Gottabesweet
Footballguy
Was shocked to see Moreno ranked below Miller this week. In PPR is MIller consistently in third downs?
What's the play here
What's the play here
Dodds has MIller 26 and Moreno 38thAny service that ranks Moreno below miller after last week is terarded. Moreno is the play in ppr and non ppr. Miller is also viable but if you have both you start Moreno.
Dodds has MIller 26 and Moreno 38thAny service that ranks Moreno below miller after last week is terarded. Moreno is the play in ppr and non ppr. Miller is also viable but if you have both you start Moreno.
I believe Trembaly has MIller higher as well
They have always been slow to change their stance on players & situations. They had Miller comfortably ahead in week one & will probably keep it that way until the Dolphins show an extended pattern of how the backs will be used. My concern would be that the Dolphins are still showing Miller as the starter & if he has a hot start, who knows what kind of touches Moreno would get.But why does Dodds have him there? Even with the catches, miller still only had 15 touches to Moreno's 24. I can see Miller having value but not above Knowshon that much.
Where did Dodds and Tremblay rank Miller and Moreno heading into the season? Perhaps both of them continue to be more bullish on Miller over Moreno in an attempt justify their preseason predictions. Whatever the reasoning, I agree with ricky g's post.But why does Dodds have him there? Even with the catches, miller still only had 15 touches to Moreno's 24. I can see Miller having value but not above Knowshon that much.
Why? He's correct.Dodds has MIller 26 and Moreno 38thAny service that ranks Moreno below miller after last week is terarded. Moreno is the play in ppr and non ppr. Miller is also viable but if you have both you start Moreno.
I believe Trembaly has MIller higher as well![]()
rickyg - open mouth...insert foot.
It's hot and humid in Miami...a committee approach makes the most NFL sense....I don't believe the coaches think Miller is the better 3rd down option....I think folks are over-reacting to Miller having a receiving TD.MT has Moreno higher.
What's the reason the Dolphins aren't involving Moreno in the pass game? You would think they would give some targets to a guy who caught 60 last year and had a career 8.9 YPC.
Lol absolutely not! I don't care who it is that has him ranked higher than Moreno. They are wrong.Dodds has MIller 26 and Moreno 38thAny service that ranks Moreno below miller after last week is terarded. Moreno is the play in ppr and non ppr. Miller is also viable but if you have both you start Moreno.
I believe Trembaly has MIller higher as well![]()
rickyg - open mouth...insert foot.
Yes, but it was supposed to be improved this year with Wilfork and Mayo healthy. Give Miami some credit for a better offensive scheme than last year and the o-line coach, John Benton, is a major improvement over last year. There were nice holes for both Miller and Moreno, but Moreno has clearly been the better runner the last 2 games (including preseason game 3). He's more instinctive and breaks more tackles. Miller's only advantage is speed.Lets think, didn't NE have a bad run d last year? Lets not overreact.
great post veebsIt's hot and humid in Miami...a committee approach makes the most NFL sense....I don't believe the coaches think Miller is the better 3rd down option....I think folks are over-reacting to Miller having a receiving TD.MT has Moreno higher.
What's the reason the Dolphins aren't involving Moreno in the pass game? You would think they would give some targets to a guy who caught 60 last year and had a career 8.9 YPC.
Regarding Dodds having Miller ranked higher, it makes sense if you think about projecting all players and trying to maximize your accuracy for the entirety. Mixed messages having been coming out of Miami media and Miami coaching staff for some time now, including the recent "we'll go with the hot hand" drivel, so its probably premature to project Moreno as the 60% piece of the RBBC at this juncture. Now if we see the same kind of touches distribution in Week 2, I would imagine seeing website projections adjusted accordingly.
Disclaimer: I took Moreno in the subscription contest, but was not confident as I was doing it. Initial outlook looks good for Moreno to be the 60% guy for the year, but we'll see....
Would you prefer they overreact based on week 1 or stick with their initial projections?Football Guys has always been like this. They play it safe (i.e. stick with their initial predictions in an effort to save face/be right)until it's clear that safe is no longer right. By the time they give breakout and/or surprise players their due, it's too late to do anyone who listened to them all along any good. So, listen to them on some things, but in situations like this, go with what your gut and your eyes and your rational thinking unbiased mind is telling you--because things move fast in this little hobby of ours and as such we can't always wait for confirmation from the so-called experts. Don't get me wrong, Football Guys is the best fantasy football site out there and I'm not so much bashing them as giving an honest critique on what I consider to be one of its few shortcomings--you just have to take the good with the bad, and be smart enough to know which is which.
Neither.I'd prefer they adequately react to both the preseason and Week 1 which both strongly suggest that Moreno is better back going forward.Would you prefer they overreact based on week 1 or stick with their initial projections?Football Guys has always been like this. They play it safe (i.e. stick with their initial predictions in an effort to save face/be right)until it's clear that safe is no longer right. By the time they give breakout and/or surprise players their due, it's too late to do anyone who listened to them all along any good. So, listen to them on some things, but in situations like this, go with what your gut and your eyes and your rational thinking unbiased mind is telling you--because things move fast in this little hobby of ours and as such we can't always wait for confirmation from the so-called experts. Don't get me wrong, Football Guys is the best fantasy football site out there and I'm not so much bashing them as giving an honest critique on what I consider to be one of its few shortcomings--you just have to take the good with the bad, and be smart enough to know which is which.
Precisely. It doesn't have to be so black and white either. That's what being a fantasy guru is all about: being able to dissect each situation and have the ability to weed out which players are for real and which ones are fools gold using evidence and rational thinking. In the Moreno/miller situation it's easy to see the writing on the wall. Just read the posts in this thread. People knew WEEKS ago that this was probably going to be the Moreno show. Week 1 just signed, sealed and delivered in expectations.Neither.I'd prefer they adequately react to both the preseason and Week 1 which both strongly suggest that Moreno is better back going forward.Would you prefer they overreact based on week 1 or stick with their initial projections?Football Guys has always been like this. They play it safe (i.e. stick with their initial predictions in an effort to save face/be right)until it's clear that safe is no longer right. By the time they give breakout and/or surprise players their due, it's too late to do anyone who listened to them all along any good. So, listen to them on some things, but in situations like this, go with what your gut and your eyes and your rational thinking unbiased mind is telling you--because things move fast in this little hobby of ours and as such we can't always wait for confirmation from the so-called experts. Don't get me wrong, Football Guys is the best fantasy football site out there and I'm not so much bashing them as giving an honest critique on what I consider to be one of its few shortcomings--you just have to take the good with the bad, and be smart enough to know which is which.
What they saidPrecisely. It doesn't have to be so black and white either. That's what being a fantasy guru is all about: being able to dissect each situation and have the ability to weed out which players are for real and which ones are fools gold using evidence and rational thinking. In the Moreno/miller situation it's easy to see the writing on the wall. Just read the posts in this thread. People knew WEEKS ago that this was probably going to be the Moreno show. Week 1 just signed, sealed and delivered in expectations.Neither.I'd prefer they adequately react to both the preseason and Week 1 which both strongly suggest that Moreno is better back going forward.Would you prefer they overreact based on week 1 or stick with their initial projections?Football Guys has always been like this. They play it safe (i.e. stick with their initial predictions in an effort to save face/be right)until it's clear that safe is no longer right. By the time they give breakout and/or surprise players their due, it's too late to do anyone who listened to them all along any good. So, listen to them on some things, but in situations like this, go with what your gut and your eyes and your rational thinking unbiased mind is telling you--because things move fast in this little hobby of ours and as such we can't always wait for confirmation from the so-called experts. Don't get me wrong, Football Guys is the best fantasy football site out there and I'm not so much bashing them as giving an honest critique on what I consider to be one of its few shortcomings--you just have to take the good with the bad, and be smart enough to know which is which.
Yes, he's a bell cow now. Shouldn't be on ww.Does this mean Miller is a must-have pickup for Week 3