You guys are better off without Ariza, no idea who you got for him even. But come on the Knicks would not trade Gallo for anyone on your roster besides Brooks and even that is a maybe since we got Felton.
Ariza for Courtney Lee.Here is how I see the players ranking uin terms of immediate performanceusing Bill Simmons "the higher ranked guy wouldn't be traded for the lower guy straight up, but if the team owning the lower ranked guy were offered the higher guy they would seriously consider the deal...:
1. Amare
2. Martin
3. Brooks
4. Danilo
5. Scola
6. Budinger
7. Chandler
8. Lowry
9. Felton
10. Battier
IMO, no BS here Knicks easily win 40 games in top heavy eastern conference while Rockets will be about a 35 win team thus making Knicks pick worse. With the Miami 3 happening it knocked two teams in the 40+ wins column. Raptors and Cavs into the 20 win column and Knicks with improvements will easily coast above those teams
Maybe the Knicks win 40, but I'm not sure why the Rockets would regress frm 42 wins to the range of 35.
They have added Courtney Lee, Patrick Patterson, Brad Miller, and Yao and have lost Trevor Ariza and David Anderson. So they have a better team (or at least a deeper team) then last season.
So they have added nobody is what you are saying?Don't want to knock you but you leaving Anthony Randolph off the list is an abomination. Ask any sane Knicks fan if they would rather AR or Chandler, 99 of 100 would tell you AR. Kid is still 21, was a lottery pick, played extremely well in limited minutes but since he was in Donnie Darkos doghouse he never played enough. That wont happen with Dantoni who will play him 30+ mins
Budinger is the second coming of that readhead on the Celtics nothing more
Battier can play some D but is a role player. If i was the Rockets GM i would clearly have Scola higher on that list then Martin, Scola is a very solid player, martin is a one dimensional chucker and cant play a lick of D
I don't want to make a habit out of agreeing with the Rockets fans in here, but you have no idea what you're talking about. The Knicks may have a good future, but I highly doubt anything special is coming from them anytime in the near future. For the Knicks to be a better team than the Rockets in the next few years they are going to need a lot of improvement from their youngsters.
Gallo has a pretty jumper, but is possibly the worst rebounding and defending PF in the league, and with a bum back is unlikely to ever improve much in those categories. Randolph can't stay healthy and has shown no ability to effectively score in the NBA, at this point he is a poor man's version of Marcus Camby. Chandler is slowly improving, but can't shoot and is both an average rebounder and defender. Douglas could be a very good player in this league, and I loved the pick of him by the Knicks, he could develop into an average starting PG who can defend and hit the 3.
If those 4 young guys all improve they still will be a mediocre team in 3-4 years because Amare is going to be 31 or 32 with crap legs getting paid $20 million. In the 2014-2015 season, at best, I see him as the 32 year old Antonio Mcdyess, who like Amare was a super athlete who developed a nice jumper and had bad knees. The difference being Mcdyess is/was a willing defender.
Does a team of mid career Derek Fisher (Douglas), Wilson Chandler (I think what you see at this point is what you get), Detlef Schrempf (Gallinari), washed up McDyess (Amare) and mid career Marcus Camby get 50 wins?