BeaverCleaver
Footballguy
and the meltdown continues.As are your posts about me...nothing about the topic...and inability to answer questions.sho nuff and his meltdowns are priceless.

and the meltdown continues.As are your posts about me...nothing about the topic...and inability to answer questions.sho nuff and his meltdowns are priceless.
Only if the guy told him not to lay a golden egg.Maybe it was that Cadbury bunny...thanks Easter Bunny...bawk bawk!!!Maybe he wanted to send the guy a Christmas goose?I have no idea what his reason was...last time I checked I am not Mike McCarthy...you would have to ask him.I asked what could be a reason for MM to ask for his name.Why cant you answer that question?What I have said is that all we know is that McCarthy asked his name. Anything more is speculation.Its not side stepping...its the facts of the situation.
Here is a hint...this is just me laughing that none of you can back up your claims that I am jumping to conclusions....I just get the expected response from you.So...post where I jumped to a conclusion...or just stop.I doubt you will do either.and the meltdown continues.As are your posts about me...nothing about the topic...and inability to answer questions.sho nuff and his meltdowns are priceless.
![]()
He has a man-crush on you.NTTAWWTAs are your posts about me...nothing about the topic...and inability to answer questions.sho nuff and his meltdowns are priceless.
Here is a hint...this is just me laughing that none of you can back up your claims that I am jumping to conclusions....I just get the expected response from you.So...post where I jumped to a conclusion...or just stop.I doubt you will do either.and the meltdown continues.As are your posts about me...nothing about the topic...and inability to answer questions.sho nuff and his meltdowns are priceless.
![]()
since you don't understand, sho....this is an example of you jumping to a conclusion. You don't know for a fact either that McCarthy or the front office had anything to do with the firing. Of course, we don't expect you to understand.Hilarious that people blame the front office for a part time maintenance guy getting fired.
since you don't understand, sho....this is an example of you jumping to a conclusion. You don't know for a fact either that McCarthy or the front office had anything to do with the firing. Of course, we don't expect you to understand.Hilarious that people blame the front office for a part time maintenance guy getting fired.
I didnt ask what was his reason.I asked what could be a reason."Care to actually answer the question? Or should I assume you don't have an answer?"I have no idea what his reason was...last time I checked I am not Mike McCarthy...you would have to ask him.I asked what could be a reason for MM to ask for his name.Why cant you answer that question?What I have said is that all we know is that McCarthy asked his name. Anything more is speculation.Its not side stepping...its the facts of the situation.
I said it was hilarious that you all blame the "front office".I jumped to no conclusion. I have said over and over we don't know exactly what happened.I find it hilarious that you all jump to blame the front office.Get it yet?I doubt it.Your one attempt to show a jump to conclusion showed me laughing at those simply blaming the front office. Pretty weak.since you don't understand, sho....this is an example of you jumping to a conclusion. You don't know for a fact either that McCarthy or the front office had anything to do with the firing. Of course, we don't expect you to understand.Hilarious that people blame the front office for a part time maintenance guy getting fired.
You can assume I have no clue why he would ask the guy's name.Does not mean he had him fired though.I didnt ask what was his reason.I asked what could be a reason."Care to actually answer the question? Or should I assume you don't have an answer?"I have no idea what his reason was...last time I checked I am not Mike McCarthy...you would have to ask him.I asked what could be a reason for MM to ask for his name.Why cant you answer that question?What I have said is that all we know is that McCarthy asked his name. Anything more is speculation.Its not side stepping...its the facts of the situation.
You can assume I have no clue why he would ask the guy's name.Does not mean he had him fired though.I didnt ask what was his reason.I asked what could be a reason."Care to actually answer the question? Or should I assume you don't have an answer?"I have no idea what his reason was...last time I checked I am not Mike McCarthy...you would have to ask him.I asked what could be a reason for MM to ask for his name.Why cant you answer that question?What I have said is that all we know is that McCarthy asked his name. Anything more is speculation.Its not side stepping...its the facts of the situation.
it isnt absolute proof, but the fact that you cant even think of a possible explanation is fairly telling.You can assume I have no clue why he would ask the guy's name.Does not mean he had him fired though.I didnt ask what was his reason.I asked what could be a reason."Care to actually answer the question? Or should I assume you don't have an answer?"I have no idea what his reason was...last time I checked I am not Mike McCarthy...you would have to ask him.I asked what could be a reason for MM to ask for his name.Why cant you answer that question?What I have said is that all we know is that McCarthy asked his name. Anything more is speculation.Its not side stepping...its the facts of the situation.
Its telling that Im not Mike McCarthy and I have absolutely no clue why.It would all be speculation. Perhaps he wanted to know in case he crossed paths with him and said anything again...I just don't know.it isnt absolute proof, but the fact that you cant even think of a possible explanation is fairly telling.
sho' doesn't believe in speculating. unless we are talking about Favre and TT.it isnt absolute proof, but the fact that you cant even think of a possible explanation is fairly telling.
sho' doesn't believe in speculating. unless we are talking about Favre and TT.it isnt absolute proof, but the fact that you cant even think of a possible explanation is fairly telling.
sho' doesn't believe in speculating. unless we are talking about Favre and TT.it isnt absolute proof, but the fact that you cant even think of a possible explanation is fairly telling.![]()
Maybe McCarthy asked the dude's name because he wanted to be able to say "Hey Mr. Wood, how's it going today?" the next time he saw him on the loading dock.Now please cease and desist with this ludicrous "logic" that if there's no conceivable reason, then that must prove an otherwise unsupported conclusion.it isnt absolute proof, but the fact that you cant even think of a possible explanation is fairly telling.You can assume I have no clue why he would ask the guy's name.Does not mean he had him fired though.
GD man, you need to read and follow this link here for better understanding of the English language.sho nuff said:I said it was hilarious that you all blame the "front office".
I jumped to no conclusion. I have said over and over we don't know exactly what happened.
I find it hilarious that you all jump to blame the front office.
Get it yet?
I doubt it.
Your one attempt to show a jump to conclusion showed me laughing at those simply blaming the front office. Pretty weak.
Thanks for grammar lessons.I guess you need to go into every other thread on this board and start posting this...because very few follow perfect paragraph form.GD man, you need to read and follow this link here for better understanding of the English language.sho nuff said:I said it was hilarious that you all blame the "front office".
I jumped to no conclusion. I have said over and over we don't know exactly what happened.
I find it hilarious that you all jump to blame the front office.
Get it yet?
I doubt it.
Your one attempt to show a jump to conclusion showed me laughing at those simply blaming the front office. Pretty weak.
You are quite correct.This is a message board.Thanks for grammar lessons.I guess you need to go into every other thread on this board and start posting this...because very few follow perfect paragraph form.GD man, you need to read and follow this link here for better understanding of the English language.sho nuff said:I said it was hilarious that you all blame the "front office".
I jumped to no conclusion. I have said over and over we don't know exactly what happened.
I find it hilarious that you all jump to blame the front office.
Get it yet?
I doubt it.
Your one attempt to show a jump to conclusion showed me laughing at those simply blaming the front office. Pretty weak
This is a message board...I am not going for a pulitzer here.
I used to like Packer threads.Sho is the reason I don't post in them anymore.Sorry dude, I like some of your posts especially when you're relatively objective, but you and your following have ruined things for me.Thanks for that
It worked last week. Give that maintenance guy a raise."Hey Mike, don't lay an egg this week!"![]()