What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*NBA THREAD* Abe will be missed (8 Viewers)

Although Rose's statline wasn't impressive (5-12 for 13 points, 3 assists, 4 TOs) and he was clearly rusty, his speed seemed back. He's also apparently has added five inches to his vertical. Out of those 12 shots, I think only one was from the outside and that was an end of the shot clock heave. I was concerned that post-injury he'd start relying on his outside shot, but he didn't seem shy about penetrating at all. Nice start all things considered. If the Bulls stay healthy, they are certainly a contender.

 
Although Rose's statline wasn't impressive (5-12 for 13 points, 3 assists, 4 TOs) and he was clearly rusty, his speed seemed back. He's also apparently has added five inches to his vertical. Out of those 12 shots, I think only one was from the outside and that was an end of the shot clock heave. I was concerned that post-injury he'd start relying on his outside shot, but he didn't seem shy about penetrating at all. Nice start all things considered. If the Bulls stay healthy, they are certainly a contender.
He exploded to the rim multiple times and the drive miss and quick jump to tap it in alleviated any of my concerns. It is all about getting into game shape now.

I have almost zero faith the Bulls will be close to full strength for the playoffs so I can't even talk about what they are capable of doing if they are.

 
I have almost zero faith the Bulls will be close to full strength for the playoffs so I can't even talk about what they are capable of doing if they are.
Even one rotation player down (besides Rose and perhaps Noah), I think they could compete with the best.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Although Rose's statline wasn't impressive (5-12 for 13 points, 3 assists, 4 TOs) and he was clearly rusty, his speed seemed back. He's also apparently has added five inches to his vertical. Out of those 12 shots, I think only one was from the outside and that was an end of the shot clock heave. I was concerned that post-injury he'd start relying on his outside shot, but he didn't seem shy about penetrating at all. Nice start all things considered. If the Bulls stay healthy, they are certainly a contender.
I would hope that a by-product of the additional time off is that he's fully ready to go and not worried about cutting on the knee. Not to pile on, but it's not like he's rushing back from this. Agreed that they are contenders - he's just a bit of an upgrade on Nate Rob.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Although Rose's statline wasn't impressive (5-12 for 13 points, 3 assists, 4 TOs) and he was clearly rusty, his speed seemed back. He's also apparently has added five inches to his vertical. Out of those 12 shots, I think only one was from the outside and that was an end of the shot clock heave. I was concerned that post-injury he'd start relying on his outside shot, but he didn't seem shy about penetrating at all. Nice start all things considered. If the Bulls stay healthy, they are certainly a contender.
I would hope that a by-product of the additional time off is that he's fully ready to go and not worried about cutting on the knee. Not to pile on, but it's not like he's rushing back from this. Agreed that they are contenders - he's just a bit of an upgrade on Nate Rob.
Honestly, I'm not sure where his 37 is coming from. At his draft combine he tested 34.5 for no-step vertical and 40.0 max vertical. He was only 19 at the time and it's not surprising he'd be better as he got into his 20s. The main point is he doesn't appear to have lost his athleticism like many others have after ACL tears. I was in "wait and see" mode when it came to his prospects post-surgery but now I'll 100% on board as a fan-boy.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Magic leaving ESPN, reportedly because of Bill Simmons having too much power. http://deadspin.com/sources-magic-johnson-left-espn-because-of-bill-simmon-1443543687

Losing Magic and Wilbon is a good thing, although I don't know about Doris Burke as a replacement.
I can't believe that. Magic Johnson is one of the most iconic basketball players of all time and is a billionaire. Bill Simmons is popular, but espn is not going to let him be the big dog in all that.

 
Magic leaving ESPN, reportedly because of Bill Simmons having too much power. http://deadspin.com/sources-magic-johnson-left-espn-because-of-bill-simmon-1443543687

Losing Magic and Wilbon is a good thing, although I don't know about Doris Burke as a replacement.
I can't believe that. Magic Johnson is one of the most iconic basketball players of all time and is a billionaire. Bill Simmons is popular, but espn is not going to let him be the big dog in all that.
No one on this forum loves Magic more than I do, but if I was running a network's basketball coverage show, I'd put Simmons behind the wheel instead of Magic. Simmons has proven to be brilliant at spotting talent and giving viewers what they want. :shrug:

 
Magic is awful as an analyst/commentator. The only studio show that I actually like is Inside The NBA, even with Shaq. The rest are pretty bad - Gametime on NBA tv can be o.k. at times.

 
Magic leaving ESPN, reportedly because of Bill Simmons having too much power. http://deadspin.com/sources-magic-johnson-left-espn-because-of-bill-simmon-1443543687

Losing Magic and Wilbon is a good thing, although I don't know about Doris Burke as a replacement.
I can't believe that. Magic Johnson is one of the most iconic basketball players of all time and is a billionaire. Bill Simmons is popular, but espn is not going to let him be the big dog in all that.
No one on this forum loves Magic more than I do, but if I was running a network's basketball coverage show, I'd put Simmons behind the wheel instead of Magic. Simmons has proven to be brilliant at spotting talent and giving viewers what they want. :shrug:
Television is far from Simmons' best medium (except for 30 for 30). But Magic's talent for stating the obvious in a confusing manner won't be missed. Besides the Dodgers suck.

ESPN's NBA panel shows have always been poor. I think the table has generally been too crowded. It's too many guys yelling about random stuff and laughing at each other's jokes. It's hard to break down a half of basketball in a couple of short segments because the game doesn't lend itself to being summarized in a handful of highlights. TNT errs on the side of entertainment which is probably the best way to play it.

 
Magic leaving ESPN, reportedly because of Bill Simmons having too much power. http://deadspin.com/sources-magic-johnson-left-espn-because-of-bill-simmon-1443543687

Losing Magic and Wilbon is a good thing, although I don't know about Doris Burke as a replacement.
I can't believe that. Magic Johnson is one of the most iconic basketball players of all time and is a billionaire. Bill Simmons is popular, but espn is not going to let him be the big dog in all that.
No one on this forum loves Magic more than I do, but if I was running a network's basketball coverage show, I'd put Simmons behind the wheel instead of Magic. Simmons has proven to be brilliant at spotting talent and giving viewers what they want. :shrug:
Television is far from Simmons' best medium (except for 30 for 30). But Magic's talent for stating the obvious in a confusing manner won't be missed. Besides the Dodgers suck.

ESPN's NBA panel shows have always been poor. I think the table has generally been too crowded. It's too many guys yelling about random stuff and laughing at each other's jokes. It's hard to break down a half of basketball in a couple of short segments because the game doesn't lend itself to being summarized in a handful of highlights. TNT errs on the side of entertainment which is probably the best way to play it.
The Simmons/Rose Youtube team previews may be the best thing I've seen on the internet in years. They are absolutely perfect in every way.

 
Magic leaving ESPN, reportedly because of Bill Simmons having too much power. http://deadspin.com/sources-magic-johnson-left-espn-because-of-bill-simmon-1443543687

Losing Magic and Wilbon is a good thing, although I don't know about Doris Burke as a replacement.
I can't believe that. Magic Johnson is one of the most iconic basketball players of all time and is a billionaire. Bill Simmons is popular, but espn is not going to let him be the big dog in all that.
No one on this forum loves Magic more than I do, but if I was running a network's basketball coverage show, I'd put Simmons behind the wheel instead of Magic. Simmons has proven to be brilliant at spotting talent and giving viewers what they want. :shrug:
Television is far from Simmons' best medium (except for 30 for 30). But Magic's talent for stating the obvious in a confusing manner won't be missed. Besides the Dodgers suck.

ESPN's NBA panel shows have always been poor. I think the table has generally been too crowded. It's too many guys yelling about random stuff and laughing at each other's jokes. It's hard to break down a half of basketball in a couple of short segments because the game doesn't lend itself to being summarized in a handful of highlights. TNT errs on the side of entertainment which is probably the best way to play it.
I'm more excited about Countdown with the news of Simmons getting more control. TV's not his best medium, yet. He can certainly improve with experience, like he has with everything else.

It's probably good for the overcrowded stage problem. Simmons has long made fun of the overcrowded analyst desk.

With Wilbon and Magic out, and Burke and Collins in, it's already heading into a better direction.

 
Magic leaving ESPN, reportedly because of Bill Simmons having too much power. http://deadspin.com/sources-magic-johnson-left-espn-because-of-bill-simmon-1443543687

Losing Magic and Wilbon is a good thing, although I don't know about Doris Burke as a replacement.
I can't believe that. Magic Johnson is one of the most iconic basketball players of all time and is a billionaire. Bill Simmons is popular, but espn is not going to let him be the big dog in all that.
No one on this forum loves Magic more than I do, but if I was running a network's basketball coverage show, I'd put Simmons behind the wheel instead of Magic. Simmons has proven to be brilliant at spotting talent and giving viewers what they want. :shrug:
Television is far from Simmons' best medium (except for 30 for 30). But Magic's talent for stating the obvious in a confusing manner won't be missed. Besides the Dodgers suck.

ESPN's NBA panel shows have always been poor. I think the table has generally been too crowded. It's too many guys yelling about random stuff and laughing at each other's jokes. It's hard to break down a half of basketball in a couple of short segments because the game doesn't lend itself to being summarized in a handful of highlights. TNT errs on the side of entertainment which is probably the best way to play it.
The Simmons/Rose Youtube team previews may be the best thing I've seen on the internet in years. They are absolutely perfect in every way.
They are very entertaining.

Stop with this sentiment that Simmons was behind Magic leaving. If that was the case Simmons would let it be instead he has gone out of his way to say it's not the case. I really like Simmons. But he barely gets PTI gigs and to think that he is the shot-caller with regards to the on-air talent is laughable.

 
Magic leaving ESPN, reportedly because of Bill Simmons having too much power. http://deadspin.com/sources-magic-johnson-left-espn-because-of-bill-simmon-1443543687

Losing Magic and Wilbon is a good thing, although I don't know about Doris Burke as a replacement.
I can't believe that. Magic Johnson is one of the most iconic basketball players of all time and is a billionaire. Bill Simmons is popular, but espn is not going to let him be the big dog in all that.
No one on this forum loves Magic more than I do, but if I was running a network's basketball coverage show, I'd put Simmons behind the wheel instead of Magic. Simmons has proven to be brilliant at spotting talent and giving viewers what they want. :shrug:
Television is far from Simmons' best medium (except for 30 for 30). But Magic's talent for stating the obvious in a confusing manner won't be missed. Besides the Dodgers suck.

ESPN's NBA panel shows have always been poor. I think the table has generally been too crowded. It's too many guys yelling about random stuff and laughing at each other's jokes. It's hard to break down a half of basketball in a couple of short segments because the game doesn't lend itself to being summarized in a handful of highlights. TNT errs on the side of entertainment which is probably the best way to play it.
The Simmons/Rose Youtube team previews may be the best thing I've seen on the internet in years. They are absolutely perfect in every way.
They are very entertaining.
I kind of agree, even though I find Jalen unwatchable and skip ahead through his inane feature segment every time. But there's eight-to-ten solid, interesting minutes of almost each one.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Magic leaving ESPN, reportedly because of Bill Simmons having too much power. http://deadspin.com/sources-magic-johnson-left-espn-because-of-bill-simmon-1443543687

Losing Magic and Wilbon is a good thing, although I don't know about Doris Burke as a replacement.
I can't believe that. Magic Johnson is one of the most iconic basketball players of all time and is a billionaire. Bill Simmons is popular, but espn is not going to let him be the big dog in all that.
No one on this forum loves Magic more than I do, but if I was running a network's basketball coverage show, I'd put Simmons behind the wheel instead of Magic. Simmons has proven to be brilliant at spotting talent and giving viewers what they want. :shrug:
Television is far from Simmons' best medium (except for 30 for 30). But Magic's talent for stating the obvious in a confusing manner won't be missed. Besides the Dodgers suck.

ESPN's NBA panel shows have always been poor. I think the table has generally been too crowded. It's too many guys yelling about random stuff and laughing at each other's jokes. It's hard to break down a half of basketball in a couple of short segments because the game doesn't lend itself to being summarized in a handful of highlights. TNT errs on the side of entertainment which is probably the best way to play it.
The Simmons/Rose Youtube team previews may be the best thing I've seen on the internet in years. They are absolutely perfect in every way.
They are very entertaining.

Stop with this sentiment that Simmons was behind Magic leaving. If that was the case Simmons would let it be instead he has gone out of his way to say it's not the case. I really like Simmons. But he barely gets PTI gigs and to think that he is the shot-caller with regards to the on-air talent is laughable.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/more/news/20131013/bill-simmons-magic-johnson-espn-media-circus/

Simmons says he had nothing to do with Magic leaving...

 
I found Magic to be incredibly dull. ESPN made the right move IMHO.

Others have stated, but he did little more than state the obvious. As legendary as the guy is, he's not going to want to make you tune in on regular basis. I think he's better left to making a cameo appearance here and there.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Magic leaving ESPN, reportedly because of Bill Simmons having too much power. http://deadspin.com/sources-magic-johnson-left-espn-because-of-bill-simmon-1443543687

Losing Magic and Wilbon is a good thing, although I don't know about Doris Burke as a replacement.
I can't believe that. Magic Johnson is one of the most iconic basketball players of all time and is a billionaire. Bill Simmons is popular, but espn is not going to let him be the big dog in all that.
No one on this forum loves Magic more than I do, but if I was running a network's basketball coverage show, I'd put Simmons behind the wheel instead of Magic. Simmons has proven to be brilliant at spotting talent and giving viewers what they want. :shrug:
Television is far from Simmons' best medium (except for 30 for 30). But Magic's talent for stating the obvious in a confusing manner won't be missed. Besides the Dodgers suck.

ESPN's NBA panel shows have always been poor. I think the table has generally been too crowded. It's too many guys yelling about random stuff and laughing at each other's jokes. It's hard to break down a half of basketball in a couple of short segments because the game doesn't lend itself to being summarized in a handful of highlights. TNT errs on the side of entertainment which is probably the best way to play it.
The Simmons/Rose Youtube team previews may be the best thing I've seen on the internet in years. They are absolutely perfect in every way.
They are very entertaining.

Stop with this sentiment that Simmons was behind Magic leaving. If that was the case Simmons would let it be instead he has gone out of his way to say it's not the case. I really like Simmons. But he barely gets PTI gigs and to think that he is the shot-caller with regards to the on-air talent is laughable.
http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/more/news/20131013/bill-simmons-magic-johnson-espn-media-circus/

Simmons says he had nothing to do with Magic leaving...
Magic the last guy you want to make an enemy of if you are in the NBA business. Why doesn't he own an NBA team?

 
The Favors deal makes me feel better about the Cousins deal.
Cousins is the better talent, but I would rather have Favors for equivalent money.

$12M/yr for a starting center is probably pretty close to the going rate. That's McGee/Pekovic/Nene money. Cousins at $15M is more like Gasol/Chandler/Lopez money.

 
The Favors deal makes me feel better about the Cousins deal.
Cousins is the better talent, but I would rather have Favors for equivalent money.

$12M/yr for a starting center is probably pretty close to the going rate. That's McGee/Pekovic/Nene money. Cousins at $15M is more like Gasol/Chandler/Lopez money.
Not saying Favors is overpaid. We live in a world where McGee makes 10m. But would rather pay a slight premium for franchise player upside, even if he's nuts.

 
Everyone figured that they would be super conservative with his rehab, especially since they don't care about winning games. It is a surprise that they would officially shut him down, especially since Andrews is saying good things. Tank mode is really in full effect.

 
The Favors deal makes me feel better about the Cousins deal.
Cousins is the better talent, but I would rather have Favors for equivalent money.

$12M/yr for a starting center is probably pretty close to the going rate. That's McGee/Pekovic/Nene money. Cousins at $15M is more like Gasol/Chandler/Lopez money.
Not saying Favors is overpaid. We live in a world where McGee makes 10m. But would rather pay a slight premium for franchise player upside, even if he's nuts.
Boogie's the more highlight reel friendly talent, but for a franchise I hoped would contend one day, I'd prefer Favors for everything except moving merchandise.

If Favors hits his ceiling, he's a nightly 20/10 threat who also becomes one of the premiere paint lockdown guys in the NBA, against 4's or 5's. If Boogie hits his, he's a nightly 20/10 threat with occasional 30+ outbursts who's useless on D. I'd rather have the guy who has the potential to play at an allstar level both ways, and Favors is already the only one who does it pretty much every night on at least one end of the court. :shrug:

 
The Favors deal makes me feel better about the Cousins deal.
Cousins is the better talent, but I would rather have Favors for equivalent money.

$12M/yr for a starting center is probably pretty close to the going rate. That's McGee/Pekovic/Nene money. Cousins at $15M is more like Gasol/Chandler/Lopez money.
Not saying Favors is overpaid. We live in a world where McGee makes 10m. But would rather pay a slight premium for franchise player upside, even if he's nuts.
Boogie's the more highlight reel friendly talent, but for a franchise I hoped would contend one day, I'd prefer Favors for everything except moving merchandise.

If Favors hits his ceiling, he's a nightly 20/10 threat who also becomes one of the premiere paint lockdown guys in the NBA, against 4's or 5's. If Boogie hits his, he's a nightly 20/10 threat with occasional 30+ outbursts who's useless on D. I'd rather have the guy who has the potential to play at an allstar level both ways, and Favors is already the only one who does it pretty much every night on at least one end of the court. :shrug:
Cousins' ceiling is significantly higher. That's not a slight to Favors, as there are only a few player in the league whose ceiling is higher than Boogie's.

 
The Favors deal makes me feel better about the Cousins deal.
Cousins is the better talent, but I would rather have Favors for equivalent money.

$12M/yr for a starting center is probably pretty close to the going rate. That's McGee/Pekovic/Nene money. Cousins at $15M is more like Gasol/Chandler/Lopez money.
Not saying Favors is overpaid. We live in a world where McGee makes 10m. But would rather pay a slight premium for franchise player upside, even if he's nuts.
Boogie's the more highlight reel friendly talent, but for a franchise I hoped would contend one day, I'd prefer Favors for everything except moving merchandise.

If Favors hits his ceiling, he's a nightly 20/10 threat who also becomes one of the premiere paint lockdown guys in the NBA, against 4's or 5's. If Boogie hits his, he's a nightly 20/10 threat with occasional 30+ outbursts who's useless on D. I'd rather have the guy who has the potential to play at an allstar level both ways, and Favors is already the only one who does it pretty much every night on at least one end of the court. :shrug:
Cousins' ceiling is significantly higher. That's not a slight to Favors, as there are only a few player in the league whose ceiling is higher than Boogie's.
Agreed, but that begs the question....

Is it easier to teach a big man to play elite defense or elite offense and what's more valuable, because that's what it is with Cousins and Favors?

 
Anyone watch the Rockets tonight? I'm liking the prospects of Twin Towers 2.0 w/ Asik and D12. Talk about plugging the hole. Now if only they can get prohibit hackashaq :kicksrock:

 
The Favors deal makes me feel better about the Cousins deal.
Cousins is the better talent, but I would rather have Favors for equivalent money.

$12M/yr for a starting center is probably pretty close to the going rate. That's McGee/Pekovic/Nene money. Cousins at $15M is more like Gasol/Chandler/Lopez money.
Not saying Favors is overpaid. We live in a world where McGee makes 10m. But would rather pay a slight premium for franchise player upside, even if he's nuts.
Boogie's the more highlight reel friendly talent, but for a franchise I hoped would contend one day, I'd prefer Favors for everything except moving merchandise.

If Favors hits his ceiling, he's a nightly 20/10 threat who also becomes one of the premiere paint lockdown guys in the NBA, against 4's or 5's. If Boogie hits his, he's a nightly 20/10 threat with occasional 30+ outbursts who's useless on D. I'd rather have the guy who has the potential to play at an allstar level both ways, and Favors is already the only one who does it pretty much every night on at least one end of the court. :shrug:
Favors will never sniff 20 points a game. You are vastly overrating his offensive talent.

 
The Favors deal makes me feel better about the Cousins deal.
Cousins is the better talent, but I would rather have Favors for equivalent money.

$12M/yr for a starting center is probably pretty close to the going rate. That's McGee/Pekovic/Nene money. Cousins at $15M is more like Gasol/Chandler/Lopez money.
Not saying Favors is overpaid. We live in a world where McGee makes 10m. But would rather pay a slight premium for franchise player upside, even if he's nuts.
Boogie's the more highlight reel friendly talent, but for a franchise I hoped would contend one day, I'd prefer Favors for everything except moving merchandise.

If Favors hits his ceiling, he's a nightly 20/10 threat who also becomes one of the premiere paint lockdown guys in the NBA, against 4's or 5's. If Boogie hits his, he's a nightly 20/10 threat with occasional 30+ outbursts who's useless on D. I'd rather have the guy who has the potential to play at an allstar level both ways, and Favors is already the only one who does it pretty much every night on at least one end of the court. :shrug:
Favors will never sniff 20 points a game. You are vastly overrating his offensive talent.
Agreed.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top