H8fulHuck
Footballguy
Agreed. Actually starting him in a league or two this week.This is a good one. He has two TDs in his first 3 games in the league and a lot of people still dont know who he is.McCluster
Agreed. Actually starting him in a league or two this week.This is a good one. He has two TDs in his first 3 games in the league and a lot of people still dont know who he is.McCluster
Wasn't McDaniels the OC for the Pats the year that Moss went all buck nutty and set the NFL record for TD's and such? Pretty sure his system has featured him quite often. His offense is not a specific formula all the time. It's about playing matchups to get the most out of mismatches in the defense. There are players in the NFL that are pretty much always (read: not going against Revis) a mismatch for opposing defenses such. as Moss. If Thomas is that type of player, the system will certainly allow for great success. He just has to prove it. Doesn't hurt that McDaniels butt is tied to Thomas and Tebow's success. Clearly Tebow has little chance to save him right now, so....There are a lot of options on Denver dude, and quite a few of whom are playing pretty well. Orton's playing the role of Brady in a McD offense, spreading the ball to the open man, not any one particular player. I think Thomas has big time upside, and I will not rule out an "epic second half" but I wouldn't bank on it.That said I would drop McCluster for Thomas on body type alone, let alone the fact DT is supposedly very brilliant to boot. I can't remember the number but I think he crushed the Wonderlic. Definitely a talent to watch.I cut McCluster for D Thomas.. I don't feel McCluster has the high ceiling I want when I'm rolling the dice. I feel Thomas could have an epic 2nd half.
ETA: Thomas scored a 34. Second highest scoring WR (Eric Decker, DEN - 43!)...To put this in perspective, QBs Sam Bradford scored a 36; Max Hall (BYU) a 38 and Tim Hiller (West. Mich.) a 37.
I respectfully disagree. At that point in his career Randy Moss was a savvy 10 year veteran WR playing on one of the most prolific offenses of all time and with a massive chip on his shoulder (a recurring theme in his career and one that's about to repeat itself) after being declared "washed up" after two lost years in Oakland.I'll also note that Tom Brady threw 50 TDs (Randy had 23 in going all 'buck nutty') for the Pats. Someone had to catch a significant portion of those TDs and why not the WR1 of that team? After that, that QB threw an astonishing 27 MORE TDs that season - yes, in a Josh McD offense to confirm.Wasn't McDaniels the OC for the Pats the year that Moss went all buck nutty and set the NFL record for TD's and such? Pretty sure his system has featured him quite often. His offense is not a specific formula all the time. It's about playing matchups to get the most out of mismatches in the defense. There are players in the NFL that are pretty much always (read: not going against Revis) a mismatch for opposing defenses such. as Moss. If Thomas is that type of player, the system will certainly allow for great success. He just has to prove it. Doesn't hurt that McDaniels butt is tied to Thomas and Tebow's success. Clearly Tebow has little chance to save him right now, so....There are a lot of options on Denver dude, and quite a few of whom are playing pretty well. Orton's playing the role of Brady in a McD offense, spreading the ball to the open man, not any one particular player. I think Thomas has big time upside, and I will not rule out an "epic second half" but I wouldn't bank on it.That said I would drop McCluster for Thomas on body type alone, let alone the fact DT is supposedly very brilliant to boot. I can't remember the number but I think he crushed the Wonderlic. Definitely a talent to watch.I cut McCluster for D Thomas.. I don't feel McCluster has the high ceiling I want when I'm rolling the dice. I feel Thomas could have an epic 2nd half.
ETA: Thomas scored a 34. Second highest scoring WR (Eric Decker, DEN - 43!)...To put this in perspective, QBs Sam Bradford scored a 36; Max Hall (BYU) a 38 and Tim Hiller (West. Mich.) a 37.
with obrien around i wasnt sure he would hit 800ydsyeah I'm still waiting for this guy to break out - seems he can never hit that 1000 yd markrandy moss. big.
Seems the bye is the ideal time to make adjustments to their offense.would love to see Tate be the man, but the Pats dealt Moss within 24hrs of the Monday night game. the Pats have a BYE this week, so between now and when they play again (BAL on 10/17), I don't think the Pats will rest with Tate as their #1.Interesting that no one around here thinks that Tate has the potential to blow up. NE still has a poor defense and Brady is going to have to put points on the board to win games. You would think that the Patriots are going to have to keep using the threat of the long ball (from Tate now) to keep the TE and Welker routes open.This scenario has been all but thrown out by pundits here.It will be interesting to see reactions if Brady connects for even 1 long ball to Tate in his first game in the X.How about Tate?
Barrying injury to one of their other receivers I just dont see it... He is simply not on the field enough to consistently produce and there is no reason to lighten the other receivers loads, they are producing and looking very good doing it.only guy i could imagine really blwoing up at this point is D thomas
I've been stashing Wallace for ben's return...in PPR I'd be a little leary to start him, it seems like he runs 1 route, fly pattern. It doesnt seem like hes the guy who'll get 10 catches 150 yds. Opinions?Wallace when Ben is back, top 10 from week 6 on.
Your on to something.I like Butler a bunch and have him stashed on quite a few dynasty teams. I think he has a ton of upside and can be a great #2 WR in this league as well as a deep threat. A guy who can become a Donald Driver type is what I envision.Deon Butler if Branch is traded to New England