What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Missing Malaysian jet news (1 Viewer)

Hypothetical.

If this had happened back in mid-2004, would they have canceled the premiere of Lost?
Not cancelled at all. Would have been a free advertising promo.I think the bigger conspiracy is how much influence did ABC have on the 2004 World Series? No way the Sox win that one with LOST going on like that. No way.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Hypothetical.

If this had happened back in the early-70's, would they have canceled the premiere of All in the Family?

 
Aviation question:

Can you fly over the south pole?

For example, given the right amount of fuel, airplane, etc, could you fly out of South America heading directly south and at some point reach North America / Canada or does it not work like that?
I'm dumbfounded by the question - Is the premise that the South and North poles are connected by a space portal? Or the escape routes in pacman?

 
Aviation question:

Can you fly over the south pole?

For example, given the right amount of fuel, airplane, etc, could you fly out of South America heading directly south and at some point reach North America / Canada or does it not work like that?
I'm dumbfounded by the question - Is the premise that the South and North poles are connected by a space portal? Or the escape routes in pacman?
Now I'm imagining the Malaysian jet making "waka waka" noises as it flies. Thank you.

(Not like Fozzy Bear, like Pac-Man.)

 
Aviation question:

Can you fly over the south pole?

For example, given the right amount of fuel, airplane, etc, could you fly out of South America heading directly south and at some point reach North America / Canada or does it not work like that?
I'm dumbfounded by the question - Is the premise that the South and North poles are connected by a space portal? Or the escape routes in pacman?
Yes, I know.

 
Hypoxia back on the table as the British satellite math guys got the plane flying at 30,000 feet. Hypoxia best case scenerio for all onboard. Go to sleep and not be aware of what is ahead.
If somebody just originally reported that the plane made a turn back, and descended, but never made it lower than 30,000 feet, I think most everybody would've considered rapid decompression and an issue with oxygen as the prime suspect. As per "Hakeem's Razor," its the simplest idea that explains it.

Rapid decompression, pilots go "oh crap," and turn around and begin to descend. somehow oxygen doesn't work or isn't used quickly enough and everyone passes out. Autopilot continues to maintain heading and altitude, flying them out to sea. It's not that uncommon, and seems to happen every few years. I think the focus goes back to the 777 technical service memo about corrosion around a satellite antennae.

Why didn't we get to this sooner? Because of all the misinformation about flying higher, and very very low, evasive turns, timing of communications, pilots deleting flight simulator files and calling people before take-off, etc.

 
Hypoxia back on the table as the British satellite math guys got the plane flying at 30,000 feet. Hypoxia best case scenerio for all onboard. Go to sleep and not be aware of what is ahead.
If somebody just originally reported that the plane made a turn back, and descended, but never made it lower than 30,000 feet, I think most everybody would've considered rapid decompression and an issue with oxygen as the prime suspect. As per "Hakeem's Razor," its the simplest idea that explains it.

Rapid decompression, pilots go "oh crap," and turn around and begin to descend. somehow oxygen doesn't work or isn't used quickly enough and everyone passes out. Autopilot continues to maintain heading and altitude, flying them out to sea. It's not that uncommon, and seems to happen every few years. I think the focus goes back to the 777 technical service memo about corrosion around a satellite antennae.

Why didn't we get to this sooner? Because of all the misinformation about flying higher, and very very low, evasive turns, timing of communications, pilots deleting flight simulator files and calling people before take-off, etc.
but why was the transponder off before the sign off message? Why were both transponders off? Would a decompression situation disable the second transponder?

And I wonder what is the best possible contingency for a plane in this situation...does a plane have life rafts or is it all on the seats as flotation devices gimmick and life vests?

Dark of night, open ocean, vast wastland with no control of the plane presumably but assuming some awareness, could you fuel dump, glide onto the water and take your chances? beter than certain death in the plane I'd bet.

 
Hypoxia back on the table as the British satellite math guys got the plane flying at 30,000 feet. Hypoxia best case scenerio for all onboard. Go to sleep and not be aware of what is ahead.
If somebody just originally reported that the plane made a turn back, and descended, but never made it lower than 30,000 feet, I think most everybody would've considered rapid decompression and an issue with oxygen as the prime suspect. As per "Hakeem's Razor," its the simplest idea that explains it.

Rapid decompression, pilots go "oh crap," and turn around and begin to descend. somehow oxygen doesn't work or isn't used quickly enough and everyone passes out. Autopilot continues to maintain heading and altitude, flying them out to sea. It's not that uncommon, and seems to happen every few years. I think the focus goes back to the 777 technical service memo about corrosion around a satellite antennae.

Why didn't we get to this sooner? Because of all the misinformation about flying higher, and very very low, evasive turns, timing of communications, pilots deleting flight simulator files and calling people before take-off, etc.
but why was the transponder off before the sign off message? Why were both transponders off? Would a decompression situation disable the second transponder?

And I wonder what is the best possible contingency for a plane in this situation...does a plane have life rafts or is it all on the seats as flotation devices gimmick and life vests?

Dark of night, open ocean, vast wastland with no control of the plane presumably but assuming some awareness, could you fuel dump, glide onto the water and take your chances? beter than certain death in the plane I'd bet.
I'm not sure the transponder WAS off before the sign-off message. That's another one of those facts that was reported at one point, and never reconfirmed, and just basically forgotten. Exactly what I mean about so much misinformation. If it's confirmed it was, then you have a point...

A decompression via some kind of major hole in the fuselage would be basically an explosion, so it could disable most anything...transponder, comm, and oxygen possibly.

The contingency for a plane is to get under 12,000 feet as quickly as possible. That's it. If you've got no oxygen due to malfunction or damage, and you're at 30,000 ft, you've just got to go down as fast as possible and hope you don't pass out on the way. Assuming the plane is flyable, once you're in breathable air, you can probably fly wherever and land normally. All big commercial planes have floating seats and door slides that double as rafts, but again, with a decompression, it's not crashing that's the worry...it's passing out.

I think the only reason they had no control of the plane was because they were unconscious. There have been reports of pilots controlling planes using only the engine throttles when all hydraulics were out, so I think if the plane was airworthy, and they were conscious, they'd have steered it somewhere. If it wasn't air-worthy, it wouldn't have continued to fly for hours on autopilot.

And FWIW - A water landing at night would probably be the last option...basically it's a semi-controlled crash at that point. But again...you've got to be conscious to make that choice.

 
CNN is now talking to Bill Nye the Science Guy for his thoughts.

WTF? I like Bill as much as the next guy, but just because a guy ends his name with "the Science Guy" doesn't mean he's qualified to answer every question about current events.

Hey, Bill. Where do you think the plane is? Is Global Warming real? Can Dayton beat Stanford? What did you study in college? He's an engineer, for God's sake. Not the science Pope.

 
CNN is now talking to Bill Nye the Science Guy for his thoughts.

WTF? I like Bill as much as the next guy, but just because a guy ends his name with "the Science Guy" doesn't mean he's qualified to answer every question about current events.

Hey, Bill. Where do you think the plane is? Is Global Warming real? Can Dayton beat Stanford? What did you study in college? He's an engineer, for God's sake. Not the science Pope.
he pwnt that creationist dude a couple months ago. let him enjoy the moment.

 
My understanding is that the transponder just sends info periodically, not continuously. So what was actually the time the last packets of info were sent was being misinterpreted by media as when the transponder was turned off.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
CNN is now talking to Bill Nye the Science Guy for his thoughts.

WTF? I like Bill as much as the next guy, but just because a guy ends his name with "the Science Guy" doesn't mean he's qualified to answer every question about current events.

Hey, Bill. Where do you think the plane is? Is Global Warming real? Can Dayton beat Stanford? What did you study in college? He's an engineer, for God's sake. Not the science Pope.
He wanted to be called Bill Nye "the Iron Shiek",

 
CNN is now talking to Bill Nye the Science Guy for his thoughts.

WTF? I like Bill as much as the next guy, but just because a guy ends his name with "the Science Guy" doesn't mean he's qualified to answer every question about current events.

Hey, Bill. Where do you think the plane is? Is Global Warming real? Can Dayton beat Stanford? What did you study in college? He's an engineer, for God's sake. Not the science Pope.
he pwnt that creationist dude a couple months ago. let him enjoy the moment.
Not taking anything away from Bill, but I think a lot of people could have pwned that dude. But CNN has been using him for everything WAAAAAAY before that "debate."

 
Not taking anything away from Bill, but I think a lot of people could have pwned that dude. But CNN has been using him for everything WAAAAAAY before that "debate."
Like that McInerney idiot Fox uses as an "expert"? Man was he wrong on this one. :lmao:

MCINERNEY: It's about 3,500 miles, seven hours, 500 miles through, let's say. So -- and they went north for a part, say 3,000 miles, 3,200 miles, something like that. Of course there now appears to be evidence that there was a direct course through India flying in the shadow of a Singapore flight 68. That hasn't been verified. The only thing that I have seen that is starting to become verified is the report from Boeing saying they believe the airplane was in Pakistan, which I talked about on Friday.

HANNITY: General, I've known you a long time. I know you too well to know that you're not just making this up, this isn't something you've concocted. You've spoken to a number of people, am I correct?

MCINERNEY: Yes, but that's all I want to say, Sean, please.

HANNITY: Fair enough. And you believe this plane is intact and that this plane landed?

MCINERNEY: I do.
MCINERNEY: I don't know anything about their status. What I do know is the most sensors that we have in the world are in that region. They're not in the south of the Indian Ocean. We have a lot of sensors up there so we have a lot of capabilities. And I believe with Rolls-Royce and with Boeing as well as the U.S. government, we know a lot more than is coming out. I suspect we may in the next 24 to 48 hours start hearing from either the Malaysian government or the Pakistani government. If the Pakistani government doesn't talk soon, they're going to be complicit in this.

HANNITY: For this plane, if it would have landed in Pakistan, the Pakistanis would have had to know that?

MCINERNEY: Yes.
http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/03/19/could-missing-plane-be-held-pakistan

 
My understanding is that the transponder just sends info periodically, not continuously. So what was actually the time the last packets of info were sent was being misinterpreted by media as when the transponder was turned off.
I thought it sort of serves as an ID to air traffic control so its not a mystery dot on the radar..so if its in radar range you know what it is...

 
Not taking anything away from Bill, but I think a lot of people could have pwned that dude. But CNN has been using him for everything WAAAAAAY before that "debate."
Like that McInerney idiot Fox uses as an "expert"? Man was he wrong on this one. :lmao:

MCINERNEY: It's about 3,500 miles, seven hours, 500 miles through, let's say. So -- and they went north for a part, say 3,000 miles, 3,200 miles, something like that. Of course there now appears to be evidence that there was a direct course through India flying in the shadow of a Singapore flight 68. That hasn't been verified. The only thing that I have seen that is starting to become verified is the report from Boeing saying they believe the airplane was in Pakistan, which I talked about on Friday.

HANNITY: General, I've known you a long time. I know you too well to know that you're not just making this up, this isn't something you've concocted. You've spoken to a number of people, am I correct?

MCINERNEY: Yes, but that's all I want to say, Sean, please.

HANNITY: Fair enough. And you believe this plane is intact and that this plane landed?

MCINERNEY: I do.
MCINERNEY: I don't know anything about their status. What I do know is the most sensors that we have in the world are in that region. They're not in the south of the Indian Ocean. We have a lot of sensors up there so we have a lot of capabilities. And I believe with Rolls-Royce and with Boeing as well as the U.S. government, we know a lot more than is coming out. I suspect we may in the next 24 to 48 hours start hearing from either the Malaysian government or the Pakistani government. If the Pakistani government doesn't talk soon, they're going to be complicit in this.

HANNITY: For this plane, if it would have landed in Pakistan, the Pakistanis would have had to know that?

MCINERNEY: Yes.
http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/03/19/could-missing-plane-be-held-pakistan
And yet the next time there's some kind of crisis, Fox (and CNN) will trundle out the same cast of buffoons to babble their tripe at a rate of $50 / minute and nothing will have changed.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Not taking anything away from Bill, but I think a lot of people could have pwned that dude. But CNN has been using him for everything WAAAAAAY before that "debate."
Like that McInerney idiot Fox uses as an "expert"? Man was he wrong on this one. :lmao:

MCINERNEY: It's about 3,500 miles, seven hours, 500 miles through, let's say. So -- and they went north for a part, say 3,000 miles, 3,200 miles, something like that. Of course there now appears to be evidence that there was a direct course through India flying in the shadow of a Singapore flight 68. That hasn't been verified. The only thing that I have seen that is starting to become verified is the report from Boeing saying they believe the airplane was in Pakistan, which I talked about on Friday.

HANNITY: General, I've known you a long time. I know you too well to know that you're not just making this up, this isn't something you've concocted. You've spoken to a number of people, am I correct?

MCINERNEY: Yes, but that's all I want to say, Sean, please.

HANNITY: Fair enough. And you believe this plane is intact and that this plane landed?

MCINERNEY: I do.
MCINERNEY: I don't know anything about their status. What I do know is the most sensors that we have in the world are in that region. They're not in the south of the Indian Ocean. We have a lot of sensors up there so we have a lot of capabilities. And I believe with Rolls-Royce and with Boeing as well as the U.S. government, we know a lot more than is coming out. I suspect we may in the next 24 to 48 hours start hearing from either the Malaysian government or the Pakistani government. If the Pakistani government doesn't talk soon, they're going to be complicit in this.

HANNITY: For this plane, if it would have landed in Pakistan, the Pakistanis would have had to know that?

MCINERNEY: Yes.
http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/03/19/could-missing-plane-be-held-pakistan
I was too lazy to find this to bump. Hannity will connect this all to Benghazi any day now.

 
My understanding is that the transponder just sends info periodically, not continuously. So what was actually the time the last packets of info were sent was being misinterpreted by media as when the transponder was turned off.
I thought it sort of serves as an ID to air traffic control so its not a mystery dot on the radar..so if its in radar range you know what it is...
I was mixing it up with the engine/satellite pings. That's right, but how does it work when there is no radar profile to attach to?

 
My understanding is that the transponder just sends info periodically, not continuously. So what was actually the time the last packets of info were sent was being misinterpreted by media as when the transponder was turned off.
I thought it sort of serves as an ID to air traffic control so its not a mystery dot on the radar..so if its in radar range you know what it is...
I was mixing it up with the engine/satellite pings. That's right, but how does it work when there is no radar profile to attach to?
The only other function it serves is to provide altitude and directional data to air-to-air devices if the planes are so equipped. An aircraft can often see another aircraft as a line (indicating heading) and a number, indicating flight altitude. If it's not being picked up by another ground based radar, it serves no other purpose.

 
3/22/2014
A Frightening Turn of Events

Dear Friends and fellow Patriots. Yesterday evening, not too long after starting this website and, something startling and scary happened. A black van, with dark tinted windows, appeared in my neighborhood. Very mysterious, as I have never seen this van before. It was parked several houses down.

Needless to say, this frightened me. Could the NSA, FBI, CIA, or all of them, working in concert together, have been able to mobilize that fast? It is well known that they have the ability to monitor the citizens of this country, so it's not beyond the realm of reason that Obama has his goons sent to my home to watch me and intimidate me.

I slipped out of a back window in the middle of the night, and climbed over the fence in my backyard, traveled through a few back yards, and stayed over at a friend's house for the night. I drove through my neighborhood earlier this morning, and the van was still there. I was even more frightened than before. Finally, this afternoon, the van was gone. I went home, grabbed some clothes and my laptop, packed a bag, and left. I am now at a motel, and I will hop from motel to motel for several days before I even think about going back home. Pray for me, Friends and Patriots.
Wow. Some people are simply paranoid freaks.
There's more, fortunately.

Flight 370 - "Pay no attention to the Benghazi behind the curtain"

-Stephen "Bunker" Hill

Fact: In 1997, Malaysian Airlines set a distance record in the Boeing 777-200ER, the same model as the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. The record achieved that day was 10,823 nautical miles (20,044 km), in 21 hours and 23 minutes.

Fact: We have been told that the plane could only be aloft for, at most, 8 hours and travel, at most, 4,800 km. At the time of its last radar sighting, Flight 370 had traveled fewer than 1,000 km. We are lead to beleive that the missing plan must have landed or crashed sometime within the next few hours and that this must have happened within 3,800 km of its last known location.

And we are to believe this in spite of this amazing American aviation creation being lauded for flying over twice as far, for almost 3 times longer - a feat ironically achieved by the very people who have "lost" list Boeing 777-200ER.

Fact: Benghazi is about 10,000 km away from Kuala Lumpur. Most of that distance is over water or other well-known Islamist nations. With a proven range of 20,000 km, Benghazi is well within achievable distance for Flight 370, even if a somewhat circuitous route is necessary to avoid detection.

Fact: The Benghazi airport is of sufficient size to easily allow a Boeing 777 to land. American troops from Tripoli were detailed to protect this airport that fateful night to maintain a site for later troop landings. This is the only thing U.S. troops were ordered to protect, and no U.S. assets were later to land there. Perhaps the protection order was to guarantee an important plane departing from that airport? A large plane, one that a U.S. dignitary, official... perhaps a Cabinet Officer... might use?

Fact: Two passengers on Flight 370 boarded using forged documents. Since the cabin crew must already know of the fact that the plane was fully fueled (as opposed to being fueled only for a short 6-hour flight to Beijing), it's reasonable to suspect that compatriots were allowed to board, anonymously, to assist in passenger control or flight in the event one of the cabin crew became incapacitated.

We don't know yet for what reason Flight 370, its passengers, and the crew not involved in the scheme, were taken or why they were flown to Benghazi. Similarly, questions abound regarding the cowardly attacks on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi on 9-11-2012. Is it not easy to assume that both crimes come from the same source, with the same anti-U.S. objectives? Is it not obvious?
 
Not taking anything away from Bill, but I think a lot of people could have pwned that dude. But CNN has been using him for everything WAAAAAAY before that "debate."
Like that McInerney idiot Fox uses as an "expert"? Man was he wrong on this one. :lmao:

MCINERNEY: It's about 3,500 miles, seven hours, 500 miles through, let's say. So -- and they went north for a part, say 3,000 miles, 3,200 miles, something like that. Of course there now appears to be evidence that there was a direct course through India flying in the shadow of a Singapore flight 68. That hasn't been verified. The only thing that I have seen that is starting to become verified is the report from Boeing saying they believe the airplane was in Pakistan, which I talked about on Friday.

HANNITY: General, I've known you a long time. I know you too well to know that you're not just making this up, this isn't something you've concocted. You've spoken to a number of people, am I correct?

MCINERNEY: Yes, but that's all I want to say, Sean, please.

HANNITY: Fair enough. And you believe this plane is intact and that this plane landed?

MCINERNEY: I do.
MCINERNEY: I don't know anything about their status. What I do know is the most sensors that we have in the world are in that region. They're not in the south of the Indian Ocean. We have a lot of sensors up there so we have a lot of capabilities. And I believe with Rolls-Royce and with Boeing as well as the U.S. government, we know a lot more than is coming out. I suspect we may in the next 24 to 48 hours start hearing from either the Malaysian government or the Pakistani government. If the Pakistani government doesn't talk soon, they're going to be complicit in this.

HANNITY: For this plane, if it would have landed in Pakistan, the Pakistanis would have had to know that?

MCINERNEY: Yes.
http://nation.foxnews.com/2014/03/19/could-missing-plane-be-held-pakistan
And yet the next time there's some kind of crisis, Fox (and CNN) will trundle out the same cast of buffoons to babble their tripe at a rate of $50 / minute and nothing will have changed.
Hannity was a nut job before and after, but other than him, Fox was fine during this. In fact, O'Reilly not only called where the plane was last week, but told everybody they were being irresponsible in turning this story into a circus.

 
From the same boeinghazi site:

3/24/2014

Kim Jong Un – Mastermind of the MH370 hijacking

or Obama’s complicit compatriot?

By Heston Ranger

In a recent release of information from an unnamed Korean News Bureau, a photo was

discovered of Kim Jong Un studying navigational charts of the territorial waters directly

adjacent to Malaysia. The proximity of the cordoned area in the map is remarkably

close to the flight path of Malaysian airlines MH370 flight and could easily be reached

with a minor course variance. Additional photos show Un and his cadre of generals

reviewing the charts several days before the event.
:lmao:

 
Flight 370 - "Pay no attention to the Benghazi behind the curtain"

-Stephen "Bunker" Hill

Fact: In 1997, Malaysian Airlines set a distance record in the Boeing 777-200ER, the same model as the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. The record achieved that day was 10,823 nautical miles (20,044 km), in 21 hours and 23 minutes.
They do realize that the plane in question was likely empty, right? It flew eastward from Boeing Field, Seattle to Kuala Lumpur...so not exactly how a commercial flight would do it...Also, it was flying with the jet stream direction, which would've added many many miles to the distance traveled. No way it could've come BACK from Kuala Lumpur west-bound to Seattle.

 
Flight 370 - "Pay no attention to the Benghazi behind the curtain"

-Stephen "Bunker" Hill

Fact: In 1997, Malaysian Airlines set a distance record in the Boeing 777-200ER, the same model as the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. The record achieved that day was 10,823 nautical miles (20,044 km), in 21 hours and 23 minutes.
They do realize that the plane in question was likely empty, right? It flew eastward from Boeing Field, Seattle to Kuala Lumpur...so not exactly how a commercial flight would do it...Also, it was flying with the jet stream direction, which would've added many many miles to the distance traveled. No way it could've come BACK from Kuala Lumpur west-bound to Seattle.
It was also fully fueled. Airlines don't necessarily top it off on every flight.

 
So the Aussies are saying that the searches will be very difficult now as autumn is in full swing, their November is quickly approaching. Essentially if they don't find this plane in the next month they'll have to stop for winter. This means search would stop from May to September in that part of the world. Yikes.
What kind of crazy calendar do they use in Australia. I would have thought their April was approaching.

 
Flight 370 - "Pay no attention to the Benghazi behind the curtain"

-Stephen "Bunker" Hill

Fact: In 1997, Malaysian Airlines set a distance record in the Boeing 777-200ER, the same model as the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. The record achieved that day was 10,823 nautical miles (20,044 km), in 21 hours and 23 minutes.
They do realize that the plane in question was likely empty, right? It flew eastward from Boeing Field, Seattle to Kuala Lumpur...so not exactly how a commercial flight would do it...Also, it was flying with the jet stream direction, which would've added many many miles to the distance traveled. No way it could've come BACK from Kuala Lumpur west-bound to Seattle.
It was also fully fueled. Airlines don't necessarily top it off on every flight.
Pretty sure this is satire, people. The website's name is literally "Boeinghazi".

 
From the same boeinghazi site:

3/24/2014

Kim Jong Un – Mastermind of the MH370 hijacking

or Obama’s complicit compatriot?

By Heston Ranger

In a recent release of information from an unnamed Korean News Bureau, a photo was

discovered of Kim Jong Un studying navigational charts of the territorial waters directly

adjacent to Malaysia. The proximity of the cordoned area in the map is remarkably

close to the flight path of Malaysian airlines MH370 flight and could easily be reached

with a minor course variance. Additional photos show Un and his cadre of generals

reviewing the charts several days before the event.
:lmao:
Anyone else remember the much missed and mourned World Weekly News? They would have made hay from this story. The above looks like one of their staff is still writing.

 
Definition of terrorist = A person who terrorises other people and world society.

Obama terrorises Muslim and Arab countries/world.

Obama terrorises honest and hard working Americans & worldwide people. Nobody buying... Nobody earning... Nobody getting hired. The goverment doesn't create jobs. People create jobs. And Obama terrifies business owners and consumers.

Actually there are government jobs available so technically the government does create jobs but thats besides the point.

Obama terrorises world women, girls and men because as USA president he is not destroying world pornography and prostitution.


My question: Is Obama a Terrorist?

 
Flight 370 - "Pay no attention to the Benghazi behind the curtain"

-Stephen "Bunker" Hill

Fact: In 1997, Malaysian Airlines set a distance record in the Boeing 777-200ER, the same model as the missing Malaysian Airlines Flight 370. The record achieved that day was 10,823 nautical miles (20,044 km), in 21 hours and 23 minutes.
They do realize that the plane in question was likely empty, right? It flew eastward from Boeing Field, Seattle to Kuala Lumpur...so not exactly how a commercial flight would do it...Also, it was flying with the jet stream direction, which would've added many many miles to the distance traveled. No way it could've come BACK from Kuala Lumpur west-bound to Seattle.
It was also fully fueled. Airlines don't necessarily top it off on every flight.
Pretty sure this is satire, people. The website's name is literally "Boeinghazi".
If people don't recognize shtick on this board, how the hell do you expect them to know satire when they see it?

 
Definition of terrorist = A person who terrorises other people and world society.

Obama terrorises Muslim and Arab countries/world.

Obama terrorises honest and hard working Americans & worldwide people. Nobody buying... Nobody earning... Nobody getting hired. The goverment doesn't create jobs. People create jobs. And Obama terrifies business owners and consumers.

Actually there are government jobs available so technically the government does create jobs but thats besides the point.

Obama terrorises world women, girls and men because as USA president he is not destroying world pornography and prostitution.

My question: Is Obama a Terrorist?
Please define "terrorises"

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Definition of terrorist = A person who terrorises other people and world society.

Obama terrorises Muslim and Arab countries/world.

Obama terrorises honest and hard working Americans & worldwide people. Nobody buying... Nobody earning... Nobody getting hired. The goverment doesn't create jobs. People create jobs. And Obama terrifies business owners and consumers.

Actually there are government jobs available so technically the government does create jobs but thats besides the point.

Obama terrorises world women, girls and men because as USA president he is not destroying world pornography and prostitution.

My question: Is Obama a Terrorist?
Please define "terrorises"
Terrorises - When terro goes upwards

 
Definition of terrorist = A person who terrorises other people and world society.

Obama terrorises Muslim and Arab countries/world.

Obama terrorises honest and hard working Americans & worldwide people. Nobody buying... Nobody earning... Nobody getting hired. The goverment doesn't create jobs. People create jobs. And Obama terrifies business owners and consumers.

Actually there are government jobs available so technically the government does create jobs but thats besides the point.

Obama terrorises world women, girls and men because as USA president he is not destroying world pornography and prostitution.

My question: Is Obama a Terrorist?
Please define "terrorises"
Maybe he just has a lisp.........Say it like Sylvester.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
CNN is now talking to Bill Nye the Science Guy for his thoughts.

WTF? I like Bill as much as the next guy, but just because a guy ends his name with "the Science Guy" doesn't mean he's qualified to answer every question about current events.

Hey, Bill. Where do you think the plane is? Is Global Warming real? Can Dayton beat Stanford? What did you study in college? He's an engineer, for God's sake. Not the science Pope.
he pwnt that creationist dude a couple months ago. let him enjoy the moment.
Not taking anything away from Bill, but I think a lot of people could have pwned that dude. But CNN has been using him for everything WAAAAAAY before that "debate."
I mentioned it several pages back. The guy must be on some serious publicity tour. You see him everywhere all of a sudden

 
So is this story just going to fade away or what?

Seems the air is out of it and Malaysia wants to just move on. bascially "It's in the Indian Ocean alright? now leave us alone."

 
Definition of terrorist = A person who terrorises other people and world society.

Obama terrorises Muslim and Arab countries/world.

Obama terrorises honest and hard working Americans & worldwide people. Nobody buying... Nobody earning... Nobody getting hired. The goverment doesn't create jobs. People create jobs. And Obama terrifies business owners and consumers.

Actually there are government jobs available so technically the government does create jobs but thats besides the point.

Obama terrorises world women, girls and men because as USA president he is not destroying world pornography and prostitution.

My question: Is Obama a Terrorist?
Please define "terrorises"
Terrorises - When terro goes upwards
also the plural form of terroris

 
Definition of terrorist = A person who terrorises other people and world society.

Obama terrorises Muslim and Arab countries/world.

Obama terrorises honest and hard working Americans & worldwide people. Nobody buying... Nobody earning... Nobody getting hired. The goverment doesn't create jobs. People create jobs. And Obama terrifies business owners and consumers.

Actually there are government jobs available so technically the government does create jobs but thats besides the point.

Obama terrorises world women, girls and men because as USA president he is not destroying world pornography and prostitution.

My question: Is Obama a Terrorist?
Please define "terrorises"
Terrorises - When terro goes upwards
also the plural form of terroris
You sure that's not terrori?

 
So is this story just going to fade away or what?

Seems the air is out of it and Malaysia wants to just move on. bascially "It's in the Indian Ocean alright? now leave us alone."
why waste more money. everyone's dead and the plane is at the bottom of the ocean. How many more 10's of millions should be wasted.

 
From the same boeinghazi site:

3/24/2014

Kim Jong Un – Mastermind of the MH370 hijacking

or Obama’s complicit compatriot?

By Heston Ranger

In a recent release of information from an unnamed Korean News Bureau, a photo was

discovered of Kim Jong Un studying navigational charts of the territorial waters directly

adjacent to Malaysia. The proximity of the cordoned area in the map is remarkably

close to the flight path of Malaysian airlines MH370 flight and could easily be reached

with a minor course variance. Additional photos show Un and his cadre of generals

reviewing the charts several days before the event.
Obviously they are reading the FBG Missing Malaysian jet news thread. I threw it out there that Kim Jong Un stole it as his personal North Korea 1 soon after it went missing. :fishing: Got 'em.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top