Kev4029 said:
He is so slow at this point of his career all but the slowest of centers can play him tight defending his passing and short jumper because he can't get around them so he is no longer anywhere near as effective as he once was from the high post. He shot 43% percent last year and 35% outside of the immediate basket area, if you want that running your high post have at it.
O'Neal was a MUCH better signing, he rebounds better, scores much better and his defense is still very good. On top of that he is 3 years younger and has been and will continue to be the better athlete. To compare O'Neal to Miller at essentially the same price is asinine.
I think you are confusing "Brad Miller not being a good player" and "Brad Miller being the worst signing of the summer." Who cares that O'neal is younger? He's got far more minutes and games played on his knees, which are both completely shot. O'Neal's true shooting % was 56% compared to Miller's 53%, and I think you could anticipate a moderate bump for Miller being back in an offense that was basically designed for his talents. O'Neal's rebounding rate was better but not unbelievably so. Would rather have O'Neal, but it's not like that was a good value signing either. Speaking of big guys who can't rebound, or pass, and are a black hole on offense ... enjoy the Al Harrington era!

Brandon Haywood got $55m. The list goes on. I'm not defending Miller the player
but it's definitely not a signing that will kill you.