What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Mizzou Prez Forced to Resign for....? (1 Viewer)

Why stop at the revocation of First Amendment rights or "safe spaces"? How about "Merit Badges for Millennials"?

Worst.

Generation.

Ever.

(WWII vets are thinking, "We fought and died for this?")
You know that "1950" in "Concerned Students 1950" refers to the first year that black students were admitted to the University of Missouri, right? Four years after WWII ended a whole bunch of those racist mother####### were still refusing to even let black people go to school with them. Say what you will of this generation, but I don't think the previous generations have a lot to be proud of here either.
Well you know except for that World War II thing where they saved the world and everybody's rights to begin with, whereupon they followed with maybe the world's only civil rights expansion that for the great, great almost totality happened without violence or civil or guerrilla war. I'd say they have loads to be proud of.

I kind of think the progressives are going Tea Party here. There is stupid, just dumb antidemocratic stuff going on here. As happens the seesaw of extremism has tilted the other way. Hopefully the water flows back to the middle of the pond again, we'll see.

 
Why stop at the revocation of First Amendment rights or "safe spaces"? How about "Merit Badges for Millennials"?

Worst.

Generation.

Ever.

(WWII vets are thinking, "We fought and died for this?")
You know that "1950" in "Concerned Students 1950" refers to the first year that black students were admitted to the University of Missouri, right? Four years after WWII ended a whole bunch of those racist mother####### were still refusing to even let black people go to school with them. Say what you will of this generation, but I don't think the previous generations have a lot to be proud of here either.
Well you know except for that World War II thing where they saved the world and everybody's rights to begin with, whereupon they followed with maybe the world's only civil rights expansion that for the great, great almost totality happened without violence or civil or guerrilla war. I'd say they have loads to be proud of.

I kind of think the progressives are going Tea Party here. There is stupid, just dumb antidemocratic stuff going on here. As happens the seesaw of extremism has tilted the other way. Hopefully the water flows back to the middle of the pond again, we'll see.
When exactly were you born?

 
Why stop at the revocation of First Amendment rights or "safe spaces"? How about "Merit Badges for Millennials"?

Worst.

Generation.

Ever.

(WWII vets are thinking, "We fought and died for this?")
You know that "1950" in "Concerned Students 1950" refers to the first year that black students were admitted to the University of Missouri, right? Four years after WWII ended a whole bunch of those racist mother####### were still refusing to even let black people go to school with them. Say what you will of this generation, but I don't think the previous generations have a lot to be proud of here either.
Well you know except for that World War II thing where they saved the world and everybody's rights to begin with, whereupon they followed with maybe the world's only civil rights expansion that for the great, great almost totality happened without violence or civil or guerrilla war. I'd say they have loads to be proud of.

I kind of think the progressives are going Tea Party here. There is stupid, just dumb antidemocratic stuff going on here. As happens the seesaw of extremism has tilted the other way. Hopefully the water flows back to the middle of the pond again, we'll see.
When exactly were you born?
Last century.

eta - I know what you mean. I couched my point to be clear I acknowledge there was "violence" but not major civil strife. Urban riots, assassination of MLK, civil rights marches met with state and local police, some KKK violence, I realize all that, but the reality is that by and large we did what we did democratically and the ruling class by and large did so voluntarily out of principle. There isn't another country in the world with that kind of accomplishment on their record.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
so what happens when the next (insert any major college FB or BB team) decides to 'protest' and not play until (insert demand of the day) is met?
That's what the NCAA is so afraid of. The players have a lot of power if they use it.
Already happening at U of Alabama and Ole Miss
:popcorn:
I thought this angle was the most fascinating part of this story, surprised it's not getting more play. These sort of campus protest movements flare up from time to time, maybe some people change some attitudes or policies going forward, some people complain about "these kids today," but generally they don't amount to much in the long run.

Football players exercising their limitless power over universities, on the other hand? That might be just getting started. Could be a whole new world. After fighting pay and unionizing for athletes for so long the NCAA members might actually find that they're better off allowing those things, because paid players would be less inclined to strike and under a CBA they likely wouldn't be able to do so at all midseason. In the current state of affairs the football and basketball teams run the school. Can you think of anything the Alabama players couldn't get if they refused to play unless it was granted?
Honestly no. BUT, Saban is not a ####### lightweight who's going to join the protest. Any kid refusing to play would be cut, instantly, no matter who they are, and there would be tons of kids waiting eagerly to take their place.

Nick Saban, being an adult, would never capitulate to this immature, fascist crap. The players know this and know if they want their ticket punched to the NFL and that multi-million dollar payday, they better fall in line with the program.

 
When you are looking for racism, you can find it in places where it doesn't exist. People do this all of the time in a lot of areas of life. Sometimes there are legitimate instances that simply fuel the paranoia. But the entire benchmark anecdote in that article could easily be just a misunderstanding. Maybe the student didn't like the view from the seat he was in. Maybe he wanted to talk to someone else in the room. Maybe he was sitting under a vent and was cold. To assume that someone moved seats because of you is not only likely incorrect, but extremely self-absorbed.

 
so what happens when the next (insert any major college FB or BB team) decides to 'protest' and not play until (insert demand of the day) is met?
That's what the NCAA is so afraid of. The players have a lot of power if they use it.
Already happening at U of Alabama and Ole Miss
:popcorn:
I thought this angle was the most fascinating part of this story, surprised it's not getting more play. These sort of campus protest movements flare up from time to time, maybe some people change some attitudes or policies going forward, some people complain about "these kids today," but generally they don't amount to much in the long run.

Football players exercising their limitless power over universities, on the other hand? That might be just getting started. Could be a whole new world. After fighting pay and unionizing for athletes for so long the NCAA members might actually find that they're better off allowing those things, because paid players would be less inclined to strike and under a CBA they likely wouldn't be able to do so at all midseason. In the current state of affairs the football and basketball teams run the school. Can you think of anything the Alabama players couldn't get if they refused to play unless it was granted?
a national title?
That's the FIRST thing they could get. The school's already given them at least four that they didn't actually win. They probably didn't even have to ask for them.
Oh give me a ####### BREAK

 
Let's not pretend players at the real schools are going to skip out on playing... guys who are on track to play in the NFL aren't going to jeopardize that over some trumped up cause-head's hissy fit. Now second rate schools with players on the last leg of their career? More likely.

This whole thing reminds me of my pop when I was a kid:

"You wanna give you something to cry about?!"
Missouri has a few players on their team now are who "on track to play in the NFL" - Kentrell Brothers is a 2nd day pick next year, and they have 2 or 3 other draftable players in the 2016 draft. Later draft classes are harder to see, but there are a few who will be in the 2017 and 2018 drafts.

 
Why stop at the revocation of First Amendment rights or "safe spaces"? How about "Merit Badges for Millennials"?

Worst.

Generation.

Ever.

(WWII vets are thinking, "We fought and died for this?")
You know that "1950" in "Concerned Students 1950" refers to the first year that black students were admitted to the University of Missouri, right? Four years after WWII ended a whole bunch of those racist mother####### were still refusing to even let black people go to school with them. Say what you will of this generation, but I don't think the previous generations have a lot to be proud of here either.
Well you know except for that World War II thing where they saved the world and everybody's rights to begin with, whereupon they followed with maybe the world's only civil rights expansion that for the great, great almost totality happened without violence or civil or guerrilla war. I'd say they have loads to be proud of.

I kind of think the progressives are going Tea Party here. There is stupid, just dumb antidemocratic stuff going on here. As happens the seesaw of extremism has tilted the other way. Hopefully the water flows back to the middle of the pond again, we'll see.
This discussion is getting silly. These students are hardly representative of progressives or the liberal/progressive movement in this country.

 
so what happens when the next (insert any major college FB or BB team) decides to 'protest' and not play until (insert demand of the day) is met?
That's what the NCAA is so afraid of. The players have a lot of power if they use it.
Already happening at U of Alabama and Ole Miss
:popcorn:
I thought this angle was the most fascinating part of this story, surprised it's not getting more play. These sort of campus protest movements flare up from time to time, maybe some people change some attitudes or policies going forward, some people complain about "these kids today," but generally they don't amount to much in the long run.

Football players exercising their limitless power over universities, on the other hand? That might be just getting started. Could be a whole new world. After fighting pay and unionizing for athletes for so long the NCAA members might actually find that they're better off allowing those things, because paid players would be less inclined to strike and under a CBA they likely wouldn't be able to do so at all midseason. In the current state of affairs the football and basketball teams run the school. Can you think of anything the Alabama players couldn't get if they refused to play unless it was granted?
Honestly no. BUT, Saban is not a ####### lightweight who's going to join the protest. Any kid refusing to play would be cut, instantly, no matter who they are, and there would be tons of kids waiting eagerly to take their place.

Nick Saban, being an adult, would never capitulate to this immature, fascist crap. The players know this and know if they want their ticket punched to the NFL and that multi-million dollar payday, they better fall in line with the program.
It's pretty unrealistic to think that Saban is immune from all this just because lots of others are willing to play football at Alabama. The quality of Alabama's current players is exactly what gives them the clout. The quickest way out for Saban is to get a reputation for being unfriendly to black players and their grievances.

Playing the hard line is on the way out.

 
Why stop at the revocation of First Amendment rights or "safe spaces"? How about "Merit Badges for Millennials"?

Worst.

Generation.

Ever.

(WWII vets are thinking, "We fought and died for this?")
You know that "1950" in "Concerned Students 1950" refers to the first year that black students were admitted to the University of Missouri, right? Four years after WWII ended a whole bunch of those racist mother####### were still refusing to even let black people go to school with them. Say what you will of this generation, but I don't think the previous generations have a lot to be proud of here either.
Well you know except for that World War II thing where they saved the world and everybody's rights to begin with, whereupon they followed with maybe the world's only civil rights expansion that for the great, great almost totality happened without violence or civil or guerrilla war. I'd say they have loads to be proud of.

I kind of think the progressives are going Tea Party here. There is stupid, just dumb antidemocratic stuff going on here. As happens the seesaw of extremism has tilted the other way. Hopefully the water flows back to the middle of the pond again, we'll see.
This discussion is getting silly. These students are hardly representative of progressives or the liberal/progressive movement in this country.
How would you describe them ideologically?

 
Why stop at the revocation of First Amendment rights or "safe spaces"? How about "Merit Badges for Millennials"?

Worst.

Generation.

Ever.

(WWII vets are thinking, "We fought and died for this?")
You know that "1950" in "Concerned Students 1950" refers to the first year that black students were admitted to the University of Missouri, right? Four years after WWII ended a whole bunch of those racist mother####### were still refusing to even let black people go to school with them. Say what you will of this generation, but I don't think the previous generations have a lot to be proud of here either.
Well you know except for that World War II thing where they saved the world and everybody's rights to begin with, whereupon they followed with maybe the world's only civil rights expansion that for the great, great almost totality happened without violence or civil or guerrilla war. I'd say they have loads to be proud of.

I kind of think the progressives are going Tea Party here. There is stupid, just dumb antidemocratic stuff going on here. As happens the seesaw of extremism has tilted the other way. Hopefully the water flows back to the middle of the pond again, we'll see.
This discussion is getting silly. These students are hardly representative of progressives or the liberal/progressive movement in this country.
How would you describe them ideologically?
How they describe themselves or how one describes them does not mean they are representative of the progressives or the progressive movement. It would be like saying the Tea Party is representative of conservatives in general. It is too early for any polling results on this, but I doubt most people who label themselves progressive/liberal would approve of, or support the students actions/demands.

 
so what happens when the next (insert any major college FB or BB team) decides to 'protest' and not play until (insert demand of the day) is met?
That's what the NCAA is so afraid of. The players have a lot of power if they use it.
Already happening at U of Alabama and Ole Miss
:popcorn:
I thought this angle was the most fascinating part of this story, surprised it's not getting more play. These sort of campus protest movements flare up from time to time, maybe some people change some attitudes or policies going forward, some people complain about "these kids today," but generally they don't amount to much in the long run.

Football players exercising their limitless power over universities, on the other hand? That might be just getting started. Could be a whole new world. After fighting pay and unionizing for athletes for so long the NCAA members might actually find that they're better off allowing those things, because paid players would be less inclined to strike and under a CBA they likely wouldn't be able to do so at all midseason. In the current state of affairs the football and basketball teams run the school. Can you think of anything the Alabama players couldn't get if they refused to play unless it was granted?
Honestly no. BUT, Saban is not a ####### lightweight who's going to join the protest. Any kid refusing to play would be cut, instantly, no matter who they are, and there would be tons of kids waiting eagerly to take their place.

Nick Saban, being an adult, would never capitulate to this immature, fascist crap. The players know this and know if they want their ticket punched to the NFL and that multi-million dollar payday, they better fall in line with the program.
It's pretty unrealistic to think that Saban is immune from all this just because lots of others are willing to play football at Alabama. The quality of Alabama's current players is exactly what gives them the clout. The quickest way out for Saban is to get a reputation for being unfriendly to black players and their grievances.

Playing the hard line is on the way out.
Maybe at ####-### universities like Mizzou. Here's the thing: I am willing to bet that none of Saban's players would even consider sitting out regardless of how hard some neo-fascist POS like the CS1950 went at them. Because they have instead learned things like accountability, hard work, and have seen the actual rewards that gets them, so they believe in it. Saban has not balked at getting rid of highly-talented players. When he took over there were tons of them around, because they had grown complacent and entitled under Shula. He sent them all packing and had a rough first year but look at the program since.

I highly doubt any player that is an essential part of that team would be willing to sacrifice all their hard work because of some BS complaints about the fact that racism exists and the world isn't a safe space where they can be coddled.

 
The Mizzou student VP says it all here

Brenda Smith-Lezama, vice president of the Missouri Students Association, appeared on MSNBC Tuesday afternoon to express her disdain at people using their First Amendment rights to create a "hostile" and "unsafe" learning environment. Smith-Lezama advocated for a safe space for "healing" rather than "experiencing a lot of hate."MSNBC host Thomas Roberts asked Smith-Lezama to respond to a professor who "complained" universities are becoming intolerant of opposing views.

"One professor complained universities are becoming places of prohibition," Roberts said. "What's your feeling? Do you believe that's a place we are heading for American campuses now? "

"I personally am tired of hearing that first amendment rights protect students when they are creating a hostile and unsafe learning environment for myself and for other students here," Smith-Lezama said on MSNBC. "I think that it's important for us to create that distinction and create a space where we can all learn from one another and start to create a place of healing rather than a place where we are experiencing a lot of hate like we have in the past."

Smith-Lezama said the treatment of a student journalist who was accosted on Monday should be a "teachable moment" for those who approach the protestors with "hostility."

"I think it's a teachable moment for all of us," she said of the incident. "I also think it's important to remember that as student journalists, you cannot approach these type of situations with hostility and with anger because it only escalates the situation."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/11/10/missouri_student_vp_im_tired_of_hearing_people_use_first_amendment_rights_to_create_hostile_atmosphere.html
I think we just found somebody stupider than Screaming Yale Girl.

 
so what happens when the next (insert any major college FB or BB team) decides to 'protest' and not play until (insert demand of the day) is met?
That's what the NCAA is so afraid of. The players have a lot of power if they use it.
Already happening at U of Alabama and Ole Miss
:popcorn:
I thought this angle was the most fascinating part of this story, surprised it's not getting more play. These sort of campus protest movements flare up from time to time, maybe some people change some attitudes or policies going forward, some people complain about "these kids today," but generally they don't amount to much in the long run.

Football players exercising their limitless power over universities, on the other hand? That might be just getting started. Could be a whole new world. After fighting pay and unionizing for athletes for so long the NCAA members might actually find that they're better off allowing those things, because paid players would be less inclined to strike and under a CBA they likely wouldn't be able to do so at all midseason. In the current state of affairs the football and basketball teams run the school. Can you think of anything the Alabama players couldn't get if they refused to play unless it was granted?
Honestly no. BUT, Saban is not a ####### lightweight who's going to join the protest. Any kid refusing to play would be cut, instantly, no matter who they are, and there would be tons of kids waiting eagerly to take their place.

Nick Saban, being an adult, would never capitulate to this immature, fascist crap. The players know this and know if they want their ticket punched to the NFL and that multi-million dollar payday, they better fall in line with the program.
It's pretty unrealistic to think that Saban is immune from all this just because lots of others are willing to play football at Alabama. The quality of Alabama's current players is exactly what gives them the clout. The quickest way out for Saban is to get a reputation for being unfriendly to black players and their grievances.

Playing the hard line is on the way out.
Maybe at ####-### universities like Mizzou. Here's the thing: I am willing to bet that none of Saban's players would even consider sitting out regardless of how hard some neo-fascist POS like the CS1950 went at them. Because they have instead learned things like accountability, hard work, and have seen the actual rewards that gets them, so they believe in it. Saban has not balked at getting rid of highly-talented players. When he took over there were tons of them around, because they had grown complacent and entitled under Shula. He sent them all packing and had a rough first year but look at the program since.

I highly doubt any player that is an essential part of that team would be willing to sacrifice all their hard work because of some BS complaints about the fact that racism exists and the world isn't a safe space where they can be coddled.
Saban has no magical beans. How much are Alabama boosters allowed to pay Alabama players? When the chit hits the fan around the nation, Bama players aren't gonna be up on some pedestal of amateur idealism, playing for the love of their coach and the glory of their fans. They're gonna be right there with the rest of the athletes around the country, telling ol' Saint Nick that they ain't playing this weekend.......because.

Jeebus, Cliffy, your regard for that man is a little creepy.

 
The Mizzou student VP says it all here

Brenda Smith-Lezama, vice president of the Missouri Students Association, appeared on MSNBC Tuesday afternoon to express her disdain at people using their First Amendment rights to create a "hostile" and "unsafe" learning environment. Smith-Lezama advocated for a safe space for "healing" rather than "experiencing a lot of hate."MSNBC host Thomas Roberts asked Smith-Lezama to respond to a professor who "complained" universities are becoming intolerant of opposing views.

"One professor complained universities are becoming places of prohibition," Roberts said. "What's your feeling? Do you believe that's a place we are heading for American campuses now? "

"I personally am tired of hearing that first amendment rights protect students when they are creating a hostile and unsafe learning environment for myself and for other students here," Smith-Lezama said on MSNBC. "I think that it's important for us to create that distinction and create a space where we can all learn from one another and start to create a place of healing rather than a place where we are experiencing a lot of hate like we have in the past."

Smith-Lezama said the treatment of a student journalist who was accosted on Monday should be a "teachable moment" for those who approach the protestors with "hostility."

"I think it's a teachable moment for all of us," she said of the incident. "I also think it's important to remember that as student journalists, you cannot approach these type of situations with hostility and with anger because it only escalates the situation."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/11/10/missouri_student_vp_im_tired_of_hearing_people_use_first_amendment_rights_to_create_hostile_atmosphere.html
I think we just found somebody stupider than Screaming Yale Girl.
It's a pretty close race but I think you're right.

 
How they describe themselves or how one describes them does not mean they are representative of the progressives or the progressive movement. It would be like saying the Tea Party is representative of conservatives in general. It is too early for any polling results on this, but I doubt most people who label themselves progressive/liberal would approve of, or support the students actions/demands.
I don't think there's any question that Tea Partiers were/are conservative to libertarian. It doesn't mean that has to mean that all conservatives/libertarians share the same views, or even remotely that, but it becomes apparent at some point that extremist elements are tilting or affecting things.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
The Mizzou student VP says it all here

Brenda Smith-Lezama, vice president of the Missouri Students Association, appeared on MSNBC Tuesday afternoon to express her disdain at people using their First Amendment rights to create a "hostile" and "unsafe" learning environment. Smith-Lezama advocated for a safe space for "healing" rather than "experiencing a lot of hate."MSNBC host Thomas Roberts asked Smith-Lezama to respond to a professor who "complained" universities are becoming intolerant of opposing views.

"One professor complained universities are becoming places of prohibition," Roberts said. "What's your feeling? Do you believe that's a place we are heading for American campuses now? "

"I personally am tired of hearing that first amendment rights protect students when they are creating a hostile and unsafe learning environment for myself and for other students here," Smith-Lezama said on MSNBC. "I think that it's important for us to create that distinction and create a space where we can all learn from one another and start to create a place of healing rather than a place where we are experiencing a lot of hate like we have in the past."

Smith-Lezama said the treatment of a student journalist who was accosted on Monday should be a "teachable moment" for those who approach the protestors with "hostility."

"I think it's a teachable moment for all of us," she said of the incident. "I also think it's important to remember that as student journalists, you cannot approach these type of situations with hostility and with anger because it only escalates the situation."

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2015/11/10/missouri_student_vp_im_tired_of_hearing_people_use_first_amendment_rights_to_create_hostile_atmosphere.html
I think we just found somebody stupider than Screaming Yale Girl.
I don't think that girl is stupid, she is antidemocratic. Call it fascistic, authoritarian, socialistic, I don't care, but people who think they have a preeminent right to suppress the press and other people's speech are not democrats [small D].

 
Last edited by a moderator:
What percentage of Mizzou students are actually engaging in this whole thing? I feel bad for the kids who actually want to get an education and can't get away from this #### on campus.

 
Why stop at the revocation of First Amendment rights or "safe spaces"? How about "Merit Badges for Millennials"?

Worst.

Generation.

Ever.

(WWII vets are thinking, "We fought and died for this?")
You know that "1950" in "Concerned Students 1950" refers to the first year that black students were admitted to the University of Missouri, right? Four years after WWII ended a whole bunch of those racist mother####### were still refusing to even let black people go to school with them. Say what you will of this generation, but I don't think the previous generations have a lot to be proud of here either.
You think the WWII soldiers who were students in 1950 were setting admissions policy?

 
Why stop at the revocation of First Amendment rights or "safe spaces"? How about "Merit Badges for Millennials"?

Worst.

Generation.

Ever.

(WWII vets are thinking, "We fought and died for this?")
You know that "1950" in "Concerned Students 1950" refers to the first year that black students were admitted to the University of Missouri, right? Four years after WWII ended a whole bunch of those racist mother####### were still refusing to even let black people go to school with them. Say what you will of this generation, but I don't think the previous generations have a lot to be proud of here either.
Well you know except for that World War II thing where they saved the world and everybody's rights to begin with, whereupon they followed with maybe the world's only civil rights expansion that for the great, great almost totality happened without violence or civil or guerrilla war. I'd say they have loads to be proud of.

I kind of think the progressives are going Tea Party here. There is stupid, just dumb antidemocratic stuff going on here. As happens the seesaw of extremism has tilted the other way. Hopefully the water flows back to the middle of the pond again, we'll see.
This discussion is getting silly. These students are hardly representative of progressives or the liberal/progressive movement in this country.
How would you describe them ideologically?
Yeah he's not paying attention.

 
so what happens when the next (insert any major college FB or BB team) decides to 'protest' and not play until (insert demand of the day) is met?
That's what the NCAA is so afraid of. The players have a lot of power if they use it.
Already happening at U of Alabama and Ole Miss
:popcorn:
I thought this angle was the most fascinating part of this story, surprised it's not getting more play. These sort of campus protest movements flare up from time to time, maybe some people change some attitudes or policies going forward, some people complain about "these kids today," but generally they don't amount to much in the long run.

Football players exercising their limitless power over universities, on the other hand? That might be just getting started. Could be a whole new world. After fighting pay and unionizing for athletes for so long the NCAA members might actually find that they're better off allowing those things, because paid players would be less inclined to strike and under a CBA they likely wouldn't be able to do so at all midseason. In the current state of affairs the football and basketball teams run the school. Can you think of anything the Alabama players couldn't get if they refused to play unless it was granted?
Honestly no. BUT, Saban is not a ####### lightweight who's going to join the protest. Any kid refusing to play would be cut, instantly, no matter who they are, and there would be tons of kids waiting eagerly to take their place.

Nick Saban, being an adult, would never capitulate to this immature, fascist crap. The players know this and know if they want their ticket punched to the NFL and that multi-million dollar payday, they better fall in line with the program.
It's pretty unrealistic to think that Saban is immune from all this just because lots of others are willing to play football at Alabama. The quality of Alabama's current players is exactly what gives them the clout. The quickest way out for Saban is to get a reputation for being unfriendly to black players and their grievances.

Playing the hard line is on the way out.
Maybe at ####-### universities like Mizzou. Here's the thing: I am willing to bet that none of Saban's players would even consider sitting out regardless of how hard some neo-fascist POS like the CS1950 went at them. Because they have instead learned things like accountability, hard work, and have seen the actual rewards that gets them, so they believe in it. Saban has not balked at getting rid of highly-talented players. When he took over there were tons of them around, because they had grown complacent and entitled under Shula. He sent them all packing and had a rough first year but look at the program since.

I highly doubt any player that is an essential part of that team would be willing to sacrifice all their hard work because of some BS complaints about the fact that racism exists and the world isn't a safe space where they can be coddled.
Saban has no magical beans. How much are Alabama boosters allowed to pay Alabama players? When the chit hits the fan around the nation, Bama players aren't gonna be up on some pedestal of amateur idealism, playing for the love of their coach and the glory of their fans. They're gonna be right there with the rest of the athletes around the country, telling ol' Saint Nick that they ain't playing this weekend.......because.

Jeebus, Cliffy, your regard for that man is a little creepy.
We can agree to disagree.

And my regard is more directed at the intelligence and character of players we have.

These protesters make Sharpton look like a paragon of virtue. Normally I side with racism exists and there is systemic oppression, but I can't stand these little punks. Can't wait until their "safe spaces" turn into the real world and they all fail miserably.

 
so what happens when the next (insert any major college FB or BB team) decides to 'protest' and not play until (insert demand of the day) is met?
That's what the NCAA is so afraid of. The players have a lot of power if they use it.
Already happening at U of Alabama and Ole Miss
:popcorn:
I thought this angle was the most fascinating part of this story, surprised it's not getting more play. These sort of campus protest movements flare up from time to time, maybe some people change some attitudes or policies going forward, some people complain about "these kids today," but generally they don't amount to much in the long run.

Football players exercising their limitless power over universities, on the other hand? That might be just getting started. Could be a whole new world. After fighting pay and unionizing for athletes for so long the NCAA members might actually find that they're better off allowing those things, because paid players would be less inclined to strike and under a CBA they likely wouldn't be able to do so at all midseason. In the current state of affairs the football and basketball teams run the school. Can you think of anything the Alabama players couldn't get if they refused to play unless it was granted?
Honestly no. BUT, Saban is not a ####### lightweight who's going to join the protest. Any kid refusing to play would be cut, instantly, no matter who they are, and there would be tons of kids waiting eagerly to take their place.

Nick Saban, being an adult, would never capitulate to this immature, fascist crap. The players know this and know if they want their ticket punched to the NFL and that multi-million dollar payday, they better fall in line with the program.
It's pretty unrealistic to think that Saban is immune from all this just because lots of others are willing to play football at Alabama. The quality of Alabama's current players is exactly what gives them the clout. The quickest way out for Saban is to get a reputation for being unfriendly to black players and their grievances.

Playing the hard line is on the way out.
Maybe at ####-### universities like Mizzou. Here's the thing: I am willing to bet that none of Saban's players would even consider sitting out regardless of how hard some neo-fascist POS like the CS1950 went at them. Because they have instead learned things like accountability, hard work, and have seen the actual rewards that gets them, so they believe in it. Saban has not balked at getting rid of highly-talented players. When he took over there were tons of them around, because they had grown complacent and entitled under Shula. He sent them all packing and had a rough first year but look at the program since.

I highly doubt any player that is an essential part of that team would be willing to sacrifice all their hard work because of some BS complaints about the fact that racism exists and the world isn't a safe space where they can be coddled.
Saban has no magical beans. How much are Alabama boosters allowed to pay Alabama players? When the chit hits the fan around the nation, Bama players aren't gonna be up on some pedestal of amateur idealism, playing for the love of their coach and the glory of their fans. They're gonna be right there with the rest of the athletes around the country, telling ol' Saint Nick that they ain't playing this weekend.......because.

Jeebus, Cliffy, your regard for that man is a little creepy.
We can agree to disagree.

And my regard is more directed at the intelligence and character of players we have.

These protesters make Sharpton look like a paragon of virtue. Normally I side with racism exists and there is systemic oppression, but I can't stand these little punks. Can't wait until their "safe spaces" turn into the real world and they all fail miserably.
We can't have a reasonable discussion about the issues if you're just gonna homer up on Alabama and tell us how special the place and people are.

 
so what happens when the next (insert any major college FB or BB team) decides to 'protest' and not play until (insert demand of the day) is met?
That's what the NCAA is so afraid of. The players have a lot of power if they use it.
Already happening at U of Alabama and Ole Miss
:popcorn:
I thought this angle was the most fascinating part of this story, surprised it's not getting more play. These sort of campus protest movements flare up from time to time, maybe some people change some attitudes or policies going forward, some people complain about "these kids today," but generally they don't amount to much in the long run.

Football players exercising their limitless power over universities, on the other hand? That might be just getting started. Could be a whole new world. After fighting pay and unionizing for athletes for so long the NCAA members might actually find that they're better off allowing those things, because paid players would be less inclined to strike and under a CBA they likely wouldn't be able to do so at all midseason. In the current state of affairs the football and basketball teams run the school. Can you think of anything the Alabama players couldn't get if they refused to play unless it was granted?
Honestly no. BUT, Saban is not a ####### lightweight who's going to join the protest. Any kid refusing to play would be cut, instantly, no matter who they are, and there would be tons of kids waiting eagerly to take their place.

Nick Saban, being an adult, would never capitulate to this immature, fascist crap. The players know this and know if they want their ticket punched to the NFL and that multi-million dollar payday, they better fall in line with the program.
It's pretty unrealistic to think that Saban is immune from all this just because lots of others are willing to play football at Alabama. The quality of Alabama's current players is exactly what gives them the clout. The quickest way out for Saban is to get a reputation for being unfriendly to black players and their grievances.

Playing the hard line is on the way out.
Maybe at ####-### universities like Mizzou. Here's the thing: I am willing to bet that none of Saban's players would even consider sitting out regardless of how hard some neo-fascist POS like the CS1950 went at them. Because they have instead learned things like accountability, hard work, and have seen the actual rewards that gets them, so they believe in it. Saban has not balked at getting rid of highly-talented players. When he took over there were tons of them around, because they had grown complacent and entitled under Shula. He sent them all packing and had a rough first year but look at the program since.

I highly doubt any player that is an essential part of that team would be willing to sacrifice all their hard work because of some BS complaints about the fact that racism exists and the world isn't a safe space where they can be coddled.
Saban has no magical beans. How much are Alabama boosters allowed to pay Alabama players? When the chit hits the fan around the nation, Bama players aren't gonna be up on some pedestal of amateur idealism, playing for the love of their coach and the glory of their fans. They're gonna be right there with the rest of the athletes around the country, telling ol' Saint Nick that they ain't playing this weekend.......because.

Jeebus, Cliffy, your regard for that man is a little creepy.
We can agree to disagree.

And my regard is more directed at the intelligence and character of players we have.

These protesters make Sharpton look like a paragon of virtue. Normally I side with racism exists and there is systemic oppression, but I can't stand these little punks. Can't wait until their "safe spaces" turn into the real world and they all fail miserably.
So you think the players who got in on athletic scholarships are smarter than those who got in on academic merit?

 
so what happens when the next (insert any major college FB or BB team) decides to 'protest' and not play until (insert demand of the day) is met?
That's what the NCAA is so afraid of. The players have a lot of power if they use it.
Already happening at U of Alabama and Ole Miss
:popcorn:
I thought this angle was the most fascinating part of this story, surprised it's not getting more play. These sort of campus protest movements flare up from time to time, maybe some people change some attitudes or policies going forward, some people complain about "these kids today," but generally they don't amount to much in the long run.

Football players exercising their limitless power over universities, on the other hand? That might be just getting started. Could be a whole new world. After fighting pay and unionizing for athletes for so long the NCAA members might actually find that they're better off allowing those things, because paid players would be less inclined to strike and under a CBA they likely wouldn't be able to do so at all midseason. In the current state of affairs the football and basketball teams run the school. Can you think of anything the Alabama players couldn't get if they refused to play unless it was granted?
Honestly no. BUT, Saban is not a ####### lightweight who's going to join the protest. Any kid refusing to play would be cut, instantly, no matter who they are, and there would be tons of kids waiting eagerly to take their place.

Nick Saban, being an adult, would never capitulate to this immature, fascist crap. The players know this and know if they want their ticket punched to the NFL and that multi-million dollar payday, they better fall in line with the program.
It's pretty unrealistic to think that Saban is immune from all this just because lots of others are willing to play football at Alabama. The quality of Alabama's current players is exactly what gives them the clout. The quickest way out for Saban is to get a reputation for being unfriendly to black players and their grievances.

Playing the hard line is on the way out.
Maybe at ####-### universities like Mizzou. Here's the thing: I am willing to bet that none of Saban's players would even consider sitting out regardless of how hard some neo-fascist POS like the CS1950 went at them. Because they have instead learned things like accountability, hard work, and have seen the actual rewards that gets them, so they believe in it. Saban has not balked at getting rid of highly-talented players. When he took over there were tons of them around, because they had grown complacent and entitled under Shula. He sent them all packing and had a rough first year but look at the program since.

I highly doubt any player that is an essential part of that team would be willing to sacrifice all their hard work because of some BS complaints about the fact that racism exists and the world isn't a safe space where they can be coddled.
Saban has no magical beans. How much are Alabama boosters allowed to pay Alabama players? When the chit hits the fan around the nation, Bama players aren't gonna be up on some pedestal of amateur idealism, playing for the love of their coach and the glory of their fans. They're gonna be right there with the rest of the athletes around the country, telling ol' Saint Nick that they ain't playing this weekend.......because.

Jeebus, Cliffy, your regard for that man is a little creepy.
There's no doubt the players are getting paid, Alabama is no different. Just google the name Tom Albetar for one example of how it trickles through. That said, the Missouri guys I dare say in most cases weren't exactly NFL prospects. When it comes to Alabama, you shouldn't expect someone like A'Shawn Robinson to walk over someone being called a name somewhere on campus when he has millions in NFL dollars on the line.

 
Boulder Class Cancels Solidarity Rally After Black Students ObjectStudents in a class at the University of Colorado at Boulder gave up a planned rally to support protests of institutional racism at the University of Missouri after a black student group at Colorado spoke out against it, The Daily Camerareports. Members of the class “Whiteness Studies,” which examines racial inequality, were to hold the rally on Friday afternoon but canceled it when members of the Black Student Alliance complained about not being consulted.

“We acknowledge that we should have contacted (the group) to see what they were already planning with regard to Mizzou,” wrote Azabe Kassa, an organizer of the rally, in an apology on Facebook. “While we understand that this does not excuse our actions, we learned a lesson in proper allyship.”

Paris Ferribee, co-president of the Black Student Alliance, told the newspaper that the plan amounted to a “slap in the face.” She went on: “They used their white privilege and oppressed voices and stifled voices that are experiencing this every day.”
Link.

 
Why stop at the revocation of First Amendment rights or "safe spaces"? How about "Merit Badges for Millennials"?

Worst.

Generation.

Ever.

(WWII vets are thinking, "We fought and died for this?")
You know that "1950" in "Concerned Students 1950" refers to the first year that black students were admitted to the University of Missouri, right? Four years after WWII ended a whole bunch of those racist mother####### were still refusing to even let black people go to school with them. Say what you will of this generation, but I don't think the previous generations have a lot to be proud of here either.
Well you know except for that World War II thing where they saved the world and everybody's rights to begin with, whereupon they followed with maybe the world's only civil rights expansion that for the great, great almost totality happened without violence or civil or guerrilla war. I'd say they have loads to be proud of.

I kind of think the progressives are going Tea Party here. There is stupid, just dumb antidemocratic stuff going on here. As happens the seesaw of extremism has tilted the other way. Hopefully the water flows back to the middle of the pond again, we'll see.
This discussion is getting silly. These students are hardly representative of progressives or the liberal/progressive movement in this country.
How would you describe them ideologically?
Yeah he's not paying attention.
:rolleyes:

 
Boulder Class Cancels Solidarity Rally After Black Students Object

Students in a class at the University of Colorado at Boulder gave up a planned rally to support protests of institutional racism at the University of Missouri after a black student group at Colorado spoke out against it, The Daily Camerareports. Members of the class “Whiteness Studies,” which examines racial inequality, were to hold the rally on Friday afternoon but canceled it when members of the Black Student Alliance complained about not being consulted.

“We acknowledge that we should have contacted (the group) to see what they were already planning with regard to Mizzou,” wrote Azabe Kassa, an organizer of the rally, in an apology on Facebook. “While we understand that this does not excuse our actions, we learned a lesson in proper allyship.”

Paris Ferribee, co-president of the Black Student Alliance, told the newspaper that the plan amounted to a “slap in the face.” She went on: “They used their white privilege and oppressed voices and stifled voices that are experiencing this every day.”
Link.
Ok, class what ideology is this?

Racialism? It's not really progressive, is it? Or is it? Who wants to claim this or who gets to be the recipient of it?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Amherst:

Amherst Students Protest ‘Free Speech,’ Demand ‘Training’ for OffendersProtests demand the school president apologize for signs that say “free speech” died at Mizzou. Then they want him to find the offenders and teach them tolerance.
Students protesting at Amherst College have issued a list of demands to administrators that includes making them apologize for signs that lament the death of free speech.

A group calling themselves the Amherst Uprising listed 11 demands they want enacted by next Wednesday. Among them is a demand that President Biddy Martin issue a statement saying that Amherst does “not tolerate the actions of student(s) who posted the ‘All Lives Matter’ posters, and the ‘Free Speech’ posters.”

The latter posters called the principle of free speech the “true victim” of the protests at the University of Missouri.

Going further, the students demand the people behind "free speech" fliers be required to go through a disciplinary process as well as “extensive training for racial and cultural competency.”

The protests at Amherst come on the heels of protests at the University of Missouri, Yale, and Claremont McKenna College. At Mizzou, officlas resigned after after criticism of how they reacted to alleged racist incidents on campus. Students at Yale protested an email sent by a college administrator about Halloween costumes, saying it made them feel unsafe. And at Claremont McKenna, a class president resigned her post after appearing in a photo with two students dressed in ponchos and sombreros.

Amherst students also asked administrators to excuse them from coursework and classes so they could participate in protests and sit-ins—and they want the school to warn alumni that racist or critical responses of the protests will not be tolerated.

Amherst, located in western Massachusetts, is considered one of the country’s top liberal-arts colleges. Nevertheless, the students say it's steeped in racism.

President Martin must also apologize for the college’s “institutional legacy of white supremacy, colonialism, anti-black racism, anti-Latinx racism, anti-Native American racism, anti-Native/ indigenous racism, anti-Asian racism, anti-Middle Eastern racism, heterosexism, cis-sexism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, ableism, mental health stigma, and classism,” the Uprising says.

They also insist the president condemn the “inherent racist nature” of school mascot Lord Jeff, a nickname for Jeffrey Amherst. Amherst was a British army officer commonly believed to have masterminded the idea of giving Native Americans smallpox blankets during the French and Indian War.

The college's FAQ pages says it "is accurate to say that Lord Jeffery Amherst advocated biological warfare against Indians, but there is no evidence that any infected blankets were distributed at his command."

“We demand that Amherst become a leader in the fight to promote a better social climate towards individuals who have been systematically oppressed,” their statement reads. “Furthermore, we demand the College acknowledge its ethical and moral responsibilities as an institution and community of our world.”

Three students also started a hunger strike.

“We want to stress that any action taken by Amherst College to address the demands made will not erase the fact that it exists within a larger system of oppression,” Sharline Dominguez, Cristina Rey, and Carolina Vergara wrote in a blog post apologizing for not discussing their actions with other activists. “We believe that we will not be free until this larger system is deconstructed.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/11/13/amherst-students-demand-no-free-speech-signs-or-else.html

So what ideology or belief system is this? And, no, idiocy and stupidity is not a belief structure or ideology.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Amherst:

Amherst Students Protest ‘Free Speech,’ Demand ‘Training’ for OffendersProtests demand the school president apologize for signs that say “free speech” died at Mizzou. Then they want him to find the offenders and teach them tolerance.
Students protesting at Amherst College have issued a list of demands to administrators that includes making them apologize for signs that lament the death of free speech.

A group calling themselves the Amherst Uprising listed 11 demands they want enacted by next Wednesday. Among them is a demand that President Biddy Martin issue a statement saying that Amherst does “not tolerate the actions of student(s) who posted the ‘All Lives Matter’ posters, and the ‘Free Speech’ posters.”

The latter posters called the principle of free speech the “true victim” of the protests at the University of Missouri.

Going further, the students demand the people behind "free speech" fliers be required to go through a disciplinary process as well as “extensive training for racial and cultural competency.”

The protests at Amherst come on the heels of protests at the University of Missouri, Yale, and Claremont McKenna College. At Mizzou, officlas resigned after after criticism of how they reacted to alleged racist incidents on campus. Students at Yale protested an email sent by a college administrator about Halloween costumes, saying it made them feel unsafe. And at Claremont McKenna, a class president resigned her post after appearing in a photo with two students dressed in ponchos and sombreros.

Amherst students also asked administrators to excuse them from coursework and classes so they could participate in protests and sit-ins—and they want the school to warn alumni that racist or critical responses of the protests will not be tolerated.

Amherst, located in western Massachusetts, is considered one of the country’s top liberal-arts colleges. Nevertheless, the students say it's steeped in racism.

President Martin must also apologize for the college’s “institutional legacy of white supremacy, colonialism, anti-black racism, anti-Latinx racism, anti-Native American racism, anti-Native/ indigenous racism, anti-Asian racism, anti-Middle Eastern racism, heterosexism, cis-sexism, xenophobia, anti-Semitism, ableism, mental health stigma, and classism,” the Uprising says.

They also insist the president condemn the “inherent racist nature” of school mascot Lord Jeff, a nickname for Jeffrey Amherst. Amherst was a British army officer commonly believed to have masterminded the idea of giving Native Americans smallpox blankets during the French and Indian War.

The college's FAQ pages says it "is accurate to say that Lord Jeffery Amherst advocated biological warfare against Indians, but there is no evidence that any infected blankets were distributed at his command."

“We demand that Amherst become a leader in the fight to promote a better social climate towards individuals who have been systematically oppressed,” their statement reads. “Furthermore, we demand the College acknowledge its ethical and moral responsibilities as an institution and community of our world.”

Three students also started a hunger strike.

“We want to stress that any action taken by Amherst College to address the demands made will not erase the fact that it exists within a larger system of oppression,” Sharline Dominguez, Cristina Rey, and Carolina Vergara wrote in a blog post apologizing for not discussing their actions with other activists. “We believe that we will not be free until this larger system is deconstructed.”
http://www.thedailybeast.com/articles/2015/11/13/amherst-students-demand-no-free-speech-signs-or-else.html

So what ideology or belief system is this? And, no, idiocy and stupidity is not a belief structure or ideology.
DEMANDS!! They are adorable :lmao:

 
We have demands for:

- forced training for speech and thought

- punishment for criticism

- forced cultural humiliation

- racial classifications and rigorous social division on racial lines.

- Methods of accomplishing aims by large scale social agitation.

Where does this fit in ideologically? It's not progressive. It's not liberal. It's not conservative. It's not libertarian. It's not democratic. What is it?

 
We have demands for:

- forced training for speech and thought

- punishment for criticism

- forced cultural humiliation

- racial classifications and rigorous social division on racial lines.

- Methods of accomplishing aims by large scale social agitation.

Where does this fit in ideologically? It's not progressive. It's not liberal. It's not conservative. It's not libertarian. It's not democratic. What is it?
Orwellian

 
We have demands for:

- forced training for speech and thought

- punishment for criticism

- forced cultural humiliation

- racial classifications and rigorous social division on racial lines.

- Methods of accomplishing aims by large scale social agitation.

Where does this fit in ideologically? It's not progressive. It's not liberal. It's not conservative. It's not libertarian. It's not democratic. What is it?
Orwellian
Sure ok, I'll buy that, fit that under totalitarianism maybe, especially the thought crime elements. Also, some Maoism going on there with a dash of Jim Crow post-Reconstruction racialism. Could be a blend.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Boulder Class Cancels Solidarity Rally After Black Students ObjectStudents in a class at the University of Colorado at Boulder gave up a planned rally to support protests of institutional racism at the University of Missouri after a black student group at Colorado spoke out against it, The Daily Camerareports. Members of the class “Whiteness Studies,” which examines racial inequality, were to hold the rally on Friday afternoon but canceled it when members of the Black Student Alliance complained about not being consulted.

“We acknowledge that we should have contacted (the group) to see what they were already planning with regard to Mizzou,” wrote Azabe Kassa, an organizer of the rally, in an apology on Facebook. “While we understand that this does not excuse our actions, we learned a lesson in proper allyship.”

Paris Ferribee, co-president of the Black Student Alliance, told the newspaper that the plan amounted to a “slap in the face.” She went on: “They used their white privilege and oppressed voices and stifled voices that are experiencing this every day.”
Link.
Ok, class what ideology is this?

Racialism? It's not really progressive, is it? Or is it? Who wants to claim this or who gets to be the recipient of it?
It may not directly be Progressivism but the present day militancy demonstrated by any number of organizations which center around identity politics most definitely originates from progressive utopianism and navel-gazing with respect to perceived flaws in American/Western culture.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
We have demands for:

- forced training for speech and thought

- punishment for criticism

- forced cultural humiliation

- racial classifications and rigorous social division on racial lines.

- Methods of accomplishing aims by large scale social agitation.

Where does this fit in ideologically? It's not progressive. It's not liberal. It's not conservative. It's not libertarian. It's not democratic. What is it?
Orwellian
Sure ok, I'll buy that, fit that under totalitarianism maybe, especially the thought crime elements. Also, some Maoism going on there with a dash of Jim Crow post-Reconstruction racialism. Could be a blend.
what presidential candidate would they vote for? (in your opinion)

 
Boulder Class Cancels Solidarity Rally After Black Students ObjectStudents in a class at the University of Colorado at Boulder gave up a planned rally to support protests of institutional racism at the University of Missouri after a black student group at Colorado spoke out against it, The Daily Camerareports. Members of the class “Whiteness Studies,” which examines racial inequality, were to hold the rally on Friday afternoon but canceled it when members of the Black Student Alliance complained about not being consulted.

“We acknowledge that we should have contacted (the group) to see what they were already planning with regard to Mizzou,” wrote Azabe Kassa, an organizer of the rally, in an apology on Facebook. “While we understand that this does not excuse our actions, we learned a lesson in proper allyship.”

Paris Ferribee, co-president of the Black Student Alliance, told the newspaper that the plan amounted to a “slap in the face.” She went on: “They used their white privilege and oppressed voices and stifled voices that are experiencing this every day.”
Link.
Ok, class what ideology is this?

Racialism? It's not really progressive, is it? Or is it? Who wants to claim this or who gets to be the recipient of it?
It may not directly be Progressivism but the present day militancy demonstrated by any number of organizations which center around identity politics most definitely originates from progressive utopianism and naval gazing with respect to perceived flaws in American culture.
Well we may be seeing an edging out of progressivism and further into something even further left. I'd say they took an exit off the progressive highway under a sign saying "_____ this way." Not sure what that is yet. For people who think this is overreach remove whatever bs campus complaint they have and replace it with a larger societal or political goal.

 
Boulder Class Cancels Solidarity Rally After Black Students ObjectStudents in a class at the University of Colorado at Boulder gave up a planned rally to support protests of institutional racism at the University of Missouri after a black student group at Colorado spoke out against it, The Daily Camerareports. Members of the class “Whiteness Studies,” which examines racial inequality, were to hold the rally on Friday afternoon but canceled it when members of the Black Student Alliance complained about not being consulted.

“We acknowledge that we should have contacted (the group) to see what they were already planning with regard to Mizzou,” wrote Azabe Kassa, an organizer of the rally, in an apology on Facebook. “While we understand that this does not excuse our actions, we learned a lesson in proper allyship.”

Paris Ferribee, co-president of the Black Student Alliance, told the newspaper that the plan amounted to a “slap in the face.” She went on: “They used their white privilege and oppressed voices and stifled voices that are experiencing this every day.”
Link.
Ok, class what ideology is this?

Racialism? It's not really progressive, is it? Or is it? Who wants to claim this or who gets to be the recipient of it?
It may not directly be Progressivism but the present day militancy demonstrated by any number of organizations which center around identity politics most definitely originates from progressive utopianism and naval gazing with respect to perceived flaws in American culture.
Well we may be seeing an edging out of progressivism and further into something even further left. I'd say they took an exit off the progressive highway under a sign saying "_____ this way." Not sure what that is yet. For people who think this is overreach remove whatever bs campus complaint they have and replace it with a larger societal or political goal.
This is some weird mix of cultural marxism, mixed with black power racial ideology. They have managed to mix marxism and fascism together and call it progress. Good job kids!

 
Some of these articles are coming from the onion and satire sites right? I am no longer able to tell what is real and what is a joke.

 
Boulder Class Cancels Solidarity Rally After Black Students ObjectStudents in a class at the University of Colorado at Boulder gave up a planned rally to support protests of institutional racism at the University of Missouri after a black student group at Colorado spoke out against it, The Daily Camerareports. Members of the class “Whiteness Studies,” which examines racial inequality, were to hold the rally on Friday afternoon but canceled it when members of the Black Student Alliance complained about not being consulted.

“We acknowledge that we should have contacted (the group) to see what they were already planning with regard to Mizzou,” wrote Azabe Kassa, an organizer of the rally, in an apology on Facebook. “While we understand that this does not excuse our actions, we learned a lesson in proper allyship.”

Paris Ferribee, co-president of the Black Student Alliance, told the newspaper that the plan amounted to a “slap in the face.” She went on: “They used their white privilege and oppressed voices and stifled voices that are experiencing this every day.”
Link.
Can I major in whiteness?

I think I am going to major in Whiteness and have a minor in Puppetry and just watch the cash roll in.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top