This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
S.O.P. for the Pool. Always go for the shiny new toy, not the knucklehead who has already failed.Also, Titus is and shall remain the slot WR, while Broyles is an outside WR. But neither figures to have value in redraft format unless that offense does a 180 and gets back to lighting it up like last year.
S.O.P. for the Pool. Always go for the shiny new toy, not the knucklehead who has already failed.Also, Titus is and shall remain the slot WR, while Broyles is an outside WR. But neither figures to have value in redraft format unless that offense does a 180 and gets back to lighting it up like last year.
S.O.P. for the Pool. Always go for the shiny new toy, not the knucklehead who has already failed.Also, Titus is and shall remain the slot WR, while Broyles is an outside WR. But neither figures to have value in redraft format unless that offense does a 180 and gets back to lighting it up like last year.
You may be correct in that they drafted him as a slot. Tonight I only saw him outside. Maybe he moves back to his more natural position - the Lions rotate everyone to the slot, including Megatron (used a ton there against Philly) and the TEs (esp Scheffler when healthy).Regardless, Burleson/Young have been a disappointment for anyone who drafted them thinking this was the Colts circa 2004. Maybe Broyles will surprise and exceed their production. I have my doubts.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.