What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

MJD (1 Viewer)

Good thing you started this thread now rather than 2 weeks ago when he was RB #19 using FBG scoring.
Why would I start a thread about his TD count and his solid output for 2.5 years before now? It wouldn't make sense to talk about how he's broken the mold on TD consistency for 3 years now if he only had 6 for the remainder of the year. :lmao:
Is it because he had failed to reach 10 fantasy points in 15 out of his last 25 games?
Just looked it up. And, this is not true.
 
Good thing you started this thread now rather than 2 weeks ago when he was RB #19 using FBG scoring.
Why would I start a thread about his TD count and his solid output for 2.5 years before now? It wouldn't make sense to talk about how he's broken the mold on TD consistency for 3 years now if he only had 6 for the remainder of the year. :thumbup:
Is it because he had failed to reach 10 fantasy points in 15 out of his last 25 games?
Just looked it up. And, this is not true.
Standard scoring. No decimals. It is true. :lmao:
 
Synthesizer said:
GDogg said:
Synthesizer said:
scrumptrulescent said:
Synthesizer said:
Good thing you started this thread now rather than 2 weeks ago when he was RB #19 using FBG scoring.
Why would I start a thread about his TD count and his solid output for 2.5 years before now? It wouldn't make sense to talk about how he's broken the mold on TD consistency for 3 years now if he only had 6 for the remainder of the year. :rolleyes:
Is it because he had failed to reach 10 fantasy points in 15 out of his last 25 games?
Just looked it up. And, this is not true.
Standard scoring. No decimals. It is true. :rolleyes:
Did you have a point relevant to the thread here or do you just enjoy arguing to argue?
 
Yeah, being so small is actually such an advantage for him on the Goal line and in open space. The fact that he's built like a bowling ball enables him to be a work horse as well. People like Westbrook aren't that short... I mean they're short for the NFL position but MJD is really short. When he "makes himself small" to get through a hole, he probably gets about 2 1/2-3 feet from the floor. You know how hard it is for a linebacker/linemen to get underneath that and attack his center of gravity. Not to mention he can carry you if he needs to. If and when Fred Taylor retires or is released, Jones-Drew will be a real monster to deal with. I wouldn't be surprised if he wound up being better then Westy as a full-time starter. Watched him at LSU and I remember calling my friend like I just found the next LT. He's not LT but he sure is something special.
You watched him at LSU? Was UCLA playing in Baton Rouge that day?MJD is 5'9" but weighs 210 pounds and is built like a brick ####house. He has good hands, is an excellent blocker, and has breakaway speed. He will be a fantastic RB for years in the NFL.....and he's just barely getting started since his mileage is so low and he hasn't had any serious injuries (knock on wood).
LOL wow thanks dude. UCLA I meant. Thanks for the correction.No way he's 5'9 though thats a very very generous height. He's listed as 5'7 everywhere.

http://www.nfl.com/players/mauricejones-dr...le?id=DRE527472

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Good thing you started this thread now rather than 2 weeks ago when he was RB #19 using FBG scoring.
Why would I start a thread about his TD count and his solid output for 2.5 years before now? It wouldn't make sense to talk about how he's broken the mold on TD consistency for 3 years now if he only had 6 for the remainder of the year. :hophead:
Is it because he had failed to reach 10 fantasy points in 15 out of his last 25 games?
Just looked it up. And, this is not true.
Standard scoring. No decimals. It is true. :excited:
Not everyone plays in your league. So, it is not true.
 
Ok... no idea how to make this look right, but the completely ignorant arguments here make me crazy. People just make #### up.

These are the RBs averaging at least 16 PPG (PPR).

The first number is the average points scored (with partial games missed due to injury removed), the second is the standard deviation, the third is the standard deviation as a percentage of the average:

Code:
Turner, Michael ATL RB 	 17.45 	 11.04 	 0.63  Williams, DeAngelo CAR RB 	 15.40 	 9.11 	 0.59  Westbrook, Brian PHI RB 	 19.37 	 11.34 	 0.59  Johnson, Chris TEN RB (R)	   15.65 	 7.80 	 0.50  Peterson, Adrian MIN RB 	 16.86 	 8.33 	 0.49  Jackson, Steven STL RB 	 20.23 	 9.88 	 0.49  Lynch, Marshawn BUF RB 	 17.30 	 8.10 	 0.47  Barber, Marion DAL RB 	 19.01 	 8.89 	 0.47  Slaton, Steve HOU RB (R)	   15.56 	 7.27 	 0.47  Jones-Drew, Maurice JAC RB 	 17.60 	 8.19 	 0.47  Bush, Reggie NOS RB 	 20.88 	 9.37 	 0.45  Jones, Thomas NYJ RB 	 18.00 	 8.05 	 0.45  Jacobs, Brandon NYG RB 	 16.00 	 6.28 	 0.39  Gore, Frank SFO RB 	 17.74 	 6.72 	 0.38  Tomlinson, Ladainian SDC RB 	 16.81 	 6.35 	 0.38  Portis, Clinton WAS RB 	 18.16 	 5.82 	 0.32  Forte, Matt CHI RB (R)	   20.14 	 5.31 	 0.26
Jones-Drew right in the middle of the pack in terms of consistency.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top