I'd greatly prefer Tannehill. He was great when he had weapons, I'm not sure any non-elite QB would have worked in Tennessee after 2021. I think Tannehill's year off could be a benefit as it allowed him to get healthy. Flacco to me is a slightly better Jameis (blows my mind Giants fans, not just Nabers owners, are excited about him) you just know he's gonna sink you with a horrible INT, just a matter of when and how many.
I think the reason fans love Jameis is because he throws deep and plays exciting. Nobody is fooling themselves that Jameis will control himself and not turn the ball over playing hero ball. You know how baseball went all analytics and it bored the hell out of fans and made the game unwatchable? Seems like the modern movement towards short passing and the running game is doing the same in football. Fans are looking for gunslinging quarterbacks because they're exciting. Nothing is more boring than watching a team have to piddle its way down the field against a Fangio-copied defense.
It's not fun football to watch. Jameis takes shots and fans love Jameis. Chicks dig the long ball. All that stuff goes into it.
There, you've been put on notice regarding
why a crappy team's fans will rejoice at a Jameis signing. Fans of that team will get to watch exciting, sometimes competent football that is up-and-down and all around with the turnovers, too. For the moments that ball is in the air, the excitement is crazy, even when he makes one of those horrible throws into triple coverage where even the receiver wants to know what the heck he's doing. It might cost you the game, but at least its more exciting than watching Daniel Jones miss every throw and scrape out five yards a pop with an RPO that is aesthetically unpleasing beyond a doubt.
"Ooh look, there's a fifty-yard bomb!"
"Wait, you haven't seen Daniel Jones break off five yards on the ground!"
That's why the fans love Jameis even when they groan about him. At least you feel alive for a minute and have hope.