What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*NBA THREAD* Abe will be missed (1 Viewer)

We haven't mentioned Lebron for a couple days. Here's a good one:

http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/sports/col...kled_at_oh.html

Lebron goes to an Ohio amusement park, shoots baskets at one of the carnival stands, and gets heckled.

"I bet you miss," a woman said.

"Bron, shoot left-handed; your elbow hurts!" a man said.

The crowd hooted, sort of, after the first miss. He missed all three of his shots. "Just like Game 5," a fan said.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Kev4029 said:
Bears_Man2 said:
No. 16 said:
Curry > Collison.
Would agree. Was omitted from the list above.I would clump him Evans & Westbrook together. (Like Curry more myself)
What nba team do you follow? I was thinking maybe you were a big ucla fan before this post, and that was the reason you were so high on collison, but to rate evans as an equal pg to westbrook and curry as beter (which I don't think no 16 would even do as the goldens state homer on this board) shows that's not the case. Clearly college loyalties aren't the reason for the collison love.
To me Curry and Evans are two different players. Curry is a PG who can shoot and Evans is a SG who can pass. So I would say Curry, Westbrook, and Collison are better PGs than Evans. However, if you ask me which player would I rather have on my team that questions becomes a bit harder to answer. Last year, no question Evans was better than Curry for a longer stretch of time. Based on last years play only, I would rate them as: 1. Westbrook - He scores less than either and less efficiently, but he's better at everything else. 2. Evans - He edges out Curry because he performed at a top notch level for the WHOLE season. Needs a jump shot and work on TOs.3. Curry - After he became comfortable as the primary ball handler he flourished. Needs to improve his man defense and work on TOs.So now the question is who do I think will be the best in the future? This is a close one and a matter of personal preference because a franchise couldn't go wrong building around either of the three but I'd rate them as follows:1. Curry - His shooting is already among the NBA elite as a rookie, which is an attribute that ages well and often improves as one gets older. His game also relies on smarts/craftiness which also ages well. He's a fantastic passer and will only get better. He'll be like Steve Nash with inferior passing (but still elite), but he compensates with superior rebounding/defense to Nash (average defense compared to the league/rebounding above average compared to PGs). 2. Westbrook - I'll give him the current edge on Evans, but it's a close one. Both Evans and Westbrook need to improve their jump shot, but Westbrook is entering his 3rd year in the league. His FG% increased from 39% to 41% but his FT dropped from 81.5% to 78%, I need to see major improvement in his jump shot or else he'll drop to 3rd. If he had showed more improvement in his jumper between rookie and sophomore seasons, I would put him easily at #1. Other than that his all-around game is better than Curry or Westbrook. I think he becomes the modern day Jason Kidd, but only able to defend PGs and smaller SGs compared to Kidd who could lock down the 1-3 in his prime.3. Evans - He's at #3 because I think Evans is already near his offensive ceiling. He's already an elite penetrator and finisher, but his jumper is below average. It should improve but I just don't see that making much of an impact in his game. He'll take more jumpers at the expense of driving to the lane which his bread and butter. No doubt it'll make him better on offense and increase his PPG, but I think we're close to seeing the best of Evans compared to Curry and Westbrook. He's a good passer, but he gets his assists more as a function of dominating the ball and through drive and dish. He also doesn't have the athleticism of Kobe, LBJ, and MJ to become dominant. I think Evans can be a pre-injury Grant Hill, but when I watch him play I can't help but feel like I'm watching Corey Maggette (except Evans passes, which is a big difference). With all that said I think the we'll get a better idea of who will be better in their career after the sophomores seasons. It's easier to come into the league and compile stats on a losing team (Curry and Evans), but now let's see who put in the work to improve their game in the off-season and if the team success follows. I like to see how player does after the league has scouted video, game planned around them, and they have a whole off-season dealing with the money and fame.
 
I think most of the PG/SG discussion is fair.

As a Kings homer, I would add that Evans' physicallity is a huge plus. His ability to get into the lane and to the rim, despite not being super-fast, is incredible to me and is a backbreaker to D's (Sac just needs some spot shooters to make teams that crowd the lane pay). Also, Evans' on the ball D is really good. I think that is a definite plus for him vs. a guy like Curry.

This isn't to bash Curry at all, he's a stud. And frankly, if I were building a team from scratch, I am not certain if I'd rather have Evans or Curry. To me, it is super-close.

 
Rod Thorn to the 76ers = SOFD

Effectively neuters Stefanski (who is a ##### when it comes to trades anyway). Rod has a great track record of dumping guys as they start their decline.

 
3. Evans - He's at #3 because I think Evans is already near his offensive ceiling. He's already an elite penetrator and finisher, but his jumper is below average. It should improve but I just don't see that making much of an impact in his game. He'll take more jumpers at the expense of driving to the lane which his bread and butter. No doubt it'll make him better on offense and increase his PPG, but I think we're close to seeing the best of Evans compared to Curry and Westbrook. He's a good passer, but he gets his assists more as a function of dominating the ball and through drive and dish. He also doesn't have the athleticism of Kobe, LBJ, and MJ to become dominant. I think Evans can be a pre-injury Grant Hill, but when I watch him play I can't help but feel like I'm watching Corey Maggette (except Evans passes, which is a big difference).
I think Evans could be a potential multiple all-star. Take a look at his first and second half splits. Or do it quarterly. He improved the whole season.
 
3. Evans - He's at #3 because I think Evans is already near his offensive ceiling. He's already an elite penetrator and finisher, but his jumper is below average. It should improve but I just don't see that making much of an impact in his game. He'll take more jumpers at the expense of driving to the lane which his bread and butter. No doubt it'll make him better on offense and increase his PPG, but I think we're close to seeing the best of Evans compared to Curry and Westbrook. He's a good passer, but he gets his assists more as a function of dominating the ball and through drive and dish. He also doesn't have the athleticism of Kobe, LBJ, and MJ to become dominant. I think Evans can be a pre-injury Grant Hill, but when I watch him play I can't help but feel like I'm watching Corey Maggette (except Evans passes, which is a big difference).
I think Evans could be a potential multiple all-star. Take a look at his first and second half splits. Or do it quarterly. He improved the whole season.
Do you think he's better than Aaron Brooks?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
3. Evans - He's at #3 because I think Evans is already near his offensive ceiling. He's already an elite penetrator and finisher, but his jumper is below average. It should improve but I just don't see that making much of an impact in his game. He'll take more jumpers at the expense of driving to the lane which his bread and butter. No doubt it'll make him better on offense and increase his PPG, but I think we're close to seeing the best of Evans compared to Curry and Westbrook. He's a good passer, but he gets his assists more as a function of dominating the ball and through drive and dish. He also doesn't have the athleticism of Kobe, LBJ, and MJ to become dominant. I think Evans can be a pre-injury Grant Hill, but when I watch him play I can't help but feel like I'm watching Corey Maggette (except Evans passes, which is a big difference).
I think Evans could be a potential multiple all-star. Take a look at his first and second half splits. Or do it quarterly. He improved the whole season.
Do you think he's better than Aaron Brooks?
I wouldn't take it that far. Aaron Brooks is one of the top five players ever in the NBA.
 
3. Evans - He's at #3 because I think Evans is already near his offensive ceiling. He's already an elite penetrator and finisher, but his jumper is below average. It should improve but I just don't see that making much of an impact in his game. He'll take more jumpers at the expense of driving to the lane which his bread and butter. No doubt it'll make him better on offense and increase his PPG, but I think we're close to seeing the best of Evans compared to Curry and Westbrook. He's a good passer, but he gets his assists more as a function of dominating the ball and through drive and dish. He also doesn't have the athleticism of Kobe, LBJ, and MJ to become dominant. I think Evans can be a pre-injury Grant Hill, but when I watch him play I can't help but feel like I'm watching Corey Maggette (except Evans passes, which is a big difference).
I think Evans could be a potential multiple all-star. Take a look at his first and second half splits. Or do it quarterly. He improved the whole season.
Do you think he's better than Aaron Brooks?
I wouldn't take it that far. Aaron Brooks is one of the top five players ever in the NBA.
:thumbup: well played sir
 
We haven't mentioned Lebron for a couple days. Here's a good one:

http://weblogs.sun-sentinel.com/sports/col...kled_at_oh.html

Lebron goes to an Ohio amusement park, shoots baskets at one of the carnival stands, and gets heckled.

"I bet you miss," a woman said.

"Bron, shoot left-handed; your elbow hurts!" a man said.

The crowd hooted, sort of, after the first miss. He missed all three of his shots. "Just like Game 5," a fan said.
that's good stuff :shrug:
 
Bill Simmons just posted his latest trade machine disaster. Carmelo to the Knicks, trash to the Nuggets, and has the Magic giving up Jameer, Vince and Ryan Anderson for Chauncey Billups and Kenyon Martin's corpse.

:goodposting:

 
Bill Simmons just posted his latest trade machine disaster. Carmelo to the Knicks, trash to the Nuggets, and has the Magic giving up Jameer, Vince and Ryan Anderson for Chauncey Billups and Kenyon Martin's corpse. ;)
Nuggets are probably going down with the ship on this one ala Cleveland. Knicks don't have anything to offer now and I don't see another team willing to trade away the future for a one year rental.
 
Sports Illustrated: Carmelo Anthony open to multiyear deal with Houston Rockets

18 Aug 2010 12:14 PM

Chris Mannix:

Multiple league sources familiar with his situation told SI.com that Anthony would also be open to signing a long-term deal with Houston or New Jersey should either of those teams offer the Nuggets an acceptable trade package.

 
Sports Illustrated: Carmelo Anthony open to multiyear deal with Houston Rockets18 Aug 2010 12:14 PMChris Mannix: Multiple league sources familiar with his situation told SI.com that Anthony would also be open to signing a long-term deal with Houston or New Jersey should either of those teams offer the Nuggets an acceptable trade package.
That probably would've been good for Houston to know before they traded Ariza? I figure they could've made a more attractive offer with him in the deal (since he plays Anthony's position) rather than Lee.
 
Sports Illustrated: Carmelo Anthony open to multiyear deal with Houston Rockets18 Aug 2010 12:14 PMChris Mannix: Multiple league sources familiar with his situation told SI.com that Anthony would also be open to signing a long-term deal with Houston or New Jersey should either of those teams offer the Nuggets an acceptable trade package.
That probably would've been good for Houston to know before they traded Ariza? I figure they could've made a more attractive offer with him in the deal (since he plays Anthony's position) rather than Lee.
Carmelo- 17mJ. R. Smith- 6mforB. Lopez- 2.5mD. Harris- 9mT. Murphy- 12mDenver gets a nice haul. New Jersey gets the superstar they covet and a player who can attract others. Makes New Jersey instantly relevant with lots of cap space next year.Think it's a no-brainer for each side.Chauncey, Harris, Nene, Murphy/Contract, K. Martin/Contract, Anderson and Lopez. Lots of assets and height to deal.
 
Sports Illustrated: Carmelo Anthony open to multiyear deal with Houston Rockets18 Aug 2010 12:14 PMChris Mannix: Multiple league sources familiar with his situation told SI.com that Anthony would also be open to signing a long-term deal with Houston or New Jersey should either of those teams offer the Nuggets an acceptable trade package.
That probably would've been good for Houston to know before they traded Ariza? I figure they could've made a more attractive offer with him in the deal (since he plays Anthony's position) rather than Lee.
Carmelo- 17mJ. R. Smith- 6mforB. Lopez- 2.5mD. Harris- 9mT. Murphy- 12mDenver gets a nice haul. New Jersey gets the superstar they covet and a player who can attract others. Makes New Jersey instantly relevant with lots of cap space next year.Think it's a no-brainer for each side.Chauncey, Harris, Nene, Murphy/Contract, K. Martin/Contract, Anderson and Lopez. Lots of assets and height to deal.
You think NJ would want to trade Lopez? I wouldn't if I were them. Maybe do Favors/Harris/Murphy for Anthony/Billups (or Martin - he he).
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sports Illustrated: Carmelo Anthony open to multiyear deal with Houston Rockets18 Aug 2010 12:14 PMChris Mannix: Multiple league sources familiar with his situation told SI.com that Anthony would also be open to signing a long-term deal with Houston or New Jersey should either of those teams offer the Nuggets an acceptable trade package.
That probably would've been good for Houston to know before they traded Ariza? I figure they could've made a more attractive offer with him in the deal (since he plays Anthony's position) rather than Lee.
Carmelo- 17mJ. R. Smith- 6mforB. Lopez- 2.5mD. Harris- 9mT. Murphy- 12mDenver gets a nice haul. New Jersey gets the superstar they covet and a player who can attract others. Makes New Jersey instantly relevant with lots of cap space next year.Think it's a no-brainer for each side.Chauncey, Harris, Nene, Murphy/Contract, K. Martin/Contract, Anderson and Lopez. Lots of assets and height to deal.
You think NJ would want to trade Lopez? I wouldn't if I were them. Maybe Do Favors/Harris/Murphy for Anthony/Billups (or Martin - he he).
Lopez is not going anywhere - they drafted Favors to be the chip......I think the Net are very much players in this - a Favors/Harris deal with picks (they have 10 picks in the next 3 years) blows away anything the Knicks and Houston can put together...Carmello is from Brooklyn.
 
Sports Illustrated: Carmelo Anthony open to multiyear deal with Houston Rockets18 Aug 2010 12:14 PMChris Mannix: Multiple league sources familiar with his situation told SI.com that Anthony would also be open to signing a long-term deal with Houston or New Jersey should either of those teams offer the Nuggets an acceptable trade package.
That probably would've been good for Houston to know before they traded Ariza? I figure they could've made a more attractive offer with him in the deal (since he plays Anthony's position) rather than Lee.
Carmelo- 17mJ. R. Smith- 6mforB. Lopez- 2.5mD. Harris- 9mT. Murphy- 12mDenver gets a nice haul. New Jersey gets the superstar they covet and a player who can attract others. Makes New Jersey instantly relevant with lots of cap space next year.Think it's a no-brainer for each side.Chauncey, Harris, Nene, Murphy/Contract, K. Martin/Contract, Anderson and Lopez. Lots of assets and height to deal.
You think NJ would want to trade Lopez? I wouldn't if I were them. Maybe do Favors/Harris/Murphy for Anthony/Billups (or Martin - he he).
I'd trade Lopez in a heartbeat for Carmelo. Everyone else in the deal is unimportant. Even Harris.
 
Sports Illustrated: Carmelo Anthony open to multiyear deal with Houston Rockets18 Aug 2010 12:14 PMChris Mannix: Multiple league sources familiar with his situation told SI.com that Anthony would also be open to signing a long-term deal with Houston or New Jersey should either of those teams offer the Nuggets an acceptable trade package.
That probably would've been good for Houston to know before they traded Ariza? I figure they could've made a more attractive offer with him in the deal (since he plays Anthony's position) rather than Lee.
Carmelo- 17mJ. R. Smith- 6mforB. Lopez- 2.5mD. Harris- 9mT. Murphy- 12mDenver gets a nice haul. New Jersey gets the superstar they covet and a player who can attract others. Makes New Jersey instantly relevant with lots of cap space next year.Think it's a no-brainer for each side.Chauncey, Harris, Nene, Murphy/Contract, K. Martin/Contract, Anderson and Lopez. Lots of assets and height to deal.
You think NJ would want to trade Lopez? I wouldn't if I were them. Maybe Do Favors/Harris/Murphy for Anthony/Billups (or Martin - he he).
Lopez is not going anywhere - they drafted Favors to be the chip......I think the Net are very much players in this - a Favors/Harris deal with picks (they have 10 picks in the next 3 years) blows away anything the Knicks and Houston can put together...Carmello is from Brooklyn.
Favors and Harris are not nearly enough. Harris ain't taking a team nowhere. Carmelo is a perfect fit for New Jersey. They won't let Carmelo slip because of B. Lopez and Denver should know this.
 
I'd trade Lopez in a heartbeat for Carmelo.
I disagree. Even if their contracts were close, I'd rather have one of the 2nd or 3rd best true 5's in the league (even if he isn't the best on the boards) than one of the 2nd or 3rd best wings. And with the discrepancy in their contracts and Lopez being 4 years younger it makes me favor Lopez even more. But my point was more along the lines of trading Lopez to get Anthony doesn't really get your team that much farther along. You just end up being the Nuggets in the EC instead of the WC. To build a top contender you need something like both guys.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Favors is a blue chip top 3 talent, Harris was an All Star 2 yrs ago, still young and has a good contract and 2 #1's - including a very lightly protected GS pick blows away anything they can get from NY and Houston - I would be shocked if they sent out Lopez....shocked.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sports Illustrated: Carmelo Anthony open to multiyear deal with Houston Rockets18 Aug 2010 12:14 PMChris Mannix: Multiple league sources familiar with his situation told SI.com that Anthony would also be open to signing a long-term deal with Houston or New Jersey should either of those teams offer the Nuggets an acceptable trade package.
That probably would've been good for Houston to know before they traded Ariza? I figure they could've made a more attractive offer with him in the deal (since he plays Anthony's position) rather than Lee.
Carmelo- 17mJ. R. Smith- 6mforB. Lopez- 2.5mD. Harris- 9mT. Murphy- 12mDenver gets a nice haul. New Jersey gets the superstar they covet and a player who can attract others. Makes New Jersey instantly relevant with lots of cap space next year.Think it's a no-brainer for each side.Chauncey, Harris, Nene, Murphy/Contract, K. Martin/Contract, Anderson and Lopez. Lots of assets and height to deal.
You think NJ would want to trade Lopez? I wouldn't if I were them. Maybe Do Favors/Harris/Murphy for Anthony/Billups (or Martin - he he).
Lopez is not going anywhere - they drafted Favors to be the chip......I think the Net are very much players in this - a Favors/Harris deal with picks (they have 10 picks in the next 3 years) blows away anything the Knicks and Houston can put together...Carmello is from Brooklyn.
He may have a house there now but isn't he from the Baltimore area? That's what the big Warner Brothers looking tattoo on his shoulder(?) is for.
 
He may have a house there now but isn't he from the Baltimore area? That's what the big Warner Brothers looking tattoo on his shoulder(?) is for.

you're right - its his wife that is Brooklyn born.....rumor is she would be thrilled to move back to Brooklyn

 
Sports Illustrated: Carmelo Anthony open to multiyear deal with Houston Rockets18 Aug 2010 12:14 PMChris Mannix: Multiple league sources familiar with his situation told SI.com that Anthony would also be open to signing a long-term deal with Houston or New Jersey should either of those teams offer the Nuggets an acceptable trade package.
That probably would've been good for Houston to know before they traded Ariza? I figure they could've made a more attractive offer with him in the deal (since he plays Anthony's position) rather than Lee.
Carmelo- 17mJ. R. Smith- 6mforB. Lopez- 2.5mD. Harris- 9mT. Murphy- 12mDenver gets a nice haul. New Jersey gets the superstar they covet and a player who can attract others. Makes New Jersey instantly relevant with lots of cap space next year.Think it's a no-brainer for each side.Chauncey, Harris, Nene, Murphy/Contract, K. Martin/Contract, Anderson and Lopez. Lots of assets and height to deal.
You think NJ would want to trade Lopez? I wouldn't if I were them. Maybe do Favors/Harris/Murphy for Anthony/Billups (or Martin - he he).
I'd trade Lopez in a heartbeat for Carmelo. Everyone else in the deal is unimportant. Even Harris.
I'm not seeing what makes Houston so attractive to Melo in the near future of long term. The only young players I like on that roster are K-Mart, Chase, and Hayes but the latter two are still just role players. Hill and Patterson are unknowns and Brooks would just take the ball out of Melo's hands. The bulk of what makes the Rockets good... Yao, Scola, and Battier are older players. Also, if the Nets trade Lopez for Carmelo they are taking two steps back in the franchise. A Favors/Harris package looks like the best deal for Denver IMO with 2 young building blocks to ease the departure of Melo.
 
Being a Nuggets fan, all this recent Melo attention has got me thinking the last couple days.

If I am the Nuggets front office, I tell Melo that we want him as part of our long term future and we are not trading him this season. Come next off season tell him we are waiting for him to sign the extension, and if he doesn't sign we will look into trade opportunities when the new CBA comes into place. This gives Melo the option of re-upping for 22 mill a year or risking it and seeing how the CBA/agency work out.

In all likely hood I think Melo is gone, but I don't think the ####ty offers the Nuggets are getting right now offer any value. ESPN Insider posted a few trades for things like Luol Deng or Galinari and Curry or Vince Carter, personally I would rather have one year of Melo than 3 or 4 (or more) of Deng or Galinari or the other trash they can get. This gives the Nuggets two probable out comes, either he signs and all is well in the Nuggets universe (with expiring CBA I put this at about a 25% chance) or they make a sign and trade for nothing but draft picks and young cheap players (Galinari types).

With Melo gone and the team in full rebuild mode Nene will likely opt out of his final year (he'll be 28 going on 29 by opening night next year), Chauncey will want out (team option contract is partially guaranteed for something like 4 mil), JR and Martin's contracts expire. This leaves the Nuggets with Harrington's 4 years (last two half guaranteed) for 28 mil or whatever, Anderson 3/13, Lawson 2/4, Balkman 2/3, Afflalo's qualifying offer (~3 mil). With only that on the books (~22mil in used cap) the Nuggets are in cap heaven, and could technically field a starting 5.

 
Being a Nuggets fan, all this recent Melo attention has got me thinking the last couple days. If I am the Nuggets front office, I tell Melo that we want him as part of our long term future and we are not trading him this season. Come next off season tell him we are waiting for him to sign the extension, and if he doesn't sign we will look into trade opportunities when the new CBA comes into place. This gives Melo the option of re-upping for 22 mill a year or risking it and seeing how the CBA/agency work out.In all likely hood I think Melo is gone, but I don't think the ####ty offers the Nuggets are getting right now offer any value. ESPN Insider posted a few trades for things like Luol Deng or Galinari and Curry or Vince Carter, personally I would rather have one year of Melo than 3 or 4 (or more) of Deng or Galinari or the other trash they can get. This gives the Nuggets two probable out comes, either he signs and all is well in the Nuggets universe (with expiring CBA I put this at about a 25% chance) or they make a sign and trade for nothing but draft picks and young cheap players (Galinari types).With Melo gone and the team in full rebuild mode Nene will likely opt out of his final year (he'll be 28 going on 29 by opening night next year), Chauncey will want out (team option contract is partially guaranteed for something like 4 mil), JR and Martin's contracts expire. This leaves the Nuggets with Harrington's 4 years (last two half guaranteed) for 28 mil or whatever, Anderson 3/13, Lawson 2/4, Balkman 2/3, Afflalo's qualifying offer (~3 mil). With only that on the books (~22mil in used cap) the Nuggets are in cap heaven, and could technically field a starting 5.
How did that plan work out for Cleveland?The Nuggets should take what they can get now. Even if they hold an auction for Melo, there are so many teams interested that they should get back solid value.
 
Being a Nuggets fan, all this recent Melo attention has got me thinking the last couple days. If I am the Nuggets front office, I tell Melo that we want him as part of our long term future and we are not trading him this season. Come next off season tell him we are waiting for him to sign the extension, and if he doesn't sign we will look into trade opportunities when the new CBA comes into place. This gives Melo the option of re-upping for 22 mill a year or risking it and seeing how the CBA/agency work out.In all likely hood I think Melo is gone, but I don't think the ####ty offers the Nuggets are getting right now offer any value. ESPN Insider posted a few trades for things like Luol Deng or Galinari and Curry or Vince Carter, personally I would rather have one year of Melo than 3 or 4 (or more) of Deng or Galinari or the other trash they can get. This gives the Nuggets two probable out comes, either he signs and all is well in the Nuggets universe (with expiring CBA I put this at about a 25% chance) or they make a sign and trade for nothing but draft picks and young cheap players (Galinari types).With Melo gone and the team in full rebuild mode Nene will likely opt out of his final year (he'll be 28 going on 29 by opening night next year), Chauncey will want out (team option contract is partially guaranteed for something like 4 mil), JR and Martin's contracts expire. This leaves the Nuggets with Harrington's 4 years (last two half guaranteed) for 28 mil or whatever, Anderson 3/13, Lawson 2/4, Balkman 2/3, Afflalo's qualifying offer (~3 mil). With only that on the books (~22mil in used cap) the Nuggets are in cap heaven, and could technically field a starting 5.
I understand it sux as a Nuggets fan - but a pkg of the #2 pick in the draft with Dwight Howard upside, a young point guard who has been an all-star and 2 #1 picks is not trash...those are nice building blocks and would put the Nugs in much better shape than if they try to play hardball with him. If I was a Denver fan I would not want to see him walk and get nothing - Nets had that with JKidd and they pulled a nice deal out of it rather than see him walk for nothing....have to move while you can though.
 
Being a Nuggets fan, all this recent Melo attention has got me thinking the last couple days. If I am the Nuggets front office, I tell Melo that we want him as part of our long term future and we are not trading him this season. Come next off season tell him we are waiting for him to sign the extension, and if he doesn't sign we will look into trade opportunities when the new CBA comes into place. This gives Melo the option of re-upping for 22 mill a year or risking it and seeing how the CBA/agency work out.In all likely hood I think Melo is gone, but I don't think the ####ty offers the Nuggets are getting right now offer any value. ESPN Insider posted a few trades for things like Luol Deng or Galinari and Curry or Vince Carter, personally I would rather have one year of Melo than 3 or 4 (or more) of Deng or Galinari or the other trash they can get. This gives the Nuggets two probable out comes, either he signs and all is well in the Nuggets universe (with expiring CBA I put this at about a 25% chance) or they make a sign and trade for nothing but draft picks and young cheap players (Galinari types).With Melo gone and the team in full rebuild mode Nene will likely opt out of his final year (he'll be 28 going on 29 by opening night next year), Chauncey will want out (team option contract is partially guaranteed for something like 4 mil), JR and Martin's contracts expire. This leaves the Nuggets with Harrington's 4 years (last two half guaranteed) for 28 mil or whatever, Anderson 3/13, Lawson 2/4, Balkman 2/3, Afflalo's qualifying offer (~3 mil). With only that on the books (~22mil in used cap) the Nuggets are in cap heaven, and could technically field a starting 5.
How did that plan work out for Cleveland?The Nuggets should take what they can get now. Even if they hold an auction for Melo, there are so many teams interested that they should get back solid value.
Worked out terrible but the cap space they get from him leaving is more valuable than overpaid third tier stars. The combination of the new cba, the resulting cap flexibility if he leaves and the fact that Lebron is twice the diva and player Melo is make this a risk they have to take. The only way to completely #### this situation is by getting desperate and taking a ####ty trade mid/preseason and screwing this year and their future up once.
 
Being a Nuggets fan, all this recent Melo attention has got me thinking the last couple days. If I am the Nuggets front office, I tell Melo that we want him as part of our long term future and we are not trading him this season. Come next off season tell him we are waiting for him to sign the extension, and if he doesn't sign we will look into trade opportunities when the new CBA comes into place. This gives Melo the option of re-upping for 22 mill a year or risking it and seeing how the CBA/agency work out.In all likely hood I think Melo is gone, but I don't think the ####ty offers the Nuggets are getting right now offer any value. ESPN Insider posted a few trades for things like Luol Deng or Galinari and Curry or Vince Carter, personally I would rather have one year of Melo than 3 or 4 (or more) of Deng or Galinari or the other trash they can get. This gives the Nuggets two probable out comes, either he signs and all is well in the Nuggets universe (with expiring CBA I put this at about a 25% chance) or they make a sign and trade for nothing but draft picks and young cheap players (Galinari types).With Melo gone and the team in full rebuild mode Nene will likely opt out of his final year (he'll be 28 going on 29 by opening night next year), Chauncey will want out (team option contract is partially guaranteed for something like 4 mil), JR and Martin's contracts expire. This leaves the Nuggets with Harrington's 4 years (last two half guaranteed) for 28 mil or whatever, Anderson 3/13, Lawson 2/4, Balkman 2/3, Afflalo's qualifying offer (~3 mil). With only that on the books (~22mil in used cap) the Nuggets are in cap heaven, and could technically field a starting 5.
I understand it sux as a Nuggets fan - but a pkg of the #2 pick in the draft with Dwight Howard upside, a young point guard who has been an all-star and 2 #1 picks is not trash...those are nice building blocks and would put the Nugs in much better shape than if they try to play hardball with him. If I was a Denver fan I would not want to see him walk and get nothing - Nets had that with JKidd and they pulled a nice deal out of it rather than see him walk for nothing....have to move while you can though.
That trade cant happen for a number or reasons but most importantly, Billups and Lawson already play point guard and doubt NJ would be to excited about starting and playing Jordan Farmar for 40 minutes a game. Trading Melo for that would hurt more than help at this point, Harris has 3 more seasons on his contract and Favors is still a huge question mark. Something along the lines of Terrence Williams, Favors and a pick or two would be ideal, but I doubt NJ would do that.
 
Favors is a blue chip top 3 talent, Harris was an All Star 2 yrs ago, still young and has a good contract and 2 #1's - including a very lightly protected GS pick blows away anything they can get from NY and Houston - I would be shocked if they sent out Lopez....shocked.
Rockets have more 1st round picks to trade...more than Nets or Knicks. Nuggets aren't going to get a stud player in return so their best options are multiple first round picks and expiring contracts. Rockets trumps Knicks and Nets there. If the reports are accurate and Melo mentioned Rockets as one of the three teams he wants to play for I wonder if his buddy CP3 will come next.
 
This whole thing stinks as a lifelong Nuggets fan.

If they are looking to move him, Denver needs to get draft picks--bottom line. By getting rid of him it signals that the team is in full rebuild mode. The team needs options for the future, not some stiffs to try and make the fans believe this team has a chance. Melo goes, any hope of being a playoff team goes with him. As much as it pains me to say this, but if this is the direction the team is going in, blow the whole squad up. Keep Ty and maybe Nene--everyone else is available. Get a 3 year plan, follow the OKC model and then make a move.

The whole thing just sucks...

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Q&A on Carmelo Anthony’s alleged interest in the Houston Rockets

19 Aug 2010 02:09 AM

by rahat huq

After SI’s Chris Mannix’s Wednesday report of Carmelo Anthony’s alleged interest in the Houston Rockets, I got together with Jeremy Wagner of ESPN TrueHoop’s official Denver Nuggets blog, Roundball Mining Company. What ensues is our conversation about, among other things, the plausibility of a deal between Houston and Denver.

Rahat: On Wednesday, it was reported by Chris Mannix that Carmelo Anthony would be open to signing a contract extension with, in addition to the New York Knicks, the Houston Rockets or New Jersey Nets. To begin, what do you think is the likelihood of Anthony being traded?

Jeremy: At this point it is clear that Carmelo Anthony is not convinced that Denver is the place for him. As long as the Nuggets cannot be assured that he will return to play for them following this season it is only prudent to begin shopping him around the league to determine his value. Whatever that value is, it will certainly be greater than nothing, which is what the Nuggets could end up with should he exercise his early termination option and sign somewhere else following the 2010-11 season. Because of that I do believe Carmelo will be traded sometime before the trade deadline in February.

Rahat: Up to this point, with the reports of his interest in the Knicks, I had assumed that for Anthony, the driving force was to, rather than leave Denver, simply go to New York; ie: I did not feel he actively wanted out of Denver. With this latest report regarding Houston, it appears the motivation is to leave the Nuggets. Did this come as a surprise to you and do you have any insight into his mindset in this force of departure?

Jeremy: Carmelo certainly does like Denver and he knows if he stays, he will be regarded as the best player in franchise history. The reality is the Nuggets seemed to have seen their best chance at competing for a championship come and go last season when they were once again eliminated in the first round of the playoffs. Carmelo realizes that and while Denver has done a pretty good job of pairing him with some extremely talented running mates in Allen Iverson and now Chauncey Billups most of the Nuggets key players are either injury prone or in the twilight of their careers.

I believe as you stated at first he was simply enthralled with playing in New York. However, with the Nuggets dealing with a closing window and then seeing Miami pull off their free agent bonanza he began do dream about other possibilities. I am not surprised that he would consider teams other than the Knicks. If the driving force behind his decision to to be in the best position possible to win a championship, he would be crazy to only consider the Knicks simply because they are in New York.

I do think Houston is an odd fit and I question who leaked the report that Carmelo would consider the Rockets. Not to go all conspiracy theory on you, but I have to wonder if the Nuggets are doing their best to create some competition and urgency in an effort to driving up the price.

Houston is a team that can offer a young player or two, salary relief and draft picks. The Knicks have reportedly offered Danillo Galinari, Eddy Curry’s expiring deal and a future draft pick, which will have to be in 2014 at the earliest. That is not a great haul for an All-Star and borderline MVP candidate. If the Nuggets want to save any face here, they must pull off a good deal and without teams competing against each other, Denver may struggle to do better than New York’s offer. Houston could certainly create some competition, real or imagined.

Rahat: A leak from the Denver front offices could certainly be possible, but at the same time, I wonder what purpose that would ultimately serve insofar that Anthony would not want to unnecessarily deplete his new roster; were there really no interest, he would comeforth and refute the report, bringing us back to square one.

Regardless, let’s assume for a moment that the report of his interest is true. Who among the three teams could offer the package most enticing to the Nuggets? Among the Rockets’ assets, apart from their core, are Jordan Hill, Patrick Patterson, Chase Budinger, the expiring contracts of Shane Battier and Jared Jeffries, and the New York Knicks’ draft picks in 2011 and 2012.

Jeremy: That is a good point about Melo not wanting to weaken his future team and I thought about that, but I would not totally discount his desire to get paid as well. The only way he gets his extension is if he is traded prior to the trade deadline. Even a sign and trade would cost him money, especially considering it will be consummated under a new CBA.



The question is do the Nuggets try to make a deal that will keep them a playoff team, or do they decide to rebuild behind Ty Lawson, Arron Afflalo and Nene. Personally I think they are better off rebuilding. I get no satisfaction out of first round exits year after year and I would like to see some bold action to attempt to bring a championship to Denver.

Out of the three teams Carmelo has been rumored to be interested in the Rockets, Knicks and Magic, I think the Magic are the least likely destination. I doubt the Nuggets would be interested in Vince Carter, although he would fit the bill for a player they could acquire in an attempt to remain a playoff team next season and if Denver goes the picks and prospects route, Orlando could not offer Denver prospects and high draft picks.



As mentioned above the Knicks are prepared to offer Gallinari, Curry and a future draft pick. If I was Denver I would hold out for Anthony Randolph in place of the pick, which would not come for a few years.

Before we get to the Rockets I think we need to mention another team. The Nets could put together a nice package with Derrick Favors, Troy Murphy and a draft pick or two. I seriously doubt they would part with Brooke Lopez, but he would probably seal the deal in favor of the Nets if he was available.

I have to wonder how much of their stockpile of assets Houston would be willing to give up. Obviously the expiring contracts of Battier and Jeffries would be a must. The two picks owed from the Knicks would be enticing, especially since by sending Melo to Houston those picks would be more valuable than if he were sent to New York. In fact, the value of those picks could be used as leverage the Nuggets could use with Houston as a Knicks team with Melo would decrease their value. Jordan Hill and Patrick Patterson are nice assets too and either one of them would sweeten Houston’s proposal.

I think the decision comes down to the Knicks and Rockets, assuming Lopez is off limits, and if you want to know which offer I would select, you will have to check out my post on Friday where I name a fictitious winner of the Indian Summer of Carmelo.

While Carmelo may be interested in Houston, I wonder if the interest in mutual. Daryl Morey is a fan of statistical analysis and efficiency on both ends of the floor. Carmelo is not an overly efficient scorer, in fact when compared to the other elite scorers in the league he is one of the least efficient. Plus I have always admired the way the Rockets play unselfishly with great ball movement and patience. George Karl likes to refer to Carmelo as a ball stopper meaning when the ball hits Melo’s mitts, it stays there. That does not seem to fit with what the Rockets like to do. Then of course there is the matter of Carmelo’s defense, or lack thereof. Carmelo is a big name, but is he a player that makes sense for the Rockets?

Rahat: I think New Jersey easily has the capacity to put together the best package if putting either of Brooke Lopez or Devin Harris in play. Having said that, one wonders if Carmelo would still consider the Nets a desireable destination sans either of those players, given his entire motivation for this exit.

I feel the Rockets are the only team that can put together an attractive offer while still having enough left over to contend, given their aforementioned assets.

I want to get to your other point in a bit, but first, what do you think it would take (in a Rockets offer) at the bare minimum for the Nuggets to bite? What’s an offer with which you would be pleased?

Jeremy: Because of the shortage of teams Carmelo would agree to sign an extension with I think the Nuggets will be choosing from a handful of less than exciting offers. Even so in order to send Carmelo to the Rockets I personally would want at the very least the expiring contracts of Battier and Jeffries, Hill or Patterson, and the Knicks picks. To guarantee the Rockets are the big winners they would probably have to add in Buddinger and $3 million.

In your opinion who should the Nuggets target in negotiations with the Rockets between Hill or Patterson? Hill seems to have more potential, but Patterson would seem to be a safer, but less exciting prospect. Would you agree?

Rahat: Pretty interesting that you feel that that would be all it takes; Rockets fans would be dancing in the streets if landing Carmelo without sacrificing either Aaron Brooks or Kevin Martin – I think most of us considered it a foregone conclusion that Brooks would be required to consummate a deal.

Your assessment of Patterson/Hill is dead on. I think, given his ceiling, the Nuggets would prefer Hill, while ironically, the Rockets would prefer to keep Patterson, given that the latter is more ready to contribute.

Jeremy: I do not think Denver would be interested in Brooks due to the presence of Ty Lawson. Denver would certainly welcome Kevin Martin, but I was working under the assumption, possibly a false one, that Martin was quasi-untouchable. If the Nuggets are looking to rebuild and achieve some cap flexibility, which is the route I would prefer they go, Martin’s contract, while reasonable, might be more than they are interested in acquiring.

By the way, I would like to see Denver shed the contracts of Chris Andersen, four years $20 million and Renaldo Balkman, 3 years, $5.0 million in any trade involving Carmelo. So take that for what it is worth.

Rahat: I had felt that either of Brooks/Martin would be necessary, not with Denver as an end destination necessarily, but as simply “value”, parlayed to another team at a later date if Denver so chooses.

The Rockets have a trade exception from the Ariza deal with which they could absorb Andersen, but I do not think they would be too eager for such a transaction given that he would cost them $10million/annually (due to tax implications.)

To revisit your earlier point: Melo’s inefficiency has been well-documented, especially amongst stat-heads. One would imagine Morey would subscribe to this thinking, but at the same time, if drawing from his public statements, I don’t know that Morey is the staunch idealist he is characterized as by the media.

While intrinsic to conventional philosophy, he’s spoken many times of the need for a “star” and to that end, Carmelo Anthony would seem to fit that need.

Having watched him up close, are the criticisms warranted? Is Melo truly elite and can he lead a team to a title?

Jeremy: Carmelo is an elite talent, but to this point in his career that talent has not translated into becoming a transcendent player on the court. He can do almost anything he wants to on the court, including playing defense. Sadly he places value on his ability to score and as a result does not utilize his other talents to help his team win.

There are few players who can score in as many was as Carmelo can, yet instead of exploiting the advantages the team earns due to the attention he receives from the opposition Melo frequently forces his way into the teeth of the defense in an attempt to prove he can do it. Carmelo has never made that leap from I can do it, to we can do it and as a result makes things more difficult on himself than it needs to be which leads directly to the surprising void between his talent and his lack of efficiency.

After watching Carmelo play in Denver for seven seasons I have come to the conclusion the Nuggets are better off with someone else paying him $20 million a season. Carmelo will absolutely get you at least 25 points a night and plenty of regular season wins. Even so until he begins to value wins over accolades neither he nor his teams will reach their full potential.

He talks about winning championships and I do believe his desire to win a title is what is driving him to want to leave Denver, but he is constantly held back by his refusal to do what it takes on the court to earn one.

I firmly believe if Carmelo is your alpha dog, you are not winning a championship.

Do you believe Houston would go so far as to part with Kevin Martin, who was acquired less than a year ago to provide outside shooting and scoring punch to compliment Yao Ming, for a player who may be more talented, but less efficient and who is not even a mediocre shooter from behind the arc?

Rahat: I go back and forth on that one, as that’s a question which would make for a classic philosophical case-study. Given each player’s inabilities on the defensive end, they probably can’t coexist at the wings – do you trade the poster-boy for offensive efficiency to finally fill the conventional “star” role?

I also wonder if Courtney Lee was acquired to make preparation for a Martin-Melo swap. To answer/dodge your question, I don’t know, but I hope not. This team would be scary explosive with Martin/Melo, while I could maintain (for this year, at leat) willful oblivion regarding their inabilities.

 
Favors is a blue chip top 3 talent, Harris was an All Star 2 yrs ago, still young and has a good contract and 2 #1's - including a very lightly protected GS pick blows away anything they can get from NY and Houston - I would be shocked if they sent out Lopez....shocked.
Rockets have more 1st round picks to trade...more than Nets or Knicks. Nuggets aren't going to get a stud player in return so their best options are multiple first round picks and expiring contracts. Rockets trumps Knicks and Nets there. If the reports are accurate and Melo mentioned Rockets as one of the three teams he wants to play for I wonder if his buddy CP3 will come next.
Favors is the #3 pick in the draft with huge upside - way better than mid/late rd draft picks and the guys the Rockets could include - Nets are not far behind with lots of picks as well - if they didnt want Harris Im sure the Nets would do a T Will/Favors deal - only one untouchable IMO would be Lopez. Proky wants a star and to win quickly - this could be his chance.Also need to factor in Denver may want t ship him out East so they dont see him in the future....
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Favors is a blue chip top 3 talent, Harris was an All Star 2 yrs ago, still young and has a good contract and 2 #1's - including a very lightly protected GS pick blows away anything they can get from NY and Houston - I would be shocked if they sent out Lopez....shocked.
Rockets have more 1st round picks to trade...more than Nets or Knicks. Nuggets aren't going to get a stud player in return so their best options are multiple first round picks and expiring contracts. Rockets trumps Knicks and Nets there. If the reports are accurate and Melo mentioned Rockets as one of the three teams he wants to play for I wonder if his buddy CP3 will come next.
Favors is the #3 pick in the draft with huge upside - way better than mid/late rd draft picks and the guys the Rockets could include - Nets are not far behind with lots of picks as well - if they didnt want Harris Im sure the Nets would do a T Will/Favors deal - only one untouchable IMO would be Lopez. Proky wants a star and to win quickly - this could be his chance.Also need to factor in Denver may want t ship him out East so they dont see him in the future....
Nuggets would rebuild so they need expiring contracts / cheap players and multiple draft picks. Favors won't be traded or part of a package.I do not think Denver would be interested in Harris due to Ty Lawson.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Favors is a blue chip top 3 talent, Harris was an All Star 2 yrs ago, still young and has a good contract and 2 #1's - including a very lightly protected GS pick blows away anything they can get from NY and Houston - I would be shocked if they sent out Lopez....shocked.
Rockets have more 1st round picks to trade...more than Nets or Knicks. Nuggets aren't going to get a stud player in return so their best options are multiple first round picks and expiring contracts. Rockets trumps Knicks and Nets there. If the reports are accurate and Melo mentioned Rockets as one of the three teams he wants to play for I wonder if his buddy CP3 will come next.
Favors is the #3 pick in the draft with huge upside - way better than mid/late rd draft picks and the guys the Rockets could include - Nets are not far behind with lots of picks as well - if they didnt want Harris Im sure the Nets would do a T Will/Favors deal - only one untouchable IMO would be Lopez. Proky wants a star and to win quickly - this could be his chance.Also need to factor in Denver may want t ship him out East so they dont see him in the future....
Nuggets would rebuild so they need expiring contracts / cheap players and multiple draft picks. Favors won't be traded or part of a package.I do not think Denver would be interested in Harris due to Ty Lawson.
:potkettle:No one would want a player like Favors if they are trying to rebuild. They'd be much better off getting an expiring contract and a 1st round pick that is about 20th overall.
 
Favors is a blue chip top 3 talent, Harris was an All Star 2 yrs ago, still young and has a good contract and 2 #1's - including a very lightly protected GS pick blows away anything they can get from NY and Houston - I would be shocked if they sent out Lopez....shocked.
Rockets have more 1st round picks to trade...more than Nets or Knicks. Nuggets aren't going to get a stud player in return so their best options are multiple first round picks and expiring contracts. Rockets trumps Knicks and Nets there. If the reports are accurate and Melo mentioned Rockets as one of the three teams he wants to play for I wonder if his buddy CP3 will come next.
Favors is the #3 pick in the draft with huge upside - way better than mid/late rd draft picks and the guys the Rockets could include - Nets are not far behind with lots of picks as well - if they didnt want Harris Im sure the Nets would do a T Will/Favors deal - only one untouchable IMO would be Lopez. Proky wants a star and to win quickly - this could be his chance.Also need to factor in Denver may want t ship him out East so they dont see him in the future....
Nuggets would rebuild so they need expiring contracts / cheap players and multiple draft picks. Favors won't be traded or part of a package.I do not think Denver would be interested in Harris due to Ty Lawson.
Favors is on a cheap rookie contract for 4 yrs with huge upside.....T Will has 3 yrs left on his cheap rookie contract....Troy Murphy is a $10M expiring.....Nets are a player in this
 
Favors is a blue chip top 3 talent, Harris was an All Star 2 yrs ago, still young and has a good contract and 2 #1's - including a very lightly protected GS pick blows away anything they can get from NY and Houston - I would be shocked if they sent out Lopez....shocked.
Rockets have more 1st round picks to trade...more than Nets or Knicks. Nuggets aren't going to get a stud player in return so their best options are multiple first round picks and expiring contracts. Rockets trumps Knicks and Nets there. If the reports are accurate and Melo mentioned Rockets as one of the three teams he wants to play for I wonder if his buddy CP3 will come next.
Favors is the #3 pick in the draft with huge upside - way better than mid/late rd draft picks and the guys the Rockets could include - Nets are not far behind with lots of picks as well - if they didnt want Harris Im sure the Nets would do a T Will/Favors deal - only one untouchable IMO would be Lopez. Proky wants a star and to win quickly - this could be his chance.Also need to factor in Denver may want t ship him out East so they dont see him in the future....
Nuggets would rebuild so they need expiring contracts / cheap players and multiple draft picks. Favors won't be traded or part of a package.I do not think Denver would be interested in Harris due to Ty Lawson.
With all these great young players and amazing picks the rockets have, they should just holf on for another couple years and Budinger Hill and Brooks should be leading them to a series of 70 win seasons. The Nuggets aren't going to trade Melo for some future role players and a couple picks that will land a couple more future role players.
 
Favors is a blue chip top 3 talent, Harris was an All Star 2 yrs ago, still young and has a good contract and 2 #1's - including a very lightly protected GS pick blows away anything they can get from NY and Houston - I would be shocked if they sent out Lopez....shocked.
Rockets have more 1st round picks to trade...more than Nets or Knicks. Nuggets aren't going to get a stud player in return so their best options are multiple first round picks and expiring contracts. Rockets trumps Knicks and Nets there. If the reports are accurate and Melo mentioned Rockets as one of the three teams he wants to play for I wonder if his buddy CP3 will come next.
Favors is the #3 pick in the draft with huge upside - way better than mid/late rd draft picks and the guys the Rockets could include - Nets are not far behind with lots of picks as well - if they didnt want Harris Im sure the Nets would do a T Will/Favors deal - only one untouchable IMO would be Lopez. Proky wants a star and to win quickly - this could be his chance.Also need to factor in Denver may want t ship him out East so they dont see him in the future....
Nuggets would rebuild so they need expiring contracts / cheap players and multiple draft picks. Favors won't be traded or part of a package.I do not think Denver would be interested in Harris due to Ty Lawson.
:lmao: No one would want a player like Favors if they are trying to rebuild. They'd be much better off getting an expiring contract and a 1st round pick that is about 20th overall.
You only go as far as your superstar and Favors has a higher chance of being a superstar compared to a expiring contract or a low 1st rounder.
 
What about Melo to the Wizards for Gilbert Arenas and change? Melo back near his home. Big Market. Play with John Wall and some other decent pieces.
I just don't think the Nuggets would do that (at least I hope they don't). Melo is the face of the team. You trade him, this team is done as far as being a threat in a very, very deep West. I stand by what I said before, for Melo to go it needs to be for picks and expiring contracts--nothing else.Billups is winding down his career here. Martin is done and his $$$ is about to come off the books. Nene is a ?? and may end up elsewhere. Anderson has heart, but is always hurt. You just can't build a franchise around JR. This leaves Lawson and Afflalo as the the only pieces on this team to work with. (well and Harrington's contract that the team is stuck with). So by trading Melo it is basically starting over and lottery time for this team.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
:excited:

No one would want a player like Favors if they are trying to rebuild. They'd be much better off getting an expiring contract and a 1st round pick that is about 20th overall.
You only go as far as your superstar and Favors has a higher chance of being a superstar compared to a expiring contract or a low 1st rounder.
Sorry. I should have ended that with :mellow: . Favors is better than anything Houston has to offer.
 
Some folks are overrating the value of even a top 1-yr rental. The Knicks offer reflects that (and if the Nuggets dont act quickly, they wont even get that), as did Phx's inability to get a decent offer on Amare. Those NBA teams who dont quickly learn the art of handling the superstar trying to engineer his way to a SuperTeam in a major market (while Miami aint sizewise big, it's the Paris of conspicuous consumption) are going to be spending decades by the wayside.

 
:bs:

No one would want a player like Favors if they are trying to rebuild. They'd be much better off getting an expiring contract and a 1st round pick that is about 20th overall.
You only go as far as your superstar and Favors has a higher chance of being a superstar compared to a expiring contract or a low 1st rounder.
Sorry. I should have ended that with :lmao: . Favors is better than anything Houston has to offer.
I should have known. You're usually reasonable when it comes to NBA discussion. Sarcasm was my first instinct, but the good posting smilie threw me off.
 
What about Melo to the Wizards for Gilbert Arenas and change? Melo back near his home. Big Market. Play with John Wall and some other decent pieces.
Arenas is owed way too much money ($80 million over 4 years). Washington would have to agree to eat some of that salary, because Denver doesn't have any "albatross contracts" that they could unload along with Carmelo.
 
Favors is a blue chip top 3 talent, Harris was an All Star 2 yrs ago, still young and has a good contract and 2 #1's - including a very lightly protected GS pick blows away anything they can get from NY and Houston - I would be shocked if they sent out Lopez....shocked.
Rockets have more 1st round picks to trade...more than Nets or Knicks. Nuggets aren't going to get a stud player in return so their best options are multiple first round picks and expiring contracts. Rockets trumps Knicks and Nets there. If the reports are accurate and Melo mentioned Rockets as one of the three teams he wants to play for I wonder if his buddy CP3 will come next.
Favors is the #3 pick in the draft with huge upside - way better than mid/late rd draft picks and the guys the Rockets could include - Nets are not far behind with lots of picks as well - if they didnt want Harris Im sure the Nets would do a T Will/Favors deal - only one untouchable IMO would be Lopez. Proky wants a star and to win quickly - this could be his chance.Also need to factor in Denver may want t ship him out East so they dont see him in the future....
Nuggets would rebuild so they need expiring contracts / cheap players and multiple draft picks. Favors won't be traded or part of a package.I do not think Denver would be interested in Harris due to Ty Lawson.
:lmao:No one would want a player like Favors if they are trying to rebuild. They'd be much better off getting an expiring contract and a 1st round pick that is about 20th overall.
:lmao: :lmao: :lmao: :lmao: I agree, if a team is rebuilding you don't want a young player in the first year of his rookie deal. Doesn't make any sense. What you need is Jared Jeffries expiring contract and the # 25 overall pick.
 
What's going on with Rudy Fernandez? He just got docked 25K by the league for making "detrimental comments" about not wanting to play for the Blazers.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top