Ghost Rider
Footballguy
There have been 40 Super Bowl's. Of Super Bowls's XXI - XL, which has been the most exciting. Try to pick the best actual game, not the best for you from a personal standpoint.
I think this game has become a little elevated in our minds over time. I watched it again last year ... simply wasn't as exciting as I had remembered it. Doesn't compare, IMO, to Rams-Titans, Broncos-Packers, or Patriots-Rams. Still, all that said, I can't argue with a 1-pt spead.It's gotta be Giant's - Bills. That game was awesome all the way up to the kick. And then throw in the missed FG and it should go down as one of the most exciting, entertaining SB's of all time.
Superbowl XXXII sucked.Wow, very little love for SB32. Has everyone forgotten how great that game was? Do people really like ho-hum games with great endings (like SB's 34 and 36) over great overall games?
Reading is Fundamental.I VOTED XL BECUZ I MADE ME A BOATLOAD OF CASH.
I'm a Carolina fan so I might be biased, but I've never been on an emotional rollercoaster like during that game.I'm baffled that XXXVIII isn't running away with this. That game featured 7 lead changes, 3 touchdowns and field goal in the last 3 minutes of the first half, and 37 points in the fourth quarter
I bet this vote would be different if the teams involved in that game had been more popular franchises like Dallas and Pittsburgh instead of Carolina and New England. A shame really. Without a doubt the most exciting Super Bowl of the last 20 years.
Packers fan?Superbowl XXXII sucked.Wow, very little love for SB32. Has everyone forgotten how great that game was? Do people really like ho-hum games with great endings (like SB's 34 and 36) over great overall games?
It also featured a very boring first half (neither team scoring until late in the 2nd quarter had more to do with bad offense than great defense), so while SB38 did have the best 4th quarter ever in Super Bowl history, the rest of the game left a little bit to be desired.I'm baffled that XXXVIII isn't running away with this. That game featured 7 lead changes, 3 touchdowns and field goal in the last 3 minutes of the first half, and 37 points in the fourth quarter
I liked that Super Bowl a lot, don't get me wrong. In fact if I were a fan of either team I'd probably have it #1.But as an impartial observer, I just felt the pacing of that game was really off. It had drama, sure, so this is really nitpicking to the n'th degree -- but you have to do that when you're talking about the greatest Super Bowls ever, since there were so many good ones recently.I'm a Carolina fan so I might be biased, but I've never been on an emotional rollercoaster like during that game.I'm baffled that XXXVIII isn't running away with this. That game featured 7 lead changes, 3 touchdowns and field goal in the last 3 minutes of the first half, and 37 points in the fourth quarter
I bet this vote would be different if the teams involved in that game had been more popular franchises like Dallas and Pittsburgh instead of Carolina and New England. A shame really. Without a doubt the most exciting Super Bowl of the last 20 years.
It might be just me, but any game that leaves me winded, white knuckled, or otherwise drained like Pats/Caro is #1 in my book.Rams/Titans ranks up there as well.Packers fan?Superbowl XXXII sucked.Wow, very little love for SB32. Has everyone forgotten how great that game was? Do people really like ho-hum games with great endings (like SB's 34 and 36) over great overall games?It also featured a very boring first half (neither team scoring until late in the 2nd quarter had more to do with bad offense than great defense), so while SB38 did have the best 4th quarter ever in Super Bowl history, the rest of the game left a little bit to be desired.I'm baffled that XXXVIII isn't running away with this. That game featured 7 lead changes, 3 touchdowns and field goal in the last 3 minutes of the first half, and 37 points in the fourth quarter
I agree, however the Pats\Caro game did not leave me winded, white knuckled or otherwise drained; it just left me dissapointed considering Kasay booted the ball out of bounds setting the plate for the Patriots.It might be just me, but any game that leaves me winded, white knuckled, or otherwise drained like Pats/Caro is #1 in my book.
Rams/Titans ranks up there as well.
I agree and will extend that point to say that I felt the 4th quarter was just as much a product of sloppy play in other areas as it was great play on O for the teams. I just feel that the other 3 I picked offered better overall game play quality for 4 quarters and peppered it along with big plays on both sides of the ball.I agree, however the Pats\Caro game did not leave me winded, white knuckled or otherwise drained; it just left me dissapointed considering Kasay booted the ball out of bounds setting the plate for the Patriots.It might be just me, but any game that leaves me winded, white knuckled, or otherwise drained like Pats/Caro is #1 in my book.
Rams/Titans ranks up there as well.
Bears repeating. Lots of people here are talking about the best played Super Bowl. I voted NE-Car, which featured a lot of big mistakes but resulted in a lot of exciting plays.There have been 40 Super Bowl's. Of Super Bowls's XXI - XL, which has been the most exciting. Try to pick the best actual game, not the best for you from a personal standpoint.
Although I am a huge Broncos fan, I can not deny what Cannon said above. That was definetly the most exciting one. And yes, Broncos over Packers was a huge upset for the NFC and heavily favored packers.It's gotta be Giant's - Bills. That game was awesome all the way up to the kick. And then throw in the missed FG and it should go down as one of the most exciting, entertaining SB's of all time.
I voted Broncos-Packers. Even though I can no longer specifically remember why I enjoyed it so much, I distinctly remember thinking at the time that it was one of the most exciting games I'd ever seen.Interestingly, it was the only Super Bowl I ever watched by myself instead of with a pack of jabbering non-football fans. That must have had something to do with it.Broncos-Packers is my 2nd favorite (well, #1 from a Broncos fan perspective) because it's probably the best paced close Super Bowl we've ever seen. Both teams scored and had big plays in each quarter -- something I believe that's only happened in 1 other Super Bowl (49ers 49, Chargers 26). There was never a lull in the action, and while the finish wasn't quite as dramatic as some of the others that came down to the last 5 seconds, it wasn't decided until 30-something seconds were left.
I think BGP definitely has a good point above ... this was a great matchup on paper between 2 complete teams and the game itself was more of a showcase of big plays rather than big mistakes. What was the last Super Bowl between QBs who at the time of the game were well-renowned as 2 of the very best in league history?EDIT to add: I was thinking about this ... the other ones I can think of in the last 20 years are probably Jim Kelly vs. Troy Aikman and Joe Montana vs. John Elway ... all 3 of the Super Bowls between them were pretty bad.I voted Broncos-Packers. Even though I can no longer specifically remember why I enjoyed it so much, I distinctly remember thinking at the time that it was one of the most exciting games I'd ever seen.Interestingly, it was the only Super Bowl I ever watched by myself instead of with a pack of jabbering non-football fans. That must have had something to do with it.Broncos-Packers is my 2nd favorite (well, #1 from a Broncos fan perspective) because it's probably the best paced close Super Bowl we've ever seen. Both teams scored and had big plays in each quarter -- something I believe that's only happened in 1 other Super Bowl (49ers 49, Chargers 26). There was never a lull in the action, and while the finish wasn't quite as dramatic as some of the others that came down to the last 5 seconds, it wasn't decided until 30-something seconds were left.
I think Giants-Bills was one of the most impressive Super Bowl victories I have witnessed. The gameplan was awesome. The game itself was a bit tedious since it involved the Giants sitting on the ball and playing keep away. Exciting? Hardly.Although I am a huge Broncos fan, I can not deny what Cannon said above. That was definetly the most exciting one. And yes, Broncos over Packers was a huge upset for the NFC and heavily favored packers.It's gotta be Giant's - Bills. That game was awesome all the way up to the kick. And then throw in the missed FG and it should go down as one of the most exciting, entertaining SB's of all time.
Agreed. That game has become more legendary over time because of its ending, but I don't feel it was a classic in the way that some of the more recent games were.I think Giants-Bills was one of the most impressive Super Bowl victories I have witnessed. The gameplan was awesome. The game itself was a bit tedious since it involved the Giants sitting on the ball and playing keep away. Exciting? Hardly.Although I am a huge Broncos fan, I can not deny what Cannon said above. That was definetly the most exciting one. And yes, Broncos over Packers was a huge upset for the NFC and heavily favored packers.It's gotta be Giant's - Bills. That game was awesome all the way up to the kick. And then throw in the missed FG and it should go down as one of the most exciting, entertaining SB's of all time.
I agree. IIRC it would have been a career-long kick on grass. No choke there, choke is where outside circumstances force you blow something you'd normally make!I was thrilled with the result but I sorta feel bad for Norwood. A 47 yarder is never a gimme but people reacted as if the guy choked. Tough legacy.
Well, at the time they played 8 games at home + 1 game @ Jets + 1 game @ Colts + 1 game @ Patriots all on turf, right?So that's only 1 division game (@ Dolphins) that's on grass, so I guess it makes sense.That reminds me -- I've never understood this. Why on earth would Buffalo be carrying a kicker who had never made a long FG on grass? And who wasn't hot stuff on Turf either, I assume, given that he was converted a whopping 62% of FGs that year and only 72% for his career
They were the one I wasn't sure of ... this link had them switching over to grass in the 90s but I didn't know exactly when.The Patriots played on grass.