What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Most exciting Super Bowl of the last 20 years (1 Viewer)

Most exciting Super Bowl of the last 20 years

  • XXI - Giants 39, Broncos 20

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXIII - 49ers 20, Bengals 16

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXV - Giants 20, Bills 19

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXVIII - Cowboys 30, Bills 13

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXIX - 49ers 49, Chargers 26

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXX - Cowboys 27, Steelers 17

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXXI - Packers 35, Patriots 21

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXXII - Broncos 31, Packers 24

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXXIV - Rams 23, Titans 16

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXXVI - Patriots 20, Rams 17

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXXVIII - Patriots 32, Panthers 29

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XXXIX - Patriots 24, Eagles 21

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • XL - Steelers 21, Seahawks 10

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    0

Ghost Rider

Footballguy
There have been 40 Super Bowl's. Of Super Bowls's XXI - XL, which has been the most exciting. Try to pick the best actual game, not the best for you from a personal standpoint.

 
I have Rams-Titans at #1 with Broncos-Packers a very close #2.

Broncos-Packers is higher than Patriots-Rams because it was nearly as big of an upset and it broke the NFC 13-game winning streak. I also felt that it was a better played game as both teams scored in each quarter and it never felt out of control.

EDIT: Also wanted to mention that the ESPN.com fan poll on this had some of the most ridiculous results ever. No Super Bowl before Broncos-Packers was in the top 5, and somehow Patriots-Eagles ranked ahead of Broncos-Packers! I can see reasonable people ranking the other Patriots wins as better Super Bowls, but the Eagles win simply doesn't belong in the same context of the others.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Giants - Bills

I hate both teams, but this was a good game. The only SuperBowl I have found entertaining in the past 6 seasons was the Rams/Titans

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's gotta be Giant's - Bills. That game was awesome all the way up to the kick. And then throw in the missed FG and it should go down as one of the most exciting, entertaining SB's of all time.

 
It's gotta be Giant's - Bills. That game was awesome all the way up to the kick. And then throw in the missed FG and it should go down as one of the most exciting, entertaining SB's of all time.
I think this game has become a little elevated in our minds over time. I watched it again last year ... simply wasn't as exciting as I had remembered it. Doesn't compare, IMO, to Rams-Titans, Broncos-Packers, or Patriots-Rams. Still, all that said, I can't argue with a 1-pt spead. :)
 
Wow, very little love for SB32. Has everyone forgotten how great that game was? Do people really like ho-hum games with great endings (like SB's 34 and 36) over great overall games?

 
I'm baffled that XXXVIII isn't running away with this. That game featured 7 lead changes, 3 touchdowns and field goal in the last 3 minutes of the first half, and 37 points in the fourth quarter :eek:

I bet this vote would be different if the teams involved in that game had been more popular franchises like Dallas and Pittsburgh instead of Carolina and New England. A shame really. Without a doubt the most exciting Super Bowl of the last 20 years.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Tough tough call between Rams-Titans and Patriots-Panthers. Both were super tight and had very exciting endings..

 
Probably would've said Rams/Titans if I'd seen it (don't ask) - gotta go Pats/Panthers, honorable mention to 49ers/Bengals.

 
I'm baffled that XXXVIII isn't running away with this. That game featured 7 lead changes, 3 touchdowns and field goal in the last 3 minutes of the first half, and 37 points in the fourth quarter :eek:

I bet this vote would be different if the teams involved in that game had been more popular franchises like Dallas and Pittsburgh instead of Carolina and New England. A shame really. Without a doubt the most exciting Super Bowl of the last 20 years.
:goodposting: I'm a Carolina fan so I might be biased, but I've never been on an emotional rollercoaster like during that game.

 
Wow, very little love for SB32. Has everyone forgotten how great that game was? Do people really like ho-hum games with great endings (like SB's 34 and 36) over great overall games?
Superbowl XXXII sucked.
Packers fan?
I'm baffled that XXXVIII isn't running away with this. That game featured 7 lead changes, 3 touchdowns and field goal in the last 3 minutes of the first half, and 37 points in the fourth quarter :eek:
It also featured a very boring first half (neither team scoring until late in the 2nd quarter had more to do with bad offense than great defense), so while SB38 did have the best 4th quarter ever in Super Bowl history, the rest of the game left a little bit to be desired.
 
I'm baffled that XXXVIII isn't running away with this.  That game featured 7 lead changes, 3 touchdowns and field goal in the last 3 minutes of the first half, and 37 points in the fourth quarter  :eek:

I bet this vote would be different if the teams involved in that game had been more popular franchises like Dallas and Pittsburgh instead of Carolina and New England.  A shame really.  Without a doubt the most exciting Super Bowl of the last 20 years.
:goodposting: I'm a Carolina fan so I might be biased, but I've never been on an emotional rollercoaster like during that game.
I liked that Super Bowl a lot, don't get me wrong. In fact if I were a fan of either team I'd probably have it #1.But as an impartial observer, I just felt the pacing of that game was really off. It had drama, sure, so this is really nitpicking to the n'th degree -- but you have to do that when you're talking about the greatest Super Bowls ever, since there were so many good ones recently.

Rams-Titans was my favorite from both a football standpoint (contrasting styles, new teams in the big show, great play on both sides) and a pacing standpoint. Some say the first half was boring, but I found it very interesting that the Rams were up and down the field but every time the Titans needed a play they made it. And then in the 2nd half, the Rams go up 16-0 and knock out the Titans' defensive leader, only to see them come back slowly but steadily to tie it. And of course the frantic final 2 minutes.

Broncos-Packers is my 2nd favorite (well, #1 from a Broncos fan perspective) because it's probably the best paced close Super Bowl we've ever seen. Both teams scored and had big plays in each quarter -- something I believe that's only happened in 1 other Super Bowl (49ers 49, Chargers 26). There was never a lull in the action, and while the finish wasn't quite as dramatic as some of the others that came down to the last 5 seconds, it wasn't decided until 30-something seconds were left.

Obviously, :nerd: and all that.

 
My top 3 from the list:

XXXIV - Rams 23, Titans 16

XXV - Giants 20, Bills 19

XXXVI - Patriots 20, Rams 17

 
XXXIV, Rams-Titans without a doubt.

XXIII - 49ers 20, Bengals 16. Although excited, the 49ers defense crushed the Bengals high-powered offense and held them without a touchdown all game.

XXV - Giants 20, Bills 19 - missed field goal, :thumbdown:

XXXVIII - Patriots 32, Panthers 29 - 4th quarter really lacked defense.

XXXVI - Patriots 20, Rams 17 - This game really had no negatives but probably doesn't stand out in my eyes because this is the only Super Bowl I listened to on the radio instead of watching it live.

XXX - Cowboys 27, Steelers 17 - I actually enjoyed most of this game as the blue-collar Steeleres really put a scare into the coaching-challenged pro bowl-roster Cowboys.

 
Wow, very little love for SB32.  Has everyone forgotten how great that game was?  Do people really like ho-hum games with great endings (like SB's 34 and 36) over great overall games?
Superbowl XXXII sucked.
Packers fan?
I'm baffled that XXXVIII isn't running away with this.  That game featured 7 lead changes, 3 touchdowns and field goal in the last 3 minutes of the first half, and 37 points in the fourth quarter  :eek:
It also featured a very boring first half (neither team scoring until late in the 2nd quarter had more to do with bad offense than great defense), so while SB38 did have the best 4th quarter ever in Super Bowl history, the rest of the game left a little bit to be desired.
It might be just me, but any game that leaves me winded, white knuckled, or otherwise drained like Pats/Caro is #1 in my book.Rams/Titans ranks up there as well.

 
It might be just me, but any game that leaves me winded, white knuckled, or otherwise drained like Pats/Caro is #1 in my book.

Rams/Titans ranks up there as well.
I agree, however the Pats\Caro game did not leave me winded, white knuckled or otherwise drained; it just left me dissapointed considering Kasay booted the ball out of bounds setting the plate for the Patriots.
 
It might be just me, but any game that leaves me winded, white knuckled, or otherwise drained like Pats/Caro is #1 in my book.

Rams/Titans ranks up there as well.
I agree, however the Pats\Caro game did not leave me winded, white knuckled or otherwise drained; it just left me dissapointed considering Kasay booted the ball out of bounds setting the plate for the Patriots.
I agree and will extend that point to say that I felt the 4th quarter was just as much a product of sloppy play in other areas as it was great play on O for the teams. I just feel that the other 3 I picked offered better overall game play quality for 4 quarters and peppered it along with big plays on both sides of the ball.
 
Broncos-Packers was epic. If any super bowl in the past 20 years truly pitted two championship teams against each other, it was that one. There really was not a flaw on either side, but someone had to lose.

Not to mention, it broke the NFC streak of winning super bowls.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm stunned that the Rams-Titans leads in the polls. That was a totally boring first half. The second half was better but in no way made up for it.

 
There have been 40 Super Bowl's. Of Super Bowls's XXI - XL, which has been the most exciting. Try to pick the best actual game, not the best for you from a personal standpoint.
Bears repeating. Lots of people here are talking about the best played Super Bowl. I voted NE-Car, which featured a lot of big mistakes but resulted in a lot of exciting plays.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's gotta be Giant's - Bills. That game was awesome all the way up to the kick. And then throw in the missed FG and it should go down as one of the most exciting, entertaining SB's of all time.
Although I am a huge Broncos fan, I can not deny what Cannon said above. That was definetly the most exciting one. And yes, Broncos over Packers was a huge upset for the NFC and heavily favored packers.
 
Broncos-Packers is my 2nd favorite (well, #1 from a Broncos fan perspective) because it's probably the best paced close Super Bowl we've ever seen. Both teams scored and had big plays in each quarter -- something I believe that's only happened in 1 other Super Bowl (49ers 49, Chargers 26). There was never a lull in the action, and while the finish wasn't quite as dramatic as some of the others that came down to the last 5 seconds, it wasn't decided until 30-something seconds were left.
I voted Broncos-Packers. Even though I can no longer specifically remember why I enjoyed it so much, I distinctly remember thinking at the time that it was one of the most exciting games I'd ever seen.Interestingly, it was the only Super Bowl I ever watched by myself instead of with a pack of jabbering non-football fans. That must have had something to do with it.

 
Broncos-Packers is my 2nd favorite (well, #1 from a Broncos fan perspective) because it's probably the best paced close Super Bowl we've ever seen. Both teams scored and had big plays in each quarter -- something I believe that's only happened in 1 other Super Bowl (49ers 49, Chargers 26). There was never a lull in the action, and while the finish wasn't quite as dramatic as some of the others that came down to the last 5 seconds, it wasn't decided until 30-something seconds were left.
I voted Broncos-Packers. Even though I can no longer specifically remember why I enjoyed it so much, I distinctly remember thinking at the time that it was one of the most exciting games I'd ever seen.Interestingly, it was the only Super Bowl I ever watched by myself instead of with a pack of jabbering non-football fans. That must have had something to do with it.
I think BGP definitely has a good point above ... this was a great matchup on paper between 2 complete teams and the game itself was more of a showcase of big plays rather than big mistakes. What was the last Super Bowl between QBs who at the time of the game were well-renowned as 2 of the very best in league history?EDIT to add: I was thinking about this ... the other ones I can think of in the last 20 years are probably Jim Kelly vs. Troy Aikman and Joe Montana vs. John Elway ... all 3 of the Super Bowls between them were pretty bad.

Because the Broncos repeated, it's been lost just how big of an upset that was. The AFC was legitimized again, and they beat the defending champ to win it all.

I, along with many, probably put Rams-Titans at #1 because while it wasn't a work of art in the first half, the entire game was a Bolero-like crescendo, what a payoff. Broncos-Packers had more big plays, which I guess blend together over time (if you don't watch the highlight video every few months like me :bag: ).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
It's gotta be Giant's - Bills. That game was awesome all the way up to the kick. And then throw in the missed FG and it should go down as one of the most exciting, entertaining SB's of all time.
Although I am a huge Broncos fan, I can not deny what Cannon said above. That was definetly the most exciting one. And yes, Broncos over Packers was a huge upset for the NFC and heavily favored packers.
I think Giants-Bills was one of the most impressive Super Bowl victories I have witnessed. The gameplan was awesome. The game itself was a bit tedious since it involved the Giants sitting on the ball and playing keep away. Exciting? Hardly.
 
It's gotta be Giant's - Bills.  That game was awesome all the way up to the kick.  And then throw in the missed FG and it should go down as one of the most exciting, entertaining SB's of all time.
Although I am a huge Broncos fan, I can not deny what Cannon said above. That was definetly the most exciting one. And yes, Broncos over Packers was a huge upset for the NFC and heavily favored packers.
I think Giants-Bills was one of the most impressive Super Bowl victories I have witnessed. The gameplan was awesome. The game itself was a bit tedious since it involved the Giants sitting on the ball and playing keep away. Exciting? Hardly.
Agreed. That game has become more legendary over time because of its ending, but I don't feel it was a classic in the way that some of the more recent games were.
 
I voted Giants-Bills. There's defintiely some homerism in my pick but I can defend it with the following:

- It had a safety!

- No turnovers

- Both teams executed their game plans. The Giants just outlasted Buffalo.

It wasn't the light up the scoreboard thrillfest some games were but I loved the chessmatch aspect of it. Giants wnated to play ball control to keep Buffalo's offense off the field. They did it to perfection (40 minutes of possession!). However just about every time Buffalo did have the ball they drove down the field. It was a classic X's and O's kind of game. I was thrilled with the result but I sorta feel bad for Norwood. A 47 yarder is never a gimme but people reacted as if the guy choked. Tough legacy.

My other votes are the Broncos over the Packers, the Steelers over the Cowboys (SB 13) and Rams-Titans, in that order.

 
I was thrilled with the result but I sorta feel bad for Norwood.  A 47 yarder is never a gimme but people reacted as if the guy choked.  Tough legacy.
I agree. IIRC it would have been a career-long kick on grass. No choke there, choke is where outside circumstances force you blow something you'd normally make!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
That reminds me -- I've never understood this. Why on earth would Buffalo be carrying a kicker who had never made a long FG on grass? And who wasn't hot stuff on Turf either, I assume, given that he was converted a whopping 62% of FGs that year and only 72% for his career

 
That reminds me -- I've never understood this. Why on earth would Buffalo be carrying a kicker who had never made a long FG on grass? And who wasn't hot stuff on Turf either, I assume, given that he was converted a whopping 62% of FGs that year and only 72% for his career
Well, at the time they played 8 games at home + 1 game @ Jets + 1 game @ Colts + 1 game @ Patriots all on turf, right?So that's only 1 division game (@ Dolphins) that's on grass, so I guess it makes sense.

Also, I'm guessing that FG% was a lot lower in the late 1980s, and I think we have to account for kicking in Buffalo somehow as well.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top