I've not read through this thread because I believe, as noted, the entire premise is not an objective approach. While I stated that, my intent was not to go point by point as I've come to the conclusion that's a futile endeavor when dealing with folks that, imo, play loose with the truth (just going on the years of history here for that assessment)
If you read my heartfelt plea to you in the other thread (don't recall which right now), that should explain it further. It was probably the first time I've bothered re-engaging with you for some time due to my thoughts on the matter, and assuming no change in approach, we can just let it sit for a while again.
Unlike some folks here who flat out troll, or just dont come off as people with any intent to be constructive and in fact seem to want for being a disruptive and negative contributor, I don't believe that is the case with you. So every so often it's worth tossing out a line, checking the temp.
Unfortunately, I've not personally seen a willingness to be more honest, up front, fair nor objective, hence no need to continually engage without getting frustrated and perhaps being more a drain on the conversation, myself.