What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

*NBA THREAD* Abe will be missed (3 Viewers)

Milwaukee wouldn't even consider that.
What if it allowed them to shed Jennings and/or mayo?

Henson. Illyasova, sanders. Exum, Gordon and room to sign someone like lance or Lowry.
I don't think it's that crazy for them.

If this is really an 8-player draft, 5 and 9 gives them a shot at 2 of them when some stupid team takes Buckets in the top 8.

And it's DET that's looking to shed Jennings now, btw.

 
I wonder exactly what Utah would be willing to give as far as future picks (taking CHA out of the equation).

Seems like MIL could find a way to really fleece them here.

What if Utah offered the #5 (#35 too if MIL wants it), along with unprotected 1sts in 2015 and 2017? Take Mayo's contract too. MIL say no to that?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder exactly what Utah would be willing to give as far as future picks (taking CHA out of the equation).

Seems like MIL could find a way to really fleece them here.

What if Utah offered the #5 (#35 too if MIL wants it), along with unprotected 1sts in 2015 and 2017? Take Mayo's contract too. MIL say no to that?
Utah has two warriors firsts as well.

 
I wonder exactly what Utah would be willing to give as far as future picks (taking CHA out of the equation).

Seems like MIL could find a way to really fleece them here.

What if Utah offered the #5 (#35 too if MIL wants it), along with unprotected 1sts in 2015 and 2017? MIL say no to that?
No.

You have three of the best prospects staring you in the face.

Go look at the last couple NBA drafts.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2013_NBA_draft

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_NBA_draft

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2011_NBA_draft

If they dont get the #1 overall in those drafts, it just isnt worth it.

The Utah #5 this year is likely worth way more then two future #1s, because you have good talent this year.

Its so good, that you are willing to ship the #5 in a deep draft and two more 1st rounders to get at these 3 elite prospects.

 
I wonder exactly what Utah would be willing to give as far as future picks (taking CHA out of the equation).

Seems like MIL could find a way to really fleece them here.

What if Utah offered the #5 (#35 too if MIL wants it), along with unprotected 1sts in 2015 and 2017? Take Mayo's contract too. MIL say no to that?
Utah has two warriors firsts as well.
The 2017 pick could be nice. Klay could be gone by then. They could be a Curry and/or Bogut injury from being really horrible in the West.

This the Warriors. They're are feeling so good about themselves that they just fired a coach after a 51 win season. Disaster is probably around the corner.

 
If Parker slides to 3, wouldn't hinke do something like heyward (sign and trade), 6 and 9 for the 2 and a couple of the seconds he's accumulated?

And philly with MCW, Noel, heyward, randle or vonleah, and Gary Harris isn't a terrible start.

 
If Parker slides to 3, wouldn't hinke do something like heyward (sign and trade), 6 and 9 for the 2 and a couple of the seconds he's accumulated?

And philly with MCW, Noel, heyward, randle or vonleah, and Gary Harris isn't a terrible start.
How much does Heyward want?

MCW Stauskus(10)

Heyward

Young

Vonleah(6) Gordon (9)

Noel

would have to be considered.

 
I think a PHI-Utah deal could make all kinds of sense, but you guys are forgetting something with that particular deal.....Hornets would want some sort of compensation for the #9 pick.

Wait, Jordan didn't trade it away last night, did he? I'll go check.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder exactly what Utah would be willing to give as far as future picks (taking CHA out of the equation).

Seems like MIL could find a way to really fleece them here.

What if Utah offered the #5 (#35 too if MIL wants it), along with unprotected 1sts in 2015 and 2017? Take Mayo's contract too. MIL say no to that?
Utah has two warriors firsts as well.
The 2017 pick could be nice. Klay could be gone by then. They could be a Curry and/or Bogut injury from being really horrible in the West.This the Warriors. They're are feeling so good about themselves that they just fired a coach after a 51 win season. Disaster is probably around the corner.
Hey, hey. Just cause your team is terrible no reason to bring me down with you.FWIW, this is a new ownership group and so far they've done everything opposite of the previous regime. The Dubs are headed on the right path.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I wonder exactly what Utah would be willing to give as far as future picks (taking CHA out of the equation).

Seems like MIL could find a way to really fleece them here.

What if Utah offered the #5 (#35 too if MIL wants it), along with unprotected 1sts in 2015 and 2017? Take Mayo's contract too. MIL say no to that?
Utah has two warriors firsts as well.
The 2017 pick could be nice. Klay could be gone by then. They could be a Curry and/or Bogut injury from being really horrible in the West.This the Warriors. They're are feeling so good about themselves that they just fired a coach after a 51 win season. Disaster is probably around the corner.
Hey, hey. Just cause you're team is terrible no reason to bring me down with you.

FWIW, this is a new ownership group and so far they've done everything opposite of the previous regime. The Dubs are headed on the right path.
I like those Warriors. They're no Jackson-Davis era Warriors, but I do wish them all the best (well, at least until Curry becomes a FA and it's time to come home).

 
Joerger decides to stay with Memphis. Wolves fans suffer yet another disappointment

http://www.startribune.com/sports/blogs/260613911.html
I wonder if this means Minnesota is certain to deal Kevin Love. That position becomes much less desirable without Love as the centerpiece.
Or it could mean the opposite.

If there's a franchise that's dumb enough NOT to trade Love, it's MIN. This is a fine spot for them. The star said he's walking in 12 months. It just so happens that it coincides with a really good draft. They could really re-tool here and pick up some pieces to really start rebuilding around.

If I'm Joeger, and the MIN front office tells me they don't plan on trading Love, I'm out.

It probably doesn't mean much on the Love front either way though.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I was looking at the overall prospect grades at nbadraft.net and it's nuts.

CHA's pick at #9 is so wide open. There will be 16 prospects available at #9 (assuming Gordon or Buckets goes #8 after the big 7) that have a grade between 92-95.

It's a near certainty that a couple players they consider at #9 will still be available at #24. It's also very likely that the guy they take #24 has a higher grade than whoever they take at #9. They are looking at a handful of guys with a 92 grade at #9 (Stauskas, Gordon/Buckets, Young), and a handful of 93's will be available much later (Ennis, Warren, Early, Robinson, Napier, Anderson, Payton with a 94 grade).

Obviously, those grades are far from gospel and the actual draft surely will look far different than mocks, but clearly, they are seeing a massive number of guys of similar quality.

 
Anybody think the Suns would give the 14, 27, and the 2015 Lakers pick (5 protected in '15, 3 protected in '16-17, unprotected in '18) to move up to 9?

Think the Bulls would give 16 and 19 for the 9?

Let's say Gordon drops to 9 (decent chance for that it seems).

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Anybody think the Suns would give the 14, 27, and the 2015 Lakers pick (5 protected in '15, 3 protected in '16-17, unprotected in '18) to move up to 9?

Think the Bulls would give 16 and 19 for the 9?

Let's say Gordon drops to 9 (decent chance for that it seems).
In order to move up into the top 10, it takes a lot more than just a couple mid to late teen picks. This draft seems to have two main tiers that take you to about pick 10. A few teams may have a couple different guys in the bottom of that second tier, but pick 14/16/19, etc. are in a whole different stratosphere.

 
Anybody think the Suns would give the 14, 27, and the 2015 Lakers pick (5 protected in '15, 3 protected in '16-17, unprotected in '18) to move up to 9?Think the Bulls would give 16 and 19 for the 9?Let's say Gordon drops to 9 (decent chance for that it seems).
Bulls would do that in a heartbeat.

 
Anybody think the Suns would give the 14, 27, and the 2015 Lakers pick (5 protected in '15, 3 protected in '16-17, unprotected in '18) to move up to 9?

Think the Bulls would give 16 and 19 for the 9?

Let's say Gordon drops to 9 (decent chance for that it seems).
In order to move up into the top 10, it takes a lot more than just a couple mid to late teen picks. This draft seems to have two main tiers that take you to about pick 10. A few teams may have a couple different guys in the bottom of that second tier, but pick 14/16/19, etc. are in a whole different stratosphere.
Maybe, but I'm not so sure those 1st 2 tiers don't stop at Pick 7 with the downgrade from 9 to 16 or so not being incredibly steep.

I'm not terribly excited about Gordon. I could get behind Stauskas, but there's no doubt he's going to be an atrocious defender.

I think I'd rather have Young or Hood at 14 than Stauskas at 9 if it meant getting the 27 and that Lakers pick. Who knows what happens with the Lakers pick, but they need something pretty big to happen for it not to be a lottery pick. Hell, Stauskas could even be there at 14.

 
Anybody think the Suns would give the 14, 27, and the 2015 Lakers pick (5 protected in '15, 3 protected in '16-17, unprotected in '18) to move up to 9?Think the Bulls would give 16 and 19 for the 9?Let's say Gordon drops to 9 (decent chance for that it seems).
Bulls would do that in a heartbeat.
I'm on the other line with PHX right now, but if they won't give up the Lakers pick, we're in.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top