What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*NBA THREAD* Abe will be missed (2 Viewers)

Durant is probably the only player I'd trade Irving for.
This is some decent trolling.
LBJ's 8 yrs older. I guess some would rather have Anthony Davis, but I'd take Kyrie. And he's just outright better than Griffin.Everyone else is too old.
Are you assuming normal NBA contracts? Because after five years, any of these guys could hypothetically be wooed away.James' game seems like it's going to age well. He's extremely durable, and he's got enough size to where he's not going to fall off the map once he loses a step. I dunno, I'm thinking five-year window here, and trying to rack up titles ASAP. Success begets free agents/superteams.
Exactly. Let's even forget contracts and assume you get either guy for the duration of what they have left. The difference is only 7 years and a month or two. Would you rather have Michael Jordan in his prime at 28 or a rookie Gary Payton? That's about what this is. And it's really not even close. Guys at that top tier of the "All Time Greats" make such a gigantic difference compared to the ones a tier below them like Kobe that you simply take that guy when you have some reasonable tread left on the tires no questions asked.
You're asleep at the wheel if you're comparing Kyrie to GP.
True, Payton was pretty good on the defensive side of the ball too.
And passed the ball.I'm a big fan of Irving but its a bit early to be calling him the second coming.
 
The only rookie guards to have a higher PER than Kyrie are Jordan and CP3. That's it. As a 22 yr old rookie, GP's PER was 13. Kyrie's was 21.4 as a 19 yr old.It took GP 7 seasons (age 28) to have a season matching Kyrie's PER as a 19 yr old rookie. And Payton was playing with All Star caliber guys like Kemp and Detlef Schrempf. Kyrie is handing out beatdowns to LeBron and Co. by dropping 13 in the final 2 minutes with Marreese Speights, Alonzo Gee, and Tyler Zeller.
 
Durant is probably the only player I'd trade Irving for.
This is some decent trolling.
LBJ's 8 yrs older. I guess some would rather have Anthony Davis, but I'd take Kyrie. And he's just outright better than Griffin.Everyone else is too old.
Are you assuming normal NBA contracts? Because after five years, any of these guys could hypothetically be wooed away.James' game seems like it's going to age well. He's extremely durable, and he's got enough size to where he's not going to fall off the map once he loses a step.

I dunno, I'm thinking five-year window here, and trying to rack up titles ASAP. Success begets free agents/superteams.
Good points. Especially the bold. I'm obviously way high on Kyrie - I think he is an all timer. Best guard to come into the league since CP3 hands down.
Rose?
Rose was the most overrated player in the NBA prior to his injury. I think 20 year old Irving is better than MVP Rose.
 
Durant is probably the only player I'd trade Irving for.
This is some decent trolling.
LBJ's 8 yrs older. I guess some would rather have Anthony Davis, but I'd take Kyrie. And he's just outright better than Griffin.Everyone else is too old.
Are you assuming normal NBA contracts? Because after five years, any of these guys could hypothetically be wooed away.James' game seems like it's going to age well. He's extremely durable, and he's got enough size to where he's not going to fall off the map once he loses a step.

I dunno, I'm thinking five-year window here, and trying to rack up titles ASAP. Success begets free agents/superteams.
Good points. Especially the bold. I'm obviously way high on Kyrie - I think he is an all timer. Best guard to come into the league since CP3 hands down.
Rose?
Rose was the most overrated player in the NBA prior to his injury. I think 20 year old Irving is better than MVP Rose.
Irving has yet to put up a PER as high as MVP Rose. Since that's your #1 metric I guess.He hasn't even put up a PER as high as beat up Rose playing with an injured groin amongst other injuries.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Durant is probably the only player I'd trade Irving for.
This is some decent trolling.
LBJ's 8 yrs older. I guess some would rather have Anthony Davis, but I'd take Kyrie. And he's just outright better than Griffin.Everyone else is too old.
Are you assuming normal NBA contracts? Because after five years, any of these guys could hypothetically be wooed away.James' game seems like it's going to age well. He's extremely durable, and he's got enough size to where he's not going to fall off the map once he loses a step.

I dunno, I'm thinking five-year window here, and trying to rack up titles ASAP. Success begets free agents/superteams.
Good points. Especially the bold. I'm obviously way high on Kyrie - I think he is an all timer. Best guard to come into the league since CP3 hands down.
Rose?
Rose was the most overrated player in the NBA prior to his injury. I think 20 year old Irving is better than MVP Rose.
Irving has yet to put up a PER as high as MVP Rose. Since that's your #1 metric I guess.He hasn't even put up a PER as high as beat up Rose playing with an injured groin amongst other injuries.
The majority of the reason Rose's PER was higher than Irving's is now is because of his ungodly 32.2 usage as a PG. It also helps to have a great team around you. I suspect that Irving would be putting up better statistics with the 2010 Bulls around him than with the 2012 Cavs. And a difference in PER of 0.8 is hardly significant.
 
Durant is probably the only player I'd trade Irving for.
This is some decent trolling.
LBJ's 8 yrs older. I guess some would rather have Anthony Davis, but I'd take Kyrie. And he's just outright better than Griffin.Everyone else is too old.
Are you assuming normal NBA contracts? Because after five years, any of these guys could hypothetically be wooed away.James' game seems like it's going to age well. He's extremely durable, and he's got enough size to where he's not going to fall off the map once he loses a step.

I dunno, I'm thinking five-year window here, and trying to rack up titles ASAP. Success begets free agents/superteams.
Good points. Especially the bold. I'm obviously way high on Kyrie - I think he is an all timer. Best guard to come into the league since CP3 hands down.
Rose?
Rose was the most overrated player in the NBA prior to his injury. I think 20 year old Irving is better than MVP Rose.
Irving has yet to put up a PER as high as MVP Rose. Since that's your #1 metric I guess.He hasn't even put up a PER as high as beat up Rose playing with an injured groin amongst other injuries.
The majority of the reason Rose's PER was higher than Irving's is now is because of his ungodly 32.2 usage as a PG. It also helps to have a great team around you. I suspect that Irving would be putting up better statistics with the 2010 Bulls around him than with the 2012 Cavs. And a difference in PER of 0.8 is hardly significant.
This is the metric Tommy's electing to use. You can suspect all you like, but fact remains that Rose had a higher figure using this metric.
 
Durant is probably the only player I'd trade Irving for.
This is some decent trolling.
LBJ's 8 yrs older. I guess some would rather have Anthony Davis, but I'd take Kyrie. And he's just outright better than Griffin.Everyone else is too old.
Are you assuming normal NBA contracts? Because after five years, any of these guys could hypothetically be wooed away.James' game seems like it's going to age well. He's extremely durable, and he's got enough size to where he's not going to fall off the map once he loses a step.

I dunno, I'm thinking five-year window here, and trying to rack up titles ASAP. Success begets free agents/superteams.
Good points. Especially the bold. I'm obviously way high on Kyrie - I think he is an all timer. Best guard to come into the league since CP3 hands down.
Rose?
Rose was the most overrated player in the NBA prior to his injury. I think 20 year old Irving is better than MVP Rose.
Irving has yet to put up a PER as high as MVP Rose. Since that's your #1 metric I guess.He hasn't even put up a PER as high as beat up Rose playing with an injured groin amongst other injuries.
The majority of the reason Rose's PER was higher than Irving's is now is because of his ungodly 32.2 usage as a PG. It also helps to have a great team around you. I suspect that Irving would be putting up better statistics with the 2010 Bulls around him than with the 2012 Cavs. And a difference in PER of 0.8 is hardly significant.
This is the metric Tommy's electing to use. You can suspect all you like, but fact remains that Rose had a higher figure using this metric.
I guess we're done here. Rose>Irving.
 
Good points. Especially the bold. I'm obviously way high on Kyrie - I think he is an all timer. Best guard to come into the league since CP3 hands down.
Rose?
Rose was the most overrated player in the NBA prior to his injury. I think 20 year old Irving is better than MVP Rose.
Irving has yet to put up a PER as high as MVP Rose. Since that's your #1 metric I guess.He hasn't even put up a PER as high as beat up Rose playing with an injured groin amongst other injuries.
The majority of the reason Rose's PER was higher than Irving's is now is because of his ungodly 32.2 usage as a PG. It also helps to have a great team around you. I suspect that Irving would be putting up better statistics with the 2010 Bulls around him than with the 2012 Cavs. And a difference in PER of 0.8 is hardly significant.
This is the metric Tommy's electing to use. You can suspect all you like, but fact remains that Rose had a higher figure using this metric.
I guess we're done here. Rose>Irving.
I have little say in this fight since I haven't seen too much of Irving. In fact, the two of them have yet to play each other.
 
Game of 1 on 1 in their prime - Jordan destroys Kobe because he's so much quicker and better defensively. Lebron vs KD would yield similar results I'd think, but might be closer because of Lebron's lack of a jumper.
I actually think Durant, Kobe & MJ are all better in a game of 1-1 than James. James strengths are in the 5-5 game.
 
Durant is probably the only player I'd trade Irving for.
This is some decent trolling.
LBJ's 8 yrs older. I guess some would rather have Anthony Davis, but I'd take Kyrie. And he's just outright better than Griffin.Everyone else is too old.
Are you assuming normal NBA contracts? Because after five years, any of these guys could hypothetically be wooed away.James' game seems like it's going to age well. He's extremely durable, and he's got enough size to where he's not going to fall off the map once he loses a step. I dunno, I'm thinking five-year window here, and trying to rack up titles ASAP. Success begets free agents/superteams.
Exactly. Let's even forget contracts and assume you get either guy for the duration of what they have left. The difference is only 7 years and a month or two. Would you rather have Michael Jordan in his prime at 28 or a rookie Gary Payton? That's about what this is. And it's really not even close. Guys at that top tier of the "All Time Greats" make such a gigantic difference compared to the ones a tier below them like Kobe that you simply take that guy when you have some reasonable tread left on the tires no questions asked.
You're asleep at the wheel if you're comparing Kyrie to GP.
Agreed. GP was a stud on both ends of the floor. Kyrie is lazy on defense.
 
Game of 1 on 1 in their prime - Jordan destroys Kobe because he's so much quicker and better defensively. Lebron vs KD would yield similar results I'd think, but might be closer because of Lebron's lack of a jumper.
I actually think Durant, Kobe & MJ are all better in a game of 1-1 than James. James strengths are in the 5-5 game.
Depends how you play. If you play like Scalabrine with no rebounds than maybe, but who is going to be able to cover LeBron on the block? Durant is the only one who could do that and if you do rebounding, LeBron's advantage becomes that much greater.
 
LBJ's 8 yrs older. I guess some would rather have Anthony Davis, but I'd take Kyrie. And he's just outright better than Griffin.

Everyone else is too old.
Are you assuming normal NBA contracts? Because after five years, any of these guys could hypothetically be wooed away.James' game seems like it's going to age well. He's extremely durable, and he's got enough size to where he's not going to fall off the map once he loses a step.

I dunno, I'm thinking five-year window here, and trying to rack up titles ASAP. Success begets free agents/superteams.
Good points. Especially the bold. I'm obviously way high on Kyrie - I think he is an all timer. Best guard to come into the league since CP3 hands down.
Rose?
Rose was the most overrated player in the NBA prior to his injury. I think 20 year old Irving is better than MVP Rose.
Irving has yet to put up a PER as high as MVP Rose. Since that's your #1 metric I guess.He hasn't even put up a PER as high as beat up Rose playing with an injured groin amongst other injuries.
The majority of the reason Rose's PER was higher than Irving's is now is because of his ungodly 32.2 usage as a PG. It also helps to have a great team around you. I suspect that Irving would be putting up better statistics with the 2010 Bulls around him than with the 2012 Cavs. And a difference in PER of 0.8 is hardly significant.
This is the metric Tommy's electing to use. You can suspect all you like, but fact remains that Rose had a higher figure using this metric.
I guess we're done here. Rose>Irving.
So if you had a re-draft of every player in the league, Rose goes over Irving? I don't know. There are going to be a lot of injury concerns going forward with Rose just b/c of the way he plays. Irving has similar concerns but he doesn't take the beating that Rose does and he isn't coming off major knee surgery. We can debate Rose 2010 versus Kyrie now all we want but at the moment, it is Rose now versus Kyrie now in which case, Rose is a much bigger question mark.

 
I dont understand why I dont hear more about CP3 for MVP. They are not even a playoff team without CP3. I think they are like 2-7 since he got injured, compared to how awesome they are with him, he should be right up there with Lebron and Durant in the discussion.

 
After watching the Knicks the last bunch of games, i think the old Amare (pre-Melo) is coming back. The player who is playing 20 minutes a game and the player I watched last year are totally different. This year Amare really is getting off smart shots and not forcing many clunkers and settling for 20 footers like he did all of last year. Melo is still resorting to Iso heavy Melo when the games get tight, but he is at least to my eyes making more of an effort to give up the ball whenever he gets a hard double team while last year he would have taken a wild J or gone to the rim and thrown up an errant layup.

 
I love Woj, but that was a ridiculous and childish shot at Hollinger. Actually can't believe he wrote that.
Not just that, but he contradicts himself. Did they trade Gay because Hollinger doesn't like him or because Pera's a freeloader?As a general rule I disagree with anyone who thinks everything fits into neat categorizations. The whole "two stars/three stars" thing is nonsense. How do we even decide who is a "star"?

Everyone is trying to do the same thing: put the best team possible on the floor. No "stars" worked for the 2004 Pistons. One "star" worked for the 2011 Mavs. The whole idea that there's a model in the first place exists largely in sportswriters' heads.
Do you think this is true, or is there some element of making money over winning?
Sorry, been away for a while.The article was talking about "models" for winning a title (three stars, four stars, etc.), so I was restricting the conversation only to the behavior of teams trying to win a title in a given season. Obviously there are other motivations for other teams- saving money, drawing fans, lottery position, etc.

 
Does anyone know why the NBA doesn't schedule marquee games for Super Bowl Sunday and run them on ABC or ESPN? Maybe one at 12:30 and one at 3? Instead they had an early game on NBA TV and then just local broadcasts. You've got a captive sports-loving audience sitting around drinking and cooking/eating all day, and the only competition is an NHL game :lmao: and a golf tournament.

 
Does anyone know why the NBA doesn't schedule marquee games for Super Bowl Sunday and run them on ABC or ESPN? Maybe one at 12:30 and one at 3? Instead they had an early game on NBA TV and then just local broadcasts. You've got a captive sports-loving audience sitting around drinking and cooking/eating all day, and the only competition is an NHL game :lmao: and a golf tournament.
I don't get that either. I guess they think people would really rather sit and watch 8 hours of Super Bowl pre-game coverage.
 
If the Celtics blow it up, looks like Garnett won't agree to a trade unless Pierce goes as well. Doesn't seem to be many teams that could take on that much money (Pierce only has 4 mill guaranteed next year, so it is really only for this year - Garnett at 11 mill for two more years isn't crippling).Pierce and Garnett could both go to LAC for a package of Bledsoe, Jordan, a pick, and salary filler (Butler and Billups perhaps).Paul, Green/Crawford, Pierce, Griffin, Garnett is a pretty slick lineup.

 
If the Celtics blow it up, looks like Garnett won't agree to a trade unless Pierce goes as well. Doesn't seem to be many teams that could take on that much money (Pierce only has 4 mill guaranteed next year, so it is really only for this year - Garnett at 11 mill for two more years isn't crippling).

Pierce and Garnett could both go to LAC for a package of Bledsoe, Jordan, a pick, and salary filler (Butler and Billups perhaps).

Paul, Green/Crawford, Pierce, Griffin, Garnett is a pretty slick lineup.
If I'm LAC, I'm asking for picks in that deal, definitely not giving them up.
 
I misread the tweet anyhow. Just seems that Garnett wouldn't agree to a trade if it meant that Pierce would be left in Boston with the rebuild. So Pierce could be traded elsewhere. But Garnett does see to only be open to a trade to LA.

 
'sporthenry said:
LBJ's 8 yrs older. I guess some would rather have Anthony Davis, but I'd take Kyrie. And he's just outright better than Griffin.

Everyone else is too old.
Are you assuming normal NBA contracts? Because after five years, any of these guys could hypothetically be wooed away.James' game seems like it's going to age well. He's extremely durable, and he's got enough size to where he's not going to fall off the map once he loses a step.

I dunno, I'm thinking five-year window here, and trying to rack up titles ASAP. Success begets free agents/superteams.
Good points. Especially the bold. I'm obviously way high on Kyrie - I think he is an all timer. Best guard to come into the league since CP3 hands down.
Rose?
Rose was the most overrated player in the NBA prior to his injury. I think 20 year old Irving is better than MVP Rose.
Irving has yet to put up a PER as high as MVP Rose. Since that's your #1 metric I guess.He hasn't even put up a PER as high as beat up Rose playing with an injured groin amongst other injuries.
The majority of the reason Rose's PER was higher than Irving's is now is because of his ungodly 32.2 usage as a PG. It also helps to have a great team around you. I suspect that Irving would be putting up better statistics with the 2010 Bulls around him than with the 2012 Cavs. And a difference in PER of 0.8 is hardly significant.
This is the metric Tommy's electing to use. You can suspect all you like, but fact remains that Rose had a higher figure using this metric.
I guess we're done here. Rose>Irving.
So if you had a re-draft of every player in the league, Rose goes over Irving? I don't know. There are going to be a lot of injury concerns going forward with Rose just b/c of the way he plays. Irving has similar concerns but he doesn't take the beating that Rose does and he isn't coming off major knee surgery. We can debate Rose 2010 versus Kyrie now all we want but at the moment, it is Rose now versus Kyrie now in which case, Rose is a much bigger question mark.
The debate is basically 2010 Rose vs Kyrie now the way Tommy has framed this. He stated that Kyrie is the best guard to come into the league hands down since Chris Paul, and with Rose offered as a counterpoint he went on to say that MVP Rose was completely overrated and that today Kyrie is better than MVP Rose.Completely agree that we have no clue today, and I would imagine the majority of GM's (if not all of them) would take Kyrie since the floor is higher in comparison to a guy with a reconstructed knee that we haven't seen play since. But that's not the way this was framed.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
'TobiasFunke said:
Does anyone know why the NBA doesn't schedule marquee games for Super Bowl Sunday and run them on ABC or ESPN? Maybe one at 12:30 and one at 3? Instead they had an early game on NBA TV and then just local broadcasts. You've got a captive sports-loving audience sitting around drinking and cooking/eating all day, and the only competition is an NHL game :lmao: and a golf tournament.
I was quite surprised too. Maybe they thought this sb was going to draw in more peeps to watch than ever since it's the battle between the bros. :dunno:I definitely have not read this whole thread... I think the Lakers will make the playoffs but won't go far. Too many problems and a defenseless minded coach. I'm loving that Miami and San Antonio are doing so well! :wub:
 
'TobiasFunke said:
Does anyone know why the NBA doesn't schedule marquee games for Super Bowl Sunday and run them on ABC or ESPN? Maybe one at 12:30 and one at 3? Instead they had an early game on NBA TV and then just local broadcasts. You've got a captive sports-loving audience sitting around drinking and cooking/eating all day, and the only competition is an NHL game :lmao: and a golf tournament.
Not sure how you missed it, but Miami was in Toronto. Doesn't get much more marquee than that.
 
Lakers on a good roll here.
The Lakers play Boston and Charlotte, and then Kobe will bring his talents to South Beach on Sunday. I'm looking forward to that game. If Gasol and Howard are both out, Kobe may return to hero mode. Gotta give him credit for better shot selection and team play.
 
Sam Dalembert has 35 points and 11 rebounds so far tonight in 22 minutes. Larry Sanders just landed hard on his lower back/hip, he might be out for a while, he was carried off the court after being down for about 5 minutes.

 
:eek: Just saw the Houston/GS highlights. Pretty punk move by Mark Jackson fouling just to not have the record set against you. Lost a little bit of respect for him tonight. Can't just overplay on the 3 and give up wide open lay ups or just play defense?
 
:eek: Just saw the Houston/GS highlights. Pretty punk move by Mark Jackson fouling just to not have the record set against you. Lost a little bit of respect for him tonight. Can't just overplay on the 3 and give up wide open lay ups or just play defense?
did they foul a lot of times down the stretch or just one time before the last shot or something? Was it clearly an intentional foul?
 
:eek: Just saw the Houston/GS highlights. Pretty punk move by Mark Jackson fouling just to not have the record set against you. Lost a little bit of respect for him tonight. Can't just overplay on the 3 and give up wide open lay ups or just play defense?
did they foul a lot of times down the stretch or just one time before the last shot or something? Was it clearly an intentional foul?
Looks like just once with :34 left. Defender got faked badly, but then swipes the shooter across the face as he's flying by to prevent the shot. Definitely intentional. Houston had the subs in at that point as well, so while they were clearly going for the record they weren't putting forth their best effort.
 
:eek: Just saw the Houston/GS highlights. Pretty punk move by Mark Jackson fouling just to not have the record set against you. Lost a little bit of respect for him tonight. Can't just overplay on the 3 and give up wide open lay ups or just play defense?
did they foul a lot of times down the stretch or just one time before the last shot or something? Was it clearly an intentional foul?
Looks like just once with :34 left. Defender got faked badly, but then swipes the shooter across the face as he's flying by to prevent the shot. Definitely intentional. Houston had the subs in at that point as well, so while they were clearly going for the record they weren't putting forth their best effort.
No, they fouled twice after this including once 80 feet from the basket. Two of them were intentional fouls like you see at the end of the game. The first one was Draymond Green got pump faked, went flying by and sort of clothes lined the guy. Lead to some ejections and some extra curriculars but in a weird way, I care less about that and more about intentionally fouling down 40. At least Green was trying and he was actually playing defense but down 40, the whole thing seemed bush league.
 
Adrian Wojnarowski‏@WojYahooNBA Pau Gasol felt a "pop" in the bottom of his foot, on crutches now. Getting an MRI on Wednesday.

 
Adrian Wojnarowski‏@WojYahooNBA Pau Gasol felt a "pop" in the bottom of his foot, on crutches now. Getting an MRI on Wednesday.
brilliant move by Dantoni allowing him to keep playing for another few plays after what looked like a bad injury until removing him the next dead ball
 
:eek: Just saw the Houston/GS highlights. Pretty punk move by Mark Jackson fouling just to not have the record set against you. Lost a little bit of respect for him tonight. Can't just overplay on the 3 and give up wide open lay ups or just play defense?
Why? Fouling is part of the game. Nothing wrong with what he did. His guys didn't want to be embarrassed any further so they put an end to it.
 
Abe: Fire up the machine:

Of the Lakers' three free-agent competitors, Houston appears to be the most favorable for Howard. Dallas is aging, and Howard is not keen on playing in his hometown of Atlanta. Houston, on the other hand, has star guard James Harden and is only a frontcourt star away from becoming a legitimate factor in the Western Conference.While Howard had no interest in going to Houston last season, sources say he is aware the Rockets have become a more attractive destination since acquiring Harden.
 
:eek: Just saw the Houston/GS highlights. Pretty punk move by Mark Jackson fouling just to not have the record set against you. Lost a little bit of respect for him tonight. Can't just overplay on the 3 and give up wide open lay ups or just play defense?
Why? Fouling is part of the game. Nothing wrong with what he did. His guys didn't want to be embarrassed any further so they put an end to it.
Yeah I don't see the problem with it. They were up 30 and jacking three-pointers with 20 seconds left on the shot clock. I'd foul them too.
 
Sam Dalembert has 35 points and 11 rebounds so far tonight in 22 minutes.

Larry Sanders just landed hard on his lower back/hip, he might be out for a while, he was carried off the court after being down for about 5 minutes.
I was at Pepsi Center last night and was stunned by his play - everything and I mean everything was working for him. Too bad Monta Ellis has to be a ball hog - they failed to go to Dalembert a bunch of times. Gotta feed a big man when he's eating like that.
 
:eek: Just saw the Houston/GS highlights. Pretty punk move by Mark Jackson fouling just to not have the record set against you. Lost a little bit of respect for him tonight. Can't just overplay on the 3 and give up wide open lay ups or just play defense?
Why? Fouling is part of the game. Nothing wrong with what he did. His guys didn't want to be embarrassed any further so they put an end to it.
Yeah I don't see the problem with it. They were up 30 and jacking three-pointers with 20 seconds left on the shot clock. I'd foul them too.
And Beverly got a T for taunting, up by 30, with a minute left. If anything, Houston is the team to lose respect for.
 
:eek: Just saw the Houston/GS highlights. Pretty punk move by Mark Jackson fouling just to not have the record set against you. Lost a little bit of respect for him tonight. Can't just overplay on the 3 and give up wide open lay ups or just play defense?
Why? Fouling is part of the game. Nothing wrong with what he did. His guys didn't want to be embarrassed any further so they put an end to it.
Yeah I don't see the problem with it. They were up 30 and jacking three-pointers with 20 seconds left on the shot clock. I'd foul them too.
Hard.
 
Abe: Fire up the machine:

Of the Lakers' three free-agent competitors, Houston appears to be the most favorable for Howard. Dallas is aging, and Howard is not keen on playing in his hometown of Atlanta. Houston, on the other hand, has star guard James Harden and is only a frontcourt star away from becoming a legitimate factor in the Western Conference.While Howard had no interest in going to Houston last season, sources say he is aware the Rockets have become a more attractive destination since acquiring Harden.
With Asik being so dominant, Howard may have to move to PF.
 
:eek: Just saw the Houston/GS highlights. Pretty punk move by Mark Jackson fouling just to not have the record set against you. Lost a little bit of respect for him tonight. Can't just overplay on the 3 and give up wide open lay ups or just play defense?
Why? Fouling is part of the game. Nothing wrong with what he did. His guys didn't want to be embarrassed any further so they put an end to it.
Yeah I don't see the problem with it. They were up 30 and jacking three-pointers with 20 seconds left on the shot clock. I'd foul them too.
And Beverly got a T for taunting, up by 30, with a minute left. If anything, Houston is the team to lose respect for.
Exactly. Mark Jackson ain't no punk.
 
:eek: Just saw the Houston/GS highlights. Pretty punk move by Mark Jackson fouling just to not have the record set against you. Lost a little bit of respect for him tonight. Can't just overplay on the 3 and give up wide open lay ups or just play defense?
Why? Fouling is part of the game. Nothing wrong with what he did. His guys didn't want to be embarrassed any further so they put an end to it.
Yeah I don't see the problem with it. They were up 30 and jacking three-pointers with 20 seconds left on the shot clock. I'd foul them too.
This is rather common practice in the NBA when the scrubs get some run. They are trying to score. If Houston wasn't going for the record, does Jackson foul? Doubtful.ETA: When Orlando set the record, they were petty much doing the exact same. They shot 3 3PA's in the last 1:06 of the game.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top