CGRdrJoe
Footballguy
no, over coaching. they think they can’t stop them on d but that still makes 0 sense because being tied or up 1 still loses to a field goalSo, why go for 2 there? Do they think the refs are about to strike again?
no, over coaching. they think they can’t stop them on d but that still makes 0 sense because being tied or up 1 still loses to a field goalSo, why go for 2 there? Do they think the refs are about to strike again?
Love to agree but think he was down on the second look.
no, over coaching. they think they can’t stop them on d but that still makes 0 sense because being tied or up 1 still loses to a field goalSo, why go for 2 there? Do they think the refs are about to strike again?
Yeah, if it was 1:27 to go, I could see it. But 4:27 is both PLENTY of time to drive for a FG, and also not too much to just grind out with a first down or two.no, over coaching. they think they can’t stop them on d but that still makes 0 sense because being tied or up 1 still loses to a field goalSo, why go for 2 there? Do they think the refs are about to strike again?
Too much time left to be going for the win there.no, over coaching. they think they can’t stop them on d but that still makes 0 sense because being tied or up 1 still loses to a field goalSo, why go for 2 there? Do they think the refs are about to strike again?
Could be they just went for the win and it didn't work.
I think it was the right move, but I'm not a fan of either team, so I'm not sure if it's just because I don't care or if that was really a gutsy call that was the right one that didn't work out.
Was likely going to be the case either wayYeah I don’t get the call to go for 2 either. It’s not like a 1 pt lead does much against Mahomes with that much time left. If anything, he then gets 4 downs to play with. Now the Raiders likely lose without ever seeing the ball again.
Very good point.Yeah I don’t get the call to go for 2 either. It’s not like a 1 pt lead does much against Mahomes with that much time left. If anything, he then gets 4 downs to play with. Now the Raiders likely lose without ever seeing the ball again.
But at least they could hope for some fluke like a missed FG. Now KC doesn’t even have to attempt a FGWas likely going to be the case either wayYeah I don’t get the call to go for 2 either. It’s not like a 1 pt lead does much against Mahomes with that much time left. If anything, he then gets 4 downs to play with. Now the Raiders likely lose without ever seeing the ball again.
I was expecting it …please no penalty on the kickoff!!!!
The Chiefs should no have tried to run the ball like they did
I doubt they’re going to see the ball again because they can’t stop the runThe Chiefs should no have tried to run the ball like they did
Not with that turtle CEH.
Ataxia?jacobs hurt, couldn't tell what, got up and ran off
Like I said... Great call to go for 2. You will almost certainly get the ball back with a couple minutes to go
Renfrow on 3rd and short is acceptableAny Raider play that does not involve Jacobs or Adams is probably a bad play.
It was clearly a shoulder stinger, but this new protocol has me worried. Seems like it introduces grey-area on injuries like that, or an ankle injury, etc. where the player tries to get up but the pain makes them stagger, or brings them to their knees.Ataxia?jacobs hurt, couldn't tell what, got up and ran off
Yup. Very clearly.no catch