drunk when you wrote this? Or just having a hard time reading?
I'm not having a hard time reading at all. Perhaps you should go back and read the post he is refering to. I'll provide it;
Yea, he doesn't really have the leverage to ask for a huge deal after getting hurt in 2011, not playing much in 2012, and clashing with the coaching staff.

There will be teams out there who want him. And sooner or later, his asking price will drop to the point where someone is willing to meet it.

Some of the obvious potential destinations:

Miami

New York Jets

Steelers

Colts

Broncos

Raiders

Lions

Packers

Falcons

Cardinals

Rams

Most of those teams have some degree of need for a RB, and not all of them will end up drafting one high. When the game of musical chairs ends, it's likely that Mendenhall ends up on one of these teams, IMO. And I think he'd have a good chance to emerge right away in any of these spots.
Nothing about this suggests Arz is a likely destination. This is simply broad statement of teams with needs at the RB position and there are 11 teams mentioned. Not 1 or 2 or even 5 that narrow it down in the least bit. This is a blanket list of teams with RB needs with no specifics on any of them being likely or not. Of course Mendy was likely to land on 1 of these 11 teams. Naming 35% of the teams in the NFL in a general way here and then later parlaying that into some sort of conviction of the one he ends up on as you're "likely destination" are 2 drastically different things. Any one of us could do this with just about every FA out there. Simply list a slew of teams with needs at a position and say player X who plays that position is likley to sign within these 35% of the leagues teams.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That's exactly what it is. And you seem to be the only one that doesn't see that. And note, this is COMPLETELY irrelevant to what I think of Mendenhall as a RB. You're arguing he can still be good. I'm not disputing that. You're also arguing it's not bad news that all he could get was a one year contract in Arizona. I'm absolutely disputing that. It's terrible news. If you think it's great, name me anything that could have been worse other than not signing.
That's easy. It would've been a lot worse if he had signed behind an established starter. I also think the fact that Arizona flew him out on the first day of free agency is a minor positive. They didn't wait until after the draft. They didn't wait until training camp to see what they had. Seems like he was their guy all along. If I didn't expect Mendenhall to receive a big contract (see my earlier post) and thought Arizona was one of the likely destinations (see my earlier post), why is the news that he signed with Arizona on a modest contract supposed to change my take on how this might play out? Nonsense.
You can't honestly be taking credit for "calling" him landing in Arz or saying it was likely. That is hilarious. All you did was provide a list of about 12 teams who needed RB help who could be potential suitors. That's not nearly the same thing. You never singled Arz out as a favorite in any way. This has to be one of the biggest stretches I've seen around here in a while.
Were you drunk when you wrote this? Or just having a hard time reading?
I'm not having a hard time reading at all. Perhaps you should go back and read the post he is refering to. I'll provide it;
Yea, he doesn't really have the leverage to ask for a huge deal after getting hurt in 2011, not playing much in 2012, and clashing with the coaching staff.

There will be teams out there who want him. And sooner or later, his asking price will drop to the point where someone is willing to meet it.

Some of the obvious potential destinations:

Miami

New York Jets

Steelers

Colts

Broncos

Raiders

Lions

Packers

Falcons

Cardinals

Rams

Most of those teams have some degree of need for a RB, and not all of them will end up drafting one high. When the game of musical chairs ends, it's likely that Mendenhall ends up on one of these teams, IMO. And I think he'd have a good chance to emerge right away in any of these spots.
Nothing about this suggests Arz is a likely destination. This is simply broad statement of teams with needs at the RB position and there are 11 teams mentioned. Not 1 or 2 or even 5 that narrow it down in the least bit. This is a blanket list of teams with RB needs with no specifics on any of them being likely or not. Of course Mendy was likely to land on 1 of these 11 teams. Naming 35% of the teams in the NFL in a general way here and then later parlaying that into some sort of conviction of the one he ends up on as you're "likely destination" are 2 drastically different things. Any one of us could do this with just about every FA out there. Simply list a slew of teams with needs at a position and say player X who plays that position is likley to sign within these 35% of the leagues teams.
This is a stupid semantical argument you are creating, for reasons that are really not clear.
 
Have owned Mendenhall since his rookie year. Held last year on small dynasty keeper rosters (we keep 6 of 19 players - QB, 2RB, 2WR, TE, K, D) and I'm leaning towards keeping him again this offseason as a RB4 (Ridley, McFadden, Gore). In a start 2 WR league, WR's aren't that valuable and I'm probably dropping my WR's altogether (Nicks, Cobb).
Mendenhall (and Gore for that matter) over Nicks and Cobb is a team killing mistake in any dynasty or keeper format. Bad enough to make any "worst ever" list.I'd also say Mendenhall's chances of finishing in the top 20 RBs in PPG are minimal in 2013. In PPR leagues he won't be top 25.
 
That's exactly what it is. And you seem to be the only one that doesn't see that. And note, this is COMPLETELY irrelevant to what I think of Mendenhall as a RB. You're arguing he can still be good. I'm not disputing that. You're also arguing it's not bad news that all he could get was a one year contract in Arizona. I'm absolutely disputing that. It's terrible news. If you think it's great, name me anything that could have been worse other than not signing.
That's easy. It would've been a lot worse if he had signed behind an established starter. I also think the fact that Arizona flew him out on the first day of free agency is a minor positive. They didn't wait until after the draft. They didn't wait until training camp to see what they had. Seems like he was their guy all along. If I didn't expect Mendenhall to receive a big contract (see my earlier post) and thought Arizona was one of the likely destinations (see my earlier post), why is the news that he signed with Arizona on a modest contract supposed to change my take on how this might play out? Nonsense.
You can't honestly be taking credit for "calling" him landing in Arz or saying it was likely. That is hilarious. All you did was provide a list of about 12 teams who needed RB help who could be potential suitors. That's not nearly the same thing. You never singled Arz out as a favorite in any way. This has to be one of the biggest stretches I've seen around here in a while.
Were you drunk when you wrote this? Or just having a hard time reading?
I'm not having a hard time reading at all. Perhaps you should go back and read the post he is refering to. I'll provide it;
Yea, he doesn't really have the leverage to ask for a huge deal after getting hurt in 2011, not playing much in 2012, and clashing with the coaching staff.

There will be teams out there who want him. And sooner or later, his asking price will drop to the point where someone is willing to meet it.

Some of the obvious potential destinations:

Miami

New York Jets

Steelers

Colts

Broncos

Raiders

Lions

Packers

Falcons

Cardinals

Rams

Most of those teams have some degree of need for a RB, and not all of them will end up drafting one high. When the game of musical chairs ends, it's likely that Mendenhall ends up on one of these teams, IMO. And I think he'd have a good chance to emerge right away in any of these spots.
Nothing about this suggests Arz is a likely destination. This is simply broad statement of teams with needs at the RB position and there are 11 teams mentioned. Not 1 or 2 or even 5 that narrow it down in the least bit. This is a blanket list of teams with RB needs with no specifics on any of them being likely or not. Of course Mendy was likely to land on 1 of these 11 teams. Naming 35% of the teams in the NFL in a general way here and then later parlaying that into some sort of conviction of the one he ends up on as you're "likely destination" are 2 drastically different things. Any one of us could do this with just about every FA out there. Simply list a slew of teams with needs at a position and say player X who plays that position is likley to sign within these 35% of the leagues teams.
"obvious potential destination" vs. "one of the likely destinations". Wow, you are really nit picking here. That wasn't even his point, and I certainly didnt read it as someone taking credit for a call. His point, as I read it, was simply that if the AZ signing was not unexpected and if he liked it then, why then would his signing there now change his mind about the overall situation? In this context, "obvious potential destination" and "one of the likely destinations" are the same things. Context is important.

 
My first pass at some new dynasty RB rankings:Doug MartinTrent Richardson ---------------------------Ray RiceCJ SpillerJamaal CharlesLeSean McCoy --------------------------- Arian FosterAdrian PetersonMarshawn Lynch ---------------------------Ryan MathewsAlfred MorrisStevan RidleyRashard MendenhallDavid WilsonDeMarco MurrayJonathan Stewart After you get past those guys, you are mainly left to choose between low probability prospects and low longevity veterans. I think the context of your team becomes a major driving factor. For example, on a rebuilding team I would not want MJD or Chris Johnson. On a contender, Bernard Pierce and Bryce Brown would not do me a lot of good. Rather than trying to mix these groups together, I kept them separate. The old guys:Matt ForteChris JohnsonMaurice Jones-DrewBenjarvus Green-EllisDarren McFaddenReggie Bush---------------------Darren SprolesFrank GoreSteven Jackson---------------------DeAngelo WilliamsKnowshon MorenoShonn Greene---------------------Felix JonesFred JacksonCedric Benson The prospects:Bernard PierceBryce BrownBen TateMikel LeshoureLamar MillerLaMichael JamesMark IngramRobert Turbin--------------Vick BallardDaryl RichardsonRonnie Hillman--------------Quizz RodgersToby GerhartBrandon BoldenJonathan Dwyer---------------Chris IvoryDuJuan HarrisKendall HunterDaniel Thomas
EBF has been a steady supporter and believer in Mendenhalls talent pretty much before he even entered the NFL.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
EBF has been a steady supporter and believer in Mendenhalls talent pretty much before he even entered the NFL.
So basically you are saying he never admits a mistake?
Was he a mistake when he was rushing for 1200 and 13TD's?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
EBF has been a steady supporter and believer in Mendenhalls talent pretty much before he even entered the NFL.
So basically you are saying he never admits a mistake?
That might be the perception, but it's far from reality. As I've mentioned elsewhere, there have been other players that I rated highly and bailed on within a year. Moreno and Ingram came into the NFL more recently than Mendenhall. I was reasonably high on both at one point and now I wouldn't give up a 1st round rookie pick for either. If it were true that I never admitted mistakes or changed my mind on players, wouldn't I still be touting those guys as great buys? When I have clear and decisive evidence that an evaluation is wrong, I change it. As far as Mendenhall is concerned, I'm not quite sure where people get the idea that I thought he was some all-world mega star. That isn't and hasn't ever been the case.

Here's what I actually said about him as a draft prospect:

2. Rashard Mendenhall, RB, Illinois

Positives: Mendenhall is built like a rock with a top notch combination of size, speed, and strength. He is solid overall athlete who could start in almost any system. He just looks like an NFL RB. I knew from the first time I saw him play this year that he would be a first round pick. I think he will have excellent durability at the next level, as his frame is ideally proportioned for the position. Very sturdy build.

Negatives: Not as shifty as you look for. More of a no-nonsense North-South runner than a guy who will shake and bake. A little bit stiff in the hips, he doesn't flash the "wiggle" of a guy like Westbrook or Bush. Good at everything, yet elite at nothing.

Overall: I think Mendenhall is a very safe bet to become a decent NFL player. He is just a good, solid RB prospect who should step in and start for a team from day done. If he lands in a good spot on draft day then he will warrant consideration at the 1.01. The gap between him and Stewart is VERY narrow in my mind. I might even prefer Mendenhall with a gun to my head since he seems like the safer pick. At the same time, there's a little bit of Thomas Jones/Julius Jones risk if he lands on a team with a weak supporting cast. He's likely not exceptional enough to transcend a bad situation. IMO, his success will always mirror his supporting cast.

NFL Comparison: Joseph Addai, Julius Jones
1. Rashard Mendenhall, RB, PIT

OUTLOOK - When you talk about the synergy of situation and talent, there's no better bet in this RB class than Rashard Mendenhall. He doesn't have the elite combine numbers I look for in a back, but he has good speed and an elite frame. He's a solid first round RB who should eventually step in and rack up several 300+ carry seasons. A lot of people are down on him because he landed on a team with a proven starter. Personally, I think it's a great spot for him. Pittsburgh has a phenomenal track record in the first round. Polamalu, Roethlisberger, Holmes, Hampton, Miller, Simmons, Faneca, Burress. This team drafts winners. The fact that they were willing to place their bets on Mendenhall improves his standing in my mind. More importantly, the presence of Roethlisberger and friends guarantees that Mendenhall will never be the focus of opposing defenses. I've always thought FWP was an overrated talent. Mendenhall should eventually nudge him out of the way and become another Joseph Addai type performer. Yes, you might have to wait a year or two, but if he lives up to his potential then it will be well worth it.
Apart from being wrong about his durability, I don't see anything too outrageous there. When he's been healthy, he's more or less been the exact guy I thought he'd be. Obviously you can point to last season as evidence that he's finished, but there were lots of factors at work (recovering from injury, poor supporting cast, attitude problems). He had a good three year stretch from 2009-2011 when he averaged 265 carries and 1103 rushing yards per season (4.17 YPC). If people want to believe that he's useless crap, fine. I don't think his body of work supports that stance. In his five year NFL career he's been a productive starter more often than not.

I understand that some people think he only had value because of his opportunity and that he'll never get another chance to be the guy for a team. I happen to disagree with that assessment. Doesn't mean I am in denial. Doesn't mean I think he's the greatest back on the planet either. There's a level between "elite Pro Bowl talent" and "journeyman." I'd put guys like Mendenhall, McGahee, Thomas Jones, and Cedric Benson in that group. This type of back is simultaneously bad enough to fall out of favor with one team, but good enough to find a second or third home and stay relevant.

If you're more of a short term/reactive thinker, you're going to bail on these guys when they fall out of fashion. If you're the type who can ride out some highs and lows in a player's career while maintaining an accurate perspective of his value, you can exploit the chicken little mentality. I think Mendenhall is just the latest in this trend. He has a chance to yield 2-5 more productive seasons, but you can get him quite cheap in a lot of leagues because so many people have lost faith in him or moved on to the next big thing.

 
I'm not a huge Mendenhall fan, and wasn't buying prior to him signing in AZ (while his owners were hoping for Atlanta, GB, or Denver). I am going to send out offers NOW though. The Cards will probably ruin him this year, but he's only on a one year deal -- I bet his value is pretty close to throw-in level with certain types of owners.

 
As a team, Arizona running backs only rushed the ball 316 times last year. There aren't going to be that many carries to go around in 2013. Add to the fact that there will be 8 men in the box who are not fooled by the spin move, and we've got a recipe for disaster. Mendenhall will have to be going very late for me to consider him. It's been years since he's looked like a good running back. It's time to move on from this guy.

 
I'm not a huge Mendenhall fan, and wasn't buying prior to him signing in AZ (while his owners were hoping for Atlanta, GB, or Denver). I am going to send out offers NOW though. The Cards will probably ruin him this year, but he's only on a one year deal -- I bet his value is pretty close to throw-in level with certain types of owners.
My guess is that if you want to buy low, it is probably best to include him in a larger deal where he is not the focus of the trade. Ive offered various picks for him to test the market (in one a third rounder, in another a second rounder and yet another 2 third rounders) and have gotten quick rejections in each.
 
I said a lot in this thread but I'm panicking after they dropped the only veteran QB who actually played great at least for a few glimpses.

Great talent but now I'm not a fan of the situation. A Stanton/Lindly/Skelton lead offense will not be moving the ball efficiently or scoring much. I would go all out flipping Mendy if not for him signing a one year deal. May still toss around some offers

 
I said a lot in this thread but I'm panicking after they dropped the only veteran QB who actually played great at least for a few glimpses. Great talent but now I'm not a fan of the situation. A Stanton/Lindly/Skelton lead offense will not be moving the ball efficiently or scoring much. I would go all out flipping Mendy if not for him signing a one year deal. May still toss around some offers
I think cutting Kolb just means its even more likely the Cards take Geno Smith, which would be a boost for Mendy IMO.
 
I said a lot in this thread but I'm panicking after they dropped the only veteran QB who actually played great at least for a few glimpses. Great talent but now I'm not a fan of the situation. A Stanton/Lindly/Skelton lead offense will not be moving the ball efficiently or scoring much. I would go all out flipping Mendy if not for him signing a one year deal. May still toss around some offers
Resigning Hoyer most likely means one of Lindly or Skelton is gone, maybe both.
 
I said a lot in this thread but I'm panicking after they dropped the only veteran QB who actually played great at least for a few glimpses. Great talent but now I'm not a fan of the situation. A Stanton/Lindly/Skelton lead offense will not be moving the ball efficiently or scoring much. I would go all out flipping Mendy if not for him signing a one year deal. May still toss around some offers
Resigning Hoyer most likely means one of Lindly or Skelton is gone, maybe both.
Thats not assuring.
 
I think cutting Kolb just means its even more likely the Cards take Geno Smith, which would be a boost for Mendy IMO.
I think Mendy needs to win the starting job first before he's even in a position to get a "boost". I don't think he's going to be given the job. I fully expect it to be a competition with Ryan Williams and my money is on Williams but again that's just a matter of opinion and I won't be surprised to see it turn out the other way. Fact is both have had some injury issues, Williams much more often and severely, and good chance both end up starting games for the Cardinals next season.I will add one more thing and I'm sure some of you will dismiss this as crazy talk but if you examine Mendenhall's contract I think it's very reasonable to conclude that he's far from a lock to make the opening day roster and is going to need to show well in camp to stick.His contract only guaranteed him $500,000 or 1/5th of his pay. Compare that contract to some of the other contracts you saw some players accept on so called "prove it deals". Brandon Myers got $1.5 million of his $2.25 million one year deal guaranteed. Dustin Keller got $2.25 millions of his one year deal guaranteed. These are one year "prove it" deals where the teams are taking a bit of a gamble on the signings and paying the majority of pay in guarantees. I can't come up with guarantees for some other one year prove it deals, like for Michael Bennett and Talib but I feel pretty confident the guarantees are more than $500,000 and more than 1/5th of their one year salary.Mendenhalls contract simply tells me the Cardinals signed him as a low risk $500,000 gamble and if they like what they see they'll exercise the right to gamble on him for the season at an extra $2 million but I don't think it should be considered a guarantee at this time or shocking if it does not happen. It also gives them the chance to trade him if they want an incur a minimal cap hit. I think it's a fantastic job by the Cardinals of getting him signed cheaply with little guarantees so they have a lot of options, one of which is making sure Ryan Williams is healthy.
 
I think cutting Kolb just means its even more likely the Cards take Geno Smith, which would be a boost for Mendy IMO.
I think Mendy needs to win the starting job first before he's even in a position to get a "boost". I don't think he's going to be given the job. I fully expect it to be a competition with Ryan Williams and my money is on Williams but again that's just a matter of opinion and I won't be surprised to see it turn out the other way. Fact is both have had some injury issues, Williams much more often and severely, and good chance both end up starting games for the Cardinals next season.I will add one more thing and I'm sure some of you will dismiss this as crazy talk but if you examine Mendenhall's contract I think it's very reasonable to conclude that he's far from a lock to make the opening day roster and is going to need to show well in camp to stick.His contract only guaranteed him $500,000 or 1/5th of his pay. Compare that contract to some of the other contracts you saw some players accept on so called "prove it deals". Brandon Myers got $1.5 million of his $2.25 million one year deal guaranteed. Dustin Keller got $2.25 millions of his one year deal guaranteed. These are one year "prove it" deals where the teams are taking a bit of a gamble on the signings and paying the majority of pay in guarantees. I can't come up with guarantees for some other one year prove it deals, like for Michael Bennett and Talib but I feel pretty confident the guarantees are more than $500,000 and more than 1/5th of their one year salary.Mendenhalls contract simply tells me the Cardinals signed him as a low risk $500,000 gamble and if they like what they see they'll exercise the right to gamble on him for the season at an extra $2 million but I don't think it should be considered a guarantee at this time or shocking if it does not happen. It also gives them the chance to trade him if they want an incur a minimal cap hit. I think it's a fantastic job by the Cardinals of getting him signed cheaply with little guarantees so they have a lot of options, one of which is making sure Ryan Williams is healthy.
Nice work. As usual, excellent information beyond what has been widely discussed. Sounds more like a "Lets see what you got" (in camp) then a one-year prove it deal.
 
I said a lot in this thread but I'm panicking after they dropped the only veteran QB who actually played great at least for a few glimpses. Great talent but now I'm not a fan of the situation. A Stanton/Lindly/Skelton lead offense will not be moving the ball efficiently or scoring much. I would go all out flipping Mendy if not for him signing a one year deal. May still toss around some offers
I think cutting Kolb just means its even more likely the Cards take Geno Smith, which would be a boost for Mendy IMO.
Wouldnt call Geno a slamdunk but i can agree with you. I happen to like how Kolb played when Ari was 4-0 last year
 
His contract only guaranteed him $500,000 or 1/5th of his pay.
Wow. I wasn't aware of this, and agree with your conclusion.
But Arizona is a great place to land....
Yeah, that talk has to be out the window now. I was honestly expecting the majority of the 2.5 to be guaranteed, and still thought it was a bad sign. At 500,000... :toilet: I hope my league-mates haven't seen this, as I'll likely try to get Williams where I can. I'll even keep an eye out for Mendy, but won't pay the price of anyone expecting him to start.

 
His contract only guaranteed him $500,000 or 1/5th of his pay.
Wow. I wasn't aware of this, and agree with your conclusion.
But Arizona is a great place to land....
Is that really about the landing spot or what the contract tells us about his skills/health/attitude or what the NFL thinks about his skills/health/attitude? If he landed on the Niners (a fairly middle of the road landing spot) with a similar contract, would it have been better? I would argue no. The Giants, definite no. After some time has past since the signing, I am now in the camp (if there is one) that the landing in Arizona is neither patently good nor bad (after previously leaning towards bad following the aftermath of the Denver letdown) and that we are all just guessing at this point.

He landed on a bad offense. But, he has a coach that knows him and that appears to be giving him a chance to start where another team may not have. He still has fairly weak and fragile competition for the starting job. Off hand, I'd say that the competition at RB is the most important factor right now for Mendenhall.

On the other hand, he is getting paid far from starter salary. It is also conceivable he could get cut in camp if he doesn't show good health and performance or if Ryan Williams shows good health and performance.

Not knowing (i) what Arians is/was thinking, (ii) what Mendenhall was thinking, (iii) how healthy Mendenhall is or Ryan Williams will be and (iii) how bad Arizona will actually be this year, I am of the opinion that we won't really know what kind of landing spot this is until we get into camp and into the season. In this case, performance will likely matter, but not in the way most think (i.e., great performance does not indicate a great landing spot necessarily and poor performance does not indicate a bad one necessarily). A combination of factors will determine how the landing spot plays out.

For example:

If he performs lights out in camp, shows good skills, easily takes the job but can't get going in the season due to the poor offense, than Arizona will have proven to be a poor or at best a "not great" landing spot. He would have won the job in a number of other teams with better offenses in that case.

If he is mediocre in camp, wins the job anyway (either in camp or during the season) due to Ryan Williams' equally mediocre performance and/or poor health and puts up RB2, even RB3 type numbers, I'd consider Arizona to have been a great or at worst a "not bad" landing spot. On any other team, he could have been fantasy irrelevant.

If he is awesome throughout camp and into the season despite a poor offense, then that may tell us very little about the AZ landing spot (because he probably would have lit it up in other teams as well) and with that kind of performance, who really cares?

Similarly, if he sucks in camp and can't win the starting job, then that would tell us little as well as he would have similarly sucked in any situation, whether Arizona or Denver. And again, who cares about landing spot if he sucks that bad.

There's a lot of grey area we could fall in as well depending on performance.

Bottomline, its a wait and see on this one imo.

As for Ryan Williams as a value play, I don't think he presents any more "buy low" value than does Mendenhall at the moment. I would be inclined to pay a 2nd for Williams right now as a gamble. I would pay the same for Mendenhall as well. Something tells me though that I won't be getting either for that price.

 
His contract only guaranteed him $500,000 or 1/5th of his pay.
Wow. I wasn't aware of this, and agree with your conclusion.
But Arizona is a great place to land....
Is that really about the landing spot or what the contract tells us about his skills/health/attitude or what the NFL thinks about his skills/health/attitude? If he landed on the Niners (a fairly middle of the road landing spot) with a similar contract, would it have been better? I would argue no. The Giants, definite no. After some time has past since the signing, I am now in the camp (if there is one) that the landing in Arizona is neither patently good nor bad (after previously leaning towards bad following the aftermath of the Denver letdown) and that we are all just guessing at this point.

He landed on a bad offense. But, he has a coach that knows him and that appears to be giving him a chance to start where another team may not have. He still has fairly weak and fragile competition for the starting job. Off hand, I'd say that the competition at RB is the most important factor right now for Mendenhall.

On the other hand, he is getting paid far from starter salary. It is also conceivable he could get cut in camp if he doesn't show good health and performance or if Ryan Williams shows good health and performance.

Not knowing (i) what Arians is/was thinking, (ii) what Mendenhall was thinking, (iii) how healthy Mendenhall is or Ryan Williams will be and (iii) how bad Arizona will actually be this year, I am of the opinion that we won't really know what kind of landing spot this is until we get into camp and into the season. In this case, performance will likely matter, but not in the way most think (i.e., great performance does not indicate a great landing spot necessarily and poor performance does not indicate a bad one necessarily). A combination of factors will determine how the landing spot plays out.

For example:

If he performs lights out in camp, shows good skills, easily takes the job but can't get going in the season due to the poor offense, than Arizona will have proven to be a poor or at best a "not great" landing spot. He would have won the job in a number of other teams with better offenses in that case.

If he is mediocre in camp, wins the job anyway (either in camp or during the season) due to Ryan Williams' equally mediocre performance and/or poor health and puts up RB2, even RB3 type numbers, I'd consider Arizona to have been a great or at worst a "not bad" landing spot. On any other team, he could have been fantasy irrelevant.

If he is awesome throughout camp and into the season despite a poor offense, then that may tell us very little about the AZ landing spot (because he probably would have lit it up in other teams as well) and with that kind of performance, who really cares?

Similarly, if he sucks in camp and can't win the starting job, then that would tell us little as well as he would have similarly sucked in any situation, whether Arizona or Denver. And again, who cares about landing spot if he sucks that bad.

There's a lot of grey area we could fall in as well depending on performance.

Bottomline, its a wait and see on this one imo.

As for Ryan Williams as a value play, I don't think he presents any more "buy low" value than does Mendenhall at the moment. I would be inclined to pay a 2nd for Williams right now as a gamble. I would pay the same for Mendenhall as well. Something tells me though that I won't be getting either for that price.
CKC,.this is exactly what I was trying to say above. If you'd like, reread what I wrote above and my comments have almost exclusively been aimed at the terrible contract he received. The contract he got speaks volumes. When I stated that above, I was told "yeah, but at least he's in Arizona where he's got a chance to start. It could be worse if he landed somewhere else behind a starter". My comment that you quoted wasn't a shot at him landing in Arizona. My comment above was a shot at those saying Arizona was good for him to land while playing down the contract he received as if it's normal to get that low of a payday in a "show me" deal.

 
CKC,.this is exactly what I was trying to say above. If you'd like, reread what I wrote above and my comments have almost exclusively been aimed at the terrible contract he received. The contract he got speaks volumes. When I stated that above, I was told "yeah, but at least he's in Arizona where he's got a chance to start. It could be worse if he landed somewhere else behind a starter". My comment that you quoted wasn't a shot at him landing in Arizona. My comment above was a shot at those saying Arizona was good for him to land while playing down the contract he received as if it's normal to get that low of a payday in a "show me" deal.
I agree that the contract is not a good sign no matter the spin. But does it not matter that he has a chance to start as well?
 
I agree that the contract is not a good sign no matter the spin. But does it not matter that he has a chance to start as well?
Where was he linked to in which he wouldn't have had a chance to start? EBF made a nice sized list of potential landing spots. How can Arizona not be near the bottom of that list?
 
I agree that the contract is not a good sign no matter the spin. But does it not matter that he has a chance to start as well?
Where was he linked to in which he wouldn't have had a chance to start? EBF made a nice sized list of potential landing spots. How can Arizona not be near the bottom of that list?
Ultimately, he needs carries to have any value, and the easiest way to do that is by having the least amount of competition. Arizona provides this.
 
I agree that the contract is not a good sign no matter the spin. But does it not matter that he has a chance to start as well?
Where was he linked to in which he wouldn't have had a chance to start? EBF made a nice sized list of potential landing spots. How can Arizona not be near the bottom of that list?
Why does it matter where he was linked? Does it mean that if he didn't sign in AZ or Denver, that he couldn't have landed elsewhere where he wasn't supposedly "linked"? Would it have been inconceivable for example that he could have landed as a backup on the NY Giants? If he was only linked in Arizona, does that mean that Arizona would have been a good landing spot? The fact that he was most recently linked in Denver is irrelevant imo to how good or bad AZ was outside of the expectations letdown. EBF's list was for what he thought were potential starting spots, not all potential landing spots (iirc), and whatever his intent, the list does not cover all potential landing spots (unless he has inside info that we don't) - and it was only for 10 or so teams in the first place. Whether AZ was bottom of that list still puts it ahead of at least half of the league's other teams. Any team potentially could have been a landing spot if the price were low enough (e.g., at minimum wage for his year). We don't know where he could have landed if he hadn't signed with AZ.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ultimately, he needs carries to have any value, and the easiest way to do that is by having the least amount of competition. Arizona provides this.
MiamiNew York JetsSteelersColtsBroncosRaidersLionsPackersFalconsRamsHere's the list, minus AZ. If we are so worried about him beating out teh guys on these rosters, why is it likely he'll beat out Williams?
 
The contract he got speaks volumes. When I stated that above, I was told "yeah, but at least he's in Arizona where he's got a chance to start. It could be worse if he landed somewhere else behind a starter". My comment that you quoted wasn't a shot at him landing in Arizona. My comment above was a shot at those saying Arizona was good for him to land while playing down the contract he received as if it's normal to get that low of a payday in a "show me" deal.
Why does the contract he received matter at this point? Yes, the NFL wasn't throwing money at a player that had a real poor season coming off an ACL injury and has had his share of "team cancer" moments.None of the really matters now though. He has a good opportunity to be a starter (yes in a poor situation) with a coach that thought enough of him to bring him along for his first head coaching job.He'll either perform now and increase his value (in real life and in fantasy football) or he won't. What he's making isn't an issue going forward - other than making it easier for his team to cut him - but that will only happen if he doesn't perform.
 
I agree that the contract is not a good sign no matter the spin. But does it not matter that he has a chance to start as well?
Where was he linked to in which he wouldn't have had a chance to start? EBF made a nice sized list of potential landing spots. How can Arizona not be near the bottom of that list?
Ultimately, he needs carries to have any value, and the easiest way to do that is by having the least amount of competition. Arizona provides this.
This is particularly true if he is in fact the mediocre talent that the NFL seems to think he is at this point. If that is the case, there aren't too many landing spots better than AZ I suppose (Jets maybe?).

 
What he's making isn't an issue going forward - other than making it easier for his team to cut him - but that will only happen if he doesn't perform.
The argument is that the low salary and cut-friendly contract suggests the NFL is more worried about having to turn him loose than we knew beforehand.Could be the attitude, could be the knee, could be lack of production in the last couple years. Or all of the above. But they're definitely worried about something.
 
Ultimately, he needs carries to have any value, and the easiest way to do that is by having the least amount of competition. Arizona provides this.
MiamiNew York JetsSteelersColtsBroncosRaidersLionsPackersFalconsRamsHere's the list, minus AZ. If we are so worried about him beating out teh guys on these rosters, why is it likely he'll beat out Williams?
I don't know if I want to go as far as "likely", but the reasons would be:1. His former OC is a new Head Coach and thought enough of him to bring him on board, and on some level is staking his job on Mendenhall.2. Williams and Mendenhall are similar talents but Mendenhall is arguably the better overall RB.3. Williams has had difficulties staying healthy dating back to his college years.4. Williams being an "incumbent" is negated by having a new HC with a hole new offense.
 
The contract he got speaks volumes. When I stated that above, I was told "yeah, but at least he's in Arizona where he's got a chance to start. It could be worse if he landed somewhere else behind a starter". My comment that you quoted wasn't a shot at him landing in Arizona. My comment above was a shot at those saying Arizona was good for him to land while playing down the contract he received as if it's normal to get that low of a payday in a "show me" deal.
Why does the contract he received matter at this point? Yes, the NFL wasn't throwing money at a player that had a real poor season coming off an ACL injury and has had his share of "team cancer" moments.None of the really matters now though. He has a good opportunity to be a starter (yes in a poor situation) with a coach that thought enough of him to bring him along for his first head coaching job.He'll either perform now and increase his value (in real life and in fantasy football) or he won't. What he's making isn't an issue going forward - other than making it easier for his team to cut him - but that will only happen if he doesn't perform.
It matter (in the fantasy world) because it likely tells us how the NFL views him. Unless the NFL view is irrelevant to you in evaluating players (it is very relevant to me), then his contract in this case matters.
 
Ultimately, he needs carries to have any value, and the easiest way to do that is by having the least amount of competition. Arizona provides this.
MiamiNew York JetsSteelersColtsBroncosRaidersLionsPackersFalconsRamsHere's the list, minus AZ. If we are so worried about him beating out teh guys on these rosters, why is it likely he'll beat out Williams?
What is your point about this list? EBF indicated that ALL of these spots, including AZ, would have been good ones (or so I thought). The fact that AZ may have been at the bottom of this list (which I dont believe to be the case) doesn't matter.
 
Why does it matter where he was linked? Does it mean that if he didn't sign in AZ or Denver, that he couldn't have landed elsewhere where he wasn't supposedly linked? Would it have been inconceivable for example that he could have landed as a backup on the NY Giants? If he was only linked in Arizona, does that mean that Arizona would have been a good landing spot? The fact that he was most recently linked in Denver is irrelevant imo to how good or bad AZ was outside of the expectations letdown. EBF's list was for what he thought were potential starting spots, not all potential landing spots (iirc), and whatever his intent, the list does not cover all potential landing spots - and it was only for 10 or so teams in the first place. Whether AZ was bottom of that list still puts it ahead of at least half of the league's other teams. Any team potentially could have been a landing spot if the price were low enough (e.g., at minimum wage for his year). We don't know where he could have landed if he hadn't signed with AZ.
If he's not good enough start for the other 31 teams, I don't see it mattering that, today, he only has Ryan Williams in front of him. He went to a team that doesn't use the back much in the passing game, with a very poor run-blocking offensive line, and who finished 31st in offensive TDs per game with 1.6.I'd much rather him go to NYG and battle Andre Brown for a RBBC spot than end up in AZ. KC too. There are teams where he wouldn't start, but where he value could be better than it is in AZ, in my opinion.
 
The contract he got speaks volumes. When I stated that above, I was told "yeah, but at least he's in Arizona where he's got a chance to start. It could be worse if he landed somewhere else behind a starter". My comment that you quoted wasn't a shot at him landing in Arizona. My comment above was a shot at those saying Arizona was good for him to land while playing down the contract he received as if it's normal to get that low of a payday in a "show me" deal.
Why does the contract he received matter at this point? Yes, the NFL wasn't throwing money at a player that had a real poor season coming off an ACL injury and has had his share of "team cancer" moments.None of the really matters now though. He has a good opportunity to be a starter (yes in a poor situation) with a coach that thought enough of him to bring him along for his first head coaching job.He'll either perform now and increase his value (in real life and in fantasy football) or he won't. What he's making isn't an issue going forward - other than making it easier for his team to cut him - but that will only happen if he doesn't perform.
It matter (in the fantasy world) because it likely tells us how the NFL views him. Unless the NFL view is irrelevant to you in evaluating players (it is very relevant to me), then his contract in this case matters.
I understand that. My point is that what the NFL currently thinks of him is established, but going forward those thoughst will either be vindicated or changed to a more positive view.I guess if you were looking to "buy" or "sell" it would matter to some degree, but as far as what will happen going forward it really doesn't.
 
What is your point about this list? EBF indicated that ALL of these spots, including AZ, would have been good ones (or so I thought). The fact that AZ may have been at the bottom of this list (which I dont believe to be the case) doesn't matter.
He said "Some of the obvious potential destinations:", so I don't take that to mean good landing spots. But I don't won't to put words in his mouth, since he didn't specify. My point is that I don't think it's a good landing spot. Like you, I'm simply sharing my opinion and reasoning behind it. As for the list, it is teams likely to have been in the market for Mendenhall, of which Arizona is one of the worst, in terms of his fantas value.At a certain point, bad is bad. If there were only 4-5 good landing spots, and Arizona wasn't one of them, it's still a bad landing spot, regardless of it's rank among the junk.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bottomline, its a wait and see on this one imo.
This. By and large, the people who are down on him after the signing are the people who were down on him before the signing. And the people who still think he has value are the people who were fans before the signing. Both sides can come up with plenty of reasons to explain why he's going to flop/succeed. Rehashing the same arguments again and again is just a waste of time and energy. At this point I'm content to let it play out and see what happens. As for the Arizona landing spot, the one year contract and poor performance of their 2011 RBs means it's less than ideal. On the other hand, it's far from catastrophic either. He could've gone to a team with a solid starter or he could still be sitting on the couch like Beanie Wells and Ahmad Bradshaw. The people painting this as a disaster likely weren't very high on Mendenhall all along and probably needed a great outcome (like him signing a big deal with Denver or Detroit) to get excited.
 
CKC,.this is exactly what I was trying to say above. If you'd like, reread what I wrote above and my comments have almost exclusively been aimed at the terrible contract he received. The contract he got speaks volumes. When I stated that above, I was told "yeah, but at least he's in Arizona where he's got a chance to start. It could be worse if he landed somewhere else behind a starter". My comment that you quoted wasn't a shot at him landing in Arizona. My comment above was a shot at those saying Arizona was good for him to land while playing down the contract he received as if it's normal to get that low of a payday in a "show me" deal.
I agree that the contract is not a good sign no matter the spin. But does it not matter that he has a chance to start as well?
It certainly matters. I mean, that is about the only positive spin to take from this. If you believe in him and think he can eventually be a starter again, then at least Arizona isn't going to provide THAT much of a roadblock to it. That said, those assuming it's his job over Ryan Williams are mistaken, IMO. Similarly, the contract is far more of a negative than the potential to start in Arizona is a positive. The only reason I bothered to post in here at all (because I honestly don't really care about Mendenhall one way or the other) is that Mendenhall supporters were pointing to that as a positive while seemingly ignoring the MUCH bigger negative of the contract length, size, and guaranteed money (which I didn't even realize was that bad). In fact, the idea that he may not even be on the roster come week 1 is an idea I didn't even consider until seeing that money and I believe is definitely a possibility. For those paying "cheap starting RB" prices for him in trades may be very disappointed (like Helu last year). I don't dislike Mendenhall personally. If he can revive his career, then good for him. If those who buy get rewarded for it, then good for them as well. I just find it amusing when ardent supporters of a player clearly ignore BIG RED FLAGS (i.e. his contract and lack of interest elsewhere in relation to it) while clinging to small glimmers of hope (yay, he could start in Arizona). My comment earlier today about it was just some sarcasm about trying to find the positive in a sea of negatives. If these supporters get rewarded for their persistence, good for them.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top